Well I can't play this game with you, seriously if you're gonna act like atheists don't use a confirmation bias to support their opinion then you're either really, really stupid or you're a liar. I don't think you're stupid.
Whenever an atheist and a theist have a debate about religion, it's usually the case that the confirmation bias of the theist causes them to make all sorts of errors.
If you understood religion as well as I do, the cognitive dissonance that would produce in you would be so uncomfortable that you would live in constant turmoil. You can't understand, as a believer. It would wreck your faith. Understanding religion results in atheism, in almost every case.
I disagree, I think the more one learns about their religion the more they believe in it, mot the less they believe in it.
See? You, an atheist, are using confirmation bias to support your opinion.
Oh give me a break, that's like telling the judge that the fine for speeding was too much because the speed limit is unfair.It is in error. Where is the justice in torturing a human for eternity, for any crime a human can commit? Would it be justice for me to kill you and your family in return for you flicking a booger at me?
It is an error to attribute such a fictional character with anything close to justice, when it gratuitously punishes the vast majority of human souls for an eternity.
You know the speed limit so you have a choice, either you obey it and everything's fine for you disobey it and you pay the penalty.
Not once, but twice you use the atheist handbook because you have nothing else to say, no defense.You're an idiot.
You're an idiot.
No it isn't, it's based purely on conjecture, opinion and your 'gut feeling'. That's hardly evidence.My "belief" that no deities exist is based on statistical analysis.
I'm sorry that you're getting all butt hurt over this, but that's your downfall, not mine.Not even close.
If you're not going to put effort into it, I'm not going to bother with you.