BTW, just how would one go "into detail" about "how" straight (OR gay) someone is?<quoted text>
Well that's my point, isn't it?
If somebody did something noteworthy in history, what the f*ck difference does it make what that person's sexual preference is?
How come junior high or high school history classes don't go into detail about how straight George Washington or Abraham Lincoln or Martin Luther King were?
Answer: It's not important.
And it shouldn't be taught to kids.
What is so wrong about teaching kids about the contributions of minority groups and all the more when those minority groups are so often maligned as in the case of blacks, for instance?
And of course, in the case of homosexuals as well....
You have a problem with "good press" being put out there in order to help offset the "bad press"?
Why just on this thread, many have posted that homosexuals are evil, are no good, are all sick, are a blight on society.....
So what is wrong with bringing to the forefront the many great accomplishments by many homosexuals throughout history?