Prove there's a god.

Posted in the Top Stories Forum

Comments (Page 29,736)

Showing posts 594,701 - 594,720 of680,323
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:

Since: May 11

UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#626246
May 25, 2013
 

Judged:

1

RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey, ASSumptive Huh doesn't know that RR's at work and his kids are home asleep.
presumably you`re using the term "work" loosely...

“Today we pray”

Since: Jul 12

"tomorrow we win"

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#626247
May 25, 2013
 
OCB wrote:
<quoted text> You're a word twisting pile of puke.
What I said was is that in the very unlikely scenario of a six month old baby doing something that could injure themselves or others,only then might striking a six month old baby be appropriate but again, such a scenario is extremely unlikely.
However you think hitting a six month old baby for simply being what they are-a baby-is perfectly fine and dandy.
And quit editing my posts in your stupid and moronic attempt to twist my words.
Feck off.
By your own words, you think it's ok to hit a 6 month old, too.

Asking as it meets your criteria.

Plain and simple.
Huh

Fort Worth, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#626248
May 25, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

psalms 23 wrote:
<quoted text>
NOWHERE, did i say that ""this country needs PUBLIC executions done publicaly"". All you have done is proved me right and you a liar!! I said ( NOT STONING ) and that means the instructions that come with stoning, which its done in public!
So once again, you have proven yourself to be DECIETFUL LIAR for ALL to see..
<quoted text>
LIAR! Here is the part of the post to which you asked PROOF AND SOURCE for on two different occasions, and "we" was talking about Israel.... Post# 625909
psalms 23 wrote:
<quoted text>Anyway........
We may think Godís laws in the Old Testament were cruel, but in reality these laws prevented many crimes. For a time in Israel, when they obeyed Godís law like they were commanded, there were hardly any murders, rapes, kidnappings, thefts, etc.
YOU WRITE;
Proof? Source? The "deterrent" method of crime prevention has been so thoroughly discredited I am astounded to see even you repeating it here. I suppose I shouldn't be surprised though - this *is* coming from the guy who just suggested that I was "lucky" I am not at risk for a stoning.
psalms 23 wrote:
<quoted text>When they thought they would be soft on crime and criminals many of the above crimes took place in Israel. So who has the better idea?
YOU WRITE;
Proof? Source? Anything beyond this vague bit of nonsense?
So looks like you are what i say you are, nothing but a LIAR, who twist words and takes things out of context, and is incapable of having an honest and fair debate..
<quoted text>
Those cases of "justifiable" public executions was their CUSTOM back then and it was their LAWS. And Those who recieved it, i am sure they was Guilty of the Crime committed.... It's the same thing as our custom and laws of this modern day. But its a different form of Capitol punishment we hold today as compared back then.
Nice backpedal. You did make the claim, you nutter. Capital punishment has zero deterrent effect and no effect on recidivism rates. Take a deep breath. You're losing your final grasp on whatever sanity you still possessed. Please don't hurt anyone today, BTK.

Capital, not Capitol you mis-educated twit.

There were hardly any rapes or murders committed? Please cite your source. You are a looney bird.
Huh

Fort Worth, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#626249
May 25, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

OCB wrote:
<quoted text> Yeah - "stop" is right. Stop editing my posts to suit your sick notion that heating six-month-old babies is okay.
That's right RR- six-month-old babies in your sick mind " can" be cunning and manipulative...okay?
Better? Not really- you're a moron.
You think playing your little word games makes it any better that you think it's okay to hit six-month-old babies?
It doesn't. You are delusional.
You dare question Koersh?
Huh

Fort Worth, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#626250
May 25, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

psalms 23 wrote:
<quoted text>

Those cases of "justifiable" public executions was their CUSTOM back then and it was their LAWS. And Those who recieved it, i am sure they was Guilty of the Crime committed.... I
Yeah, I'm sure everyone executed was guilty. You are sick, BTK, just sick.
Huh

Fort Worth, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#626251
May 25, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

MisterCharrington wrote:
<quoted text>
I believe the EVIDENCE!
I am related to a chimp/bonobo who is in turn related to all `lower` forms of life. My second chromosome is contains the extra chromosome posessed by chimpanzees.
55% of your DNA ia banana.
60% is insect
75% reptile
40% bacteria
god did not do it you are a product of natural selection and 3.9 billion years of time.
This is supported by every evolutionary discovery to date, faith is not required.
Gravity is just a theory. Intelligent falling is what really happens. When those people leapt from the World Trade Center because religion coerced people to fly planes into buildings, Christian angels gleefully thrust them to the ground at 9.8 meters per second, squared, minus any velocity loss from friction. Those angels love the sound of bodies hitting concrete. They are Christian, after all. Suffering. It's in the book!
Huh

Fort Worth, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#626252
May 25, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

MisterCharrington wrote:
<quoted text>
presumably you`re using the term "work" loosely...
Most employers consider spending five hours of their time defending their ego-driven Koresh on the Internet as a very productive use of their time. In fact, most employee manuals encourage the practice.
Huh

Fort Worth, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#626253
May 25, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
By your own words, you think it's ok to hit a 6 month old, too.
Asking as it meets your criteria.
Plain and simple.
Oh, Koresh, I now hope there is a Hell. Hey, you've turned me into a fake Cjristian, just like you, baby beater.

“Today we pray”

Since: Jul 12

"tomorrow we win"

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#626254
May 25, 2013
 
Huh wrote:
<quoted text>Why would you ask this question. You know your magic decoder ring will magically allow you to claim "Biblical ignorance" if someone provides evidence from your immoral book about the claim. Your crazy "friend" psalms has stated such, yet you never correct that twit on theological positions that go against your decoder ring. You two obviously possess different models. He got the Marquis de Sade version while you must have picked up the Progressive Koresh model.
Matthew 5:48 - You therefore must be perfect, as your heavenly Father is perfect.
John 1:1-3 - In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God. All things were made through him, and without him was not any thing made that was made.
So, perfection begets imperfection, eh? We are so complex that we need an infinitely even more complex, perfect specimen that is somehow magically there on its own, is perfect, but screws up royally and still blames others for its foibles. The pretzel logic required to pretend your ego will live forever because you believe in such nonsense is unfathomable.
I need to buy you a new irony meter....

You proclaim word salad and decoder rings on us theists, then turn around and twist it up yourself by taking two separate verses from two separate books and pretend like they go together.

Hypocrite.
Huh

Fort Worth, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#626255
May 25, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
I need to buy you a new irony meter....
You proclaim word salad and decoder rings on us theists, then turn around and twist it up yourself by taking two separate verses from two separate books and pretend like they go together.
Hypocrite.
Ah, your Progressive Koresh decoder ring strikes again! You're right. No e of it goes together. It is all utter nonsense, a mush mash of contradictions, word salad of the worst order, non-evidential, ignorant, non-testable, non-repeatable, and utterly immoral and ridiculous. Plus, it creates people like you, Koresh, willfully and woefully ignorant, just so their Koresh, baby-beating ego can pretend to live forever. You're pretending, fool.

You don't understand the term word salad. Read your fellow theists posts. Maybe you'll understand it. I am nor using a magic decoder ring. These two scripture contradict one another. It really is that simple, Koresh. It doesn't matter which chapter they are in. Would you care to entertain contradictory scripture that are right next to each other? Will that make you feel better so you can invoke your Progressive Koresh decoder ring again, Koresh?

Yes, it is a ridiculous book. I didn't write it. Those that did were criminal in intent and practice. The motive was to consolidate power and wealth.
Huh

Fort Worth, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#626256
May 25, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
I need to buy you a new irony meter....
You proclaim word salad and decoder rings on us theists, then turn around and twist it up yourself by taking two separate verses from two separate books and pretend like they go together.
Hypocrite.
I must be omniscient, because I predicted this would be your concession speech, Koresh. Now before me, Koresh!
Huh

Fort Worth, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#626257
May 25, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
I need to buy you a new irony meter....
You proclaim word salad and decoder rings on us theists, then turn around and twist it up yourself by taking two separate verses from two separate books and pretend like they go together.
Hypocrite.
5 hours a day you are stealing from someone in your land of make-believe, Koresh. Whoopie!
OCB

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#626258
May 25, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
By your own words, you think it's ok to hit a 6 month old, too.
Asking as it meets your criteria.
Plain and simple.
Look , you moron -what I said was that if in the very unlikely scenario that a six month old baby was doing something that could cause harm to them or others -in a situation like that striking a baby would be better and more appropriate than letting the baby hurt themselves. STOP twisting my words- you are a f*cking creep who isn't even as smart as a six month old baby but who's sure is cunning and you sure CAN be manipulative so I guess that's why you think six months old babies can be manipulative.

I am on record saying I do not think it's okay to ever hit a six month old baby -the likelihood of a six month old baby doing something that could cause injury or harm to themselves or others is highly unlikely but IF such an unlikely situation were to occur and that was the ONLY way to stop the baby from harming themselves or others, then and ONLY then MIGHT hitting a baby be an acceptable course of action.

YOU on the other hand, see nothing wrong with hitting a baby for crying.

You're a sick piece of work -not only because you think hitting babies is fine but because you are trying to twist what I said.

Get lost- which you already are- lost in your world of delusion, LOSER.

“I see quantum effects”

Since: Jan 11

In the macro world.

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#626259
May 25, 2013
 
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>If you thing the universe somehow created itself, explain how and why.
It's being worked on.

Ever hear of the LHC?

Stay tuned.

Or not, as is your nature.

“Today we pray”

Since: Jul 12

"tomorrow we win"

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#626260
May 25, 2013
 
OCB wrote:
<quoted text> Yeah - "stop" is right. Stop editing my posts to suit your sick notion that heating six-month-old babies is okay.
That's right RR- six-month-old babies in your sick mind " can" be cunning and manipulative...okay?
Better? Not really- you're a moron.
You think playing your little word games makes it any better that you think it's okay to hit six-month-old babies?
It doesn't. You are delusional.
Now you've added "cunning" and claim that I did?!

“Today we pray”

Since: Jul 12

"tomorrow we win"

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#626261
May 25, 2013
 
MisterCharrington wrote:
<quoted text>
I believe the EVIDENCE!
I am related to a chimp/bonobo who is in turn related to all `lower` forms of life. My second chromosome is contains the extra chromosome posessed by chimpanzees.
55% of your DNA ia banana.
60% is insect
75% reptile
40% bacteria
god did not do it you are a product of natural selection and 3.9 billion years of time.
This is supported by every evolutionary discovery to date, faith is not required.
LMAO!

You claim to believe "the EVIDENCE", right?

I believe you.

But where's your evidence that "god did not do it"?

Or is it you believe the EVIDENCE for what you want and you believe the LACK OF EVIDENCE for what fits?

“Today we pray”

Since: Jul 12

"tomorrow we win"

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#626262
May 25, 2013
 
MisterCharrington wrote:
<quoted text>
presumably you`re using the term "work" loosely...
Oh don't get upset that I don't work for a Nazi slave driving boss...

“Today we pray”

Since: Jul 12

"tomorrow we win"

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#626263
May 25, 2013
 
Huh wrote:
<quoted text>24,860 posts in 10 months. 2,486 posts a month. 100 posts a day, assuming you keep Koresh Day holy, Koresh. Admittedly, your posts are not that deep, so not much thought or time is required for each one. Let's average it out to 3 minutes each. 5 hours a day posting on Topix. 5 hours you have either stolen from your family or your employer, Koresh. 5 hours a day. Imagine what kind of legacy and financial independence you could offer your children if you devoted this time for their future instead of pretending to defend the Koresh you have created in your mind, Koresh. What a waste.
Thank you for keeping count.

Someone has to...

“Today we pray”

Since: Jul 12

"tomorrow we win"

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#626264
May 25, 2013
 
<quoted text>
I need to buy you a new irony meter....
You proclaim word salad and decoder rings on us theists, then turn around and twist it up yourself by taking two separate verses from two separate books and pretend like they go together.
Hypocrite.
Huh wrote:
<quoted text>Ah, your Progressive Koresh decoder ring strikes again! You're right. No e of it goes together. It is all utter nonsense, a mush mash of contradictions, word salad of the worst order, non-evidential, ignorant, non-testable, non-repeatable, and utterly immoral and ridiculous. Plus, it creates people like you, Koresh, willfully and woefully ignorant, just so their Koresh, baby-beating ego can pretend to live forever. You're pretending, fool.
You don't understand the term word salad. Read your fellow theists posts. Maybe you'll understand it. I am nor using a magic decoder ring. These two scripture contradict one another. It really is that simple, Koresh. It doesn't matter which chapter they are in. Would you care to entertain contradictory scripture that are right next to each other? Will that make you feel better so you can invoke your Progressive Koresh decoder ring again, Koresh?
Yes, it is a ridiculous book. I didn't write it. Those that did were criminal in intent and practice. The motive was to consolidate power and wealth.
Uh-huh...

So you go from word salad to a goal post change.

Nice play, but don't change the subject.

“Today we pray”

Since: Jul 12

"tomorrow we win"

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#626265
May 25, 2013
 
OCB wrote:
<quoted text> Look , you moron -what I said was that if in the very unlikely scenario that a six month old baby was doing something that could cause harm to them or others -in a situation like that striking a baby would be better and more appropriate than letting the baby hurt themselves. STOP twisting my words- you are a f*cking creep who isn't even as smart as a six month old baby but who's sure is cunning and you sure CAN be manipulative so I guess that's why you think six months old babies can be manipulative.
I am on record saying I do not think it's okay to ever hit a six month old baby -the likelihood of a six month old baby doing something that could cause injury or harm to themselves or others is highly unlikely but IF such an unlikely situation were to occur and that was the ONLY way to stop the baby from harming themselves or others, then and ONLY then MIGHT hitting a baby be an acceptable course of action.
YOU on the other hand, see nothing wrong with hitting a baby for crying.
You're a sick piece of work -not only because you think hitting babies is fine but because you are trying to twist what I said.
Get lost- which you already are- lost in your world of delusion, LOSER.
Oh, now it's a "very unlikely scenario"?!

But it's still ok, according to you, to hit a baby.

I love watching you back pedal...

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 594,701 - 594,720 of680,323
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

628 Users are viewing the Top Stories Forum right now

Search the Top Stories Forum:
Topic Updated Last By Comments
Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 4 min Michael 512,199
Kokopelli's Place, too (Jan '08) 4 min Ricky F 23,829
body to body massage abu-dhabi.massage at abu d... (May '13) 5 min kareen 37
Which Group Needs To Be Deported? 6 min Johnny 119
Blaming Israel for carnage (Jul '06) 8 min Go Le Gay Levi GO 109,630
Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) 16 min Catcher1 217,056
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 18 min VIKING WARRIOR 596,571
Girls snapchat names?(dirty) 23 min ryanm654321 258
Game of Thrones Ebook Download Free [PDF] (Feb '13) 14 hr sakib 47
•••
•••
•••