Prove there's a god.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#624278 May 17, 2013
Huh wrote:
<quoted text>Ergo, you have the morals of a Christian.
Uh-huh...

Cuz atheists don't stand behind their decisions?

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#624279 May 17, 2013
Huh wrote:
<quoted text>You're still quoting Wikipoo's simplification, even though you were shown it was wrong. Why?
It's not wrong. ToE is hinged on the common ancestor guess.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#624280 May 17, 2013
Huh wrote:
<quoted text>The heart is merely a pump and souls are demonstrably false. Whoops.
Really? Then demonstrate that souls are false.

Go.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#624281 May 17, 2013
Huh wrote:
<quoted text>That's perfect. You know what else provides testimonials? Infomercials. Every scam has them, including Christianity, the most immoral scam ever evinced.
Christianity isn't a scam and it isn't immoral.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#624282 May 17, 2013
Huh wrote:
<quoted text>Great. Milk just came out of my nose.
Good, it'll flush out the cocaine.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#624283 May 17, 2013
Huh wrote:
<quoted text>No. Presuppositionalism is not knowledge.
I didn't say that, did I?

You atheists aren't very good at reading skills are you?

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#624284 May 17, 2013
timn17 wrote:
<quoted text>Do you know how irritating it is that you think you can speak for atheists?
That I've figured you morons out?

Ya, that sucks. For you.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#624285 May 17, 2013
timn17 wrote:
<quoted text>I can speak for myself, and RR has been told many times that there is no "atheist bible."
By "get my lego blocks," you mean refer you to the miller urey experiment, right? Reading might help to cure your ignorance.
RR never said there is an atheist bible.

RR said atheist handbook.

Google it, there are many.

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#624286 May 17, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Uh-huh...
Cuz atheists don't stand behind their decisions?
I know it's too much to assume you have evidence of your assertion here.

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#624287 May 17, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
It's not wrong. ToE is hinged on the common ancestor guess.
No it does not.

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#624288 May 17, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Really? Then demonstrate that souls are false.
Go.
There is no evidence suggesting that the undefined thing you call "soul" exists. There, done.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#624289 May 17, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
You did not debate anything, you made a facetious comment and nearly gave yourself a stroke rolling about at your own attempt at humour. To which (if you were capable of reading) I responded to. However seeing as how you so ignorantly seem to ignore much of my post first time round (just so you can have another christian dig) I will repeat it for you in the hope that you have learned to read by now.
Quote
“Anyway give or take a million years of so yes it’s an estimate. An estimate based on fact and accepted by science and most of the church.
But not you, what it like to be a loner of little brain?”
EndQuote
Up to now and like so much else you rabbit on about have not been able to counter that with any evidence but instead rely on your own ignorance.
Uh-huh...

The 13.7 billion year guess is just that - a guess.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#624290 May 17, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
As yet NO ONE has disproved that formula
Oh people have ranted and raved and offered impossible scenarios or magic with no evidence to back up their mythological (or downright lying) claims but that my dear little fool is not proof enough to overturn scientific fact on which the modern world is built.
Just because it shows your own stupidity does not mean that it’s wrong it just means that it shows your stupidity
Uh-huh....

As yet NO ONE has disproved God, either.

Sucks to he you.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#624291 May 17, 2013
Huh wrote:
<quoted text>Because you have intimate knowledge of me. What was it that someone not named Matthew wrote in your immoral book...Judge not? The odds of you idiots not making your immoral tome a cafeteria plan are 0:0.
Biblical ignorance is astounding in you people.

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#624292 May 17, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Uh-huh....
As yet NO ONE has disproved God, either.
Sucks to he you.
Since you have not proven it exists, then it's a lie to claim it does exist.

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#624293 May 17, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Biblical ignorance is astounding in you people.
No, what is astounding is that a book made publicly available, easy to google, and yet you still deny what it says.

“I see quantum effects”

Since: Jan 11

In the macro world.

#624294 May 17, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>Uh-huh...

The 13.7 billion year guess is just that - a guess.
It's closer to 13.74 billion.
Huh

North Richland Hills, TX

#624295 May 17, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Biblical ignorance is astounding in you people.
No, what is astounding is our spin. You made one apt statement earlier, that it is impossible to lump all Christians together. With 40,000 and counting sects and schisms, each of you possesses your own decoder ring that somehow follows your ego and psyche exactly. The nature of your god is your nature, a reflection of your ego, and nothing else. You think you get to claim Biblical ignorance when someone points out a passage in the most unholy, immoral book that disagrees with your personal interpretation. It just makes you look foolish and proves that there is no substance to any religious claims. If there were one true word of one true god, it would not be open to personal interpretation. Start spin in 3..2..1..
Huh

North Richland Hills, TX

#624296 May 17, 2013
I know how pedantic you are. The sixth word in the first sentence is your. Your spin.
Huh

North Richland Hills, TX

#624297 May 17, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Uh-huh....
As yet NO ONE has disproved God, either.
Sucks to he you.
I can disprove your personal god. Please describe the exact nature of this god. I will disprove it.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
selena coleman (Aug '12) 17 min Imetuatatittybar 10
Which is the Oldest Indian Language? Sanskrit V... (Jul '08) 43 min sangili karuppan 7,647
Any females wanna skype? 45 min jblizzz 1
The Christian Atheist debate 55 min Critical Eye 3,983
Makutyiwane e Mmotherwell 1 hr Tobey-black 1
Tamil vs Kannada. Which one is the oldest langu... (Oct '12) 1 hr Anitha 1,870
*** All Time Favorite Songs *** (Dec '10) 2 hr Halle Berry Sister 2,862
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 2 hr marge 603,438
Poll If you're Christain what kind are you? (Oct '07) 2 hr dollarsbill 8,287
Bush is a hero (Sep '07) 10 hr gentlepplpleaser 177,894
More from around the web