Comments
594,501 - 594,520 of 720,605 Comments Last updated 6 min ago
Huh

Fort Worth, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#626255
May 25, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
I need to buy you a new irony meter....
You proclaim word salad and decoder rings on us theists, then turn around and twist it up yourself by taking two separate verses from two separate books and pretend like they go together.
Hypocrite.
Ah, your Progressive Koresh decoder ring strikes again! You're right. No e of it goes together. It is all utter nonsense, a mush mash of contradictions, word salad of the worst order, non-evidential, ignorant, non-testable, non-repeatable, and utterly immoral and ridiculous. Plus, it creates people like you, Koresh, willfully and woefully ignorant, just so their Koresh, baby-beating ego can pretend to live forever. You're pretending, fool.

You don't understand the term word salad. Read your fellow theists posts. Maybe you'll understand it. I am nor using a magic decoder ring. These two scripture contradict one another. It really is that simple, Koresh. It doesn't matter which chapter they are in. Would you care to entertain contradictory scripture that are right next to each other? Will that make you feel better so you can invoke your Progressive Koresh decoder ring again, Koresh?

Yes, it is a ridiculous book. I didn't write it. Those that did were criminal in intent and practice. The motive was to consolidate power and wealth.
Huh

Fort Worth, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#626256
May 25, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
I need to buy you a new irony meter....
You proclaim word salad and decoder rings on us theists, then turn around and twist it up yourself by taking two separate verses from two separate books and pretend like they go together.
Hypocrite.
I must be omniscient, because I predicted this would be your concession speech, Koresh. Now before me, Koresh!
Huh

Fort Worth, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#626257
May 25, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
I need to buy you a new irony meter....
You proclaim word salad and decoder rings on us theists, then turn around and twist it up yourself by taking two separate verses from two separate books and pretend like they go together.
Hypocrite.
5 hours a day you are stealing from someone in your land of make-believe, Koresh. Whoopie!
OCB

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#626258
May 25, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
By your own words, you think it's ok to hit a 6 month old, too.
Asking as it meets your criteria.
Plain and simple.
Look , you moron -what I said was that if in the very unlikely scenario that a six month old baby was doing something that could cause harm to them or others -in a situation like that striking a baby would be better and more appropriate than letting the baby hurt themselves. STOP twisting my words- you are a f*cking creep who isn't even as smart as a six month old baby but who's sure is cunning and you sure CAN be manipulative so I guess that's why you think six months old babies can be manipulative.

I am on record saying I do not think it's okay to ever hit a six month old baby -the likelihood of a six month old baby doing something that could cause injury or harm to themselves or others is highly unlikely but IF such an unlikely situation were to occur and that was the ONLY way to stop the baby from harming themselves or others, then and ONLY then MIGHT hitting a baby be an acceptable course of action.

YOU on the other hand, see nothing wrong with hitting a baby for crying.

You're a sick piece of work -not only because you think hitting babies is fine but because you are trying to twist what I said.

Get lost- which you already are- lost in your world of delusion, LOSER.

“I see quantum effects”

Since: Jan 11

In the macro world.

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#626259
May 25, 2013
 
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>If you thing the universe somehow created itself, explain how and why.
It's being worked on.

Ever hear of the LHC?

Stay tuned.

Or not, as is your nature.

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#626260
May 25, 2013
 
OCB wrote:
<quoted text> Yeah - "stop" is right. Stop editing my posts to suit your sick notion that heating six-month-old babies is okay.
That's right RR- six-month-old babies in your sick mind " can" be cunning and manipulative...okay?
Better? Not really- you're a moron.
You think playing your little word games makes it any better that you think it's okay to hit six-month-old babies?
It doesn't. You are delusional.
Now you've added "cunning" and claim that I did?!

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#626261
May 25, 2013
 
MisterCharrington wrote:
<quoted text>
I believe the EVIDENCE!
I am related to a chimp/bonobo who is in turn related to all `lower` forms of life. My second chromosome is contains the extra chromosome posessed by chimpanzees.
55% of your DNA ia banana.
60% is insect
75% reptile
40% bacteria
god did not do it you are a product of natural selection and 3.9 billion years of time.
This is supported by every evolutionary discovery to date, faith is not required.
LMAO!

You claim to believe "the EVIDENCE", right?

I believe you.

But where's your evidence that "god did not do it"?

Or is it you believe the EVIDENCE for what you want and you believe the LACK OF EVIDENCE for what fits?

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#626262
May 25, 2013
 
MisterCharrington wrote:
<quoted text>
presumably you`re using the term "work" loosely...
Oh don't get upset that I don't work for a Nazi slave driving boss...

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#626263
May 25, 2013
 
Huh wrote:
<quoted text>24,860 posts in 10 months. 2,486 posts a month. 100 posts a day, assuming you keep Koresh Day holy, Koresh. Admittedly, your posts are not that deep, so not much thought or time is required for each one. Let's average it out to 3 minutes each. 5 hours a day posting on Topix. 5 hours you have either stolen from your family or your employer, Koresh. 5 hours a day. Imagine what kind of legacy and financial independence you could offer your children if you devoted this time for their future instead of pretending to defend the Koresh you have created in your mind, Koresh. What a waste.
Thank you for keeping count.

Someone has to...

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#626264
May 25, 2013
 
<quoted text>
I need to buy you a new irony meter....
You proclaim word salad and decoder rings on us theists, then turn around and twist it up yourself by taking two separate verses from two separate books and pretend like they go together.
Hypocrite.
Huh wrote:
<quoted text>Ah, your Progressive Koresh decoder ring strikes again! You're right. No e of it goes together. It is all utter nonsense, a mush mash of contradictions, word salad of the worst order, non-evidential, ignorant, non-testable, non-repeatable, and utterly immoral and ridiculous. Plus, it creates people like you, Koresh, willfully and woefully ignorant, just so their Koresh, baby-beating ego can pretend to live forever. You're pretending, fool.
You don't understand the term word salad. Read your fellow theists posts. Maybe you'll understand it. I am nor using a magic decoder ring. These two scripture contradict one another. It really is that simple, Koresh. It doesn't matter which chapter they are in. Would you care to entertain contradictory scripture that are right next to each other? Will that make you feel better so you can invoke your Progressive Koresh decoder ring again, Koresh?
Yes, it is a ridiculous book. I didn't write it. Those that did were criminal in intent and practice. The motive was to consolidate power and wealth.
Uh-huh...

So you go from word salad to a goal post change.

Nice play, but don't change the subject.

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#626265
May 25, 2013
 
OCB wrote:
<quoted text> Look , you moron -what I said was that if in the very unlikely scenario that a six month old baby was doing something that could cause harm to them or others -in a situation like that striking a baby would be better and more appropriate than letting the baby hurt themselves. STOP twisting my words- you are a f*cking creep who isn't even as smart as a six month old baby but who's sure is cunning and you sure CAN be manipulative so I guess that's why you think six months old babies can be manipulative.
I am on record saying I do not think it's okay to ever hit a six month old baby -the likelihood of a six month old baby doing something that could cause injury or harm to themselves or others is highly unlikely but IF such an unlikely situation were to occur and that was the ONLY way to stop the baby from harming themselves or others, then and ONLY then MIGHT hitting a baby be an acceptable course of action.
YOU on the other hand, see nothing wrong with hitting a baby for crying.
You're a sick piece of work -not only because you think hitting babies is fine but because you are trying to twist what I said.
Get lost- which you already are- lost in your world of delusion, LOSER.
Oh, now it's a "very unlikely scenario"?!

But it's still ok, according to you, to hit a baby.

I love watching you back pedal...
OCB

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#626266
May 25, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Now you've added "cunning" and claim that I did?!
All I can say is in your case it would've been better if when you were six months old if your parents had hit you instead what they did- which obviously was dropping you on your head-one time too many.

You are so off the mark on this it's not even funny.

What IS funny is that you don't even realize it.

PFFT.

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#626267
May 25, 2013
 
Huh wrote:
<quoted text>Most employers consider spending five hours of their time defending their ego-driven Koresh on the Internet as a very productive use of their time. In fact, most employee manuals encourage the practice.
You're pretending that the only time I post is while I'm on the clock, pissy.

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#626268
May 25, 2013
 
Huh wrote:
<quoted text>Oh, Koresh, I now hope there is a Hell. Hey, you've turned me into a fake Cjristian, just like you, baby beater.
I would never turn you into a fake Cjristian.

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#626269
May 25, 2013
 
Aerobatty wrote:
<quoted text>
It's being worked on.
Ever hear of the LHC?
Stay tuned.
Or not, as is your nature.
In other words: You don't know and can't answer...

"It's being worked on" is a copout.

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#626270
May 25, 2013
 
OCB wrote:
<quoted text> All I can say is in your case it would've been better if when you were six months old if your parents had hit you instead what they did- which obviously was dropping you on your head-one time too many.
You are so off the mark on this it's not even funny.
What IS funny is that you don't even realize it.
PFFT.
OCB: "Quick!!! Change the subject!!"

Since: May 11

UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#626271
May 25, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
LMAO!
You claim to believe "the EVIDENCE", right?
I believe you.
But where's your evidence that "god did not do it"?
Or is it you believe the EVIDENCE for what you want and you believe the LACK OF EVIDENCE for what fits?
And right there you have proven once again that you are driven solely by dogma.

There is no evidence for a god.

Since: May 11

UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#626272
May 25, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Huh wrote:
<quoted text>Most employers consider spending five hours of their time defending their ego-driven Koresh on the Internet as a very productive use of their time. In fact, most employee manuals encourage the practice.
The blue collar life is such a hard one....
OCB

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#626273
May 25, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
OCB: "Quick!!! Change the subject!!"
Oh please I didn't change anything-what a fool you are.

Anyway, I'll leave you to your day of work posting on Topix- such meaning you have in your life RR-that you are here all the time proves you have no life at all.

But first: when I said it might be okay to hit a baby if in doing so it would prevent them from hurting themselves or others I was trying to give YOU some slack- I'll be sure to never make that mistake again.

You prove yourself to be the measurable cur you are by attempting to twist my words and by trying to make it sound as if I think it's okay to hit babies when I do not and when the truth is you DO think it's okay to hit babies and basically for any reason at all- even for doing what comes naturally to babies- CRYING.

What does not come naturally to six month old babies is engaging in activities that could cause great harm to themselves or others- but it can happen and does happen - very rare as that may be- so for the LAST time- in a circumstance in which hitting a baby would prevent the baby from causing serious injury or harm to themselves or others and if there is no other way to prevent the babies from doing what they're doing other than by hitting them there might not be any other choice but I am very hard-pressed to come up with any scenario in which there would be no other choice.

And it is you who is attempting to change the subject - this all came up when you said it is okay to hit a six month old baby if they are trying to distract their parents from having a quiet dinner together.

You've been busted on this so many times already I've lost count.

I suggest you quit while you're so far behind.

Toodles!
OCB

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#626274
May 25, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

Oops!* MISERABLE" cur that you are- which IS quite measurable, btw....

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

427 Users are viewing the Top Stories Forum right now

Search the Top Stories Forum:
Title Updated Last By Comments
Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 7 min Commander Bunny 256,448
Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 8 min marge 532,620
Bush is a hero (Sep '07) 13 min Strength and Honor 172,337
Play "end of the word" (Jan '11) 13 min Al Capone 3,949
Which is the Oldest Indian Language? Sanskrit V... (Jul '08) 20 min shyam 4,579
Hot gays in Abu Dhabi (Nov '13) 23 min sss223 398
Nine Eleven 26 min passing by 6
Does anyone do incest sex with your sister (Apr '12) 2 hr Larry 122
Sims 4 Key Generator (Oct '13) 11 hr Helga 72
•••
•••
Enter and win $5000
•••