Prove there's a god.

[Pat]

Mylan wrote:

<quoted text>If that is happening then that is self defeating.

Envy is indeed self defeating.

[prove]

9728082087 prove there god

[Pat]

RiversideRedneck wrote:

<quoted text>
Nice opinion, but that's all it is.

No, it's absed on research.

"Whether you prefer whirling with the dervishes, participating in liturgical services or meditating with Buddhists may depend on the level of serotonin in your brain, recent research indicates.

Participation in and receptivity to certain religious and spiritual practices may be linked to the density of one of 15 serotonin receptors in the brain, said Dr. Lars Farde, professor of psychiatry at Karolinska Institutet in Stockholm, Sweden, and co-author of, "The Serotonin System and Spiritual Experiences," published in the November issue of the American Journal of Psychology.

According to Farde, the receptor neurologists call 5-HT1A "is one of the most important because it serves as a marker for the entire serotonin system." He said the connection furthers the belief that brain function may impact openness to spiritual experiences."

http://www.beliefnet.com/News/Science-Religio...

[OCB]

Pat wrote:

<quoted text>
Solution to what exactly? Do whites have a right to defend themselves against unjust accusations of causing the black race to fail (when compared to whites)? I think they do.
Is a racially equal society necessary? I don't think it is. We can certainly accept that individual ability determines an 85 percent black NBA outcome and these are some of the most lucrative job positions in the country so why can't we just ensure everybody gets equal opportunity and then let the chips fall where they may? That is the essence of fairness, not forced equality. An obsession over a world of racial equality is pointless for it does not exist nor will it ever exist until we are all so intermixed genetically that we become one race.

Solution to what?? The solution to what you see as the "problem" with blacks.

You want the entire world to accept your views that blacks are inferior to whites. It's not gonna happen because not only is that factually incorrect, such a view fuels more hatred and racial division and to do so is not only pointless, but very counterproductive.

Forced equality? So you're okay with job discrimination and sexual discrimination as well, I guess......

I don't obsess over a world of racial equality; it is YOU who obsesses over a world of racial INequality.

Plus, when talking about equality, it's best to talk about it in terms of the legal sense of equality, and like it or not, we ARE all basically equal under the law with the same basic legal rights.

Your opinions about ANY race mean SQUAT when it comes to the law.

What you have are your subjective- and EMOTIONAL-opinions.

[OCB]

Hukt on Fonix wrote:

<quoted text>
Howdy! Nice to read you too.
I'll admit to being a little hard on RR for doing something most anyone would (also do) under similar circumstances. People tend to get complacent, becoming ignorant of just how good they do have it.
It's just that many confuse collecting a paycheck with being productive. RR, by his own admission, seems no exception (on the contrary... he's the rule).
Perhaps, if RR's employer's network admin implemented a porn filter, the company would realize a noticeable increase on profits from his cubical.
I've seen it happen.

RR is a REPROBATE. A snail has a better sense of morals, ethics and doing the right thing than RR does.

[Pat]

OCB wrote:

<quoted text>LOL! It doesn't.
How about YOU explain how blacks who live in the USA in the same climate as whites commit more crime because of temperature and climate.
Pat, on second thought- don't bother.
I'm not blaming white people as a whole for anything.
I DO blame idiot racists like YOU for fueling the fire.
I don't get what your hatred and contempt of blacks does for you, but that's okay- I really don't care what it gets for you.
It does disgust ME, however; therefore, my apologies for even broaching this topic with you.
You will never become less of a racist and I will never become a racist at all.
Let's just leave it at that.
Now go get your sociology degree.

"How about YOU explain how blacks who live in the USA in the same climate as whites commit more crime because of temperature and climate."

Do you also wonder why Europeans who have lived for a few generations in South Africa don't have afros and black skin by now? If you are this ignorant about natural selection then there is no point in responding.

"I DO blame idiot racists like YOU for fueling the fire."

Rather it is your baseless legacy of slavery blame game that fuels the fire you dumb hypocrite.

"I don't get what your hatred and contempt of blacks does for you, but that's okay- I really don't care what it gets for you."

Why do you accuse me of things that are not in my posts? If blacks are ten times more violent than whties then a fact is a fact, it is not hate in any sense. The only hate here is coming from you when facts you don't like get exposed.

[Pat]

OCB wrote:

<quoted text>It's enough to know that racism is alive and well, sad as that fact is and even sadder is knowing there are people like you who EMBRACE that racism.
Again- enjoy.

Then why are you a racist unjustly blaming whites for black failure? If you don't want to be a racist then stop being one and face life honestly for once.

[JOEL]

karl44 wrote:

<quoted text>

ambiguity is not knowledge , nor does it foster knowledge.

I hope your posts please yourself, for me, they only confirm your immaturity.

You're just a superficial thinker, not deep or holistic in any way, and so you'll find much of what I say immature.

I have a long way to go in the mind-matter matrix but am quite deep into it.

Anyway, peace and good wishes to you and family.

I am at a restaurant right now.

Bye.

[Aura Mytha]

ChristineM wrote:

<quoted text>
Just a though and you may be correct, then again my comment may also have something to do with it
Some African countries are very sparely populated and yet atrocities abound so you are not stating a hard and fast rule

Well when you apply revolution and warlords all the rules go straight out the window.

[Pat]

OCB wrote:

<quoted text>Solution to what?? The solution to what you see as the "problem" with blacks.
You want the entire world to accept your views that blacks are inferior to whites. It's not gonna happen because not only is that factually incorrect, such a view fuels more hatred and racial division and to do so is not only pointless, but very counterproductive.
Forced equality? So you're okay with job discrimination and sexual discrimination as well, I guess......
I don't obsess over a world of racial equality; it is YOU who obsesses over a world of racial INequality.
Plus, when talking about equality, it's best to talk about it in terms of the legal sense of equality, and like it or not, we ARE all basically equal under the law with the same basic legal rights.
Your opinions about ANY race mean SQUAT when it comes to the law.
What you have are your subjective- and EMOTIONAL-opinions.

Your views are what fuels racial tension. Insisting blacks are just like whites when they are not and telling blacks they will end up just like whites when they have equal opportunity is what causes bitterness, resentment and blaming when it does not occur, for in their mind, if they believe the lie then what else could possibly be the cause of the disparate outcomes but the evil white man, right? The legacy of slavery blame game nonsense causes the problem, not honestly about racial differences. I’ve even seen blacks try to blame the high AIDS rates suffered by blacks onto whites! A secret conspiracy to kill off blacks... The worst thing for the black population is to not understand the facts about racial differences for if they think they are not to blame for their failures then they will never even attempt little to try
to improve themselves.

" It's not gonna happen because not only is that factually incorrect..."

Then provide your FACTS that support a belief in racial equality. Where is the evidence that intelligence for blacks is just waiting to be discovered? To put matters bluntly, the question is not why anyone would believe the races are unequal in intelligence, but why anyone would believe them equal. If you are going to insist that black intellectual performance would equal that of whites were society free of bias, then you need to offer some evidence for this. Where are the black majority areas that thrive absent of whites? Why does the quality of life decline for blacks when whites are absent? The burden of proof is on you since your position conflicts with all the evidence.

[OCB]

Pat wrote:

<quoted text>
Then why are you a racist unjustly blaming whites for black failure? If you don't want to be a racist then stop being one and face life honestly for once.

Why are you lying when I said nothing about blaming whites or anyone else for the failure of blacks or anyone else?

You simply like to focus on the problem while offering nothing in the way of a solution.

I think you do so because you LIKE being the racist that you are.

[OCB]

Pat wrote:

<quoted text>
"How about YOU explain how blacks who live in the USA in the same climate as whites commit more crime because of temperature and climate."
Do you also wonder why Europeans who have lived for a few generations in South Africa don't have afros and black skin by now? If you are this ignorant about natural selection then there is no point in responding.
"I DO blame idiot racists like YOU for fueling the fire."
Rather it is your baseless legacy of slavery blame game that fuels the fire you dumb hypocrite.
"I don't get what your hatred and contempt of blacks does for you, but that's okay- I really don't care what it gets for you."
Why do you accuse me of things that are not in my posts? If blacks are ten times more violent than whties then a fact is a fact, it is not hate in any sense. The only hate here is coming from you when facts you don't like get exposed.

And you derive some sort of perverse satisfaction from that fact of blacks being more violent than whites.

You like to think it is due to some sort of imagined inferiority of black people. It makes you happy to think that you are superior.

And stop frothing- it's getting in the way of you typing correctly.

I don't know what "whties" are- do you?

[Pat]

OCB wrote:

<quoted text>Oh my- such frothing, Pat.
Where did I say or even imply that you are forcing me to post?
Stop your frothing, will ya?
But actually, your frothing here may very well be your most attractive quality and I daresay maybe your ONLY attractive quality.
How about YOU stop YOUR WHINING about the "inferior" black race?

You implied it by telling me you didn't want to post about this topic any more. Why do you bother to do that? Just don't post then if you don't want to. I'm not making you post.

I hope you didn't forget to take your blood pressure medicine today.... You seem very on edge and combative.

[Pat]

OCB wrote:

<quoted text>And you derive some sort of perverse satisfaction from that fact of blacks being more violent than whites.
You like to think it is due to some sort of imagined inferiority of black people. It makes you happy to think that you are superior.
And stop frothing- it's getting in the way of you typing correctly.
I don't know what "whties" are- do you?

Is that all you've got left, more lies about the imagined motives you think I have? You go off point like this because you know you are wrong and you know you can't back up your racial equality nonsense with any real facts. Don't blame me for racial inequality blame nature.

[Aura Mytha]

ChristineM wrote:

<quoted text>
Yes – and?
You were making claims for a law that does not (at least yet) exist, will you not allow me the same privilege? Or are you harking back to freedom of speech the way you want it?
As it happens it was a generalisation to describe the independent attitude of states

The thing with the second amendment it is not given by the government, but rather a condition set by the sovereign people.
Sure you can make laws to take it away, but it would be a direct violation of the second amendment. You can't erase those words and
amendments can be added but not taken away.

I don't know a fool proof solution to the problem, other than
destruction of the constitution, and reformation.
But that will go over like a fart in church also.
You see America in freeing itself from England, gave the power inherit to your Queen (or King) to the people.
So the power is supposed to be from the people, who are represented by the elected , not handed out by the Government.
If the majority dos not agree then we eliminate the elected in the next election.

Executive orders are acts such as a Kings command, something that will not always be accepted by the people, because they are not emanating from the people. Congress and the senate represent more of a majority of the people , not one party or one mans decision.

[Mylan]

Pat wrote:

http://www.beliefnet.com/News/Science-Religio...

Excellent link, thank you.

"Recently, the researchers became interested in the serotonin system because of its relationship to depression and anxiety, said Farde. In attempting to confirm the correlation between serotonin levels and anxiety, he said they were surprised to discover a connection between the density of the receptors and spiritual acceptance."

[Aura Mytha]

ChristineM wrote:

<quoted text>
The unalienable rights – with amendments, it’s actually change to the unalienable rights that gives them the right, and to be true there are not many who see the hilarity of this.

Again it's not funny,and they were designed this way for good reason.
To limit the authority a government could rule over the sovereignty
of the people. As I said conditions of the union of states were written as the amendments. Failure to adhere to these amendments are grounds for succession. Which 30 states have filed, though I believe more as a statement than the thought it would actually happen.
Though a few seem quite serious about it.

[waaasssuuup]

Black Thunder 42 wrote:

<quoted text> Been there done that -several times over--ya never read the papers anyway.

cut & pasting anticrister propaganda is NOT proof! i.e., you can't use your antibible mythology to disprove the facts;)

[Pat]

OCB wrote:

<quoted text>Why did you show dishonesty by leaving out THIS part of what you quoted:
"Sorry, but in order to be a complete and whole human being with respect for oneself and for others,......."
And- you are a LIAR- I'm not blaming any specific group for the woes of another specific group.
So- again- what do you see as the solution to the problem?
Come ON, Pat- be HONEST. You obviously find the stats about blacks to be very troubling; so....what would you have as the solution to what is so very troubling to you?
And why do YOU find it necessary to focus on problems among blacks?
Because YOU say so?
Do you ANY real joy in your life, Pat? If so, it can't be much joy given your incredible penchant to talk about the "fact" that blacks are inferior.
I really am curious as to what that gets you and what satisfaction you derive from your racist views.

"Why did you show dishonesty by leaving out THIS part of what you quoted:
"Sorry, but in order to be a complete and whole human being with respect for oneself and for others,......."

I left it out because it was irrelevant to my point and that point was that you will ignore facts that conflict with your cherished egalitarian world view. Leaving it out did not change the context of what you wrote one bit unlike you leaving out the part about home invasions from my quote did.

"And why do YOU find it necessary to focus on problems among blacks? Because YOU say so?"

I don't. But I do like to point out that whites are not to blame for them an that your baseless argument (legacy of slavery) is racist tripe.

"I really am curious as to what that gets you and what satisfaction you derive from your racist views."

The satisfaction knowing I am not a mindless dishonest sheeple, controlled by political correctness like you are.

[waaasssuuup]

Mylan wrote:

<quoted text>LOL.... oh I concede, you're the one who's really nuts.

your not saying anything about what you believe IS the concession, pal;)