You told me.If you have not read the law then how could you have been claiming to knlow what it was implying?
Still beating the horse, eh? OK. I'm good with it. Just please be aware that it was your pleasure to do so the next time you accuse me of it. I'll be happy yo let it go when you're done.The point is what you and the others here are soo adamant about. You keep ranting about, "What Baby" etc. well the law refers to the baby. It names it a Child in utero and explains exactly what that means. That was the point. There is a baby there is a child and the law states that very plainly. If you can not grasp that then there is something seriously wrong.
But the law is not relevant to the matter. It's a matter of biology, not government. I've already explained that this is no more meaningful than if some legislature in Rhode Island or West Virginia called a fetus a dolphin. Who cares, especially if you don't live there.