Prove there's a god.

Catcher1

Since: Sep 10

Fremont, CA

#624573 May 17, 2013
nanoanomaly wrote:
<quoted text>The kilt isn't worn to "hide" a Scotsman's true sex and you know it.
Whaddayaknow?

It's nano van Winkle.

Welcome back.

RiversideRedneck

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#624574 May 17, 2013
MisterCharrington wrote:
<quoted text>
lmao there`s just no downside for god with apologists like you out there.
if someone goes to hell for obeying a mistranslated passage(like killing a witch for example) that`s a bit like rough justice isn`t it?
The most powerful entity in the universe couldn`t guarantee an accurate translation of his instructions for living a life as one of his gang?..too bad so sad.
Alright, then. We'll use you beloved KJV version.

Where does the KJV bible instruct ***me*** to kill witches?

RiversideRedneck

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#624576 May 17, 2013
MisterCharrington wrote:
<quoted text>
The word in question was "they" not "he".
http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TOCO8TE...
Just admit you`re wrong and we`ll all believe you have a job...deal?
No shit, ole chap. That quote was from OCB's link about the use of 'they' & 'he', that's why the author wrote those two sentences using 'he' in lieu of 'they'.

"They are a witch" is not a proper sentence.

"They are witches" is.

"She is a witch" is.

RiversideRedneck

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#624577 May 17, 2013
macumazahn wrote:
<quoted text>So.
It's currently unreliable.
Absolutely not. But "reading it cover to cover", what many of you claim to have done, is not sufficient to say you understand it.

“Is that all you've got?”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#624579 May 17, 2013
MisterCharrington wrote:
<quoted text>
The word in question was "they" not "he".
http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TOCO8TE...
Just admit you`re wrong and we`ll all believe you have a job...deal?
"Seeing" isn't always "believing", though, is it? There will always be people who refuse to believe what they see, but, instead, see what they believe. I suspect you are the latter of the two.

Since: May 11

Nottingham, UK

#624580 May 17, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
No shit, ole chap. That quote was from OCB's link about the use of 'they' & 'he', that's why the author wrote those two sentences using 'he' in lieu of 'they'.
"They are a witch" is not a proper sentence.
"They are witches" is.
"She is a witch" is.
"They are a witch" is certainly a sentence.

for example:

"If a person is involved in the practice of witchcraft then we may draw the following inference. They are a witch."

English appears to be something else on the list of things you haven`t quite mastered...and we all know by now it`s a non exhaustive list.
Huh

Fort Worth, TX

#624581 May 17, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Great. Then you're a non- believer.
Feel better?
I never felt not better, liar.

OCB

“What a GLORIOUS day!!!”

Since: Apr 12

Orlando but NYC born & raised

#624582 May 17, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
"No- I will NOT explain it"
Then remain ignorant.
YOU are the one who is ignorant.

The bible clearly states that "thou shalt not suffer a witch to live".

The message there is crystal clear.

But since you seem to think that there is NO clear meaning in ANY of the scriptures, just what do you believe in?

You are an IDIOT, RR- and while I haven't told you the following lately, it's as true as when I first told you and it was totally true then, and it's totally true now:

YOU ARE NOT A CHRISTIAN.
Huh

Fort Worth, TX

#624583 May 17, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Figure of speech. Like yer decoder ring.
Hey, you finally learned something. Wow.
Huh

Fort Worth, TX

#624584 May 17, 2013
nanoanomaly wrote:
<quoted text>"Seeing" isn't always "believing", though, is it? There will always be people who refuse to believe what they see, but, instead, see what they believe. I suspect you are the latter of the two.
You mean like Christians who think they were touched by their culturally-conditioned god, right?

Catcher1

Since: Sep 10

Fremont, CA

#624585 May 17, 2013
nanoanomaly wrote:
<quoted text>"Seeing" isn't always "believing", though, is it? There will always be people who refuse to believe what they see, but, instead, see what they believe. I suspect you are the latter of the two.
You describe Christians here.

Faith allows for blindness to evidence.

“The King of R&R”

Since: Dec 07

Location hidden

#624586 May 17, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Uh-huh...
Cuz atheists don't stand behind their decisions?
Show me evidence of your deity's Supernatural Essence. I will then "bow" to it.
Huh

Fort Worth, TX

#624587 May 17, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
I just wrote: You staunchly defend certain parts of it and repel and protest others. Atheists do that quote often.
And you proved my point by completely ignoring my post and started rambling on about termites & cockroaches.
I have ignored nothing. It is you who is unwilling to delineate exactly which translation of the many unholy bibles is the right one. I addressed your post directly by illustrating the lunacy of your bible and the ark story. Mocking your unholy screed is not defending it. Illustrating that adherents pick and choose which passages to follow is not defending it. Showing how each of you clowns has a different decoder ring is not supporting or defending it. If there were an omnipotent deity your mess would not be so convoluted and indefensible. I defend none of the nonsense and protest all of it. There is nothing of redeeming quality in the bible. Even the Sermon on the Mount is ridiculous trash. It certainly is not of any divine revelation and contains so much bad advice to be criminal. It is a mess of "bottled wisdom" and not wise at all. So many of the passages contradict, ergo:

Matthew 5:16

Let your light so shine before men, that they may see your good works, and glorify your Father which is in heaven.

vs.

Matthew 6:1

Take heed that ye do not your alms before men, to be seen of them: otherwise ye have no reward of your Father which is in heaven.

I'm sure your decoder ring can excuse that away. There are so many more, though.

You can't explain the nature of your god. You can't divulge which of the unholy bibles you consider the correct one. You can't explain the ridiculous stories that your unholy book contains. I get it. Even pretzel logic won't help you.

“Is that all you've got?”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#624588 May 17, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
You still have no examples for anything that is actually "normal" about living organisms. Try harder, one day you may just see reality.
The most intentionally abnormal creature on Earth is man. Even chemically confused bulls don't try to tear the unborn calves from the wombs of the cows they inseminated. There are many instances of abnormal behavior in animals that scientists try to cure instead of excusing it as "enculturization" like they do with humans. We know that same-sex nest sharing among adult birds is counter-intuitive to that specie's continued survival and that it is not normal.

Too bad you try so hard to excuse your own aberrant behavior within a twisted sense of reality. Keep twisting, maybe you'll torque something back into its correct position.

“Is that all you've got?”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#624589 May 17, 2013
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
You describe Christians here.
Faith allows for blindness to evidence.
I believe that there is power "in" belief.

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm...

Unless you believe there can be no faith, and vice verse. Belief can produce real results in the real world. Deny it all you want.

“Is that all you've got?”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#624590 May 17, 2013
Huh wrote:
<quoted text>You mean like Christians who think they were touched by their culturally-conditioned god, right?
I believe that some people are wired to use their "belief" in a positive way with real, physical manifestation of "the" belief.

“Is that all you've got?”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#624591 May 17, 2013
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Whaddayaknow?
It's nano van Winkle.
Welcome back.
q:
Huh

Fort Worth, TX

#624592 May 17, 2013
OCB wrote:
<quoted text>YOU are the one who is ignorant.
The bible clearly states that "thou shalt not suffer a witch to live".
The message there is crystal clear.
But since you seem to think that there is NO clear meaning in ANY of the scriptures, just what do you believe in?
You are an IDIOT, RR- and while I haven't told you the following lately, it's as true as when I first told you and it was totally true then, and it's totally true now:
YOU ARE NOT A CHRISTIAN.
Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live. KJV

Sorcerers must not be allowed to live. Knox Bible

You will not let a witch live. Lexam Bible

Don’t let a sorceress live. The Message

Never let a witch live. Names of God Bible

You shall not allow a sorceress to live. New American Standard

Thou shalt not allow a mekhashefah (witch, sorceress) to live. Orthodox Jewish Bible

You shall not permit a sorceress to live. Revised Standard Version (Tell me that's not a funny name)

Thou shalt not suffer witches to live. Wycliffe Bible

A witch thou dost not keep alive. Young's Literal Translation

Don’t allow a female sorcerer to live. Common English Bible

Whoever has sexual relations with an animal must be put to death. Complete Jewish Bible.(Ain't that a departure?)

Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live. Darby Translation

Put to death any woman who does evil magic. Expanded Bible

Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live. 1599 Geneva Bible

Never let a witch live. God's word translation

Put to death any woman who practices magic. Good News Translation (Good News? Bwahahaha)

You must not allow a sorceress to live. Holman Christian Standard

Hmm, those are only the tip of the iceberg. Except for the beastiality-obsessed Jews, it seems pretty clear that these evil twits want you to kill women on speculation.

Monty Python
Witch Scene Script

Cast:
(V) Sir Vladimir
(King) King is Arthur, King of the Britains!
(W)'Witch' woman
(P1,P2,P3) Peasants one, two and three

Peasants: We have found a witch! Burn her burn her!

Peasant 1: We have found a witch, may we burn her?
(cheers)
Vladimir: How do you known she is a witch?
P2: She looks like one!
V: Bring her forward

Woman: I'm not a witch! I'm not a witch!
V: ehh... but you are dressed like one.
W: They dressed me up like this!
All: naah no we didn't... no.
W: And this isn't my nose, it's a false one.
(V lifts up carrot)
V: Well?
P1: Well we did do the nose
V: The nose?
P1:...And the hat, but she is a witch!
(all: yeah, burn her burn her!)
V: Did you dress her up like this?
P1: No!(no no... no) Yes.(yes yeah) a bit (a bit bit a bit) But she has got a wart!
(P3 points at wart)
V: What makes you think she is a witch?
P2: Well, she turned me into a newt!
V: A newt?!

P2: I got better.

P3: Burn her anyway!(burn her burn her burn!)
(king walks in)
V: There are ways of telling whether she is a witch.
P1: Are there? Well then tell us!(tell us)
V: Tell me... what do you do with witches?
P3: Burn'em! Burn them up!(burn burn burn)
V: What do you burn apart from witches?
P1: More witches!

P3: Wood!
V: So, why do witches burn?
(long pause)
P2: Cuz they're made of... wood?
V: Gooood.
(crowd congratulates P2)
V: So, how do we tell if she is made of wood?
P1: Build a bridge out of her!
V: Ahh, but can you not also make bridges out of stone?
P1: Oh yeah...
V: Does wood sink in water?
P1: No
P3: No. It floats!
P1: Let's throw her into the bog!(yeah yeah ya!)
V: What also floats in water?
P1: Bread
P3: Apples
P2: Very small rocks
(V looks annoyed)
P1: Cider
P3: Grape gravy
P1: Cherries
P3: Mud
King: A Duck!
(all look and stare at king)
V: Exactly! So, logically...
P1(thinking): If she ways the same as a duck... she's made of wood!
V: And therefore,
(pause & think)
P3: A witch!(P1: a witch)(P2: a witch)(all: a witch!)
V: We shall use my largest scales.

(push her into scale)
V: Right, remove the stops!
(wait while scales remains still)
All: A witch! burn her burn her!!



Huh

Fort Worth, TX

#624593 May 17, 2013
nanoanomaly wrote:
<quoted text>I believe that some people are wired to use their "belief" in a positive way with real, physical manifestation of "the" belief.
Is that why you go off half-cocked about things you find unpalatable?

“The King of R&R”

Since: Dec 07

Location hidden

#624594 May 17, 2013
The manifestation of "faith" is a mental disorder. Science provides facts. "Faith" is simple heresay - a mental disorder, for which thousands of humans have been persecuted and murdered for centuries.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing (Mar '17) 11 min bonespurscadet 53,135
Is God a "Bully" sometimes? 24 min Peter Ross 28
Why I’m no longer a Christian (Jul '08) 56 min bonespurscadet 446,006
women who don't wear panties at all (May '09) 2 hr HornySarah 2
Who are the most racist people towards inter-ra... 2 hr spotlight on truth 3
exhibitionism (Jul '13) 2 hr HornySarah 10
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 11 hr Phooey 693,483
More from around the web