Prove there's a god.

RiversideRedneck

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#625801 May 22, 2013
OCB wrote:
<quoted text>Your god doesn't care about what YOU believe.
Your god cares only about what HE believes.
And per YOUR bible:
Exodus 22:18
King James Version (KJV)
18 Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live.
I doubt your god would appreciate you contradicting him, RR......
Oh GAWD, OCB.

I'm going to ask you again and I'm only going to ask you again one more time. If you refuse to do a little research and get some answers, then all future posts of your "kill the witches" crap will be ignored. Here's my question:

Who was that scripture written for and why?

RiversideRedneck

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#625802 May 22, 2013
OCB wrote:
<quoted text>Uh-huh. And just what does religion have to do with, RR?
Do you even read posts? Do you even care about the context of any post? You know the definition of the used an atheist?

In the most simplest terms, theism is the belief that deities are real and atheism is a belief that deities are not real.

Neither one has to do with religion, just deities.

Religion is the worship of said deity.

For a smart lady, you sure ask some dumb questions.

“Darwin was right..of course.”

Since: Jun 11

Evolution is true.....

#625803 May 22, 2013
susanblange wrote:
<quoted text>Adam went to heaven when he died and his name was changed to Satan which means adversary. He went to heaven to preserve his life and be reincarnated to bring Messiah/God into the world. He was previously the son of God and now is the father of God. He's the only one who could bring the Messiah/God into the world. It has always been Gods intent to live on earth, God created evil and is ultimately responsible for it. She also feels the need to be accountable for it. Satan will be tried and executed by God. Isaiah 27:1.
WOW!, and I thought Christian theology was crazy weird. What do you call your brand of wackiness??

RiversideRedneck

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#625805 May 22, 2013
timn17 wrote:
<quoted text>It was a euphemism. A more accurate suggestion would be that christians believe in an "incorporeal manifestation of their ego as omnipotent embodiment of justice in the sky.......buddy" Sky buddy just rolls off the tongue, though.
I understand what it means, but it still holds as an atheists statement, not Christian.

Unless you think you can prove that we think God is a "manifestation of [our] ego".....

RiversideRedneck

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#625806 May 22, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:

What I wrote stands, the biblically ignorant the ***the*** bible is "a mess".
timn17 wrote:
Well, that clears things up.
LMAO! I just burned myself, didn't I?

DamnYouAutocorrect!

RiversideRedneck

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#625807 May 22, 2013
Sharkey wrote:
<quoted text>Christians command their god to change the hearts or kill those who refuse to convert.
All of them are using passive-aggressive, psychological warfare. The strategy is to get the whole human race to mentally twist itself to the point of fighting itself to extinction.
Since their pipe dream of Christians-only world will never come true, now, it's their way - an all-Christian world - or no way - which means all humans die.
Since it's likely to be no-way, then humans are facing certain self-extinction.
Woah, hey, hold the phone.... WHAT?!

...Christians command their god ?!?

...fighting itself to extinction ?!?

...an all-Christian world ?!?

...then humans are facing certain self-extinction?!?

What the dizzle are you talking about?!?

RiversideRedneck

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#625808 May 22, 2013
Sharkey wrote:
<quoted text>What's nuts is that you don't believe that each individual interprets the bible in his own way, even if they go to the same church.
You are naïve. Wake up out of your Christupor!
Uh-huh....

With that 'logic', then if 6 billion people have tasted chocolate then there are 6 billion different flavors of chocolate because everyone will interpret the taste a little differently.

O_o

“Darwin was right..of course.”

Since: Jun 11

Evolution is true.....

#625809 May 22, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
What reality? YOUR reality?
You still haven't shown that Hitler was a Christian is reality.
You still haven't shown that Christians "kill for their God".
You still haven't shown that Adam & Eve were fictional.
You still haven't shown how to prove a memory.
You still haven't shown why you need God's "exact nature" to disprove Him.
You still haven't shown many, MANY things.
Your reality is a fucked up mess.
You write:
"You still haven't shown that Christians "kill for their God"

"conflicts immediately connected with the Reformation of the 1520s to 1540s:
the German Peasants' War (1524–1525)
the battle of Kappel in Switzerland (1531)
the Schmalkaldic War (1546–1547) in the Holy Roman Empire
the Eighty Years' War (1568–1648) in the Low Countries
the French Wars of Religion (1562–1598)
the Thirty Years War (1618–1648), affecting the Holy Roman Empire including Habsburg Austria and Bohemia, France, Denmark and Sweden
the Wars of the Three Kingdoms (1639–1651), affecting England, Scotland and Ireland
Scottish Reformation and Civil Wars
English Reformation and Civil War
Irish Confederate Wars and the Cromwellian conquest of Ireland"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_wars_of...

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#625810 May 22, 2013
Al Garcia wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL! I don't think that It's not that beautiful people are especially smart, so much as that ugly people are especially dumb
Lol. I didn't just make that up though... they've actually researched it.

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#625811 May 22, 2013
waaasssuuup wrote:
<quoted text>
lol - um....thanks i guess:)
no dude, i'm with Jesus when He said "i didn't come to destroy men's lives, but I came to save them":)
You also came to have a massively inflated ego, but it didn't work out in the first sense, and you're doing it backwards in the second sense.
xianity is EVIL

Walton, Canada

#625812 May 22, 2013
thewordofme wrote:
<quoted text>
WOW!, and I thought Christian theology was crazy weird. What do you call your brand of wackiness??
I suspect Susan is on some strange drugs

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#625813 May 22, 2013
thewordofme wrote:
<quoted text>
I think it was last year (2012) it may have been 2011 though, I'll look it up when I get off of Topix later. If you want to look it up meanwhile google: Svante Paabo. I think Wikipedia has an article on him also
Thanks, will google.
xianity is EVIL

Walton, Canada

#625814 May 22, 2013
Sharkey wrote:
<quoted text>Why does it take death to reveal the proof/evidence of this god?
Dead people can't tell us what they see, because they see nothing - they're DEAD. DEAD FOREVER.
Why can't your god prove himself while people are STILL ALIVE, and do so in a way that ALL 7 BILLION people on this earth have seen it happen with their REAL, ACTUAL EYES so we humans can FINALLY STOP FIGHTING over whether one exists or not and this thread will end?
What is so damn difficult for you religionists to comprehend about this???
It's so damn simple!
Believing does NOT = seeing and it NEVER WILL!
Zero will NEVER be = to 1.
With your method of "waiting till death" the dead can NEVER PROVE that "they saw god" because they can NEVER come back alive to say so!
And for you to believe that is to believe in a LIE, and it is an EMPTY threat.
So you have basically firmly decided to delude yourself. You choose to lie to yourself, bullsh!t yourself.
And isn't lying a sin?
Ironic how your own behavior is sending you to the same hell that you religionists condemn other people to, just like the phony lying hypocrites that you are.
Im starting to think that these religitards are mentaly damaged,

no normal person can lay on such idiocy like they do,..

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#625815 May 22, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
I understand what it means, but it still holds as an atheists statement, not Christian.
Unless you think you can prove that we think God is a "manifestation of [our] ego".....
I don't think you think that. But that's what it is, in my humble opinion. Why is it that our gods seem to so closely share our views on such a wide range of subjects? These universe spanning, unfathomable beings that we have thought up, and they all seem to have a profound interest in our genetalia and the use thereof, as well as other assorted oddities that have no business bouncing around in an infinite being's brain. I wonder...

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#625816 May 22, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
RiversideRedneck wrote:
What I wrote stands, the biblically ignorant the ***the*** bible is "a mess".
<quoted text>
LMAO! I just burned myself, didn't I?
DamnYouAutocorrect!
Lol, Yeah, you made it even worse.

RiversideRedneck

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#625817 May 22, 2013
New Age Spiritual Leader wrote:

No it isn't - it's called - believing something different.
No it isn't, I don't care if she believes something different.
You call it hypocrisy, because you can't handle the way she puts the perspective.
Nope I call it for what it is.

Saying that we Christians cherry pick the bible and them cherry picking it herself IS hypocrisy.

So you pull "that card" - IMO, as an intimidation tactic.
No intimidation, just brutal honesty.
Shoot - if you want to talk about unfounded claims, let's use your post to me.
You want me to prove a claim I didn't make, but when I ask you to substantiate you asking me to, you run-away and refuse to answer or blame me for not providing you with an answer.
Sure. Okay.
I didn't 'run away'- I saw no reason to re-re-re-repost to you the same damn thing.

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#625818 May 22, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
It's not necessarily 'how' it's interpreted.
In the case of Leviticus, it's pretty clear. It was written Laws for the Levite people and nothing else. It's recorded in the bible for history, for future generations and cultures to learn from and to not repeat the same 'evil ways' they did.
It's not pretty clear. Nothing in the bible is pretty clear. That's why you guys can't even agree on anything.

RiversideRedneck

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#625819 May 22, 2013
thewordofme wrote:
<quoted text>
You write:
"You still haven't shown that Christians "kill for their God"
"conflicts immediately connected with the Reformation of the 1520s to 1540s:
the German Peasants' War (1524–1525)
the battle of Kappel in Switzerland (1531)
the Schmalkaldic War (1546–1547) in the Holy Roman Empire
the Eighty Years' War (1568–1648) in the Low Countries
the French Wars of Religion (1562–1598)
the Thirty Years War (1618–1648), affecting the Holy Roman Empire including Habsburg Austria and Bohemia, France, Denmark and Sweden
the Wars of the Three Kingdoms (1639–1651), affecting England, Scotland and Ireland
Scottish Reformation and Civil Wars
English Reformation and Civil War
Irish Confederate Wars and the Cromwellian conquest of Ireland"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_wars_of...
OMG dude, really? The 1520's?

LMMFAO!

Can't find anything a teensy bit more current?

No? I know you did a google search, probably "Christians kill for their god" or some crazy shit.

Imagine that.

“Darwin was right..of course.”

Since: Jun 11

Evolution is true.....

#625820 May 22, 2013
psalms 23 wrote:
In 2008 Richard E. Green et al. from Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany published the full sequence of Neanderthal mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) and suggested "Neanderthals had a long-term effective population size smaller than that of modern humans."[71] Writing in Nature about Green et al.'s findings, James Morgan asserted the mtDNA sequence contained clues that Neanderthals lived in "small and isolated populations, and probably did not interbreed with their human neighbours."[72][73]
In the same publication, it was disclosed by Svante Pääbo that in the previous work at the Max Planck Institute that "Contamination was indeed an issue," and they eventually realized that 11% of their sample was modern human DNA.[74][75] Since then, more of the preparation work has been done in clean areas and 4-base pair 'tags' have been added to the DNA as soon as it is extracted so the Neanderthal DNA can be identified.
With 3 billion nucleotides sequenced, analysis of about &#8531; showed no sign of admixture between modern humans and Neanderthals, according to Pääbo. This concurred with the work of Noonan from two years earlier. The variant of microcephalin common outside Africa, which was suggested to be of Neanderthal origin and responsible for rapid brain growth in humans, was not found in Neanderthals. Nor was the MAPT variant, a very old variant found primarily in Europeans.[74]
However, an analysis of a first draft of the Neanderthal genome by the same team released in May 2010 indicates interbreeding may have occurred.[13][14] "Those of us who live outside Africa carry a little Neanderthal DNA in us," said Pääbo, who led the study. "The proportion of Neanderthal-inherited genetic material is about 1 to 4 percent. It is a small but very real proportion of ancestry in non-Africans today," says Dr. David Reich of Harvard Medical School, who worked on the study. This research compared the genome of the Neanderthals to five modern humans from China, France, sub-Saharan Africa, and Papua New Guinea. The finding is that about 1 to 4 percent of the genes of the non-Africans came from Neanderthals, compared to the baseline defined by the two Africans.[13]
This indicates a gene flow from Neanderthals to modern humans, i.e., interbreeding between the two populations. Since the three non-African genomes show a similar proportion of Neanderthal sequences, the interbreeding must have occurred early in the migration of modern humans out of Africa, perhaps in the Middle East. No evidence for gene flow in the direction from modern humans to Neanderthals was found. Gene flow from modern humans to Neanderthals would not be expected if contact occurred between a small colonizing population of modern humans and a much larger resident population of Neanderthals. A very limited amount of interbreeding could explain the findings, if it occurred early enough in the colonization process.[13]
While interbreeding is viewed as the most parsimonious interpretation of the genetic discoveries, the authors point out they cannot conclusively rule out an alternative scenario, in which the source population of non-African modern humans was already more closely related to Neanderthals than other Africans were, due to ancient genetic divisions within Africa.[13]
Among the genes shown to differ between present-day humans and Neanderthals were RPTN, SPAG17, CAN15, TTF1 and PCD16.[13]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neanderthal
You know this means that the connection to other Homo species is made. If we were a special creation of God we would not be carrying the genes/blood of, and able to interbreed with non-human Neanderthals. We came out of Africa and are the hominids that won.

Our ancestors are those of the Homo genus; Homo-heidelbergensis, Homo-erectus, Homo-habilis, Homo-rhodesiensis, Etc.

RiversideRedneck

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#625821 May 22, 2013
timn17 wrote:
<quoted text>Lol. I didn't just make that up though... they've actually researched it.
Top 10 smartest people in the world.
(They're gorgeous)

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mobileweb/2012/...

http://www.catalogs.com/info/bestof/top-10-sm...

HA HA HA !!!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
JakeDover34 Add me on snap!! 5 min Jakedover34 1
Jehovah's Witnesses are true disciple of Jesus ... (Mar '07) 41 min Student 46,264
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing 1 hr old_moose 15,223
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 2 hr Michael 683,541
O.J. Simpson is about to be a free man once again. 4 hr Doctor REALITY 5
Dan Gilbert: Get off your arrogant (BLEEP!) B4 ... 4 hr Awesome Facts 5
Venting Against FAKE Americans 4 hr Awesome Facts 2
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 6 hr Born Again Past JW 619,683
More from around the web