Prove there's a god.

Since: Jul 09

Location hidden

#587710 Jan 14, 2013
Aura Mytha wrote:
<quoted text>
Those women might have been molested, beaten, raped and killed had they not had their guns.
you might be an idiot

do you own a gun for protection?

Since: Jul 09

Location hidden

#587711 Jan 14, 2013
Aura Mytha wrote:
<quoted text> I hear you like to make up all sorts of thinks , just the way you like it ..lol
unlike you

he is capable of some thinks

Since: Jul 09

Location hidden

#587712 Jan 14, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Enacted by the government as "safety & health" laws.
We don't get a choice. They get to tell us what's healthy...
So you can't smoke in the workplace, out here in California you can't smoke within 20 feet of public building like a court or public utility building.
Yup, I can't smoke in my break room at work because it's "unhealthy", but it's perfectly "healthy" to eat snickers and chips and cheeseburgers in the break room because that's healthy...
poor RR

poor, poor RR

poor RR

this happened to you when you chose the wrong god, the real god is pissed (at you)

“There is no such thing”

Since: May 08

as a reasonable person

#587713 Jan 14, 2013
karl44 wrote:
<quoted text>
you might be an idiot
do you own a gun for protection?
I own a couple of hammers because you know that hammers killed more people in America in 2011 than rifles and shotguns.

Since: Jul 09

Location hidden

#587714 Jan 14, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
You won't. But you'll have to hear the fat f_cks stuffing their mouths with fat while I have to pay a extra $50 a month because I smoke.
Real fair, huh?
that is unfair

you are not paying the full costs of your poor choice, and the rest of the nation must now pay, not fair

Since: Jul 09

Location hidden

#587715 Jan 14, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Ok, you seem to be having a hard time so I'll make it very simple for you.
The government should not be able to enforce a non-smoking workplace. It should be the decision of the business owner, not the government. Some business owners would like a smoking workplace, some wouldn't. But when the gub'ment gets involved, nobody has a right & nobody gets a say-so & nobody gets a choice.
no place that is open to the public has "a choice" to infringe upon the health of those who enter.

Since: Jul 09

Location hidden

#587716 Jan 14, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Nah, I'm not into gameplay like you.
<quoted text>
Don't you mean my smoking "might" affect others?
I think that's exactly why people like you are anti-smoking. You hate the smell so you try to do whatever you can to make sure that happens.
And that's why you don't care about fat people costing more money than smokers, because they don't smell like cigarettes do...
your cigarettes polute the air that others must breath.

Look, when you smoke, do not exhale, and I will support your right to smoke

Since: Jul 09

Location hidden

#587717 Jan 14, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
And your reasoning is that no matter what happens, if your property is stolen and somebody uses it to commit a crime you are responsible for the crime.
That's pretty damn retarded.
if that property were properly secured, how did it get stolen?

you will only be held responsible when you are irresponsible.

you should fear, for you are an irresponsible coward.
Pat

East Granby, CT

#587718 Jan 14, 2013
karl44 wrote:
<quoted text>
if that property were properly secured, how did it get stolen?
you will only be held responsible when you are irresponsible.
you should fear, for you are an irresponsible coward.
We all don't live in a fortress with no windows and steel doors. Things get stolen all the time and it is of no fault of the owner. This is why we need guns, to step on the sociopaths who like to steal.

Since: Jul 09

Location hidden

#587719 Jan 14, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
You won't. But you'll have to hear the fat f_cks stuffing their mouths with fat while I have to pay a extra $50 a month because I smoke.
Real fair, huh?
Tide with Beach wrote:
<quoted text>
What, you think that's too low? Too high?
I think they should charge as much as the market will allow.
in Canada where every one must show ID to purchase.

About fifty cents each cigarette, if purchased by the carton

200 in a carton, about $100.00 (can)

some think, that these things should be sold and wrapped individually

Since: Jul 09

Location hidden

#587720 Jan 14, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
I think it's unfair, that's all.
That a smoker pays more for medical insurance while a fat f_ck with diabetes doesn't.
what is fair, is that you pay the full costs of your poor choice

If your cost of cigarettes were to double, that would be still insufficient.

“There is no such thing”

Since: May 08

as a reasonable person

#587721 Jan 14, 2013
karl44 wrote:
<quoted text>
no place that is open to the public has "a choice" to infringe upon the health of those who enter.
The public has a choice as to whether or not to enter an establishment that allows legal behaviors that they do not agree with. Nobody forces people to enter their place of business.

“There is no such thing”

Since: May 08

as a reasonable person

#587722 Jan 14, 2013
Pat wrote:
<quoted text>
We all don't live in a fortress with no windows and steel doors. Things get stolen all the time and it is of no fault of the owner. This is why we need guns, to step on the sociopaths who like to steal.
Because when seconds count the police are only minutes away.

Since: Jul 09

Location hidden

#587723 Jan 14, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, actually.
My employer, like many others, Likes to pretend they want their employees to be healthy. They use "get healthy" tactics to try to get people to "live a healthier life". They charge cigarette smokers an extra $50 a month but our five vending machines in the break room are filled with crap like candy bars, chips, disgusting vending machine cheeseburgers and burritos, energy drinks, soda, etc.
I don't understand why people just can't be honest and say They don't like the smell of cigarette smoke.
You have to use tactics like you want to live healthier and you want me to live healthy too so you help the government enact all kinds of new laws to try to prevent people from smoking.
That's not following my right to my own pursuit of happiness.
You should stick to your own life and stay out of mine.
you do not care about anyone other than yourself

why would you expect different behviour from others?

“There is no such thing”

Since: May 08

as a reasonable person

#587724 Jan 14, 2013
karl44 wrote:
<quoted text>
your cigarettes polute the air that others must breath.
Look, when you smoke, do not exhale, and I will support your right to smoke
When you realize that campfires, grills, fireplaces, combustible engines, etc. pollute the air far more than a cigarette then I will support your right to not be a hypocrite.
Pat

East Granby, CT

#587725 Jan 14, 2013
karl44 wrote:
<quoted text>
you are a paraniod
which suggest that you are also religious, they go together soooo well
What are the odds of your house burning to the ground? Is everybody who buys fire insurance paranoid to you? I would be willing to bet you that we have more predatory acts of violence and home invasions in CT then we do houses that burn.

There was just a home invasion in the next town over from me, a very exclusive town. Too bad the home owners weren't "paranoid", we might have one less predator walking the streets.

A few months back there was a home invasion in Sharon, CT, another wealthy rural town. They kicked in the front door and tied up a man and his elderly mother. They robbed the home but first shot the tied up man in the head, killing him. Your see Karl, our "paranoia" is justified by these heinous acts. Sociopaths are not like god, we have proof that they really do exist and in good numbers. Call me paranoid on this subject if you want and I'll call you ignorant. My loaded shotgun, amongst others gives me peace of mind.
Pat

East Granby, CT

#587726 Jan 14, 2013
Lil Ticked wrote:
<quoted text>Because when seconds count the police are only minutes away.
I know that fact all too well.

Since: Jul 09

Location hidden

#587727 Jan 14, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
What if somebody steals your car?
Then they use that stolen vehicle to run over a couple people and kill them.
Who's responsibility do you think that is?
did you fail to secure your car?

my lawyer thinks that is the case.

the thief hit my child with your car, the child lived, the suit is for ten million.

have a nice day
Pat

East Granby, CT

#587728 Jan 14, 2013
karl44 wrote:
<quoted text>
oh
if it changes operators, it then becomes a liability problem for the owner.
Not where I live it doesn't. We have no law in CT that requires guns be kept in a vault. If it is in your home and is stolen you are not liable.

Since: Jul 09

Location hidden

#587729 Jan 14, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
You saying that pot is healthier than tobacco?
yes

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 2 min kent 687,441
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing 5 min Trump is a joke 31,787
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 38 min Here For Now 619,795
God is REAL - Miracles Happen! (Jun '11) 3 hr ChromiuMan 6,496
Trump: "Get that Son of a B- - - - off the fiel... 3 hr Love Trump 9
*** All Time Favorite Songs *** (Dec '10) 4 hr SmokinJoe 4,319
Popcorn time for movies and shows using VPN 4 hr Neil_Hines 3
More from around the web