Prove there's a god.

“Is that all you've got?”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#624704 May 18, 2013
karl44 wrote:
<quoted text>
You are a hate troll.
answer other posts.
or
GFY
lol

Like I consider any of that an insult?!!!

Is GFY all you got?

“I speak my mind”

Since: Sep 10

It hurts to bite my tongue

#624705 May 18, 2013
Huh wrote:
<quoted text>Look back. You'll see how this comment vies for stupidity supremacy with your others.
hmmm...that was just rude and uncalled for.

“Is that all you've got?”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#624706 May 18, 2013
timn17 wrote:
<quoted text>It can theoretically work on anyone. Being a critical thinker does not preclude one from experiencing it. I would assume that positive placebo like effects resulting from belief/faith are out of the question for the "critical thinker," but certainly not the traditional placebo effect seen in medical trials/research studies, etc.
Like I said, you have to "believe", to *know*, not suspect, or hope or wish. "Your" type of critical thinking is full of doubt; there is no power in doubt.

“Is that all you've got?”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#624707 May 18, 2013
lightbeamrider wrote:
<quoted text> I'll think on it and get back to you. Actually i was paraphrasing one of the Marx Brothers in Duck Soup. In case you didn't know. Another example below.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =mY47JN05jhcXX
Wow, you expected me to clue in to something that chronologically obscure an entertainment medium?

“Is that all you've got?”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#624709 May 18, 2013
xianity is EVIL wrote:
<quoted text>
you think?
now thats an oxymoron!
when you die youll be DEAD,know what that means?go talk to some dead people and see what they have to say
I would have thought you would be able to recognize sarcasm by now.

“Is that all you've got?”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#624711 May 18, 2013
_Jesus is Lord_ wrote:
<quoted text>Could you explain to us how you could possibly be homogeneous group unless you are saying that there is one mind that you feed off of?
Yep, even bees know when it's time to ditch a hive-mind that's fkd.

...snerk...
xianity is EVIL

Walton, Canada

#624713 May 18, 2013
_Jesus is Lord_ wrote:
<quoted text>Respectfully, your approach is simply one where you point to horse poop and then argue that the cow standing next to it is a horse. Apologies, but it seems as though you do not know what a transistional fossil is or would need to be. As for me, there is only one transistional fossil that must be found and that is the alleged one that links man to another species.
Transitional fossil
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A transitional fossil is any fossilized remains of a life form that exhibits traits common to both an ancestral group and its derived descendant group. This is especially important where the descendant group is sharply differentiated by gross anatomy and mode of living from the ancestral group. These fossils serve as a reminder that taxonomic divisions are human constructs that have been imposed in hindsight on a continuum of variation. Because of the incompleteness of the fossil record, there is usually no way to know exactly how close a transitional fossil is to the point of divergence. Therefore, transitional fossils cannot be assumed to be direct ancestors of more recent groups, though they are frequently used as models for such ancestors.
However, it is almost impossible to be sure that any form represented in the fossil record is a direct ancestor of any other.
it would help. if you read the COMPLETE site and not just cherry pick parts of it,

Limitations of the fossil record [edit]

Further information: Fossils
Not every transitional form appears in the fossil record, because the fossil record is not complete. Organisms are only rarely preserved as fossils in the best of circumstances, and only a fraction of such fossils have been discovered. Paleontologist Donald Prothero noted that this is illustrated by the fact that the number of species known through the fossil record was less than 5% of the number of known living species, suggesting that the number of species known through fossils must be far less than 1% of all the species that have ever lived.[38]
Because of the specialized and rare circumstances required for a biological structure to fossilize, only a very small percentage of all life-forms that have ever existed can be expected to be represented in discoveries, and each discovery represents only a snapshot of the process of evolution. The transition itself can only be illustrated and corroborated by transitional fossils, which will never demonstrate an exact half-way point between clearly divergent forms.[39]
The fossil record is very uneven and, with few exceptions, is heavily slanted toward organisms with hard parts, leaving most groups of soft-bodied organisms with little to no fossil record.[38] The groups considered to have a good fossil record, including a number of transitional fossils between traditional groups, are the vertebrates, the echinoderms, the brachiopods and some groups of arthropods.[40]
xianity is EVIL

Walton, Canada

#624714 May 18, 2013
psalms 23 wrote:
<quoted text>
Again, oh brightless one. You have lived in your fantasy world for so long that you actualy believe you have a "case" against God?
And you get that concept from where?
That in itself, realy shows who is the stupid one..lol
projection

and
ad hominem

can you do any worse?
xianity is EVIL

Walton, Canada

#624715 May 18, 2013
nanoanomaly wrote:
<quoted text>I would have thought you would be able to recognize sarcasm by now.
I dont care what you think,you lying cu*t

“Is that all you've got?”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#624716 May 18, 2013
xianity is EVIL wrote:
<quoted text>
I dont care what you think,you lying cu*t
Yes, you do, otherwise you wouldn't be so hateful.

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#624717 May 18, 2013
nanoanomaly wrote:
<quoted text>Like I said, you have to "believe", to *know*, not suspect, or hope or wish. "Your" type of critical thinking is full of doubt; there is no power in doubt.
Einstein doubted Newton. Tesla doubted Edison. There is a lot more power in doubt than blind acceptance of what someone says, especially if you do that just to be popular.

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#624718 May 18, 2013
_Jesus is Lord_ wrote:
<quoted text>Respectfully, your approach is simply one where you point to horse poop and then argue that the cow standing next to it is a horse. Apologies, but it seems as though you do not know what a transistional fossil is or would need to be. As for me, there is only one transistional fossil that must be found and that is the alleged one that links man to another species.
Transitional fossil
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A transitional fossil is any fossilized remains of a life form that exhibits traits common to both an ancestral group and its derived descendant group. This is especially important where the descendant group is sharply differentiated by gross anatomy and mode of living from the ancestral group. These fossils serve as a reminder that taxonomic divisions are human constructs that have been imposed in hindsight on a continuum of variation. Because of the incompleteness of the fossil record, there is usually no way to know exactly how close a transitional fossil is to the point of divergence. Therefore, transitional fossils cannot be assumed to be direct ancestors of more recent groups, though they are frequently used as models for such ancestors.
However, it is almost impossible to be sure that any form represented in the fossil record is a direct ancestor of any other.
Wikipedia is wrong sometimes, because that is not what a transitional form is. You are a transitional form, for example.

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#624719 May 18, 2013
Aura Mytha wrote:
<quoted text> It's just denial of anything that shows his philosophy is in error.
I understand it now , the creationist has to believe genesis is true.
If it is not true then the whole bible is based on lies, hence the denial of anything that conflicts with their fantasy version of reality. There can't be transitional animals , that shows evolution and throws a monkey wrench in creationism.
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text> It's actually quite simple, we have this simple and real "gotcha," by asking for evidence of their god they must face their delusion for what it is. They lash out by attempting to find one "gotcha" to use against us, but failing to do that they try to trip you up with utter nonsense that they think is actually intelligent. The fun thing is that it betrays how stupid they are.
Yep. Well said, both of you. I'm sure you've both heard of the term confirmation bias...

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#624720 May 18, 2013
psalms 23 wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL, of course timmy, of course.. Anything or anyone that disagrees with evolution, and has proven your fantasy of evolution to be just that, is either disliked or ignorant. Ohhh, and the other excuse is, well they are not excepted in the "main stream" of science..
What are you talking about? I said that the term itself (the 'god particle') is disliked. I did not say that the people who use it are disliked. And why are you talking about evolution?

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#624721 May 18, 2013
nanoanomaly wrote:
<quoted text>You got the "homo-" part right.
Clever!

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

#624722 May 18, 2013
nanoanomaly wrote:
<quoted text>Like I said, you have to "believe", to *know*, not suspect, or hope or wish. "Your" type of critical thinking is full of doubt; there is no power in doubt.
You seem quite confused.

Critical thinking is necessarily full of doubt. It does not work without it. The power to figure out what is true, and what is not true, is dependent on the ability to doubt. We are also dependent on working methodologies, those that have been proven to make accurate predictions. We place trust in methodologies, but we never place so much trust in a methodology that we disregard errors in the process as having anything to do with the methodology. Even our ways of knowing must occasionally be doubted, tested, and affirmed, or rejected.

Knowing that there are some things we can't know, won't know, or don't know, is extremely important. Acknowledgement of ignorance is essential. Doubt is an actual virtue, whereas faith is a mistake.

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#624724 May 18, 2013
timn17 wrote:
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
Yep. Well said, both of you. I'm sure you've both heard of the term confirmation bias...
Yep, and people are starting to see through this effect of their delusion. It is only a matter of time when religious stupidstitions are finally discarded for reality and logic.

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#624725 May 18, 2013
psalms 23 wrote:
<quoted text>
You are a product of the brainwashed 21st century of idots , who cleverly "try" to use the "fantasy" of evolution as an excuse for your ignorance. Smart people see that!
http://biop.ox.ac.uk/www/mol_of_life/how_are_...
Here is just one thing, that debunks your stupid fantasy! How could this be done "naturaly" without there first being an intelligent designer to give that INFORMATION?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Tree_of_lif...
And here is a picture, which BTW anybody with a high school education, and somewhat artistic skills could draw a tree, and conviently place each item at the beginning and ends of it's branches to support their agenda and concepts. It'doesnt take a scientist to do that, but a deluted person such as Darwin and those of evolution, who has designed evolution to keep you ignorant of the Creator.
Wow, your link debunked the whole TOE in just 3 paragraphs. Talk about efficiency!

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#624726 May 18, 2013
nanoanomaly wrote:
<quoted text>Like I said, you have to "believe", to *know*, not suspect, or hope or wish. "Your" type of critical thinking is full of doubt; there is no power in doubt.
It doesn't matter. If a Dr. tells a "critical thinker" that the sugar pill they are taking is a proven medication, then the placebo effect may just come into play.

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#624727 May 18, 2013
_Jesus is Lord_ wrote:
<quoted text>Could you explain to us how you could possibly be homogeneous group unless you are saying that there is one mind that you feed off of?
The point of my post was that we are not a homogeneous group..

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 4 min Bongo 69,969
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 7 min Just Think 658,349
Moms having sex with their sons (Aug '12) 14 min Jersey97boy 86
Bush is a hero (Sep '07) 14 min bad bob 183,437
Whose fault was it that O.J. Simpson beat murde... (Mar '16) 16 min Garden Girl 22
Should Black People Forgive White People for Sl... (Jun '07) 23 min gundee123 4,917
Poll Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 1 hr Brian_G 282,832
More from around the web