Huh

Fort Worth, TX

#620718 May 1, 2013
Expert in all things wrote:
<quoted text>
Can't help but notice that you have not tried to refute any arguments but only offer personal attacks. Are you trying to compensate for having a small pecker?
Pssst, you don't have an argument. Like your divine master, all you have is hot air and a big bag of Bulshirt.

“What's left to defend?”

Since: Jan 11

Freedom

#620719 May 1, 2013
Huh wrote:
Yeah, we'll, you're missing a major step, there is no evidence that any of this was "created." Tide goes in, tide goes out, eh, Bill?
Are you thinking of going out with the Tide?

Swimwear is recommended.

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

#620720 May 1, 2013
Tide with Beach wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you thinking of going out with the Tide?
Swimwear is recommended.
Now you tell me.

“The Intrepid”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#620721 May 1, 2013
Aerobatty wrote:
<quoted text>
We're just plain nasty people.
Aren't we.
Very nasty.
Huh

Fort Worth, TX

#620722 May 1, 2013
Tide with Beach wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you thinking of going out with the Tide?
Swimwear is recommended.
Yet, optional. More curious theism. The body was allegedly designed, yet we are to cover it up and be ashamed. How utterly stupid.

The best argument against design? Foreskins. Hmmm, let me put one on the tally whacked just to require them to cut it off in a barbaric, non-consensual, unhygienic ritual. Stupid. Stupid. Stupid.
Huh

Fort Worth, TX

#620723 May 1, 2013
Expert in all things wrote:
<quoted text>
Can't help but notice that you have not tried to refute any arguments but only offer personal attacks. Are you trying to compensate for having a small pecker?
Can't help but notice your penis obsession and your inability to respond with anything resembling wit, relevance, or cogent thought. You lose.

Look, the ape ran away with his prehensile tale between his legs, yammering, "Logical absolutes. Logical absolutes!" Look at the oxymoron go.

You're as useless as a male nipple. Design! Whoop!

Hey, did you know some babies are still born with a prominent tail, a provenance of our vestigial coccyx? Surgery is required. Design! Whoop? No, whoops!
Huh

Fort Worth, TX

#620724 May 1, 2013
nanoanomaly wrote:
<quoted text>Very nasty.
Nasty is a belief in a retributive divine master, poised to strike at a moment's notice for thought crime. Silly and nasty.

There was a Christian on Topix, Educator was her sobriquet. She related a story about a science teacher that had the audacity to teach science in her school. One day she was hit by a car. What did "Educator" post, reveling in her good fortune? "Jesus really mowed her down!"

Christianity. It is a sick, twisted, perverted belief.

Since: Sep 10

Long Beach, CA

#620725 May 1, 2013
nanoanomaly wrote:
<quoted text>Very nasty.
Catcher isn't nasty.

I'm a nice guy, doing the best I can.

Since: Sep 10

Long Beach, CA

#620726 May 1, 2013
Huh wrote:
<quoted text>Yet, optional. More curious theism. The body was allegedly designed, yet we are to cover it up and be ashamed. How utterly stupid.
The best argument against design? Foreskins. Hmmm, let me put one on the tally whacked just to require them to cut it off in a barbaric, non-consensual, unhygienic ritual. Stupid. Stupid. Stupid.
I disagree.

In my view, the design defect was placing the testicles on the outside.

Surely a god could have designed an internal cooling system, or made the gonads less sensitive to heat.

“What's left to defend?”

Since: Jan 11

Freedom

#620727 May 1, 2013
_-Alice-_ wrote:
Now you tell me.
If you forgot your swimsuit, I'm really in trouble, because I was going to ask to borrow yours.

“The Intrepid”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#620728 May 1, 2013
Huh wrote:
<quoted text>...

You're as useless as a male nipple. Design! Whoop!
....
Get a clue...

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm...

...loser.

“The Intrepid”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#620729 May 1, 2013
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
I disagree.
In my view, the design defect was placing the testicles on the outside.
Surely a god could have designed an internal cooling system, or made the gonads less sensitive to heat.
I don't see a problem with the basic pattern.

“I see quantum effects”

Since: Jan 11

In the macro world.

#620730 May 1, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>That's your choice.

I'm not afraid of any gods, either.
Yes you are.

“I see quantum effects”

Since: Jan 11

In the macro world.

#620731 May 1, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>I don't. You must be mistaking me for someone else.
Oh.

You've given up the bible god?

Good for you.

“What's left to defend?”

Since: Jan 11

Freedom

#620732 May 1, 2013
Huh wrote:
Yet, optional. More curious theism. The body was allegedly designed, yet we are to cover it up and be ashamed. How utterly stupid.
The best argument against design? Foreskins. Hmmm, let me put one on the tally whacked just to require them to cut it off in a barbaric, non-consensual, unhygienic ritual. Stupid. Stupid. Stupid.
I'm not ashamed of your body.

Not at all.

“I see quantum effects”

Since: Jan 11

In the macro world.

#620733 May 1, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>1. I don't have a pope.
2. I don't fear The Lord.
2. Yes you do.
Sharkey

Reno, NV

#620734 May 1, 2013
nanoanomaly wrote:
<quoted text>Get a clue...
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm...
...loser.
I guess being a lying hypocritical fraud is just natural to you.

Well, you need to learn to keep THAT hell to yourself.

Shut you lying @ss the hell up, f*cking LOSER.

Since: Sep 10

Long Beach, CA

#620735 May 1, 2013
nanoanomaly wrote:
<quoted text>I don't see a problem with the basic pattern.
Hey, when you play ball(s), you can have fun with no risk.

When we play ball, we are at serious risk of terrible pain.

With proper design, you would still have something to play with, and we would be far safer.
Sharkey

Reno, NV

#620736 May 1, 2013
nanoanomaly wrote:
<quoted text>I don't see a problem with the basic pattern.
No one gives a damn what you don't see a problem with. What's so wrong with an internal cooling system for balls?

There's this product out now that can cure sweaty balls - a lotion that turns into a powder.

Sorta like an EXTERNAL cooling system...

Did your god make that appear out of thin air? Hell no. REAL PEOPLE in the REAL WORLD created it.

"God" didn't "inspire" them either, irritation with sweaty balls did.

Time for you to grow up and stop believing in MAAAAAAAGIC.
Huh

Fort Worth, TX

#620738 May 1, 2013
Tide with Beach wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm not ashamed of your body.
Not at all.
Me neither. It's quite lovely.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 1 min truth 560,745
Will the False Prophet come from the Vatican??? 8 min Mr Koresh 17
Play "end of the word" (Jan '11) 18 min Al Capone 5,161
Bush is a hero (Sep '07) 24 min UMAKEWORLDPEACEUI... 175,798
Are our soldiers traitors? 25 min RiccardoFire 20
Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 36 min RiccardoFire 265,584
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 37 min eyeful 605,385
Moses never existed 3 hr feces for jesus 860
How do I ask my dad for sex? (Oct '13) 10 hr daveo69 72
More from around the web