“H-o-o-o-o-o-o-ld on thar!”

Since: Sep 08

The Borderland of Sol

#623963 May 15, 2013
OCB wrote:
<quoted text>BTW, I think it's "cute" that you found a BLOG which agrees with YOU.
You ALWAYS cherry-pick to bible to try and get it to conform with what YOU choose to believe.
Doesn't work like that, RR.
Too bad you're not MAN enough to admit that you only believe the parts of the bible which make sense to YOU.
That's the thing with fairy tales- they NEVER make sense.
I might as well cherry-pick "Cinderella" to conform with what is possible and what is not.
Could she have lost a slipper? Sure. Could it have been made out of glass? No.
Could a pumpkin have been turned into a coach? No.
But the POINT is that the entire FAIRY TALE of "Cinderella"- while a beautiful FAIRY TALE- does not make sense.
News flash! Either does the BIBLE- a book of FAIRY TALES.
So you either believe it or you don't- YOU make no sense if you think you can PICK and CHOOSE the parts of the bible you think are literally correct while dismissing the parts of the bible you do NOT think are literally correct.
And according to the bible, the creation WAS 6 LITERAL 24 hour days.
That you find that to be ludicrous- which it most definitely is- does NOT mean the words written mean anything OTHER than 6 LITERAL 24 hour days.
In the original German, it was a fur slipper.

It became glass through a magnificent accident of mistranslation.

(sorry!)

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#623964 May 15, 2013
OCB wrote:
And....true to form- you trying to deny that you said how else would one discipline a 6 month old baby other than by spanking them?
I did it wrote that. You're lying.
You said it, many people commented on it horrified just as I was that anyone would even SUGGEST hitting a 6 month old baby.
YOU said that is the ONLY way a 6 month old baby can be "disciplined"- by being SPANKED.
Now you try to deny it.
I said it was ONE way, not the ONLY way.
I don't have children
Which is why you don't understand.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#623965 May 15, 2013
OCB wrote:
<quoted text>You are such a f*cking liar.
It was ME who said there are other ways to discipline children other than hitting them and you replied with saying that how else would one discipline a 6 month old BABY other than by HITTING them- and that IS what SPANKING is, RR- since a 6 month old baby can't understand what you are saying and can't be reasoned with?
Then that started a discussion about hitting BABIES to begin with- something that is truly monstrous.
"Kids, babies, whatever"??? You see no difference between a 6 month old BABY and a 6 year old CHILD?
And you think that because you spawned children that makes YOU some kind of expert when you make such moronic remarks about "disciplining" 6 month old BABIES???
RR, you are an UNFIT parent- even just trying to justify EVER hitting a BABY- even if you yourself never did- is enough for me to justifiably say that you ARE an unfit parent.
ANYONE who strikes a baby is a BULLY. And that IS what you are- a BULLY.
And FYI, here is the definition of SPANKING:
Definition of SPANK
: to strike especially on the buttocks with the open hand
— spank noun
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/spa...
Now here is the definition of STRIKING:
strike (strk)
v. struck (strk), struck or strick·en (strkn), strik·ing, strikes
v.tr.
1.
a. To hit sharply, as with the hand, the fist, or a weapon.
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/strike
Spanking is STRIKING someone. Spanking is HITTING someone.
So don't think because you use the word "spank" that doesn't mean "hit" or "strike".
It does. So you condone hitting/striking/spanking 6 month old BABIES.
You're SICK.
You're weird. And dishonest.

I've never said that the only way to discipline a child is to spank them. Ever.

It seems that you think discipline=spanking.

O_o

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#623966 May 15, 2013
OCB wrote:
<quoted text>I think it's sickening that you are trying to twist the bible to suit your own agenda.
You believe it is foolish to think what was meant is 6 literal days, but that IS what was meant so maybe you shouldn't have such faith in the bible or in the god of the bible.
"The Necessity for Believing in Six Literal Days
If people use Scripture to try to justify that the days of creation are long periods of time, they usually quote passages such as 2 Peter 3:8,“... one day is with the Lord as a thousand years ...“. Because of this, they think the days could be a thousand years, or perhaps even millions of years. However, if you look at the rest of the verse, it says,“... and a thousand years as one day“. This cancels out their argument! The context of this passage concerns the Second Coming of the Lord Jesus Christ. This particular verse is telling people that with God, waiting a day is like waiting a thousand years, and waiting a thousand years is like waiting a day because God is outside of time—He is not limited by natural processes and time. This has absolutely nothing to do with defining the days of creation. Besides, the word “day” already exists and has been defined, which is why in 2 Peter it can be compared to a thousand years. There is no reference in this passage to the days of creation."
If you think about it, an infinite Creator God could have created everything in no time. Why, then, did He take as long as six days? The answer is given in Exodus 20:11. Here we find that God tells us that He deliberately took six days and rested for one as a pattern for man—this is where the seven-day week comes from. The seven-day week has no basis for existing except from Scripture. If one believes that the days of creation are long periods of time, then the week becomes meaningless.
The Bible tells us that Adam was created on the sixth day. If he lived through day six and day seven, and then died when he was 930 years old, and if each of these days was a thousand or a million years, you have major problems! On the fourth day of creation (Genesis 1:14-19), we are given the comparison of day to night, and days to years. If the word “day” doesn’t mean an ordinary day, then the comparison of day to night and day to years becomes meaningless.
Were the days 24 hours? Most definitely!“Let God be true, but every man a liar”(Romans 3:4)."
http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/cm/v...
Sorry for your luck, RR. According to the mere mortal men who wrote the bible, your god created EVERYTHING in just SIX LITERAL 24 hour DAYS.
That that doesn't make any sense doesn't mean that is not what is written and that that is what is meant by what was written- it IS.
Continue to wonder why the bible is often referred to as a book of fairy tales- LOL!!
Your post edited not only for space but for relevance as well.
Ok.

Creationist.

Your google copy/paste tells me you're not educated in what you're talking about, you just believe the creationists.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#623967 May 15, 2013
OCB wrote:
<quoted text>BTW, I think it's "cute" that you found a BLOG which agrees with YOU.
You ALWAYS cherry-pick to bible to try and get it to conform with what YOU choose to believe.
Doesn't work like that, RR.
Too bad you're not MAN enough to admit that you only believe the parts of the bible which make sense to YOU.
That's the thing with fairy tales- they NEVER make sense.
I might as well cherry-pick "Cinderella" to conform with what is possible and what is not.
Could she have lost a slipper? Sure. Could it have been made out of glass? No.
Could a pumpkin have been turned into a coach? No.
But the POINT is that the entire FAIRY TALE of "Cinderella"- while a beautiful FAIRY TALE- does not make sense.
News flash! Either does the BIBLE- a book of FAIRY TALES.
So you either believe it or you don't- YOU make no sense if you think you can PICK and CHOOSE the parts of the bible you think are literally correct while dismissing the parts of the bible you do NOT think are literally correct.
And according to the bible, the creation WAS 6 LITERAL 24 hour days.
That you find that to be ludicrous- which it most definitely is- does NOT mean the words written mean anything OTHER than 6 LITERAL 24 hour days.
I already tried e plainsong to you the Hebrew word "yom", I'm not doing it again. You're too dense and stuck on stupid.
henry

Bad Langensalza, Germany

#623968 May 15, 2013
Tanner wrote:
Atheists are such hateful people.
Why should atheists be hateful??

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#623969 May 15, 2013
Tanner wrote:
Atheists are such hateful people.
henry wrote:
Not at all. Very many of them are very intelligent
Not that I agree with Tanner, but a person can be intelligent AND hateful. Hitler is a great example of a hateful but intelligent atheist.
henry

Bad Langensalza, Germany

#623970 May 15, 2013
Nobody wrote:
<quoted text>God does not need us, we need him if you want to live. It is not a culturally conditioned belief system. This is something the whole world could live by if they choose to. You let me know what is wrong with loving all people and forgiving all people and wanting to treat others like you want to be treated. What is wrong with that?
Sorry, god existed of course never.
henry

Bad Langensalza, Germany

#623971 May 15, 2013
Tanner wrote:
Atheists are such hateful people.
Religions are out of trend.
henry

Bad Langensalza, Germany

#623972 May 15, 2013
Tanner wrote:
Atheists are such hateful people.
Consult a doctor!
henry

Bad Langensalza, Germany

#623973 May 15, 2013
Tanner wrote:
Atheists are such hateful people.
Go to a psychiatrist!
henry

Bad Langensalza, Germany

#623974 May 15, 2013
Tanner wrote:
Atheists are such hateful people.
Are you mentally alright??
henry

Bad Langensalza, Germany

#623975 May 15, 2013
Tanner wrote:
Atheists are such hateful people.
Perhaps you have a mental defect??
henry

Bad Langensalza, Germany

#623976 May 15, 2013
Tanner wrote:
Atheists are such hateful people.
Are you having bad dreams?
henry

Bad Langensalza, Germany

#623977 May 15, 2013
timn17 wrote:
<quoted text>Sin doesn't exist. The god you describe is a jealous, fit throwing child. Hitler's in heaven and ghandi's in hell. Yeah, right.
Petrus is an old man, so he mixed the person up!
henry

Bad Langensalza, Germany

#623978 May 15, 2013
Tanner wrote:
Atheists are such hateful people.
All of them??

OCB

“What a GLORIOUS day!!!”

Since: Apr 12

Orlando but NYC born & raised

#623979 May 15, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
You're weird. And dishonest.
I've never said that the only way to discipline a child is to spank them. Ever.
It seems that you think discipline=spanking.
O_o
Yes- you did. You asked what other way would you/could you "discipline" a 6 month old baby other than by SPANKING them.

YOU are weird, dishonest and at best, your memory is totally shot.

I didn't SAY you said that was the only way to discipline a CHILD-you DID say it was the only way to discipline a 6 month old BABY.

I am the one who said there are MANY ways to discipline CHILDREN other than by HITTING them.

But when we were talking about 6 month old BABIES, it was YOU who said there is no other way to discipline a 6 month old BABY to which I responded in horror at the very idea that you think it's okay to hit BABIES and it's not.

But YOU saidm if 6 month old babies are acting up for no reason at all, it is perfectly acceptable to SPANK them and all the more since a 6 month baby can't be "disciplined" any other way.

Shut the f*ck UP about this, RR- you did say all I claim you did and other people called you out on it as well.

And no STUPID- discipline does NOT = spanking.

Anything BUT spanking since spanking = ABUSE and all the more when it is a 6 month old BABY being hit which you did advocate.

OCB

“What a GLORIOUS day!!!”

Since: Apr 12

Orlando but NYC born & raised

#623980 May 15, 2013
macumazahn wrote:
<quoted text>In the original German, it was a fur slipper.
It became glass through a magnificent accident of mistranslation.
(sorry!)
Eh- that's okay- I'm glad you told me- that's pretty interesting.

But gee, glass sure is more elegant than a fur slipper which sounds just plain yucky!

:-)
henry

Bad Langensalza, Germany

#623981 May 15, 2013
Tanner wrote:
Atheists are such hateful people.
Do you like alcohol?
henry

Bad Langensalza, Germany

#623982 May 15, 2013
Tanner wrote:
Atheists are such hateful people.
Why, are you an Atheist?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
..........."What's your name??.........." 11 min Doctor REALITY 5
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 12 min marge 584,079
Poll If you're Christain what kind are you? (Oct '07) 13 min Rosa_Winkel 3,362
Poll Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 36 min RADEKT 270,653
Why is Obama failing so miserably? (Feb '09) 47 min positronium 7,271
Bruce Jenner first 'woman' in the world with a ... 58 min Doctor REALITY 1
Why I’m no longer a Christian (Jul '08) 1 hr Rosa_Winkel 442,854
Bush is a hero (Sep '07) 1 hr onemale 176,525
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 3 hr karvimaker 611,843
More from around the web