1. Then why do they describe it as accepted by the majority of the scientific community?<quoted text>
Fallacies, so many:
1. In the scientific community there is no controversy in the theory, simply in some minor details, none of which come close to human evolution.
2. A scientific theory is never going to be called a "fact," because facts are evidence and theories are based on evidence, they are not evidence. Two very different aspects and concepts.
3. For something to be called a theory by scientists, there can be no guesswork.
2. Fact: In science, an observation that has been repeatedly confirmed and for all practical purposes is accepted as “true”.
2a. Theory: In science, a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world that can incorporate facts.
3. Ya right. Here's an awesome guess:
"Life on Earth evolved from a universal common ancestor approximately 3.8 billion years ago."