I find all your assertions biased toward a specific criteria.<quoted text>As is Everett's Many Worlds hypothesis and whether information is permanently lost(so far) at the event horizon of a black hole; all unfalsifiable, yet NOT worthless speculation. You are merely running scared when you try to shoot down one hypothesis over another, claiming it worthless. Fear has no place in true freethinker mode.
But you call that free thinking, when it is actually highly opinionated thinking. What's even worse about it is there doesn't have to be evidence for you to support your biased opinion.
I do not pick and choose hypothesis by what I want to believe, I pick and choose them by the evidence that supports them.
In this case with "quantum consciousness" nearly all predictions have been falsified. So it is rejected due to lack of evidence.
With Penrose and his Orch-OR theory which is simply asserting that wave collapse is caused by the brain, is destroyed by
The theory of Decoherence. The only thing scientific about it , was that it was testable, but it failed so pick and choose how you like nano.