Where are you getting this BS? Quit making stuff up. "Proof that the brain is responsible for consciousness" does not exist, so if I was asking for proof it was only to show you that your belief is not any more probable than mine. I'm not asking you to prove anything; only to admit that your belief is not more probable than mine. Maybe if I repeat that 100 more times you'll get it?You have completely shifted the goal posts. At the beginning of this discussion, you wanted proof that the brain is responsible for consciousness. Since then, you have refined your position to "current observations are meaningless until we can describe how awareness came from non awareness." And even further, you are now claiming that even if I could provide proof of awareness from non awareness, that you could then claim that this proof means nothing because the quantum state is more fundamental.
If you could prove 'awareness from non-awareness' then it wouldn't be meaningless. Where's the proof? I'll admit it if I see it. If you prove that molecules are the cause of consciousness then that's it. But just as you need to see proof of a higher power in order to believe it then I need to see proof of a mechanism for consciousness before I believe it is a transient product of an overall unconscious existence.
Uhhh no I'm not saying that. Show me some evidence, any evidence will do. Associating consciousness with molecules is nothing. We know molecules are involved but that's all we know; we have no idea exactly how they are involved; we have no idea what the origins of awareness are or how molecules could ever become aware of themselves. I'm getting real good at typing that line.Again, you have turned your claim in to nothing more than god of the gaps dressed up in scientific language. You are basically saying that no matter what, we can't prove awareness comes from non awareness unless all other possibilities are definitively ruled out.