“Headless Body in Topless Bar”

Since: Sep 07

Hygiene, Colorado

#621064 May 3, 2013
TRUTHS BUSTER wrote:
<quoted text>I have no doubt that you are still clinging to the idea of a flat earth. You are right, the age of the earth is formulated to be around 6200 years. Your theory based on light years is juvenile, since time and space are not constants. Don't worry, your Wiki schooling is also obvious.
That's not what he wrote. Your dishonesty is palpable.

Formulated by whom to be 6200 years old?

Are you cognizant that dogs were domesticated over 33,000 years ago? Are you postulating that we could have reached our current population in 6200 years from a pair of naked teenagers (good thing Adam didn't find the sheep sexy), especially in light of a maniacal, genocidal, world-wide flood where babies and fetuses were drowned in some failed attempt to fix an omnipotent, omniscient, omnibenevolent's mistake.

Your god is nothing more than a lousy, torturing middle manager. Welcome to YahwehMart.

“Headless Body in Topless Bar”

Since: Sep 07

Hygiene, Colorado

#621065 May 3, 2013
TRUTHS BUSTER wrote:
<quoted text>I am not a Catholic but I bet if I go to a bunch of Catholic priests and ask them the same question, I will get the same answer.
Type in "Was Mary a virgin?"
You are a lapsed Catholic, as is every American Christian.

Mary needed to be a virgin in the story because women were considered property and tainted property if they had carnal knowledge. You can't have a zombie, Semitic hippie come out of a tainted piece of meat. That such nonsense is even considered in the 21st Century is amazing. You have been pulled out of so much nonsense by the secular world and its superior morality yet you flail and thrash for the maniacal writings of goat herders in the Bronze Age. It's all so very strange.

“Headless Body in Topless Bar”

Since: Sep 07

Hygiene, Colorado

#621067 May 3, 2013
psalms 23 wrote:
<quoted text>
Given that evolution, according to Darwin, was in a continual state of motion ... it followed logically that the fossil record should be rife with examples of transitional forms leading from the less to the more evolved.3
Even those who believe in rapid evolution recognize that a considerable number of generations would be required for one distinct "kind" to evolve into another more complex kind. There ought, therefore, to be a considerable number of true transitional structures preserved in the fossils -- after all, there are billions of non-transitional structures there! But (with the exception of a few very doubtful creatures such as the controversial feathered dinosaurs and the alleged walking whales), they are not there.
Instead of filling in the gaps in the fossil record with so-called missing links, most paleontologists found themselves facing a situation in which there were only gaps in the fossil record, with no evidence of transformational intermediates between documented fossil species.4
The entire history of evolution from the evolution of life from non-life to the evolution of vertebrates from invertebrates to the evolution of man from the ape is strikingly devoid of intermediates: the links are all missing in the fossil record, just as they are in the present world.
With respect to the origin of life, a leading researcher in this field, Leslie Orgel, after noting that neither proteins nor nucleic acids could have arisen without the other, concludes:
And so, at first glance, one might have to conclude that life could never, in fact, have originated by chemical means.5
Being committed to total evolution as he is, Dr. Orgel cannot accept any such conclusion as that. Therefore, he speculates that RNA may have come first, but then he still has to admit that:
The precise events giving rise to the RNA world remain unclear.... investigators have proposed many hypotheses, but evidence in favor of each of them is fragmentary at best.6
http://www.icr.org/home/resources/resources_t...
Darwin? Darwin is so 150 years ago. Do you still use the telephone as developed by Bell? Do you still drive a Stanley Steamer. Do you still only dream of getting into a metal tube and getting to New York in three hours?

The Institute for Creation Research is a group of paid, professional apologists who are laughing all the way to the bank. How exactly is the failed attempt to debunk evolutionary science creation research? Should they be researching creation? Oh, that's right. They can't. There is no there there, so they are left to scam use lightened rubes.

You do realize that while fossils are sexy, the proofs in evolution lie in DNA, as admitted to by Christian Francis Collins, MD, PhD and current director of the NIH.

http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/arti...

Evolutionary science is intertwined with every other scientific discipline. You benefit from it every day, from oil and gas geology to medicine and beyond. Remember, Germ Theory is "just a theory", so you'd better pray that bacteria away.

“Headless Body in Topless Bar”

Since: Sep 07

Hygiene, Colorado

#621068 May 3, 2013
psalms 23 wrote:
<quoted text>
The bias of evolutionary leaders
It is a fallacy to believe that facts speak for themselves—they are always interpreted according to a framework. The framework behind the evolutionists’ interpretation is naturalism—it is assumed that things made themselves, that no divine intervention has happened, and that God has not revealed to us knowledge about the past.
Evolution is a deduction from this assumption, and it is essentially the idea that things made themselves. It includes these unproven ideas: nothing gave rise to something at an alleged ‘big bang,’ non-living matter gave rise to life, single-celled organisms gave rise to many-celled organisms, invertebrates gave rise to vertebrates, ape-like creatures gave rise to man, non-intelligent and amoral matter gave rise to intelligence and morality, man’s yearnings gave rise to religions, etc.
Professor D.M.S. Watson, one of the leading biologists and science writers of his day, demonstrated the atheistic bias behind much evolutionary thinking when he wrote:
Evolution [is] a theory universally accepted not because it can be proven by logically coherent evidence to be true, but because it's the only alternative, special creation, is clearly incredible.1
So it’s not a question of biased religious creationists versus objective scientific evolutionists; rather, it is the biases of the Christian religion versus the biases of the religion of secular humanism resulting in different interpretations of the same scientific data. As the anti-creationist science writer Boyce Rensberger admits:
At this point, it is necessary to reveal a little inside information about how scientists work, something the textbooks don’t usually tell you. The fact is that scientists are not really as objective and dispassionate in their work as they would like you to think. Most scientists first get their ideas about how the world works not through rigorously logical processes but through hunches and wild guesses. As individuals, they often come to believe something to be true long before they assemble the hard evidence that will convince somebody else that it is. Motivated by faith in his own ideas and a desire for acceptance by his peers, a scientist will labor for years knowing in his heart that his theory is correct but devising experiment after experiment whose results he hopes will support his position.2
Professor Richard Lewontin, a geneticist (and self-proclaimed Marxist — see documentation), is a renowned champion of neo-Darwinism, and certainly one of the world’s leaders in promoting evolutionary biology. He recently wrote this very revealing comment (the italics were in the original). It illustrates the implicit philosophical bias against Genesis creation regardless of whether or not the facts support it:
We take the side of science in spite of the patent absurdity of some of its constructs, in spite of its failure to fulfil many of its extravagant promises of health and life, in spite of the tolerance of the scientific community for unsubstantiated just-so stories, because we have a prior commitment, a commitment to materialism. It is not that the methods and institutions of science somehow compel us to accept a material explanation of the phenomenal world, but, on the contrary, that we are forced by our a priori adherence to material causes to create an apparatus of investigation and a set of concepts that produce material explanations, no matter how counter-intuitive, no matter how mystifying to the uninitiated. Moreover, that materialism is an absolute, for we cannot allow a Divine Foot in the door.3
http://creation.com/refuting-evolution-chapte...
Scientists are biased toward evolution because it is demonstrably true. They are biased against religion because it is demonstrably false.

Once again, trying to "debunk" evolution will never lead to Godidit.

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#621069 May 3, 2013
Jorge W Arbusto wrote:
<quoted text>That's not what he wrote. Your dishonesty is palpable.
Formulated by whom to be 6200 years old?
Are you cognizant that dogs were domesticated over 33,000 years ago? Are you postulating that we could have reached our current population in 6200 years from a pair of naked teenagers (good thing Adam didn't find the sheep sexy), especially in light of a maniacal, genocidal, world-wide flood where babies and fetuses were drowned in some failed attempt to fix an omnipotent, omniscient, omnibenevolent's mistake.
Your god is nothing more than a lousy, torturing middle manager. Welcome to YahwehMart.
Hehe, YahwehMart, I like that one.

“Headless Body in Topless Bar”

Since: Sep 07

Hygiene, Colorado

#621070 May 3, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
But not 100% right?
“Multi National” coalition force
So without or help? Really shows how much you really know – zilch You reliance on supermarket tabloids as you source of news is letting you down
US invasion forces in Iraq – 150,000
UK invasion forces in iraq 46,000
So that’s about 70% not including a small number from 30+ other countries so you are caught lying again.
RR is the worst of Topix posters. He just argues to argue.

“Headless Body in Topless Bar”

Since: Sep 07

Hygiene, Colorado

#621071 May 3, 2013
Greens - tuf wrote:
<quoted text>
Prove it. Where are these fossils that appear "in between"
There is your fossilized brain in between your ears. That's one.

“Headless Body in Topless Bar”

Since: Sep 07

Hygiene, Colorado

#621072 May 3, 2013
Greens - tuf wrote:
<quoted text> Do you have a problem with us???
Yes. Your willful ignorance born of fear. Plus, Ken Ham had to go all the way to Kentucky to find a gaggle of willing rubes large enough to fleece. He could have stayed there had he met you first and we wouldn't have to listen to his scam. He may be back, though. He's bleeding money faster than a redneck trying to win a $300 XBox at a carnival.

http://boston.cbslocal.com/2013/04/29/nh-man-...

“Headless Body in Topless Bar”

Since: Sep 07

Hygiene, Colorado

#621073 May 3, 2013
TRUTHS BUSTER wrote:
<quoted text>Still nothing. It is a none debate adage, if you have to tell your opponent that you have won, it is clear that you do not think as much. Anyone can see that if you were to post your responses for another month, they would all look like this. Desperate.
What is a no debate adage?

Are you familiar with Gish Gallop. That is what your posts are like.

“Headless Body in Topless Bar”

Since: Sep 07

Hygiene, Colorado

#621074 May 3, 2013
DeAngelo of Memphis wrote:
What trips me out about evolution is that there isn't any transitional fossils found. There has to be dozens of them in order for evolution to be 100% true. Yet not one is found. Why?!? All we see is that plants and animals reproduce after their own kind and nothing more. There isn't ANY EVIDENCE WHAT-SO-EVER that supports animals evolving into something else other than their own kind. There is no transition and the fossil record proves that. So why do people feel that evolution is the whole truth and nothing but?!
Every species is a transition. You are a transition from your parents. DNA is the evidence for evolution, that and its interweaving with every other scientific discipline. Just ask the Christian Francis Collins, MD, PhD and director of the NIH.

Do you seek pleasure in leading a life devoid of knowing as many true things as possible?

“Headless Body in Topless Bar”

Since: Sep 07

Hygiene, Colorado

#621075 May 3, 2013
Truth signed in wrote:
<quoted text>
Totally agree. Let me warn ya though, I know this crowd, they'll turn you upside down with scientific hoo hah and have you half way questioning your own question in a matter of a few posts. If you're gonna ask that question, take my advice, stick to that question and make em produce the transitional fossil evidence...good luck!!!:)
That is so unintentionally funny. "Scientific hoo hah!" Huzzah! You cling to a dusty tome written by people with less knowledge than even the least educated today and you call it scientific hoo hah. Of course you get turned upside down. You're already off balance.

Several posters have pointed to transitions. I would wager that you were all three monkey in the see no evil statue at once.

“Headless Body in Topless Bar”

Since: Sep 07

Hygiene, Colorado

#621076 May 3, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
Hehe, YahwehMart, I like that one.
Thanks. That is what Christianity, Inc. has become.

“Headless Body in Topless Bar”

Since: Sep 07

Hygiene, Colorado

#621077 May 3, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
The whole country deserves a refund for that one.
Haha. We should start by taxing the professional scam houses, the churches.

Instant deficit solution.

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#621078 May 3, 2013
Jorge W Arbusto wrote:
<quoted text>Haha. We should start by taxing the professional scam houses, the churches.
Instant deficit solution.
if we taxed churches we'd be out of the deficit in one month, without collecting back taxes. If we collected back taxes, we'd be the wealthiest country in the world again.

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#621079 May 3, 2013
I should say countries, you're in Canada. I don't envy that, but you are part of America just like Mexico, I do envy Mexico.

“Headless Body in Topless Bar”

Since: Sep 07

Hygiene, Colorado

#621080 May 3, 2013
Topix does a huge service. It provides a home for the crazy Christian to keep them off the streets. The Topix Christian Insane Asylum is open for business.
YTube

AOL

#621081 May 3, 2013
.

p r o o f_____1.5 BIL MUSLIMS SHORTLY TO DIE

http://youtu.be/n7ok0g8iwJI


.

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#621082 May 3, 2013
Jorge W Arbusto wrote:
Topix does a huge service. It provides a home for the crazy Christian to keep them off the streets. The Topix Christian Insane Asylum is open for business.
So true.

Then there's me, I misread Colorado as Canada, how is that for a "duh" moment?:P
christianity is EVIL

Halifax, Canada

#621083 May 3, 2013
Greens - tuf wrote:
<quoted text>
And the strength, where did the strength go?.
We would be no chance against a big ape in a arm wrestle.
If we are a better newer product then where is the strength ??
Lol
in the. mind maybe,
or have you seen any humans being iput into cages by apes?
LOL

“ The Lord of delirious minds.”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#621084 May 3, 2013
christianity is EVIL wrote:
<quoted text>
in the. mind maybe,
or have you seen any humans being iput into cages by apes?
LOL
They can those tuff greens though.
Seriously asides from planet of the apes, it isn't in most apes to infringe on other species , except chimps that hunt.
Chimps the most like us (funny that). They may learn how to build cages watching us though :)

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 4 min Regina 568,016
Why I’m no longer a Christian (Jul '08) 8 min ChristineM 442,014
Blaming Israel for carnage (Jul '06) 16 min An NFL Fan 120,708
Homosexuals are servants and human children of ... 18 min who 15
Last Word + 2 (Jul '14) 23 min andet1987 1,021
3 Word Game (Feb '12) 25 min andet1987 4,573
I live with my cousin, we had sex and we loved it. 29 min Clarence688 2
Scientific proof for God's existence 34 min HipGnosis 554
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 35 min New Age Spiritual... 607,188
Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 1 hr Heisenberg 267,407
More from around the web