Prove there's a god.

“There is no such thing”

Since: May 08

as a reasonable person

#582343 Jan 3, 2013
It aint necessarily so wrote:
http://www.topix.com/forum/top stories/TOCO8TEGNA8I5JT63/post 581618
<quoted text>
Imma gonna hafta guess once again which of my points (see link above) you were addressing, and what your point with regard to it is - whether you agreed or disagreed.
I'm guessing that the comment that you didn't like was, "We call the value that represents this the p-value," that the part of your link that was on your mind was, "Number of deaths for leading causes of death - Heart disease: 599,413," and that the link between them is you would have liked to see a p-value for that data.
How did I do? Not so good?
You could improve communication tremendously if your next post is more than an adverb and a link juxtaposed against an unedited comment comprising several claims. Sentences work very well for that - sentences like "I disagree that ... because of the fact that ... which you can verify and read more about at [link]."
Close.
I could be clearer in my presentation but I figured that you were a smart guy...

“Is that all you've got?”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#582344 Jan 3, 2013
UR BS wrote:
Pretty straight forward. This is the Law and it says CHILD.
"In the U.S., the Unborn Victims of Violence Act of 2004 recognizes an unborn child as a legal victim, if s/he is injured or killed during the commission of any of over 60 listed federal crimes of violence. Pursuant to 18 USCS § 1841, the term "unborn child" means a child in utero, and the term "child in utero" or "child, who is in utero" means a member of the species homo sapiens, at any stage of development, who is carried in the womb."
Notice, "Unborn Child", "Child in Utero", "Child who is in Utero".
Now last time I checked if you were in Utero you were not born yet but somehow the Federal Government has recognized these as "Children", not Fetuses, Zygots or any other name.
Scott is appealing...

http://www.cnn.com/2003/LAW/04/21/laci.peters...

...of course. Maybe he should hire one of the psychos here to argue his case. I doubt their cold-blooded, dehumanizing of the child would go over well as a defense. >;)

“There is no such thing”

Since: May 08

as a reasonable person

#582345 Jan 3, 2013
It aint necessarily so wrote:
<quoted text>
I thought that there was a Bushmaster involved, that that was a semi-automatic rifle like the M-16 I fired in basic, and that that was considered an assault weapon. I don't know much about guns, so I'll defer to you. What does this mean to you?:
"Bushmaster .223: Weapon Used in Newtown Shooting a Lightning Rod in Gun Debate"
http://newsfeed.time.com/2012/12/19/bushmaste...
Even if you were correct, would that change the argument other than to increase the enormity of the problem?
<quoted text>
I guess it's time for me to divine what you are thinking once again - the reason why you posted that. Let's see how this could possibly matter. Maybe you think the gun was supplied by Rodia. And maybe you think that matters.
If not, sorry - I give up. I'm all out of ideas. I'll consult my Ouija board and Magic 8-Ball to see if they know what you were thinking here while waiting for your answer.
[CONT.]
Now I am seriously disappointed in your deductive reasoning skills.
The M-16 rifle was adapted for semi-automatic, three-round burst, and full-automatic fire. An AR-15 is semi-auto only. Which doesn't even matter when the AR-15 was not found in the school. Which means that it was not used in the shooting. The shooter did not leave the school put the assault rifle away and then go back in side to shoot himself.

“Is that all you've got?”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#582346 Jan 3, 2013
Lil Ticked wrote:
<quoted text>Close.
I could be clearer in my presentation but I figured that you were a smart guy...
He's nowhere near as smart as he thinks he is. His ego precedes him. xD

“There is no such thing”

Since: May 08

as a reasonable person

#582347 Jan 3, 2013
It aint necessarily so wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm guessing pseudoprinciple here. Did you see the post on that? In case you missed it, here it is:
http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TOCO8TE...
The way we can decide is to see if you uniformly object to prohibitions because of the black markets that they engender. How do you feel about a prohibition on abortion, and the underground abortion clinics that would spring up? Do you object on that basis?
How about the prohibition on heroine and meth? There are black markets for both of those as well. Can we put you down for legalization of them. After all, as you said, "2. Prohibition = Blackmarket, period." If a "meth head" wants a pound of meth, "they can get one or make their own," right?
Are you retarded? A prohibition on assault rifles will work as well as the prohibiton on drugs. Yes, I am for the legalization of meth. There does that help. So, why would I want a prohibition on abortion? Try and think sh1t through next time.

“Is that all you've got?”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#582348 Jan 3, 2013
UR BS wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes she did that was a large part of our argument that she somehow along with IANS don't seem to see anything wrong with it while I look at it as being ultra insulting and a demonstartion of no class.
BWAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAAAHAHAHAHAAAAAHA....

OMG! That's hilarious!

“There is no such thing”

Since: May 08

as a reasonable person

#582349 Jan 3, 2013
It aint necessarily so wrote:
<quoted text>
I disagree. Your posting suggests otherwise. You are aware of the cost of having guns in the home, and you refuse to acknowledge the data or care about it.
<quoted text>
You're a class act, and a great illustration of the power of your god and of your faith. I'm sure that wherever you go, people ask themselves, "What has he got, and how can I get it, too."
Frach it, nevermind. I have other things to do than point out your inaccuracies all day.

“Is that all you've got?”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#582350 Jan 3, 2013
Aura Mytha wrote:
<quoted text> Really again it doesn't matter except if your hypothesis were true , then all placental mammals are a form of parasite. That would change all of biology in fact there would be no mammals no eutherian just more on this list.
http://www.cdc.gov/parasites/az/index.html
And now you are starting to get my inability to believe he is/was a doctor. Puhleeze.... um, maybe if he received his doctorate at Whassamattuh U.

Tune degrees only count in Tuneland. Th-th-th-at's all folks!

“Is that all you've got?”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#582351 Jan 3, 2013
Lil Ticked wrote:
<quoted text>Are you retarded? A prohibition on assault rifles will work as well as the prohibition on drugs.
....
Ha! Yeah, there are dopers here that will sell you a gun for $20 and there's no waiting period. Prohibition isn't terribly realistic.

“Life may be sweeter for this”

Since: Nov 08

Fennario

#582352 Jan 4, 2013
UR BS wrote:
<quoted text>
Exactly what SCOTUS Ruling would that have been concerning Slavery? I seem to be having a problem finding that one. How about a link to the actual SCOTUS Decision as it applies to Slavery in the US.
Dred Scott v. Sandford, 1857
http://www.infoplease.com/us/supreme-court/ca...

“There is no such thing”

Since: May 08

as a reasonable person

#582353 Jan 4, 2013
UR BS wrote:
<quoted text>
The problem with your answer here is that you start by saying you are for limited Government but then everything you mention expands Government.
My suggestion is for private funding or replacement of many of the services that are paid for with my taxes now.

Sandy Springs, Georgia: The City that Outsourced Everything

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#582354 Jan 4, 2013
nanoanomaly wrote:
<quoted text>Did I miss something here? Did that fudgeugly tranny call ME an "it"?
UR BS wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes she did that was a large part of our argument that she somehow along with IANS don't seem to see anything wrong with it while I look at it as being ultra insulting and a demonstartion of no class.
Right, and calling somebody a fudgeugly tranny isn't insulting at all. Gotcha.

“Is that all you've got?”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#582355 Jan 4, 2013
River Tam wrote:
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
Right, and calling somebody a fudgeugly tranny isn't insulting at all. Gotcha.
Very funny. I've seen several "skeptics" call him an ugly tranny and you and your fellow freaks let it go. I get that you're just coward enough not to call a guy on that insult but not me. You're not so tough.... for a clam diver.

Since: Feb 12

Germany

#582356 Jan 4, 2013
It aint necessarily so wrote:
<quoted text>
Dred Scott v. Sandford, 1857
http://www.infoplease.com/us/supreme-court/ca...
I knew of the Dred Scott case but that did not outlaw Slavery which was your claim. Slavery still existed and was continued until after the Civil War and the passage of the 13 Ammendment.

The Dred Scott case made an argument about slavery but did not outlaw it.

“Life may be sweeter for this”

Since: Nov 08

Fennario

#582357 Jan 4, 2013
UR BS wrote:
I am what I said I am nothing more nothing less.
Really? You're no more than what you have said you are?
UR BS wrote:
Because I do not attack all things religion simply shows that unlike yours my mind is open and I am willing to admit that I do not know everything.
Judging by that comment, I don't think you know what an open mind is. It has nothing to do with my conclusions, merely how I arrive at them, and whether I am amenable to evidence.

As far as admitting whether I know everything or not, I have never commented one way or another on that, and you have never asked.
UR BS wrote:
You accusations against the church, which one by the way, are baseless.
What?

Does this mean that you find my accusations against the church are baseless, but you want to know which church I mean? Yours sounds like the closed mind. How else could you make such a comment - you don't know what I mean, but I'm wrong anyway whatever it is.

“Life may be sweeter for this”

Since: Nov 08

Fennario

#582358 Jan 4, 2013
UR BS wrote:
As I have pointed out there is a life there
So have I. Why tell me? I have never disagreed with that.
UR BS wrote:
call it what you like but it is there and as a result of the procedure the life is terminated. That is death.
Again, why tell me? I have the said the same thing already:

"How about a little accuracy: a fetus is being killed against its interests."
http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TOCO8TE...

This is where you people leave me underwhelmed. Do you have any idea what my positions are? It doesn't sound like it.

“Life may be sweeter for this”

Since: Nov 08

Fennario

#582359 Jan 4, 2013
UR BS wrote:
You advocat the free access to that so you can be classified as pro-death.
Then call me pro-free access, and call yourself anti-free access. I'm good with that. Or are you determined to label me pro-death no matter what it is I actually advocate?

If so, by your own reckoning. I have to call you pro-death for your position on guns in the home.

Incidentally, I have taken a personal ant-abortion position:

"I find abortion repulsive, would be loathe to do one, send a lover to have one, or if I were a woman, have one myself. I'll bet that you and most pro-choice advocates are close to that position as well."
http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TOCO8TE...

Is that what you mean by pro-death?

It's rather clear which of the two of us has the closed mind here. You are clearly bound and determined to demean me with the death label, whatever the evidence against it.

“Is that all you've got?”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#582360 Jan 4, 2013
nanoanomaly wrote:
<quoted text>Very funny. I've seen several "skeptics" call him an ugly tranny and you and your fellow freaks let it go. I get that you're just coward enough not to call a guy on that insult but not me. You're not so tough.... for a clam diver.
Cr@p. I'm too sleepy to edit that. Later.

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#582361 Jan 4, 2013
nanoanomaly wrote:
<quoted text>Very funny. I've seen several "skeptics" call him an ugly tranny and you and your fellow freaks let it go. I get that you're just coward enough not to call a guy on that insult but not me. You're not so tough.... for a clam diver.
I didn't call you on anything. I expect those insults from you. I was replying to UR BS. Just wanted to know how "it" was a major insult but he said nothing about "fudgeugly tranny". I'm sure "clam diver" is quite alright as well.

Thanks for being you.

;-)

Since: Feb 12

Germany

#582362 Jan 4, 2013
Lil Ticked wrote:
<quoted text>
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =f8qFvo2qJOUXX
Sandy Springs, Georgia: The City that Outsourced Everything
That is the best Idea I have heard lately. It is nice to know that someone gets it!

I did like the part where the Mayor said that as soon as they got the Democrats out of cobtrol and the republicans took over they initiated this.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 7 min Robert F 596,274
Why I’m no longer a Christian (Jul '08) 9 min curtjester1 444,330
The Christian Atheist debate 10 min Kaitlin the Wolf ... 984
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 19 min PortaBella ITA 612,614
my wife neha ki chudai (May '14) 28 min raavan 15
Play "end of the word" (Jan '11) 1 hr WasteWater 6,138
There is Everything Wrong with Abortion (Nov '07) 1 hr Grunt56 221,822
Which is the Oldest Indian Language? Sanskrit V... (Jul '08) 3 hr The swamiji 7,335
More from around the web