Prove there's a god.

[karl44]

RiversideRedneck wrote:

<quoted text>
OK, fine.
What if someone breaks into my home & steals my gun and uses it for crime?
Would you blame me or the thief?
====OR====
What if someone breaks into my home & steals my bat and uses it for crime?

check you insurance policy

because

you are looking at a multimillion dollar law suit

[karl44]

RiversideRedneck wrote:

<quoted text>
I understand that.
I don't understand why you'd favor the criminal...
I don't understand why you won't acknowledge that a burglar can steal anything in your home and use it as a weapon....

and you do not understand that guns are designed to kill, and baseball bats are just for fun.

[karl44]

Karma is a_______ wrote:

<quoted text>
so if I leave a loaded gun on the front stoop and its stolen, I shouldn't be liable???
how about dynamite, if I leave a couple of cases of TNT out in the front yard and some Middle Eastern terrorists steal it then blow up a building killing hundreds of Americans, I shouldn't be liable...at least according to you.
tell me where does personal responsibility come into play???

RR is a christian, that is the entirety of his responsibility

he is (often) not right, but he is forgiven

he leaves loaded weapons lying about, to prove that he has a penis

[karl44]

RiversideRedneck wrote:

<quoted text>
So.
Either you move or they move...
If it was me, smoking outside on a hill at a concert, and someone nearby asked me to move because they had asthma, I'd move.
If that same person was a dick about it, likes boooots' story, I'd blow smoke in their face.

is your medical play current?

[karl44]

RiversideRedneck wrote:

<quoted text>
Huh? You know that pot is highly addictive too, doncha?

wrong

[karl44]

RiversideRedneck wrote:

<quoted text>
Smoking a single marijuana joint is equivalent to smoking 2.5 to 5 cigarettes in terms of damage to the lungs, mostly because of the differences in how pot and cigarette users smoke.

do you know anyone who smokes a whole joint?

[karl44]

RiversideRedneck wrote:

<quoted text>
It doesn't matter what the bat or guns "primary purpose" is.
The point is that they were stolen from you & used in a crime.
It also doesn't matter if they were locked up or not, they were STOLEN from you.
Your exterior doors are locked, so YES they were locked up...

my lawyer disagrees

[Lil Ticked]

Pat wrote:

<quoted text>
What about the other employees, they don't count? So a person with breathing issues doesn't count? He should have to drive an extra 30 miles to find the same kind of business where no smoking is allowed?
The fact that this obnoxious habit of smoking is legal is irrelevant to the subject. It's legal to cover yourself in skunk spray too if you want to. The fact is that it is obnoxious and should no more be allowed then you to be allowed to blast loud music where ever you want to. It's called being a considerate person. If we were all considerate we would not need no smoking laws, but unfortunatley we do.

It is called the free market. If people didn't want to go to a smoking establishment then they wouldn't. If people don't want to work at a smoking establishment then, yes they can find another place for employment.If a smoking establishment got no business or couldn't keep employees then it would change it's policy in order to attract customers/employees.
Are you saying that we should outlaw inconsiderate behaviors? What is inconsiderate? Is it inconsiderate to not hold open doors for little old ladies?

[karl44]

RiversideRedneck wrote:

<quoted text>
Yes it does.
When someone says a gun owner is responsible for a crime when that gun was stolen from them and they didn't commit the crime is favoring the criminal.

who cares

we are suing for a lot, because we are prepared for a "partial" win

[Pat]

karl44 wrote:

<quoted text>
and you do not understand that guns are designed to kill, and baseball bats are just for fun.

Irrelevant distinction. Guns may be designed to kill but so long as there are valid legal reasons to kill, your point is pointless.

[karl44]

RiversideRedneck wrote:

<quoted text>
Explain that.
Why the hell would I need a lawyer is some criminal broke into my house, stole something, then used it in a crime.......

law suit

really big one

bigger than your "gun"

[karl44]

Clementia wrote:

<quoted text>
You drink sooooo much beer and smoke, how the hell r u fit?
Redneck, does the bible not stop u from drinking and smoking???
HELLO!!! THE BODY IS THE TEMPLE OF GOD!!

RR only claims christianity because he thinks there are benefits, he is completely self-serving.

[Pat]

Lil Ticked wrote:

<quoted text>It is called the free market. If people didn't want to go to a smoking establishment then they wouldn't. If people don't want to work at a smoking establishment then, yes they can find another place for employment.If a smoking establishment got no business or couldn't keep employees then it would change it's policy in order to attract customers/employees.
Are you saying that we should outlaw inconsiderate behaviors? What is inconsiderate? Is it inconsiderate to not hold open doors for little old ladies?

We already do outlaw obnoxious behaviors, loud music, urinating in public and so forth. Irrational, inconsiderate fools like you are why we need no smoking laws.

[Lil Ticked]

RiversideRedneck wrote:

<quoted text>
Smoking a single marijuana joint is equivalent to smoking 2.5 to 5 cigarettes in terms of damage to the lungs, mostly because of the differences in how pot and cigarette users smoke.

Actually new studies show otherwise.
"Putting together 20 years of data—and using the magic of statistics to separate the effects of pot from those of tobacco, since people often smoke both—the researchers found that pot smokers seemed to have better lung function than people who didn’t smoke at all."

http://news.menshealth.com/news-every-pothead...

[karl44]

River Tam wrote:

<quoted text>
I was speaking strictly about bars and maybe bowling alleys, private clubs. Places where adults get together to drink and have fun. Nobody should smoke in a restaurant or anyplace that children are present.
There are some strip clubs where I live. I wonder if a girl with one leg could get a job? Too much of a distraction? I'm going to look into it.

a smoking one legged stripper

is there a fetish for that?

[karl44]

RiversideRedneck wrote:

<quoted text>
Ah yes, then they used my shirt to choke & kill someone.
I'm responsible for that - I should've had my shirts locked up.
Oh wait, I did. My doors were locked. And my property is 100% gated & locked....

tell it to your lawyer when you give him is 10,000 retainer

[Lil Ticked]

Pat wrote:

<quoted text>
We already do outlaw obnoxious behaviors, loud music, urinating in public and so forth. Irrational, inconsiderate fools like you are why we need no smoking laws.

Trying to derail the conversation by making ad hom against me... that is inconsiderate.

[Tide with Beach]

River Tam wrote:

Good one but another poster on another thread came up with:
Hopalong Chastity.

Can I be your Bumdance Kid?

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

[Pat]

Lil Ticked wrote:

<quoted text>Trying to derail the conversation by making ad hom against me... that is inconsiderate.

Well, you are being inconsiderate and irrational... Why don't we have this same issue over chewing tobacco?

[Henry]

karl44 wrote:

<quoted text>
RR only claims christianity because he thinks there are benefits, he is completely self-serving.

All religions are deceptive nothing more. It is for the big mass religions and all religions too.