Prove there's a god.

Since: Apr 13

Scappoose, Oregon USA

#624696 May 18, 2013
I think it would be best if you just ask him in person whether he exists when you see Him after you die.

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#624697 May 18, 2013
psalms 23 wrote:
<quoted text>
Here is a string of 1s and 0s. Can you tell by looking at this string whether it “means” anything, or is just a random sets of bits?
101001110011111010011
The number 1370067? Yeah, it's a number still.

010011000110010101110100001000 000111010001101000011001010111 001001100101001000000110001001 100101001000000110110001101001 011001110110100001110100001011 10

Now that is not still just a number at least. So, do you have a point with your little game?

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#624698 May 18, 2013
psalms 23 wrote:
<quoted text>
Again, oh brightless one. You have lived in your fantasy world for so long that you actualy believe you have a "case" against God?
And you get that concept from where?
That in itself, realy shows who is the stupid one..lol
Which god? Zeus? Nope, there is no case against Zeus, why do you deny Zeus? He loves you and doesn't want you to be fed to Cerberus, so why do you deny his love for you?
xianity is EVIL

Walton, Canada

#624699 May 18, 2013
Jenji wrote:
I think it would be best if you just ask him in person whether he exists when you see Him after you die.
you think?

now thats an oxymoron!

when you die youll be DEAD,know what that means?go talk to some dead people and see what they have to say

“I speak my mind”

Since: Sep 10

It hurts to bite my tongue

#624700 May 18, 2013
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Welcome back to our little piece of heaven.
We have been angels while you were gone.
Well...that's good to hear...I'm sure you have :)

“I speak my mind”

Since: Sep 10

It hurts to bite my tongue

#624701 May 18, 2013
psalms 23 wrote:
<quoted text>
Good to see you back! Hope all is well and good with ya...
All is wonderful...thank you! it's baseball season and I'm busy, busy running with the son from game to game...so I get on here and read what everyone's saying...but I'm usually to tired to get involved in the conversation...I can't not respond when asked a question :)

“Is that all you've got?”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#624702 May 18, 2013
timn17 wrote:
<quoted text>You've "figured us out?" We are a homogeneous group? How many of us have told you that there is absolutely no possibility of a god? Not me, that's for sure. You do enjoy straw men.
You got the "homo-" part right.
helloman23

UK

#624703 May 18, 2013
yes there is the lord

“Is that all you've got?”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#624704 May 18, 2013
karl44 wrote:
<quoted text>
You are a hate troll.
answer other posts.
or
GFY
lol

Like I consider any of that an insult?!!!

Is GFY all you got?

“I speak my mind”

Since: Sep 10

It hurts to bite my tongue

#624705 May 18, 2013
Huh wrote:
<quoted text>Look back. You'll see how this comment vies for stupidity supremacy with your others.
hmmm...that was just rude and uncalled for.

“Is that all you've got?”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#624706 May 18, 2013
timn17 wrote:
<quoted text>It can theoretically work on anyone. Being a critical thinker does not preclude one from experiencing it. I would assume that positive placebo like effects resulting from belief/faith are out of the question for the "critical thinker," but certainly not the traditional placebo effect seen in medical trials/research studies, etc.
Like I said, you have to "believe", to *know*, not suspect, or hope or wish. "Your" type of critical thinking is full of doubt; there is no power in doubt.

“Is that all you've got?”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#624707 May 18, 2013
lightbeamrider wrote:
<quoted text> I'll think on it and get back to you. Actually i was paraphrasing one of the Marx Brothers in Duck Soup. In case you didn't know. Another example below.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =mY47JN05jhcXX
Wow, you expected me to clue in to something that chronologically obscure an entertainment medium?

“Is that all you've got?”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#624709 May 18, 2013
xianity is EVIL wrote:
<quoted text>
you think?
now thats an oxymoron!
when you die youll be DEAD,know what that means?go talk to some dead people and see what they have to say
I would have thought you would be able to recognize sarcasm by now.

“Is that all you've got?”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#624711 May 18, 2013
_Jesus is Lord_ wrote:
<quoted text>Could you explain to us how you could possibly be homogeneous group unless you are saying that there is one mind that you feed off of?
Yep, even bees know when it's time to ditch a hive-mind that's fkd.

...snerk...
xianity is EVIL

Walton, Canada

#624713 May 18, 2013
_Jesus is Lord_ wrote:
<quoted text>Respectfully, your approach is simply one where you point to horse poop and then argue that the cow standing next to it is a horse. Apologies, but it seems as though you do not know what a transistional fossil is or would need to be. As for me, there is only one transistional fossil that must be found and that is the alleged one that links man to another species.
Transitional fossil
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A transitional fossil is any fossilized remains of a life form that exhibits traits common to both an ancestral group and its derived descendant group. This is especially important where the descendant group is sharply differentiated by gross anatomy and mode of living from the ancestral group. These fossils serve as a reminder that taxonomic divisions are human constructs that have been imposed in hindsight on a continuum of variation. Because of the incompleteness of the fossil record, there is usually no way to know exactly how close a transitional fossil is to the point of divergence. Therefore, transitional fossils cannot be assumed to be direct ancestors of more recent groups, though they are frequently used as models for such ancestors.
However, it is almost impossible to be sure that any form represented in the fossil record is a direct ancestor of any other.
it would help. if you read the COMPLETE site and not just cherry pick parts of it,

Limitations of the fossil record [edit]

Further information: Fossils
Not every transitional form appears in the fossil record, because the fossil record is not complete. Organisms are only rarely preserved as fossils in the best of circumstances, and only a fraction of such fossils have been discovered. Paleontologist Donald Prothero noted that this is illustrated by the fact that the number of species known through the fossil record was less than 5% of the number of known living species, suggesting that the number of species known through fossils must be far less than 1% of all the species that have ever lived.[38]
Because of the specialized and rare circumstances required for a biological structure to fossilize, only a very small percentage of all life-forms that have ever existed can be expected to be represented in discoveries, and each discovery represents only a snapshot of the process of evolution. The transition itself can only be illustrated and corroborated by transitional fossils, which will never demonstrate an exact half-way point between clearly divergent forms.[39]
The fossil record is very uneven and, with few exceptions, is heavily slanted toward organisms with hard parts, leaving most groups of soft-bodied organisms with little to no fossil record.[38] The groups considered to have a good fossil record, including a number of transitional fossils between traditional groups, are the vertebrates, the echinoderms, the brachiopods and some groups of arthropods.[40]
xianity is EVIL

Walton, Canada

#624714 May 18, 2013
psalms 23 wrote:
<quoted text>
Again, oh brightless one. You have lived in your fantasy world for so long that you actualy believe you have a "case" against God?
And you get that concept from where?
That in itself, realy shows who is the stupid one..lol
projection

and
ad hominem

can you do any worse?
xianity is EVIL

Walton, Canada

#624715 May 18, 2013
nanoanomaly wrote:
<quoted text>I would have thought you would be able to recognize sarcasm by now.
I dont care what you think,you lying cu*t

“Is that all you've got?”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#624716 May 18, 2013
xianity is EVIL wrote:
<quoted text>
I dont care what you think,you lying cu*t
Yes, you do, otherwise you wouldn't be so hateful.

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#624717 May 18, 2013
nanoanomaly wrote:
<quoted text>Like I said, you have to "believe", to *know*, not suspect, or hope or wish. "Your" type of critical thinking is full of doubt; there is no power in doubt.
Einstein doubted Newton. Tesla doubted Edison. There is a lot more power in doubt than blind acceptance of what someone says, especially if you do that just to be popular.

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#624718 May 18, 2013
_Jesus is Lord_ wrote:
<quoted text>Respectfully, your approach is simply one where you point to horse poop and then argue that the cow standing next to it is a horse. Apologies, but it seems as though you do not know what a transistional fossil is or would need to be. As for me, there is only one transistional fossil that must be found and that is the alleged one that links man to another species.
Transitional fossil
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A transitional fossil is any fossilized remains of a life form that exhibits traits common to both an ancestral group and its derived descendant group. This is especially important where the descendant group is sharply differentiated by gross anatomy and mode of living from the ancestral group. These fossils serve as a reminder that taxonomic divisions are human constructs that have been imposed in hindsight on a continuum of variation. Because of the incompleteness of the fossil record, there is usually no way to know exactly how close a transitional fossil is to the point of divergence. Therefore, transitional fossils cannot be assumed to be direct ancestors of more recent groups, though they are frequently used as models for such ancestors.
However, it is almost impossible to be sure that any form represented in the fossil record is a direct ancestor of any other.
Wikipedia is wrong sometimes, because that is not what a transitional form is. You are a transitional form, for example.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing (Mar '17) 5 min WiseMan3 45,809
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 31 min Just Think 691,912
*** All Time Favorite Songs *** (Dec '10) 37 min Classic 4,396
__POPE & ISRAEL to SIGN Historic Agreement__ 55 min Dec 2017 News 1
God is REAL - Miracles Happen! (Jun '11) 1 hr Eagle 12 - 6,687
Why are Europeans a race of savages, thieves, a... (Jun '15) 2 hr Exposing Devil Lies 368
"Come on in the house,A.C. We wanna talk to O.J." 9 hr Doctor REALITY 1
More from around the web