Prove there's a god.

“Is that all you've got?”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#621645 May 6, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
"finally make ourselves extinct"???
What are you waiting for?
War isn't making us extinct but in shark's mind it fits his fantasy well enough.

“I see quantum effects”

Since: Jan 11

In the macro world.

#621646 May 6, 2013
psalms 23 wrote:
<quoted text>Well said,,,(Hand claps)..

And by georgy, i think ya got her figured out.

Ohh, but just wait she will have a detailed scientific come back as to why she is'nt biased, and why you should ignore the apologist sites..

Good luck..
Apologist sites ALWAYS lie.

Always.

“I see quantum effects”

Since: Jan 11

In the macro world.

#621647 May 6, 2013
timn17 wrote:
<quoted text>Nice diatribe. I'm sorry, but yes, creationist sites are irrelevant, by definition. Apologists have a need to believe in god, and this need informs their opinion on the science. If you can find me work by actual scientists, those working without a preconceived agenda, then that's another story. Their religious belief is irrelevant until they allow it to interfere with their ability to be objective. Would you, for example, be interested in the opinion of a devout muslim on the divinity of jesus? You shouldn't be, because no matter what, his opinion is set in stone from the beginning. Same with christian apologists - most are unable to reconcile the massive evidence for evolution with their religious conditioning, and cognitive dissonance does the rest - resulting in this manufactured controversy. Seriously, we are at the point where we can say that either evolution happened, or some god like creature really wanted us to think that it happened, but you wouldn't know it for all the "teach the controversy" wackos out there.

Pascal, Bacon, etc. are irrelevant. Science does not simply "accept their work because they cannot refute it," they accept it because it is good work and because these men did not allow their personal beliefs to slant their scientific work.
Good post.

Well said.

“Is that all you've got?”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#621648 May 6, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
What a crock o shit that school is.
Yeah. It's not like the kid tried to talk other students into praying before or after the race on school grounds. It's kind of oppressive to think you must remain extremely calm after a win at a competition. Most of us (religious or not) raise "both" arms at the finish line after winning. Religion never had anything to do with any excitement I ever felt at being the best in a race or at the high jump. The people who punished that kid are going too far.

“Seventh son”

Since: Dec 10

Will Prevail

#621649 May 6, 2013
Truth signed in wrote:
<quoted text>
God will never be proven through science and it's quite ridiculous for anyone to try and do so. As for conflict in science regarding evolution and chromosomes...well...of course there isn't any with the exception of the creationist. Why would evolutionist refute themselves? They wouldn't. And any scientist who doesn't agree, most likely will not publicly refute it either. As I've stated before...to refute evolution is politically incorrect. Scientists who hope to receive funding wouldn't dare go against the grain. It'd be professional suicide. It is what it is.

It's not political, it's academic.
It would also be academic suicide to proclaim the Earth was the center of the solar system, and that everyone else is wrong about it.
In short that's the level of evidence showing evolution is the history of planet Earth, To say it isn't, is so outrageously ignorant that it would be academic suicide.

“Calling Out The Hermits”

Since: Apr 13

At Ricky Dicky land

#621650 May 6, 2013
Aerobatty.......broken record much?~sarcasm intended~

OCB

“What a GLORIOUS day!!!”

Since: Apr 12

Orlando but NYC born & raised

#621651 May 6, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Why did God create woman?
To carry semen from the bedroom to the toilet.
===
Why do women fake orgasms?
Because they think men care.
===
What is the definition of "making love"
Something a woman does while a guy is f_cking her.
Do you think blatant misogyny is any less abhorrent when displayed in "jokes"?

It's not- if anything, it makes misogyny even MORE abhorrent.

BTW, REAL men DO care if the woman they're with has an orgasm or not and REAL men would prefer that women NOT fake it.

And- REAL men enjoy the act of ACTUALLY making love as much as women do.

It is men who are like rutting PIGS who can only conceptualize the act of sex as "f*cking".

As to your first "joke"- just plain stupid.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#621652 May 6, 2013
OCB wrote:
<quoted text>Not true. The "theory" of gravity proves that gravity exists and is a law.
And really, RR- STFU with your STUPID insults.
Not gonna tell you again- you have such a MORONIC perception of what I look like and a totally erroneous one at that as well.
But you seem to be quite curious...so again- PM me your email addy and I'll send you a pic of me that will blow the socks off your cloven hoofed feet.
See? I can throw out stupid insults too and no doubt IF you actually HAD any balls, they'd be dragging on the ground, just as your knuckles do.
UGH.
Go ahead, email me a pic of a hot chick. Then try to prove its you....

Anyone got a pic of a ball AND knuckle-dragger? Cuz that'd be funny as hell!

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#621653 May 6, 2013
nanoanomaly wrote:
<quoted text>It's a good thing your wife understands these concepts so well. ;)
I know, huh?

“I speak my mind”

Since: Sep 10

It hurts to bite my tongue

#621654 May 6, 2013
OCB wrote:
<quoted text>Oh please. Evolutionists don't have a "need" to believe in evolution.
It is creationists who have a "need" to believe the world and all that inhabits it came to be by some sort of "magic".
Magic....really. So tell me, I get the whole...evolutionary bit...regarding our ancestral lineage. But do tell...please...how science suggest the world and all that inhabits it came to be. Oh wait...let's see...there's that whole Big Bang theory...hmmm...let's see...I do believe in this theory...life basically emerges from nothing. That's pretty cool, except we've never recorded another single event where life springs from nothing. Sounds magical to me.

The Hubble law for the large scale redshift of galaxies (i.e. redshift proportional to distance) is usually taken as evidence (if not proof) for the picture of an expanding universe in general and the Big Bang theory in particular. However, recessional velocities have by no means been actually measured, and the assumption of the Doppler effect being responsible for the shift was only reached due to the absence of other known physical explanations (for the sake of historical correctness it should be pointed out that Hubble himself was apparently never certain about this interpretation of the redshift (see http://sites.google.com/site/bigbangcosmythol... )).
On my sister site plasmaphysics.org .uk I have indeed suggested a Plasma Theory of the Hubble Redshift of Galaxies. Whether this theory is the correct one or not, I would like to make clear on this page, that (as already indicated on the page The Big Bang Theory - A Flawed Concept) the concept of an expansion of the universe (i.e. an overall recession of galaxies) is a physically unacceptable model and thus not even a potentially viable explanation. http://www.physicsmyths.org.uk/expansion.htm

So, again, please, tell me....how exactly did we come into existence?

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#621655 May 6, 2013
OCB wrote:
<quoted text>Apparently, it is- going by the definition of the school.
The kid doesn't like it? His parents don't like it? He can go to another school.
Stop WHINING, RR.
I ain't whining, just pointing out the stupidity of that school's rule.

You should understand it well.

“Is that all you've got?”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#621656 May 6, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Ya they're Christians, albeit rather strange....
The WB people do not represent Christians, they're atypical.
They ARE more of a cult than a sect...

" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cult" ;

...since most normal, decent people would never consider crashing a funeral to protest their disagreement of that person's behavior when they were alive. I find the act to be extremely cowardly and pointless. Most people do.

“I speak my mind”

Since: Sep 10

It hurts to bite my tongue

#621657 May 6, 2013
Aerobatty wrote:
<quoted text>
Apologist sites ALWAYS lie.
Always.
Nothing is "always" or "never" get a grip!

“I see quantum effects”

Since: Jan 11

In the macro world.

#621658 May 6, 2013
waaasssuuup wrote:
<quoted text>"Got any examples, or did you just make that up"

seriously???

what happens whenever an egotistical communist/socialist/humanist/a theist regime takes control of a government? usually the genocide of their perceived undesireables, no?
"Unworthy". We're talking about "unworthy".

Religionistas are the ones who primarily use that term. Not atheists.

Try to stay on track, ok?

“I see quantum effects”

Since: Jan 11

In the macro world.

#621660 May 6, 2013
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>(!)

(.)

“Is that all you've got?”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#621661 May 6, 2013
timn17 wrote:
<quoted text>Things are a bit different in school.
Right. Kids can't wear "God is love" on their t-shirts but "I rock cock" is ok now.

“I see quantum effects”

Since: Jan 11

In the macro world.

#621662 May 6, 2013
QuickDraw 1 wrote:
Aerobatty.......broken record much?~sarcasm intended~
That's rr's job.

“THE LORD IS MY SHEPHERD;”

Since: Apr 09

Location hidden

#621663 May 6, 2013
macumazahn wrote:
<quoted text>Read it.
"Primitive Baptist/Calvinist".
Christian.
Now, about the Catholics, Mormons, JWs, Christian Scientists...
I have read it and "anyone" with common sence can see they are not a follower of Jesus Christ or affiliated with the Christian denominations.
****
It is headed by Fred Phelps and consists primarily of members of his large family;[5] in 2011, the church stated that it had about 40 members.

And "they" claim they are of the primitive baptist/calvinist..

They are no different then a small group of kkk extremist who claim to be a christian...

Are you guys really that ignorant to believe they are true Christians???

“Is that all you've got?”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#621664 May 6, 2013
OCB wrote:
<quoted text>Apparently, it is- going by the definition of the school.
The kid doesn't like it? His parents don't like it? He can go to another school.
Stop WHINING, RR.
His parents should have their taxes reduced if government employees makes it impossible for him to attend the public school system without being oppressed.

“I see quantum effects”

Since: Jan 11

In the macro world.

#621665 May 6, 2013
Truth signed in wrote:
<quoted text>Nothing is "always" or "never" get a grip!
Except apologist sites.

They ALWAYS lie.

Always.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Jehovah's Witnesses are true disciple of Jesus ... (Mar '07) 3 min RiccardoFire 44,706
topix drops human sexuality forum.......this be... 5 min evangeline 23
Bring back thd human sexuality forum? 8 min Corvus Stone 5
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 8 min Pad 646,735
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 9 min Buck Crick 49,049
Play "end of the word" part 2 (Dec '15) 11 min KellyP in Jersey 2,087
Just HOW angry is Satan??? 2 hr Thinking 5
Poll Is homosexuality a sin? (Oct '07) 5 hr Annaleigh 105,636
I want to watch my wife flirt and get picked up... (Aug '12) Jun 26 Tboyslick125 151
More from around the web