Prove there's a god.

[OCB]

USG wrote:

The theory that we evolved would be a good one IF only there were evidence of that.

Really- you need to start educating yourself SOMEPLACE-

Here's a good start for you:

"Scientists and crime solvers have something in common. They can both figure out what happened, even if no one was there to see it.

Scientists do the same thing that crime solvers do. They look for clues. The more clues that were left behind, the more likely they are to figure it out.

If all of the clues point to the same conclusion, then they know what happened.

Consider the case of the origin of species.

There are many thousands of clues, and they all point to the conclusion that life evolved.

There are so many clues that they fall under multiple disciplines of science.

Each of these disciplines provides a separate line of evidence for evolution."

http://www.teachthemscience.org/evidence

[Mylan]

Aura Mytha wrote:

Men have greater sex drive because the parietal lobe is larger.

In regard to parietal lobe morphology, men have larger volumes of parietal lobe BUT it does not determine libido.

[hey]

umm I think there is god and scientist can't even explain something proerply even they didn't even know nothing about sky until they found in quran

[Mylan]

nanoanomaly wrote:

Ok, show me the math, Einstein.

Why? You clearly wouldn't understand it.

[nanoanomaly]

Mylan wrote:

<quoted text>How so?

Stop pretending innocence.

[Mylan]

nanoanomaly wrote:

Ok, show me the math, Einstein.

It's called Astrobiology dumbass. Sorry that it's not a word you'll likely find in your buybull.

"Astrobiology makes use of physics, chemistry, astronomy, biology, molecular biology, ecology, planetary science, geography, and geology to investigate the possibility of life on other worlds and help recognize biospheres that might be different from the biosphere on Earth. Astrobiology concerns itself with interpretation of existing scientific data; given more detailed and reliable data from other parts of the universe, the roots of astrobiology itself—physics, chemistry and biology—may have their theoretical bases challenged. Although speculation is entertained to give context, astrobiology concerns itself primarily with hypotheses that fit firmly into existing scientific theories.

Earth is the only place in the universe known to harbor life. However, recent advances in planetary science have changed fundamental assumptions about the possibility of life in the universe, raising the estimates of habitable zones around other stars and the search for extraterrestrial microbial life. The possibility of life on Mars, either currently or in the past, is an active area of research."

"Advancements in the fields of astrobiology, observational astronomy and discovery of large varieties of extremophiles with extraordinary capability to thrive in the harshest environments on Earth, have led to speculation that life may possibly be thriving on many of the extraterrestrial bodies in the universe. A particular focus of current astrobiology research is the search for life on Mars due to its proximity to Earth and geological history. There is a growing body of evidence to suggest that Mars has previously had a considerable amount of water on its surface, water being considered an essential precursor to the development of carbon-based life."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astrobiology

How arrogant of you to suggest that "mankind" knows everything, and is the only life form in the INFINITE universe. Your religion makes you a prisoner in the jail of stupidity.

[Aura Mytha]

OCB wrote:

<quoted text> What a silly blanket statement you made.
Not ALL men have greater sex drives than women and not ALL women have lower sex drives than men.
MANY factors contribute to the level of one's sex drive and not all of them are biological or even physiological.

Yes I think some women may have greater sex drives than men, but medically and historically men are considered to have greater sex drives. I think this is shown throughout the animal kingdom, males competing to the death over it.
This in humans is also thought to be due partially to the greater levels of testosterone in men , but the parietal lobe is larger in men and somatosensory input is to the parietal lobe.
So touch, smells, feelings haptic perception...you know what I mean?

[Mylan]

nanoanomaly wrote:

Stop pretending innocence.

Didn't think you could answer it. BTW, that's called prejudice.

[Just Think]

USG wrote:

<quoted text>
So life just appeared one day?

Is that what I said?

[Aura Mytha]

Mylan wrote:

<quoted text>In regard to parietal lobe morphology, men have larger volumes of parietal lobe BUT it does not determine libido.

Of course touching another person and the sensation would have nothing to do with sex drive.

[Aura Mytha]

USG wrote:

The theory that we evolved would be a good one IF only there were evidence of that.

You don't think your family evolved?
Have you seen a doctor about it?

[nanoanomaly]

Mylan wrote:

<quoted text>Didn't think you could answer it. BTW, that's called prejudice.

You are a willful thought oppressor.

You claim that imagination is good for people but only if it is the type of imaginings that you approve of. It is not your place to handicap anyone's imagination.

[Aura Mytha]

hey wrote:

umm I think there is god and scientist can't even explain something proerply even they didn't even know nothing about sky until they found in quran

Do what? Are you on drugs?

[Aura Mytha]

Mylan wrote:

<quoted text>From our perspective yes, but humans have been wrong before. Mathematically it's pretty unlikely that we are the only life form.

Um there's a whole bunch of them here , not just yous twos.

[nanoanomaly]

Mylan wrote:

<quoted text>It's called Astrobiology dumbass. Sorry that it's not a word you'll likely find in your buybull.
"Astrobiology makes use of physics, chemistry, astronomy, biology, molecular biology, ecology, planetary science, geography, and geology to investigate the possibility of life on other worlds and help recognize biospheres that might be different from the biosphere on Earth. Astrobiology concerns itself with interpretation of existing scientific data; given more detailed and reliable data from other parts of the universe, the roots of astrobiology itself—physics, chemistry and biology—may have their theoretical bases challenged. Although speculation is entertained to give context, astrobiology concerns itself primarily with hypotheses that fit firmly into existing scientific theories.
Earth is the only place in the universe known to harbor life. However, recent advances in planetary science have changed fundamental assumptions about the possibility of life in the universe, raising the estimates of habitable zones around other stars and the search for extraterrestrial microbial life. The possibility of life on Mars, either currently or in the past, is an active area of research."
"Advancements in the fields of astrobiology, observational astronomy and discovery of large varieties of extremophiles with extraordinary capability to thrive in the harshest environments on Earth, have led to speculation that life may possibly be thriving on many of the extraterrestrial bodies in the universe. A particular focus of current astrobiology research is the search for life on Mars due to its proximity to Earth and geological history. There is a growing body of evidence to suggest that Mars has previously had a considerable amount of water on its surface, water being considered an essential precursor to the development of carbon-based life."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astrobiology
How arrogant of you to suggest that "mankind" knows everything, and is the only life form in the INFINITE universe. Your religion makes you a prisoner in the jail of stupidity.

I asked you to show mathematical proof of the probability of life existing anywhere else but here, wadsworth.

You still haven't given any, of your own or anyone elses.

FYI,(as if you even read THAT far in the wiki tome) the Drake Equation factors are all nothing more than weak speculation with no basis in anything factual.

http://www.technologyreview.com/view/424795/p...

Try again, wookie breath.

[Honeysuckler_ros e]

OCB wrote:

<quoted text>First of all, it is NOT just the generation of today and I provided you with quotes from Plato and Socrates which illustrated that.
Here they are again:
"The children now love luxury. They have bad manners, contempt for authority, they show disrespect to their elders.... They no longer rise when elders enter the room. They contradict their parents, chatter before company, gobble up dainties at the table, cross their legs, and are tyrants over their teachers." -Socrates
"The young people of today think of nothing but themselves. They have no reverence for parents or old age. They are impatient of all restraint. They talk as if they alone knew everything and what passes for wisdom with us is foolishness with them. As for girls, they are forward, immodest and unwomanly in speech, behaviour and dress." -Plato
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Are_people_getting_...
Next- there are many ways to discipline and to teach children to respect authority without resorting to physical force or any kind of physical violence.
Spanking children teaches them to fear- it does NOT teach them to respect and there is a world of difference between the two.
I respect MANY people who have never laid a hand on me and never would but if they did, that respect would be gone in an instant.
And respect is EARNED and people can not be forced to respect anyone.
But they CAN be taught to FEAR someone- and all the more if the person being taught is a CHILD.
And sorry- but for way too many parents, it's easier and takes less time to HIT their kids than it does to actually TALK to their kids.
And even SCREAMING at kids is better than resorting to ANY type of physical force or violence.
And spanking is never done in anger or should NOT be done in anger? Wow. So the parent should just very calmly tell little Billy: I'm not angry with you, but I'm going to HIT you to at the very least cause you to feel humiliation.
I'm not going to explain to you why what you said/did was wrong- instead, I'm gonna HIT you and that'll be that....
Is THAT how it goes, Patty?
Well, there have also been many serial killers who didn't kill in anger either. Didn't make them any less deranged.
If anything, to spank a child when not angry with the child- that sounds very cold hearted and calculated, which also happens to be the MO of a great many serial killers.

well you are certainly entitled to your opinion.
but i disagree with you
and God disagrees with you.
anyone over 50 can ATTEST to the drastic changes in the generations OCB.
when i attended school in the 60s and 70s i assure you there was no such thing as school shootings.
UNheard of.
no lock downs, no metal detectors, no police patrol, no drug sniffing dogs in the halls.
drive bys were Rarely on the news.
i grew up in cincinnati, a large city.
and we could leave our cars unlocked back then.
NOT TODAY.
Crime has escalated over time.
this is a world wide issue
crime in the UK has risen like 44% over the last few years.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12564...
in the U.S
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,199096,00...
youth today walk around with their butt cracks showing
tatoos and piercing from head to toe
teen pregnancy is on the rise
http://abcnews.go.com/Health/story...
young people in the age bracket today of 15 to 24 have FOUR TIMES higher rate of chlamydia and other STD'S than any other age group measured against the population
http://www.cdc.gov/std/health-disparities/age...
there are more kids living on the streets now than every before.

[Aura Mytha]

nanoanomaly wrote:

<quoted text>I asked you to show mathematical proof of the probability of life existing anywhere else but here, wadsworth.
You still haven't given any, of your own or anyone elses.
FYI,(as if you even read THAT far in the wiki tome) the Drake Equation factors are all nothing more than weak speculation with no basis in anything factual.
http://www.technologyreview.com/view/424795/p...
Try again, wookie breath.

The odds that the milky way would produce life is 1 in 400,000,000 , at the very worst. If all galaxies have the same odds, then there should be life on at least 1 planet in each.
But if there is life in 1 planet in a million galaxies, there is still great odds there is life out there because.
There are hundreds of billions of galaxies in the universe.
So even a small chance of life , on a universal scale amounts to a large figure.

[Honeysuckler_ros e]

OCB

your post was so long i couldn't reply to it.
only allows so many letters on a post.

anyone over 50 yrs old KNOWS that the youth of today are not as they were 30 or 40 yrs ago.

I grew up in Cincinnati, a large city.
when i went to school in the 60s and 70s there were NO school shootings.
unheard of.
kids didn't come to school with guns
or make out hit lists.
there were no lock downs, metal detectors or police patrol in the schools.
Fact is today in the age bracket of kids ages 15 to 24 yrs old TODAY are FOUR TIMES HIGHER in the catagory of people with chlamydia and other STD'S.

Fact is,
Teen pregnancy is on the rise

http://abcnews.go.com/Health/story...

Fact is,
crime is on the rise
http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/regio...

Fact is,
the kids today suffer from more mental health issues than in the past....
http://depression.about.com/b/2010/01/11/yout...

Fact is,
kids today are lazier and we are facing a society of OBESITY in children today.
they don't play, exercise or do chores.
they fill their minds with violence on tv, play violent video games and listen to crazy music that have lyrics like,'I wanna slap you B'...
and filthy things like that.

they walk around with their butt cracks showing and their skin destroyed with tatoos and piercings.

they don't hold the door for anyone, or say thank you, or sir or mame'
they use the 'f' word in every breath, and disrespect their elders regularly.

THIS is a result of with holding spanking,
and not loving a child enough to warm their backside instead of worrying about hurting their feelings.

I have lived almost 59 yr's.
so i KNOW that the generations of today are worse than the generations of yesterday.

This is what your new age pop physocology produces.

[Mylan]

nanoanomaly wrote:

You are a willful thought oppressor.

Prove it, and not just with your biased "opinion" but with fact. I'll wait.

[Mylan]

Honeysuckler_rose wrote:

the kids today suffer from more mental health issues than in the past....

kids today are lazier and we are facing a society of OBESITY in children today.

True, but not because they are lazy or don't do "chores' as you call it.