RR (and others) compare the two. How they are used is a completely different argument to the purpose for which they were manufactured.<quoted text>
I'm sorry but I still don't get your point. Do you really think anybody on here does not understand that a gun is intended to be used as a weapon and a car as a mode of transportation?
"I am not saying that guns do not have a purpose but I am saying that comparing them to a car is not valid logic"
That would depend on the purpose of the comparison, no? If one is arguing that a car can just as easily be used as a weapon to injure, then that is a very logical comparison. If one is claiming a gun is as good as a car for transportation then it would be illogical, comprende?
I am saying that a gun is MANUFACTURED specifically as a weapon
A car is MANUFACTURED specifically as a mode of transport
Do you comprehend the destination? WEAPON TRANSPORT, they are even spelled differently to make it easy look we can all be sarcastic.
Comparing a gun to a car is like comparing a coconut to a shark. The very idea of such comparisons is illogical