Prove there's a god.

OCB

“What a GLORIOUS day!!!”

Since: Apr 12

Orlando but NYC born & raised

#620473 Apr 29, 2013
Rossalina wrote:
I don't have to prove it. It's a FAITH. LOL
Correct. It is faith and therefore is not fact that any god exists.

Beliefs are just that- beliefs- and unless proven to be fact, should never be referred to as fact.

OCB

“What a GLORIOUS day!!!”

Since: Apr 12

Orlando but NYC born & raised

#620474 Apr 29, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
You just can't stop bragging about yourself, can you?
So you couldn't tell that I was talking about you and Nano?

Better I should think that than to think you meant for this post of yours to be humorous.....if that was your intent, you failed- AGAIN.....

OCB

“What a GLORIOUS day!!!”

Since: Apr 12

Orlando but NYC born & raised

#620475 Apr 29, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
I am.
<quoted text>
You misunderstand. <SHOCKING>
I fault people like you for that. For being so adamantly against religion and God but praising your religious president.
<quoted text>
It is. It's refreshing.
And a nice reminder of our Christian country.
<quoted text>
I didn't say anything of the sort. That's your assertion.
Obama saying "god bless...." is not any sort of proof that he is religious.

Do you think every time someone says to someone "god bless you" after they sneeze that they are religious?

Do you think a woman crying out "oh god!" in bed means she is religious?

Nope- ours is not a Christian country and it won't be no matter how many times you insist it is.

BTW, I am not "against" religion- I am against people trying to shove religion down the throats of others for many reasons with one of those reasons being that ours is a SECULAR nation.

Always has been, still is and in all very likely probability, always will be- and thank GOD for that.

So that I said "thank GOD for that" would lead you to assume that I am religious??

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#620476 Apr 29, 2013
OCB wrote:
<quoted text>Well, now you know.
Time for you to take NanoNUT to task for posting to me on Saturday when just a week or two prior, she said she would NEVER post to me again.
Aw, is the self appointed queen of PTAG tryin ta boss me around?

“let's do this thang!”

Since: Aug 10

Location hidden

#620477 Apr 29, 2013
OCB wrote:
<quoted text>Correct. It is faith and therefore is not fact that any god exists.
Beliefs are just that- beliefs- and unless proven to be fact, should never be referred to as fact.
don't mind OCB, sister rosalinda, she's just our resident 'gladys kravitz' who minds everyone elses business but her own:)

http://blogs.965thebuzz.com/files/2011/06/gla...

“Is that all you've got?”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#620478 Apr 29, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
I am.
<quoted text>
You misunderstand. <SHOCKING>
I fault people like you for that. For being so adamantly against religion and God but praising your religious president.
<quoted text>
It is. It's refreshing.
And a nice reminder of our Christian country.
<quoted text>
I didn't say anything of the sort. That's your assertion.
As long as he's for partial-birth abortions people like OCB don't give a shyt how hypocritical he is. His lies mean nothing to the amoral as long as he gives them what they want.

“LAUREN IS MY SISTA :)”

Since: Apr 13

Over the Rainbow

#620479 Apr 29, 2013
why do we have to prove it, if you believe in god then you believe in god if you don't then you don't i don't really care it's your choice believe in what you want I'm not going to tell you what to or not to put your faith in

“let's do this thang!”

Since: Aug 10

Location hidden

#620480 Apr 29, 2013
Lauren and Kat wrote:
why do we have to prove it, if you believe in god then you believe in god if you don't then you don't i don't really care it's your choice believe in what you want I'm not going to tell you what to or not to put your faith in
if only it could be so simple, but atheist/humanist/socialist's can't have it that way. you see, they're like Cain's Abels and they have to control or destroy the people around them who remind them that they're being irresponsible hypocrites:)

“let's do this thang!”

Since: Aug 10

Location hidden

#620481 Apr 29, 2013
Lauren and Kat wrote:
why do we have to prove it, if you believe in god then you believe in god if you don't then you don't i don't really care it's your choice believe in what you want I'm not going to tell you what to or not to put your faith in
CORRECTION: if only it could be so simple, but atheist/humanist/socialist's can't have it that way. you see, they're like Cain's AMONG Abels and they have to control or destroy the people around them who remind them that they're being irresponsible hypocrites:)

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#620482 Apr 29, 2013
nanoanomaly wrote:
<quoted text>As long as he's for partial-birth abortions people like OCB don't give a shyt how hypocritical he is. His lies mean nothing to the amoral as long as he gives them what they want.
I can imagine any human being only being in favor of a partial birth abortion, if the child was considered to be essentially brain dead, so as to avoid any further distress to that being. Other than that, aborting a child which is a full intact human being in bizarre. If one wants an abortion for cosmetic reasons (by that I mean for reasons not to do with danger to the woman or child), then for goodness sakes, why not do it when they first find out they are pregnant, rather than waiting until the child is fully developed.

It is not that I think the child experiences anything in the process because likely its senses if they exist have all been destroyed or put to sleep, but it is just the principal of killing a child that would be someone's very special little person when it actually was born, if left alone.

My opinion of babies and humans is too high to condone killing them for no valid reason, and finding a valid reason for killing another human being, should not be a simple as some people make it, and that includes in wars.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#620483 Apr 29, 2013
OCB wrote:
<quoted text>Obama saying "god bless...." is not any sort of proof that he is religious.
Do you think every time someone says to someone "god bless you" after they sneeze that they are religious?
Do you think a woman crying out "oh god!" in bed means she is religious?
Nope- ours is not a Christian country and it won't be no matter how many times you insist it is.
BTW, I am not "against" religion- I am against people trying to shove religion down the throats of others for many reasons with one of those reasons being that ours is a SECULAR nation.
Always has been, still is and in all very likely probability, always will be- and thank GOD for that.
So that I said "thank GOD for that" would lead you to assume that I am religious??
You're such a hypocrite.

So if Hitler says something religious, that means he's religious.

When Obama says something religious, that means nothing.

Gotcha by the balls now, lady.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#620484 Apr 29, 2013
nanoanomaly wrote:
<quoted text>As long as he's for partial-birth abortions people like OCB don't give a shyt how hypocritical he is. His lies mean nothing to the amoral as long as he gives them what they want.
True dat.

Hey, didjya hear about the "nano/RR" alliance?

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#620485 Apr 29, 2013
waaasssuuup wrote:
<quoted text>
don't mind OCB, sister rosalinda, she's just our resident 'gladys kravitz' who minds everyone elses business but her own:)
http://blogs.965thebuzz.com/files/2011/06/gla...
HA HA HA HA !!!!

That's what OCB looks like, huh?

OCB

“What a GLORIOUS day!!!”

Since: Apr 12

Orlando but NYC born & raised

#620486 Apr 29, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
You're such a hypocrite.
So if Hitler says something religious, that means he's religious.
When Obama says something religious, that means nothing.
Gotcha by the balls now, lady.
HITLER went on and on and on about how he was doing the work of your Jesus.

You are an IDIOT to think that someone saying "god bless you all" means a person is religious.

What HITLER said- yep- THAT was religious.

Saying "god bless you all" is NOT.

How sad for you that you're too GOD damned dumb to know the difference.

You ain't got SH*T, RR- not even balls of your own.

MORON.

OCB

“What a GLORIOUS day!!!”

Since: Apr 12

Orlando but NYC born & raised

#620487 Apr 29, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Aw, is the self appointed queen of PTAG tryin ta boss me around?
Nope- not at all.

But you're quick to point me changing my mind yet you say NOTHING to that psychoB*TCH Nano the cunny.

You are a stinking hypocrite, but really- given how you truly stink in so many other ways, your stinking hypocrisy is a minor issue.

“H-o-o-o-o-o-o-ld on thar!”

Since: Sep 08

The Borderland of Sol

#620488 Apr 29, 2013
waaasssuuup wrote:
<quoted text>
if only it could be so simple, but atheist/humanist/socialist's can't have it that way. you see, they're like Cain's Abels and they have to control or destroy the people around them who remind them that they're being irresponsible hypocrites:)
It is that simple.

You: "God".

Me: "Really? Kewl! Show me."

You: "BLASPHEMER! LIAR!"

OCB

“What a GLORIOUS day!!!”

Since: Apr 12

Orlando but NYC born & raised

#620489 Apr 29, 2013
waaasssuuup wrote:
<quoted text>
don't mind OCB, sister rosalinda, she's just our resident 'gladys kravitz' who minds everyone elses business but her own:)
http://blogs.965thebuzz.com/files/2011/06/gla...
No- I mind my OWN business first and foremost, you LOON.

But YOU- you try to make it YOUR business that not everyone believes in your POS god and your Jesus.

Yet you parade around these threads all the time acting as if YOU HATE your POS god AND your Jesus.

Like RR, YOU ARE NOT A CHRISTIAN.

Like RR, you are a POSER.

Like RR, you insult your god and your Jesus- for IF they exist, you are so much NOT a Christian that you think you could fool them into believing you are.

Since: Jul 09

Location hidden

#620490 Apr 29, 2013
psalms 23 wrote:
<quoted text>
Not really, but obviously you didnt read my post to you about it..
I had asked you if GTS was the foundation to evolution.
So does that order reflect the assumption of macro-evolution (the widely held notion that all life is related and has descended from a common ancestor)?
are you really so uneducated?

“let's do this thang!”

Since: Aug 10

Location hidden

#620491 Apr 29, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
HA HA HA HA !!!!
That's what OCB looks like, huh?
it's what she acts like....so yeah, i guess you could say it's what she 'cyber looks like':)

Since: Jul 09

Location hidden

#620492 Apr 29, 2013
psalms 23 wrote:
<quoted text>
ohh, ok.. Well here is a good place to start as well..
http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/2010...
http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/cont...
http://ronyan.org/aaronk1994/aaronsblog/categ...
A popular contradiction skeptics love to exploit is one between 1 Kings 4:26 and 2 Chronicles 9:25.
1 Kings 4:26:
“And Solomon had forty thousand stalls of horses for his chariots, and twelve thousand horsemen.”
2 Chronicles 9:25:
“And Solomon had four thousand stalls for horses and chariots, and twelve thousand horsemen; whom he bestowed in the chariot cities, and with the king at Jerusalem.”
So, which is it? Forty thousand stalls or four thousand stalls? Finally, the skeptic has found an error in the Bible! YES!
Wawawa. Another failure by the skeptic.
This “error” is nothing more than a minor error by a scribe, not a contradiction.
Many critics of Christianity express hypocrisy to the principles of textual criticism when it comes to explaining claims of error in the Biblical text. They reject all explanations involving copyist error, even though they are of the same type used by textual critics in secular studies to resolve difficulties.
We’ve already said that there is no evidence that this problem existed in the original text, do we have any evidence that it didn’t exist in the original text? Yes.
• The reading found in 2 Chronicles.
• Archaeological data indicating that 4000 would be an appropriate number of stalls for a nation the size of ancient Israel, whereas 40,000 would be very excessive.
• 4000 comports better with the number of horsemen.
• There is sufficient explanation for a change. Eric Vestrup notes that there is a reasonable probability that a scribe copied incorrectly, for “40&#8243; is spelled aleph-resh-bet-ayin-yodh-mem with “4&#8243; being spelled aleph-resh-bet-ayin-heh , the only difference being the plural “-im” ending in “40&#8243; while “4&#8243; has the singular feminine ending.
so the bible is subject to error
the god does not look over the scribe's shoulder.

they say that there are several thousand errors, do you think they are all "copyist errors" or are some of them lies?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Letter: DNC accept responsibility 1 min PoliciaFederal 42
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 3 min New Age Spiritual... 667,755
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 5 min Rider on the Storm 92,611
Jehovah's Witnesses are true disciple of Jesus ... (Mar '07) 1 hr Student 46,035
Bush is a hero (Sep '07) 1 hr Rider on the Storm 183,621
Poll Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 5 hr onemales son 286,022
Poll If you're Christain what kind are you? (Oct '07) 6 hr dolarsbill 19,322
More from around the web