Prove there's a god.

“Is that all you've got?”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#620554 Apr 30, 2013
Pokay wrote:
<quoted text>You *believe* consciousness is a product of the molecules that make up our brain. There is no evidence to support a mechanism for consciousness therefore it can only be a belief. Where's your "skepticism" on that one?
You *believe* that consciousness came into being rather than always being in existence. You have no way of knowing whether it is a quantum phenomenon that could co exist with a big bang. And even if it wasn't of quantum origin, you have no way of knowing the extent of 'existence' in which consciousness or 'life as we know it' could have been coexisting with the events we believe to have taken place.
You *believe* that what we experience is a "first order" reality and not, on some level, an illusion. And even without any of that, there is no absolute knowledge, so pretty much everything is a belief.
Besides all that, why do you guys insist that you hold no beliefs when it's so obvious that you actually believe there is no higher power. If you were truly neutral you wouldn't belittle the idea so much.
<quoted text>Does that sound like someone that lacks a belief on the subject? Sounds to me like you believe it is impossible for a higher power to exist.
Apparently, he believes it is up to him to decide what is impossible. Not much free-thinking there.
YTubeVID

AOL

#620555 Apr 30, 2013
.

R A P T U R E : Who goes?...Who stays?

http://youtu.be/LVvXgkOK-84

.

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

#620556 Apr 30, 2013
macumazahn wrote:
<quoted text>Oh, dear.
Atheist's Statement:
1. There's no evidence to support the existence of a deity.
2 Therefore, there's no reason to believe in one.
3. Therefore, I don't.
Want to make me consider the idea? Provide evidence.
Want to make me believe? Provide proof.
It's your claim. And your ball.
Faith as the Evidence of things Unseen (Forerunner Commentary ...
Evidence of the unseen things gives a person conviction.... Thus, living faith is belief in God that keeps the commandments. Living faith produces growth.
www.bibletools.org/.../Faith-as-&#8203;Ev... -

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

#620557 Apr 30, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
So you buy into any conspiracy nonsense as long as it gives you justification to hate someone.
You do know what assumption does to you don't you?

“H-o-o-o-o-o-o-ld on thar!”

Since: Sep 08

The Borderland of Sol

#620558 Apr 30, 2013
My Portal wrote:
<quoted text>Faith as the Evidence of things Unseen (Forerunner Commentary ...
Evidence of the unseen things gives a person conviction.... Thus, living faith is belief in God that keeps the commandments. Living faith produces growth.
www.bibletools.org/.../Faith-as-&#8203;Ev... -
Pfft.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#620559 Apr 30, 2013
Tide with Beach wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh?
<quoted text>
Where? When?
<quoted text>
Says you. I say you're wrong. You present no argument, so why should I?
<quoted text>
You're telling me that I have a confirmation bias, yet you can't identify it.
<quoted text>
How ironic. Your next statement here applies to what you just did.
Those are not my positions, dolt.
<quoted text>
My opinions are rationally derived.
Why can't you accept that?
Is it too uncomfortable?
Why would your opinions make me uncomfortable?

What exactly are your "opinions"?

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#620560 Apr 30, 2013
Tide with Beach wrote:
<quoted text>
It does not go both ways, man.
Lacking a belief, or even rejecting a belief, is not the same as adopting a belief. No faith is required. No bias is required. Only skepticism is required.
You're just childishly turning my arguments around against me.
<quoted text>
I would entertain countless possible explanations, in any scenario, before believing an impossible explanation.
See? God *poofing* in next to you is "an impossible explanation".

That's your confirmation bias right there.

“There is no such thing”

Since: May 08

as a reasonable person

#620561 Apr 30, 2013
nanoanomaly wrote:
<quoted text>Apparently, he believes it is up to him to decide what is impossible. Not much free-thinking there.
So true. Sadly it seems to be a common theme on these threads. Certain people proclaiming themselves "free-thinkers" yet claim to know absolute truth and condemn any who challenges their views or behaviors.

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

#620562 Apr 30, 2013
macumazahn wrote:
<quoted text>Pfft.
As your friend Biden said, this is a BFD.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#620563 Apr 30, 2013
Tide with Beach wrote:
<quoted text>
Or yours.
<quoted text>
Is this an argument that the God character never tortures a single person for an eternity? It doesn't look like it.
Eternal punishment negates justice, love, and mercy.
No, it's a direct response to your inquiry of:

"Does this work for you? Let's say you live your entire life without ever hearing of God, you die, and you are tortured for an eternity. Where was the justice in that?"

You are wrong. I just showed you that.

Since: Sep 10

Fremont, CA

#620564 Apr 30, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
You are wrong. I just showed you that.
A very Buckish statement.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#620565 Apr 30, 2013
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
A very Buckish statement.
Whatever, dude. It's true. Tide claimed that it's not justice that people who have never even heard of Jesus go straight to Hell.

He was wrong.

Since: Sep 10

Fremont, CA

#620566 Apr 30, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Whatever, dude. It's true. Tide claimed that it's not justice that people who have never even heard of Jesus go straight to Hell.
He was wrong.
That's your opinion and nothing more.

I happen to agree with Tide.

“let's do this thang!”

Since: Aug 10

Location hidden

#620567 Apr 30, 2013
Aerobatty wrote:
<quoted text>
Sure.
As soon as you convince me that he existed.
Then you'll have to convince me that he's not dead.
i guess you're not a fan of history and evidence, huh? nothing i can do about that!

the law of the land dictates that we agree to disagree without doing each other harm and i'm more than good with leaving it at that!:)

OCB

“What a GLORIOUS day!!!”

Since: Apr 12

Orlando but NYC born & raised

#620568 Apr 30, 2013
waaasssuuup wrote:
<quoted text>
i guess you're not a fan of history and evidence, huh? nothing i can do about that!
the law of the land dictates that we agree to disagree without doing each other harm and i'm more than good with leaving it at that!:)
What has the law of the land or its dictates have to do with agreeing to disagree without doing harm to another?

Couldn't you agree to disagree without doing harm to another even if it wasn't the "law of the land"?

Is it only the law which keeps you in check and which you must rely on in the absence of possessing any moral fiber?

OCB

“What a GLORIOUS day!!!”

Since: Apr 12

Orlando but NYC born & raised

#620569 Apr 30, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Whatever, dude. It's true. Tide claimed that it's not justice that people who have never even heard of Jesus go straight to Hell.
He was wrong.
What was he wrong about?

Was it his claim that it's not justice or was he wrong about those who haven't heard of your Jesus going straight to hell?

“e pluribus unum”

Since: Dec 10

primus inter pares

#620570 Apr 30, 2013
nanoanomaly wrote:
<quoted text>"We?" I think for myself and you are full of crap.
Actually you spend most of your topix time trying to be annoying condescending, adversarial, opinionated, and hostile to any thoughts other than those that mirror your own.

“let's do this thang!”

Since: Aug 10

Location hidden

#620571 Apr 30, 2013
OCB wrote:
<quoted text>What has the law of the land or its dictates have to do with agreeing to disagree without doing harm to another?
Couldn't you agree to disagree without doing harm to another even if it wasn't the "law of the land"?
Is it only the law which keeps you in check and which you must rely on in the absence of possessing any moral fiber?
http://blogs.965thebuzz.com/files/2011/06/gla...

Since: Jan 11

Location hidden

#620572 Apr 30, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
See? God *poofing* in next to you is "an impossible explanation".
That's your confirmation bias right there.
I'm only going to respond to this one post.

I trust the laws of logic. If we can call anything impossible, we must start with logical contradictions. The Bible describes "God" in logical contradictions.

This is my position. See what you can do to counter it.

Since: Jan 11

Location hidden

#620573 Apr 30, 2013
Catcher1 wrote:
That's your opinion and nothing more.
I happen to agree with Tide.
If I had the Bible memorized, I'd produce the verses that contradict those he posted.

But the point is irrelevant.

A god that tortures even one person for an eternity, no matter what they did in life, isn't a just god, a merciful god, or a loving god.

If we know what justice, mercy, and love are, we cannot apply these characteristics to such a being.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 5 min Joe Fortuna 88,183
I still LOVE YOU SO MUCH, Ewa, Honey 44 min Doctor REALITY 5
Christians cannot debate with ATHEISTS 1 hr Buck Crick 575
Bush is a hero (Sep '07) 1 hr bad bob 184,737
Secular Humanism VS Christianity 1 hr Buck Crick 150
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 1 hr confrinting with ... 665,354
How come God doesn't intervene in suicides? 1 hr Knock off purse s... 12
Poll Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 2 hr OneMale OneChild 284,570
More from around the web