And....true to form- you trying to deny that you said how else would one discipline a 6 month old baby other than by spanking them?<quoted text>
Again, there are many ways to discipline kids, babies, whatever. Spanking is only one of them and I see it as a lat resort, but an option nonetheless.
I asked you why WOULDN'T you discipline a 6 month old.
And of course, you took the word 'discipline' and changed it to 'spank'.
Yes, I condone it. I've done it. It works.
Try to understand the difference between spanking out of discipline and spanking our of anger, they are VERY different.
You said it, many people commented on it horrified just as I was that anyone would even SUGGEST hitting a 6 month old baby.
YOU said that is the ONLY way a 6 month old baby can be "disciplined"- by being SPANKED.
Now you try to deny it.
Sure- YOU go ahead an explain to a 6 month old BABY that you are HITTING them to discipline them and that you are NOT HITTING them out of anger.
I'm sure a 6 month old BABY would appreciate and understand the difference, huh?
Wow. Even though I don't have children, I understand what you do not- which is all that a 6 month old baby would understand is that they are being hit for doing what comes naturally- being a BABY and CRYING.
Why wouldn't one discipline a 6 month old baby? Because there is NOTHING to discipline a 6 month old BABY about, you fool!
But no surprise that you not only condone violence, you applaud it since you have also said that killing in war is not a "sin".
Now you can try to deny you said that as well.