Comments
552,781 - 552,800 of 721,054 Comments Last updated 3 min ago

Since: Feb 12

Otterberg, Germany

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#582341
Jan 3, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

nanoanomaly wrote:
<quoted text>Did I miss something here? Did that fudgeugly tranny call ME an "it"?
Yes she did that was a large part of our argument that she somehow along with IANS don't seem to see anything wrong with it while I look at it as being ultra insulting and a demonstartion of no class.

“There is no such thing”

Since: May 08

as a reasonable person

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#582342
Jan 3, 2013
 

Judged:

1

It aint necessarily so wrote:
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
You'll have to tell me what you think this means. Are you supporting me, contradicting me, or neither?
Nobody would accept that risk? What is the population of the U.S.? What are the odds of getting shot by an "accidental discharge" of a firearm if it only occurs on average of 851 times in a year?
The same can be said for the 8,583 total firearm homicides.
As for the 19,766 Intentional self-harm (suicides) by discharge of firearms, it was their choice. If not a gun it would have been something else.

Why would I support you? Don't you have a job?

“There is no such thing”

Since: May 08

as a reasonable person

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#582343
Jan 3, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

It aint necessarily so wrote:
http://www.topix.com/forum/top stories/TOCO8TEGNA8I5JT63/post 581618
<quoted text>
Imma gonna hafta guess once again which of my points (see link above) you were addressing, and what your point with regard to it is - whether you agreed or disagreed.
I'm guessing that the comment that you didn't like was, "We call the value that represents this the p-value," that the part of your link that was on your mind was, "Number of deaths for leading causes of death - Heart disease: 599,413," and that the link between them is you would have liked to see a p-value for that data.
How did I do? Not so good?
You could improve communication tremendously if your next post is more than an adverb and a link juxtaposed against an unedited comment comprising several claims. Sentences work very well for that - sentences like "I disagree that ... because of the fact that ... which you can verify and read more about at [link]."
Close.
I could be clearer in my presentation but I figured that you were a smart guy...

“talk to the kitteh”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#582344
Jan 3, 2013
 

Judged:

1

UR BS wrote:
Pretty straight forward. This is the Law and it says CHILD.
"In the U.S., the Unborn Victims of Violence Act of 2004 recognizes an unborn child as a legal victim, if s/he is injured or killed during the commission of any of over 60 listed federal crimes of violence. Pursuant to 18 USCS 1841, the term "unborn child" means a child in utero, and the term "child in utero" or "child, who is in utero" means a member of the species homo sapiens, at any stage of development, who is carried in the womb."
Notice, "Unborn Child", "Child in Utero", "Child who is in Utero".
Now last time I checked if you were in Utero you were not born yet but somehow the Federal Government has recognized these as "Children", not Fetuses, Zygots or any other name.
Scott is appealing...

http://www.cnn.com/2003/LAW/04/21/laci.peters...

...of course. Maybe he should hire one of the psychos here to argue his case. I doubt their cold-blooded, dehumanizing of the child would go over well as a defense. >;)

“There is no such thing”

Since: May 08

as a reasonable person

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#582345
Jan 3, 2013
 

Judged:

1

It aint necessarily so wrote:
<quoted text>
I thought that there was a Bushmaster involved, that that was a semi-automatic rifle like the M-16 I fired in basic, and that that was considered an assault weapon. I don't know much about guns, so I'll defer to you. What does this mean to you?:
"Bushmaster .223: Weapon Used in Newtown Shooting a Lightning Rod in Gun Debate"
http://newsfeed.time.com/2012/12/19/bushmaste...
Even if you were correct, would that change the argument other than to increase the enormity of the problem?
<quoted text>
I guess it's time for me to divine what you are thinking once again - the reason why you posted that. Let's see how this could possibly matter. Maybe you think the gun was supplied by Rodia. And maybe you think that matters.
If not, sorry - I give up. I'm all out of ideas. I'll consult my Ouija board and Magic 8-Ball to see if they know what you were thinking here while waiting for your answer.
[CONT.]
Now I am seriously disappointed in your deductive reasoning skills.
The M-16 rifle was adapted for semi-automatic, three-round burst, and full-automatic fire. An AR-15 is semi-auto only. Which doesn't even matter when the AR-15 was not found in the school. Which means that it was not used in the shooting. The shooter did not leave the school put the assault rifle away and then go back in side to shoot himself.

“talk to the kitteh”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#582346
Jan 3, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Lil Ticked wrote:
<quoted text>Close.
I could be clearer in my presentation but I figured that you were a smart guy...
He's nowhere near as smart as he thinks he is. His ego precedes him. xD

“There is no such thing”

Since: May 08

as a reasonable person

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#582347
Jan 3, 2013
 

Judged:

1

It aint necessarily so wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm guessing pseudoprinciple here. Did you see the post on that? In case you missed it, here it is:
http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TOCO8TE...
The way we can decide is to see if you uniformly object to prohibitions because of the black markets that they engender. How do you feel about a prohibition on abortion, and the underground abortion clinics that would spring up? Do you object on that basis?
How about the prohibition on heroine and meth? There are black markets for both of those as well. Can we put you down for legalization of them. After all, as you said, "2. Prohibition = Blackmarket, period." If a "meth head" wants a pound of meth, "they can get one or make their own," right?
Are you retarded? A prohibition on assault rifles will work as well as the prohibiton on drugs. Yes, I am for the legalization of meth. There does that help. So, why would I want a prohibition on abortion? Try and think sh1t through next time.

“talk to the kitteh”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#582348
Jan 3, 2013
 

Judged:

1

UR BS wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes she did that was a large part of our argument that she somehow along with IANS don't seem to see anything wrong with it while I look at it as being ultra insulting and a demonstartion of no class.
BWAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAAAHAHAHAHAAAAAHA....

OMG! That's hilarious!

“There is no such thing”

Since: May 08

as a reasonable person

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#582349
Jan 3, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

It aint necessarily so wrote:
<quoted text>
I disagree. Your posting suggests otherwise. You are aware of the cost of having guns in the home, and you refuse to acknowledge the data or care about it.
<quoted text>
You're a class act, and a great illustration of the power of your god and of your faith. I'm sure that wherever you go, people ask themselves, "What has he got, and how can I get it, too."
Frach it, nevermind. I have other things to do than point out your inaccuracies all day.

“talk to the kitteh”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#582350
Jan 3, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

Aura Mytha wrote:
<quoted text> Really again it doesn't matter except if your hypothesis were true , then all placental mammals are a form of parasite. That would change all of biology in fact there would be no mammals no eutherian just more on this list.
http://www.cdc.gov/parasites/az/index.html
And now you are starting to get my inability to believe he is/was a doctor. Puhleeze.... um, maybe if he received his doctorate at Whassamattuh U.

Tune degrees only count in Tuneland. Th-th-th-at's all folks!

“talk to the kitteh”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#582351
Jan 3, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Lil Ticked wrote:
<quoted text>Are you retarded? A prohibition on assault rifles will work as well as the prohibition on drugs.
....
Ha! Yeah, there are dopers here that will sell you a gun for $20 and there's no waiting period. Prohibition isn't terribly realistic.

“Life may be sweeter for this”

Since: Nov 08

Fennario

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#582352
Jan 4, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

UR BS wrote:
<quoted text>
Exactly what SCOTUS Ruling would that have been concerning Slavery? I seem to be having a problem finding that one. How about a link to the actual SCOTUS Decision as it applies to Slavery in the US.
Dred Scott v. Sandford, 1857
http://www.infoplease.com/us/supreme-court/ca...

“There is no such thing”

Since: May 08

as a reasonable person

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#582353
Jan 4, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

UR BS wrote:
<quoted text>
The problem with your answer here is that you start by saying you are for limited Government but then everything you mention expands Government.
My suggestion is for private funding or replacement of many of the services that are paid for with my taxes now.
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
Sandy Springs, Georgia: The City that Outsourced Everything

“Michin yeoja”

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#582354
Jan 4, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

nanoanomaly wrote:
<quoted text>Did I miss something here? Did that fudgeugly tranny call ME an "it"?
UR BS wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes she did that was a large part of our argument that she somehow along with IANS don't seem to see anything wrong with it while I look at it as being ultra insulting and a demonstartion of no class.
Right, and calling somebody a fudgeugly tranny isn't insulting at all. Gotcha.

“talk to the kitteh”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#582355
Jan 4, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

River Tam wrote:
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
Right, and calling somebody a fudgeugly tranny isn't insulting at all. Gotcha.
Very funny. I've seen several "skeptics" call him an ugly tranny and you and your fellow freaks let it go. I get that you're just coward enough not to call a guy on that insult but not me. You're not so tough.... for a clam diver.

Since: Feb 12

Germany

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#582356
Jan 4, 2013
 

Judged:

1

It aint necessarily so wrote:
<quoted text>
Dred Scott v. Sandford, 1857
http://www.infoplease.com/us/supreme-court/ca...
I knew of the Dred Scott case but that did not outlaw Slavery which was your claim. Slavery still existed and was continued until after the Civil War and the passage of the 13 Ammendment.

The Dred Scott case made an argument about slavery but did not outlaw it.

“Life may be sweeter for this”

Since: Nov 08

Fennario

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#582357
Jan 4, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

UR BS wrote:
I am what I said I am nothing more nothing less.
Really? You're no more than what you have said you are?
UR BS wrote:
Because I do not attack all things religion simply shows that unlike yours my mind is open and I am willing to admit that I do not know everything.
Judging by that comment, I don't think you know what an open mind is. It has nothing to do with my conclusions, merely how I arrive at them, and whether I am amenable to evidence.

As far as admitting whether I know everything or not, I have never commented one way or another on that, and you have never asked.
UR BS wrote:
You accusations against the church, which one by the way, are baseless.
What?

Does this mean that you find my accusations against the church are baseless, but you want to know which church I mean? Yours sounds like the closed mind. How else could you make such a comment - you don't know what I mean, but I'm wrong anyway whatever it is.

“Life may be sweeter for this”

Since: Nov 08

Fennario

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#582358
Jan 4, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

UR BS wrote:
As I have pointed out there is a life there
So have I. Why tell me? I have never disagreed with that.
UR BS wrote:
call it what you like but it is there and as a result of the procedure the life is terminated. That is death.
Again, why tell me? I have the said the same thing already:

"How about a little accuracy: a fetus is being killed against its interests."
http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TOCO8TE...

This is where you people leave me underwhelmed. Do you have any idea what my positions are? It doesn't sound like it.

“Life may be sweeter for this”

Since: Nov 08

Fennario

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#582359
Jan 4, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

UR BS wrote:
You advocat the free access to that so you can be classified as pro-death.
Then call me pro-free access, and call yourself anti-free access. I'm good with that. Or are you determined to label me pro-death no matter what it is I actually advocate?

If so, by your own reckoning. I have to call you pro-death for your position on guns in the home.

Incidentally, I have taken a personal ant-abortion position:

"I find abortion repulsive, would be loathe to do one, send a lover to have one, or if I were a woman, have one myself. I'll bet that you and most pro-choice advocates are close to that position as well."
http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TOCO8TE...

Is that what you mean by pro-death?

It's rather clear which of the two of us has the closed mind here. You are clearly bound and determined to demean me with the death label, whatever the evidence against it.

“talk to the kitteh”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#582360
Jan 4, 2013
 
nanoanomaly wrote:
<quoted text>Very funny. I've seen several "skeptics" call him an ugly tranny and you and your fellow freaks let it go. I get that you're just coward enough not to call a guy on that insult but not me. You're not so tough.... for a clam diver.
Cr@p. I'm too sleepy to edit that. Later.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

426 Users are viewing the Top Stories Forum right now

Search the Top Stories Forum:
Title Updated Last By Comments
Last Word + 2 2 min Rosie 178
Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 2 min onemale 256,627
Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 7 min Cisco Kid 532,912
Jehovah's Witnesses are true disciple of Jesus ... (Mar '07) 11 min Holy dr Shrink 38,460
Is homosexuality a sin? (Oct '07) 15 min karl44 93,766
Shock Poll: 40% Still not Sure Obama is America... 17 min sad 87
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 26 min Holy dr Shrink 599,090
Bush is a hero (Sep '07) 49 min WildWeirdWillie 172,466
Blaming Israel for carnage (Jul '06) 5 hr guido atheist infidel 115,275
Sims 4 Key Generator (Oct '13) 7 hr kalei 79
Game of Thrones Ebook Download Free [PDF] (Feb '13) 11 hr Drom Jagter 54
•••
•••
Enter and win $5000
•••