Prove there's a god.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#626234 May 25, 2013
Huh wrote:
<quoted text>Sure, because that's how your dusty, immoral book explains it. Cafeteria Christians are adorable.
You woke up in the wrong side of the bed, pissy.
Huh

Oglesby, TX

#626235 May 25, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
It isn't explained in Genesis HOW God made anything, just THAT He did.
So your magic decoder ring gets to fill in the gaps. Check. But your Progressive Koresh model disagrees with psalms Marquis de Sade model.
Huh

Oglesby, TX

#626236 May 25, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
If you thing the universe somehow created itself, explain how and why.
Why not? Yet, your infinitely more complex god somehow created itself. Explain how and why. Infinite regress will pop your lid, Koresh.
Huh

Oglesby, TX

#626237 May 25, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes....
MAGICK!
So, let me get this straight. Supernatural deity conjures up man from dirt and woman from a rib. Not magic. Vs. We don't really know how life began and evidence points to the diversity of life coming from a change in alleles over time. Magic! WTF is wrong with you?
Huh

Oglesby, TX

#626238 May 25, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
You woke up in the wrong side of the bed, pissy.
Nope, you misogynistic creep. Your rampant stupidity deserves all the mockery it garners. People like you spread your magic god virus and ridiculous decoder rings to their children, who you simultaneously beat and ignore. You are a pox on Society, Koresh.
Huh

Oglesby, TX

#626239 May 25, 2013
OCB wrote:
<quoted text> You're a word twisting pile of puke.
What I said was is that in the very unlikely scenario of a six month old baby doing something that could injure themselves or others,only then might striking a six month old baby be appropriate but again, such a scenario is extremely unlikely.
However you think hitting a six month old baby for simply being what they are-a baby-is perfectly fine and dandy.
And quit editing my posts in your stupid and moronic attempt to twist my words.
Feck off.
In the Koresh Compound, when you arm the babies, you have to ensure they don't turn on you. Them 6 month olds need the fear of god in 'em. A good lashing makes 'em respect old Koresh. He ain't gettin' it by a bein' a human so he's gotta beat it into 'em.
Huh

Oglesby, TX

#626240 May 25, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Oops.
The word is "insecure".
You're welcome.
Writes the guy who just wrote "cones from a monkey"! What a hypocritical twit you are, Koresh the Baby Beater.
Huh

Oglesby, TX

#626241 May 25, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
You woke up in the wrong side of the bed, pissy.
Oh, and thank you again for this concession speech. Whenever you paint yourself into a theological corner, you end with something like this. Why didn't you bust out the Progressive Koresh Decoder Ring Biblical Ignorance canard with this one? Oh, that's right, you can't, because you just made up that interpretation.

Yep. 2 billion Christians. 2 billion different versions of Christianity. 2 billion different interpretations of the Bible. 2 billion different gods that somehow reflect the exact ego of each Christian. But wait, those other guys aren't real Christians because their decoder ring disagrees with mine. Christianity. An army of one.
OCB

United States

#626242 May 25, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
I did not say that.
I did not write that six month old babies "ARE" manipulative, I wrote that they can be manipulative.
One little word make a big difference in the meaning of what someone's trying to say
Yeah - "stop" is right. Stop editing my posts to suit your sick notion that heating six-month-old babies is okay.

That's right RR- six-month-old babies in your sick mind " can" be cunning and manipulative...okay?

Better? Not really- you're a moron.

You think playing your little word games makes it any better that you think it's okay to hit six-month-old babies?

It doesn't. You are delusional.

“THE LORD IS MY SHEPHERD;”

Since: Apr 09

Location hidden

#626243 May 25, 2013
timn17 wrote:
<quoted text>
You wrote:
"To stone someone it would have to be done in public, and this was part of the instructions. Since stoning was public, and carried out right away after the trial, it worked as a great """deterrent """".
Which is something i think this country needs today,( not stoning ) so dont get bent out of shape timmy, a swift and justice punishment/execution, instead of housing criminals for life..."
So, tell me again that you weren't advocating for public execution.
NOWHERE, did i say that ""this country needs PUBLIC executions done publicaly"". All you have done is proved me right and you a liar!! I said ( NOT STONING ) and that means the instructions that come with stoning, which its done in public!

So once again, you have proven yourself to be DECIETFUL LIAR for ALL to see..
I actually was not asking for proof of anything during biblical times,
LIAR! Here is the part of the post to which you asked PROOF AND SOURCE for on two different occasions, and "we" was talking about Israel.... Post# 625909

psalms 23 wrote:
<quoted text>Anyway........
We may think God’s laws in the Old Testament were cruel, but in reality these laws prevented many crimes. For a time in Israel, when they obeyed God’s law like they were commanded, there were hardly any murders, rapes, kidnappings, thefts, etc.

YOU WRITE;
Proof? Source? The "deterrent" method of crime prevention has been so thoroughly discredited I am astounded to see even you repeating it here. I suppose I shouldn't be surprised though - this *is* coming from the guy who just suggested that I was "lucky" I am not at risk for a stoning.

psalms 23 wrote:
<quoted text>When they thought they would be soft on crime and criminals many of the above crimes took place in Israel. So who has the better idea?

YOU WRITE;
Proof? Source? Anything beyond this vague bit of nonsense?

So looks like you are what i say you are, nothing but a LIAR, who twist words and takes things out of context, and is incapable of having an honest and fair debate..

I do not care if your book says that capital punishment caused everyone to grow wings; the point I was making is that capital punishment does not and has never worked as a deterrent in recorded history, and that it is unnecessarily barbaric.
I took issue with the fact that you cited two examples of public stoning as "legitimate," as if the punishment in any way fit the crime, and then proceeded to suggest that public execution (although not by stoning, so good for you for being such a progressive moral thinker) would benefit modern society.
Again, you have a capricious, vindictive, vicious, subhuman conception of morality. That's what your religion does to you. Some people can be religious without turning into a lunatic, but some can't. Unfortunately for you, your religion has you convinced that a couple of superstitious goat herders formulated *the* model of perfect moral thinking thousands of years ago.
Those cases of "justifiable" public executions was their CUSTOM back then and it was their LAWS. And Those who recieved it, i am sure they was Guilty of the Crime committed.... It's the same thing as our custom and laws of this modern day. But its a different form of Capitol punishment we hold today as compared back then.
Huh

Oglesby, TX

#626244 May 25, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
You woke up in the wrong side of the bed, pissy.
24,860 posts in 10 months. 2,486 posts a month. 100 posts a day, assuming you keep Koresh Day holy, Koresh. Admittedly, your posts are not that deep, so not much thought or time is required for each one. Let's average it out to 3 minutes each. 5 hours a day posting on Topix. 5 hours you have either stolen from your family or your employer, Koresh. 5 hours a day. Imagine what kind of legacy and financial independence you could offer your children if you devoted this time for their future instead of pretending to defend the Koresh you have created in your mind, Koresh. What a waste.

Since: May 11

Exmouth, UK

#626245 May 25, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
You're confusing me with someone else.
Unless you can find one single post where I've said I didn't cone from a monkey...
The problem I have with the common ancestor thing is that there's no evidence of it. There's no evidence that all life on earth came from one life.
The freethinkers out there just freethought their way into it and they believe it's true. You do, too.
I believe the EVIDENCE!

I am related to a chimp/bonobo who is in turn related to all `lower` forms of life. My second chromosome is contains the extra chromosome posessed by chimpanzees.

55% of your DNA ia banana.

60% is insect

75% reptile

40% bacteria

god did not do it you are a product of natural selection and 3.9 billion years of time.

This is supported by every evolutionary discovery to date, faith is not required.

Since: May 11

Exmouth, UK

#626246 May 25, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey, ASSumptive Huh doesn't know that RR's at work and his kids are home asleep.
presumably you`re using the term "work" loosely...

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#626247 May 25, 2013
OCB wrote:
<quoted text> You're a word twisting pile of puke.
What I said was is that in the very unlikely scenario of a six month old baby doing something that could injure themselves or others,only then might striking a six month old baby be appropriate but again, such a scenario is extremely unlikely.
However you think hitting a six month old baby for simply being what they are-a baby-is perfectly fine and dandy.
And quit editing my posts in your stupid and moronic attempt to twist my words.
Feck off.
By your own words, you think it's ok to hit a 6 month old, too.

Asking as it meets your criteria.

Plain and simple.
Huh

Oglesby, TX

#626248 May 25, 2013
psalms 23 wrote:
<quoted text>
NOWHERE, did i say that ""this country needs PUBLIC executions done publicaly"". All you have done is proved me right and you a liar!! I said ( NOT STONING ) and that means the instructions that come with stoning, which its done in public!
So once again, you have proven yourself to be DECIETFUL LIAR for ALL to see..
<quoted text>
LIAR! Here is the part of the post to which you asked PROOF AND SOURCE for on two different occasions, and "we" was talking about Israel.... Post# 625909
psalms 23 wrote:
<quoted text>Anyway........
We may think God’s laws in the Old Testament were cruel, but in reality these laws prevented many crimes. For a time in Israel, when they obeyed God’s law like they were commanded, there were hardly any murders, rapes, kidnappings, thefts, etc.
YOU WRITE;
Proof? Source? The "deterrent" method of crime prevention has been so thoroughly discredited I am astounded to see even you repeating it here. I suppose I shouldn't be surprised though - this *is* coming from the guy who just suggested that I was "lucky" I am not at risk for a stoning.
psalms 23 wrote:
<quoted text>When they thought they would be soft on crime and criminals many of the above crimes took place in Israel. So who has the better idea?
YOU WRITE;
Proof? Source? Anything beyond this vague bit of nonsense?
So looks like you are what i say you are, nothing but a LIAR, who twist words and takes things out of context, and is incapable of having an honest and fair debate..
<quoted text>
Those cases of "justifiable" public executions was their CUSTOM back then and it was their LAWS. And Those who recieved it, i am sure they was Guilty of the Crime committed.... It's the same thing as our custom and laws of this modern day. But its a different form of Capitol punishment we hold today as compared back then.
Nice backpedal. You did make the claim, you nutter. Capital punishment has zero deterrent effect and no effect on recidivism rates. Take a deep breath. You're losing your final grasp on whatever sanity you still possessed. Please don't hurt anyone today, BTK.

Capital, not Capitol you mis-educated twit.

There were hardly any rapes or murders committed? Please cite your source. You are a looney bird.
Huh

Oglesby, TX

#626249 May 25, 2013
OCB wrote:
<quoted text> Yeah - "stop" is right. Stop editing my posts to suit your sick notion that heating six-month-old babies is okay.
That's right RR- six-month-old babies in your sick mind " can" be cunning and manipulative...okay?
Better? Not really- you're a moron.
You think playing your little word games makes it any better that you think it's okay to hit six-month-old babies?
It doesn't. You are delusional.
You dare question Koersh?
Huh

Oglesby, TX

#626250 May 25, 2013
psalms 23 wrote:
<quoted text>

Those cases of "justifiable" public executions was their CUSTOM back then and it was their LAWS. And Those who recieved it, i am sure they was Guilty of the Crime committed.... I
Yeah, I'm sure everyone executed was guilty. You are sick, BTK, just sick.
Huh

Oglesby, TX

#626251 May 25, 2013
MisterCharrington wrote:
<quoted text>
I believe the EVIDENCE!
I am related to a chimp/bonobo who is in turn related to all `lower` forms of life. My second chromosome is contains the extra chromosome posessed by chimpanzees.
55% of your DNA ia banana.
60% is insect
75% reptile
40% bacteria
god did not do it you are a product of natural selection and 3.9 billion years of time.
This is supported by every evolutionary discovery to date, faith is not required.
Gravity is just a theory. Intelligent falling is what really happens. When those people leapt from the World Trade Center because religion coerced people to fly planes into buildings, Christian angels gleefully thrust them to the ground at 9.8 meters per second, squared, minus any velocity loss from friction. Those angels love the sound of bodies hitting concrete. They are Christian, after all. Suffering. It's in the book!
Huh

Oglesby, TX

#626252 May 25, 2013
MisterCharrington wrote:
<quoted text>
presumably you`re using the term "work" loosely...
Most employers consider spending five hours of their time defending their ego-driven Koresh on the Internet as a very productive use of their time. In fact, most employee manuals encourage the practice.
Huh

Oglesby, TX

#626253 May 25, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
By your own words, you think it's ok to hit a 6 month old, too.
Asking as it meets your criteria.
Plain and simple.
Oh, Koresh, I now hope there is a Hell. Hey, you've turned me into a fake Cjristian, just like you, baby beater.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 2 min Liamm 659,059
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 9 min Into The Night 71,248
Domestic abuse and narcissist 39 min butterfly101664 1
Play "end of the word" part 2 (Dec '15) 46 min Poppyann 3,060
Bush is a hero (Sep '07) 49 min Voyeur 183,473
News Reason to cringe: Female voters react to Trump 50 min Your Ex 328
Is it common for husbands and wives to spank ea... (Mar '13) 1 hr jane 6
Should Black People Forgive White People for Sl... (Jun '07) 3 hr eddy4294 5,105
Poll Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 5 hr Blink 283,057
More from around the web