Prove there's a god.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#626247 May 25, 2013
OCB wrote:
<quoted text> You're a word twisting pile of puke.
What I said was is that in the very unlikely scenario of a six month old baby doing something that could injure themselves or others,only then might striking a six month old baby be appropriate but again, such a scenario is extremely unlikely.
However you think hitting a six month old baby for simply being what they are-a baby-is perfectly fine and dandy.
And quit editing my posts in your stupid and moronic attempt to twist my words.
Feck off.
By your own words, you think it's ok to hit a 6 month old, too.

Asking as it meets your criteria.

Plain and simple.
Huh

Fort Worth, TX

#626248 May 25, 2013
psalms 23 wrote:
<quoted text>
NOWHERE, did i say that ""this country needs PUBLIC executions done publicaly"". All you have done is proved me right and you a liar!! I said ( NOT STONING ) and that means the instructions that come with stoning, which its done in public!
So once again, you have proven yourself to be DECIETFUL LIAR for ALL to see..
<quoted text>
LIAR! Here is the part of the post to which you asked PROOF AND SOURCE for on two different occasions, and "we" was talking about Israel.... Post# 625909
psalms 23 wrote:
<quoted text>Anyway........
We may think God’s laws in the Old Testament were cruel, but in reality these laws prevented many crimes. For a time in Israel, when they obeyed God’s law like they were commanded, there were hardly any murders, rapes, kidnappings, thefts, etc.
YOU WRITE;
Proof? Source? The "deterrent" method of crime prevention has been so thoroughly discredited I am astounded to see even you repeating it here. I suppose I shouldn't be surprised though - this *is* coming from the guy who just suggested that I was "lucky" I am not at risk for a stoning.
psalms 23 wrote:
<quoted text>When they thought they would be soft on crime and criminals many of the above crimes took place in Israel. So who has the better idea?
YOU WRITE;
Proof? Source? Anything beyond this vague bit of nonsense?
So looks like you are what i say you are, nothing but a LIAR, who twist words and takes things out of context, and is incapable of having an honest and fair debate..
<quoted text>
Those cases of "justifiable" public executions was their CUSTOM back then and it was their LAWS. And Those who recieved it, i am sure they was Guilty of the Crime committed.... It's the same thing as our custom and laws of this modern day. But its a different form of Capitol punishment we hold today as compared back then.
Nice backpedal. You did make the claim, you nutter. Capital punishment has zero deterrent effect and no effect on recidivism rates. Take a deep breath. You're losing your final grasp on whatever sanity you still possessed. Please don't hurt anyone today, BTK.

Capital, not Capitol you mis-educated twit.

There were hardly any rapes or murders committed? Please cite your source. You are a looney bird.
Huh

Fort Worth, TX

#626249 May 25, 2013
OCB wrote:
<quoted text> Yeah - "stop" is right. Stop editing my posts to suit your sick notion that heating six-month-old babies is okay.
That's right RR- six-month-old babies in your sick mind " can" be cunning and manipulative...okay?
Better? Not really- you're a moron.
You think playing your little word games makes it any better that you think it's okay to hit six-month-old babies?
It doesn't. You are delusional.
You dare question Koersh?
Huh

Fort Worth, TX

#626250 May 25, 2013
psalms 23 wrote:
<quoted text>

Those cases of "justifiable" public executions was their CUSTOM back then and it was their LAWS. And Those who recieved it, i am sure they was Guilty of the Crime committed.... I
Yeah, I'm sure everyone executed was guilty. You are sick, BTK, just sick.
Huh

Fort Worth, TX

#626251 May 25, 2013
MisterCharrington wrote:
<quoted text>
I believe the EVIDENCE!
I am related to a chimp/bonobo who is in turn related to all `lower` forms of life. My second chromosome is contains the extra chromosome posessed by chimpanzees.
55% of your DNA ia banana.
60% is insect
75% reptile
40% bacteria
god did not do it you are a product of natural selection and 3.9 billion years of time.
This is supported by every evolutionary discovery to date, faith is not required.
Gravity is just a theory. Intelligent falling is what really happens. When those people leapt from the World Trade Center because religion coerced people to fly planes into buildings, Christian angels gleefully thrust them to the ground at 9.8 meters per second, squared, minus any velocity loss from friction. Those angels love the sound of bodies hitting concrete. They are Christian, after all. Suffering. It's in the book!
Huh

Fort Worth, TX

#626252 May 25, 2013
MisterCharrington wrote:
<quoted text>
presumably you`re using the term "work" loosely...
Most employers consider spending five hours of their time defending their ego-driven Koresh on the Internet as a very productive use of their time. In fact, most employee manuals encourage the practice.
Huh

Fort Worth, TX

#626253 May 25, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
By your own words, you think it's ok to hit a 6 month old, too.
Asking as it meets your criteria.
Plain and simple.
Oh, Koresh, I now hope there is a Hell. Hey, you've turned me into a fake Cjristian, just like you, baby beater.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#626254 May 25, 2013
Huh wrote:
<quoted text>Why would you ask this question. You know your magic decoder ring will magically allow you to claim "Biblical ignorance" if someone provides evidence from your immoral book about the claim. Your crazy "friend" psalms has stated such, yet you never correct that twit on theological positions that go against your decoder ring. You two obviously possess different models. He got the Marquis de Sade version while you must have picked up the Progressive Koresh model.
Matthew 5:48 - You therefore must be perfect, as your heavenly Father is perfect.
John 1:1-3 - In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God. All things were made through him, and without him was not any thing made that was made.
So, perfection begets imperfection, eh? We are so complex that we need an infinitely even more complex, perfect specimen that is somehow magically there on its own, is perfect, but screws up royally and still blames others for its foibles. The pretzel logic required to pretend your ego will live forever because you believe in such nonsense is unfathomable.
I need to buy you a new irony meter....

You proclaim word salad and decoder rings on us theists, then turn around and twist it up yourself by taking two separate verses from two separate books and pretend like they go together.

Hypocrite.
Huh

Fort Worth, TX

#626255 May 25, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
I need to buy you a new irony meter....
You proclaim word salad and decoder rings on us theists, then turn around and twist it up yourself by taking two separate verses from two separate books and pretend like they go together.
Hypocrite.
Ah, your Progressive Koresh decoder ring strikes again! You're right. No e of it goes together. It is all utter nonsense, a mush mash of contradictions, word salad of the worst order, non-evidential, ignorant, non-testable, non-repeatable, and utterly immoral and ridiculous. Plus, it creates people like you, Koresh, willfully and woefully ignorant, just so their Koresh, baby-beating ego can pretend to live forever. You're pretending, fool.

You don't understand the term word salad. Read your fellow theists posts. Maybe you'll understand it. I am nor using a magic decoder ring. These two scripture contradict one another. It really is that simple, Koresh. It doesn't matter which chapter they are in. Would you care to entertain contradictory scripture that are right next to each other? Will that make you feel better so you can invoke your Progressive Koresh decoder ring again, Koresh?

Yes, it is a ridiculous book. I didn't write it. Those that did were criminal in intent and practice. The motive was to consolidate power and wealth.
Huh

Fort Worth, TX

#626256 May 25, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
I need to buy you a new irony meter....
You proclaim word salad and decoder rings on us theists, then turn around and twist it up yourself by taking two separate verses from two separate books and pretend like they go together.
Hypocrite.
I must be omniscient, because I predicted this would be your concession speech, Koresh. Now before me, Koresh!
Huh

Fort Worth, TX

#626257 May 25, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
I need to buy you a new irony meter....
You proclaim word salad and decoder rings on us theists, then turn around and twist it up yourself by taking two separate verses from two separate books and pretend like they go together.
Hypocrite.
5 hours a day you are stealing from someone in your land of make-believe, Koresh. Whoopie!
OCB

United States

#626258 May 25, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
By your own words, you think it's ok to hit a 6 month old, too.
Asking as it meets your criteria.
Plain and simple.
Look , you moron -what I said was that if in the very unlikely scenario that a six month old baby was doing something that could cause harm to them or others -in a situation like that striking a baby would be better and more appropriate than letting the baby hurt themselves. STOP twisting my words- you are a f*cking creep who isn't even as smart as a six month old baby but who's sure is cunning and you sure CAN be manipulative so I guess that's why you think six months old babies can be manipulative.

I am on record saying I do not think it's okay to ever hit a six month old baby -the likelihood of a six month old baby doing something that could cause injury or harm to themselves or others is highly unlikely but IF such an unlikely situation were to occur and that was the ONLY way to stop the baby from harming themselves or others, then and ONLY then MIGHT hitting a baby be an acceptable course of action.

YOU on the other hand, see nothing wrong with hitting a baby for crying.

You're a sick piece of work -not only because you think hitting babies is fine but because you are trying to twist what I said.

Get lost- which you already are- lost in your world of delusion, LOSER.

“I see quantum effects”

Since: Jan 11

In the macro world.

#626259 May 25, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>If you thing the universe somehow created itself, explain how and why.
It's being worked on.

Ever hear of the LHC?

Stay tuned.

Or not, as is your nature.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#626260 May 25, 2013
OCB wrote:
<quoted text> Yeah - "stop" is right. Stop editing my posts to suit your sick notion that heating six-month-old babies is okay.
That's right RR- six-month-old babies in your sick mind " can" be cunning and manipulative...okay?
Better? Not really- you're a moron.
You think playing your little word games makes it any better that you think it's okay to hit six-month-old babies?
It doesn't. You are delusional.
Now you've added "cunning" and claim that I did?!

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#626261 May 25, 2013
MisterCharrington wrote:
<quoted text>
I believe the EVIDENCE!
I am related to a chimp/bonobo who is in turn related to all `lower` forms of life. My second chromosome is contains the extra chromosome posessed by chimpanzees.
55% of your DNA ia banana.
60% is insect
75% reptile
40% bacteria
god did not do it you are a product of natural selection and 3.9 billion years of time.
This is supported by every evolutionary discovery to date, faith is not required.
LMAO!

You claim to believe "the EVIDENCE", right?

I believe you.

But where's your evidence that "god did not do it"?

Or is it you believe the EVIDENCE for what you want and you believe the LACK OF EVIDENCE for what fits?

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#626262 May 25, 2013
MisterCharrington wrote:
<quoted text>
presumably you`re using the term "work" loosely...
Oh don't get upset that I don't work for a Nazi slave driving boss...

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#626263 May 25, 2013
Huh wrote:
<quoted text>24,860 posts in 10 months. 2,486 posts a month. 100 posts a day, assuming you keep Koresh Day holy, Koresh. Admittedly, your posts are not that deep, so not much thought or time is required for each one. Let's average it out to 3 minutes each. 5 hours a day posting on Topix. 5 hours you have either stolen from your family or your employer, Koresh. 5 hours a day. Imagine what kind of legacy and financial independence you could offer your children if you devoted this time for their future instead of pretending to defend the Koresh you have created in your mind, Koresh. What a waste.
Thank you for keeping count.

Someone has to...

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#626264 May 25, 2013
<quoted text>
I need to buy you a new irony meter....
You proclaim word salad and decoder rings on us theists, then turn around and twist it up yourself by taking two separate verses from two separate books and pretend like they go together.
Hypocrite.
Huh wrote:
<quoted text>Ah, your Progressive Koresh decoder ring strikes again! You're right. No e of it goes together. It is all utter nonsense, a mush mash of contradictions, word salad of the worst order, non-evidential, ignorant, non-testable, non-repeatable, and utterly immoral and ridiculous. Plus, it creates people like you, Koresh, willfully and woefully ignorant, just so their Koresh, baby-beating ego can pretend to live forever. You're pretending, fool.
You don't understand the term word salad. Read your fellow theists posts. Maybe you'll understand it. I am nor using a magic decoder ring. These two scripture contradict one another. It really is that simple, Koresh. It doesn't matter which chapter they are in. Would you care to entertain contradictory scripture that are right next to each other? Will that make you feel better so you can invoke your Progressive Koresh decoder ring again, Koresh?
Yes, it is a ridiculous book. I didn't write it. Those that did were criminal in intent and practice. The motive was to consolidate power and wealth.
Uh-huh...

So you go from word salad to a goal post change.

Nice play, but don't change the subject.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#626265 May 25, 2013
OCB wrote:
<quoted text> Look , you moron -what I said was that if in the very unlikely scenario that a six month old baby was doing something that could cause harm to them or others -in a situation like that striking a baby would be better and more appropriate than letting the baby hurt themselves. STOP twisting my words- you are a f*cking creep who isn't even as smart as a six month old baby but who's sure is cunning and you sure CAN be manipulative so I guess that's why you think six months old babies can be manipulative.
I am on record saying I do not think it's okay to ever hit a six month old baby -the likelihood of a six month old baby doing something that could cause injury or harm to themselves or others is highly unlikely but IF such an unlikely situation were to occur and that was the ONLY way to stop the baby from harming themselves or others, then and ONLY then MIGHT hitting a baby be an acceptable course of action.
YOU on the other hand, see nothing wrong with hitting a baby for crying.
You're a sick piece of work -not only because you think hitting babies is fine but because you are trying to twist what I said.
Get lost- which you already are- lost in your world of delusion, LOSER.
Oh, now it's a "very unlikely scenario"?!

But it's still ok, according to you, to hit a baby.

I love watching you back pedal...
OCB

United States

#626266 May 25, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Now you've added "cunning" and claim that I did?!
All I can say is in your case it would've been better if when you were six months old if your parents had hit you instead what they did- which obviously was dropping you on your head-one time too many.

You are so off the mark on this it's not even funny.

What IS funny is that you don't even realize it.

PFFT.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Poll If you're Christain what kind are you? (Oct '07) 4 min RiccardoFire 8,276
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 5 min New Age Spiritual... 603,408
The Christian Atheist debate 8 min Into The Night 3,966
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 10 min Soon Armagedon Day 613,080
News The Latest: Husband: Kentucky clerk is 'standin... 39 min Belle Sexton 5
Jehovah's Witnesses are true disciple of Jesus ... (Mar '07) 40 min RiccardoFire 41,155
Poll It is fine when the brother makes children of h... 2 hr pepertoa 2
Bush is a hero (Sep '07) 4 hr gentlepplpleaser 177,894
Which is the Oldest Indian Language? Sanskrit V... (Jul '08) 5 hr waaasssuuup 7,643
More from around the web