Prove there's a god.
Largelanguage

Wrexham, UK

#599739 Feb 11, 2013
Mylan wrote:
<quoted text>There are MANY ways to verify this, and yet YOU have NO way To verify "god" Why is that loser?
1. If God exists, then he is perfect.
2. If God exists, then he is the creator of the universe.
3. A perfect being would have no needs or wants.
4. If any being created the universe, then he must have had some need or want.
5. Therefore, it is impossible for a perfect being to be the creator of the universe (from 3 and 4).
6. Hence, it is impossible for God to exist (from 1, 2, and 5).
See how easy it is to understand slave?
Here's another;
1. If God exists, then he is immutable (hope that word's not too big for you redneck)
2. If God exists, then he is the creator of the universe.
3. An immutable being cannot at one time have an intention and then at a later time not have that intention.
4. For any being to create anything, prior to the creation he must have had the intention to create it, but at a later time, after the creation, no longer have the intention to create it.
5. Thus, it is impossible for an immutable being to have created anything (from 3 and 4).
6. Therefore, it is impossible for God to exist (from 1, 2, and 5)
When you read this post I smell rubber burning redneck, is that the rubber band inside your head over heating, trying to figure out a way to weasel out of this? That's rhetorical of course.
Now you TRY to prove that your "god" exist. Go ahead, I dare you loser.
1. God is perfect.
2. God is the creator of the universe.
3. God does want things, what is different is the ability for a person to meet his wants, which he can.
4. He did have a want, and easily met his desire.
Based on all of the above, 1-4, it is not impossible, unintellectual moron.
5. No it is not. Lost again, gibberish head.
6. More deflections of your own limited experience with schrephrenia.

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#599740 Feb 11, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
You don't believe you should care for the weak. You emotionless inhuman sociapath!
This from the LOSER who constantly wishes that innocent people get raped and/or murdered. You're a fraud and a loser little crusty turd.

“ Ah see's lanlubbers Cap'n BT!”

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#599741 Feb 11, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
What a perfect example of a heathen! You attacked someone who has been perfectly civil and never attacked you, such as GenoGirl. You have been outted as a hoodlum!
Well...Thanks fer that Lunger.
Yer socks all smell the same ta me...an it's revealing that you jist couldn't resust mak'n the remark covering yer azz like ya did...
That was the reason I baited ya in the first place...

Now we all can know.

Carry on Lunger!

“ Ah see's lanlubbers Cap'n BT!”

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#599742 Feb 11, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
But God is just like her daddy(Who raped her, HAHAHA).
You mean yer Virgin Mary?
Largelanguage

Wrexham, UK

#599743 Feb 11, 2013
Mylan wrote:
<quoted text>Show me where I said that or STFU loser.
You said you hated all religions with the only exception being budism. So why don't you hate Islam? What was it Bill Gothard taught you? You seem to have an anger towards christianity because you were brought up by abusive strict "christian" fanatical parents, deal with it yourself, or brand yourself the name of a weakling in the chain of evolution.

“ Ah see's lanlubbers Cap'n BT!”

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#599744 Feb 11, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
NAMBLA is one of your gay groups, trying to lower the age of consent. NAMBLA comprises of many homosexual males who happen to be paedophiles.
The american population is 313,914,040. Gays make up 2% or 1% of the american population, which leaves 6278280 or 3139140. I'm sure NAMBLA has many members in it, with many of those people within the 6278280 to 3139140 range. So you have it, a large percentage of most gays are trying to get in the butt of young boys. All gays are paedophiles.
Thanks fer yer input flybuster...
That's why O asked...so ya could show everyone exactly who an what ya are...

Carry on Lunger!

Since: Jul 09

Location hidden

#599745 Feb 11, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
I will continue to call you an atheist until you tell me what you are.
BTW - Nice diversion to my post...
compliments from experts should be apprediated

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#599746 Feb 11, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
No it does not.
LIAR.... liar...... iar..... ar....r.....

When you get communion do you ever ask yourself "wow, if this really is the blood of jesus, then he must have been wasted 24/7."
Largelanguage

Wrexham, UK

#599747 Feb 11, 2013
karl44 wrote:
<quoted text>
the "original" of the book you call the bible, was assembled under the direction of Emperor Constantine at the Council of Nicaea, most of the authorship is unknown.(First Council of Nicaea in AD 325 >wiki)
No, the early church was in Israel from the Jews. And Constantine was a catholic, different from the Christian bible. And constanine only settled after the dates of the Bible was written.

How dumb!

Since: Jul 09

Location hidden

#599748 Feb 11, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
I will continue to call you an atheist until you tell me what you are.
BTW - Nice diversion to my post...
compliments from experts should be appreciated
Largelanguage

Wrexham, UK

#599749 Feb 11, 2013
Mylan wrote:
<quoted text>I will, soon as you register so they can ban your IP. My pleasure.
I wouldn't get angry if they did, unlike you irrational little sod. I bet you hate it whenever you face opposition, so self absorbed. So self centered. Its all about you. Don't like it when someone makes just one odd comment.

“ Ah see's lanlubbers Cap'n BT!”

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#599750 Feb 11, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
He thinks I am that poster called Gatekeeper1, from palmdale, he thinks I am a sock puppet. I used to post as orangelion on here though, I'm sure you noticed already, must have gotten you angry, and enraged when you wish you could point that out, but you couldn't, otherwise it would reveal you as the sock puppet of hidingfromyou, the username you posted under while observing orangelion. Oh look, I mentioned posted under orangelion, I beat you to it! We know you are that same user from Japan called hidingfromyou.
No think'n about it...You are proving it by your own words and stupidity!

You are BUSTED again Lunger...

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#599751 Feb 11, 2013
Black Thunder 42 wrote:
Now ya know.
Thank you. Explains why the loser is using a gray box.
Largelanguage

Wrexham, UK

#599752 Feb 11, 2013
Mylan wrote:
<quoted text>Only because you have more children which you then "train".... Don't pat yourself on the back just yet fool...
Just like how you were trained?
Largelanguage

Wrexham, UK

#599753 Feb 11, 2013
Black Thunder 42 wrote:
<quoted text> Lunger is jist another of hundreds of sockpuppets that lives in palmdale, ca. The only reason the azzhole loser stalker uses this greybox lunger is all his other shit is banned for now...
I have no doubt that Acadia is the second in the good guy/bad guy sockpuppet routine either...it helps the loser to keep up it's positive icon count in the process.
Problem is...this Lunger really sucks at it.
Now ya know.
While you suck at writing anything actually offensive, no matter how much you try to hurt people. Hard to believe you are 63.

Since: Jul 09

Location hidden

#599754 Feb 11, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Me?!
You're the one that thinks God is a sky daddy & lives in the clouds. Grow up.
only the god you advance

others are thought to live elsewhere, according to their advocates.
Largelanguage

Wrexham, UK

#599755 Feb 11, 2013
Black Thunder 42 wrote:
<quoted text> Well...Thanks fer that Lunger.
Yer socks all smell the same ta me...an it's revealing that you jist couldn't resust mak'n the remark covering yer azz like ya did...
That was the reason I baited ya in the first place...
Now we all can know.
Carry on Lunger!
Is using the sock puppet arguement and excuse to cover your sorry ass? Such integrity! So you aren't even honest with yourself that you are doing the right thing. Sucks for you to be in such a complex!

RiversideRedneck

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#599756 Feb 11, 2013
Mylan wrote:
There are MANY ways to verify this, and yet YOU have NO way To verify "god" Why is that loser?
1. If God exists, then he is perfect.
2. If God exists, then he is the creator of the universe.
3. A perfect being would have no needs or wants.
4. If any being created the universe, then he must have had some need or want.
5. Therefore, it is impossible for a perfect being to be the creator of the universe (from 3 and 4).
6. Hence, it is impossible for God to exist (from 1, 2, and 5).


First, you have to be able to prove or to show that your #1 guess is correct. Then and only then can you get to #2.

Why & how did you come to the conclusion that if God exists, then He "is" perfect?
1. If God exists, then he is immutable (hope that word's not too big for you redneck)
2. If God exists, then he is the creator of the universe.
3. An immutable being cannot at one time have an intention and then at a later time not have that intention.
4. For any being to create anything, prior to the creation he must have had the intention to create it, but at a later time, after the creation, no longer have the intention to create it.
5. Thus, it is impossible for an immutable being to have created anything (from 3 and 4).
6. Therefore, it is impossible for God to exist (from 1, 2, and 5)
When you read this post I smell rubber burning redneck, is that the rubber band inside your head over heating, trying to figure out a way to weasel out of this? That's rhetorical of course.
Now you TRY to prove that your "god" exist. Go ahead, I dare you loser.
What makes you think God is immutable? You can demonstrate the He is unable to change?
See how easy it is to understand slave?
See how easy that was to debunk, atheist?

“ Ah see's lanlubbers Cap'n BT!”

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#599757 Feb 11, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
Personal attacks that aren't even original, you've already been outted as a barbaric self hating heathen, Black Thunder 63.
That wasn't a personal attack you imbecile.

It was a question involving an incident in your (supposed) town that everyone would have been well aware of if the "actually" lived there.

You are obviously NOT aware of it...and a pathetic PHONEY....

Being a Lunger from palmdale.
Largelanguage

Wrexham, UK

#599758 Feb 11, 2013
Black Thunder 42 wrote:
<quoted text> You mean yer Virgin Mary?
Mary was not raped, gullible little turd! No education, so no one should be bothered with you either. You are such a poor excuse for a human being, you so do know that don't you?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing (Mar '17) 17 min NICK 88,568
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 28 min BongoKrap 703,852
Poll ~ Should 911 have a New Investigation? ~ (Feb '11) 46 min Choir Loft 952
mgtow 3 hr GotIt 15
God is REAL - Miracles Happen! (Jun '11) 3 hr ChromiuMan 6,924
I'm sick of being single and having no one to l... 3 hr Choicerocks 8
Why are women from USA prefer casual dating ove... 4 hr Choicerocks 4