That is a teleological perspective and yes which reminds me I'm still up for the creats/creator argument which I've been left unanswered. Thanks for bringing that up again.<quoted text>
please explain how your right pinky proves that leprechauns exist. as far as i can see, there is no logical connection between the two.
on the other hand, the existence of the world, in all its' complexity and beauty, logically implies that there must have been a Creator. just as a painting logically implies an artist, a building logically implies an architect, a delicious meal logically implies a chef, the existence of the universe and everything in it logically implies the existence of God.
And well said ^^