Prove there's a god.

Since: Jul 09

Location hidden

#582315 Jan 3, 2013
Aura Mytha wrote:
<quoted text>
Plinking cans and bottles is murder.
the owner needs be held criminally accountable for irresponsible gun storage

Since: Jul 09

Location hidden

#582316 Jan 3, 2013
UR BS wrote:
<quoted text>
Is a woman a mother if her kid gets run over by a car and killed?
You might consider pulling your head out of your backside.
if my only child dies, I am no longer a parent

Since: Jul 09

Location hidden

#582317 Jan 3, 2013
Aura Mytha wrote:
The baby IS the benefit.
<quoted text> Only if you think the TOE is correct.
ToE is silent on abortion.

ToE is not a bible

Since: Jul 09

Location hidden

#582318 Jan 3, 2013
Aura Mytha wrote:
<quoted text>
Well you will have to put the entire armed forces in a lower IQ bracket than some creationists and retards to qualify that.
I think not.
I think it's massively stupid to live in this world without protection, but it must be respected and kept safe or it's a liability.
I'll leave you libatards to protect yourselves with daisy's and
picket signs agains't the wolves.
guns in the wrong hands make the world a less safe place.

I would prefer to give up my guns than to see people like RR armed.

licensing, restrictions, and storage laws need upgrading.

Since: Jul 09

Location hidden

#582319 Jan 3, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Greater restriction?
That crazy sumbitch shot 20 little kids. Don't you think he would've used something else if his mom's guns were't handy?
the point is: that the gun was too handy, that the gun needs greater restriction so that in the future it will be less handy.
the gun is designed as an efficient killing machine.
Tell me, RR what contributions are you prepared to make, to reduce the kind of incident we saw at sandy hook

Since: Jul 09

Location hidden

#582320 Jan 3, 2013
christianity is EVIL wrote:
universe is Infinite and self sustaining NO gods needed
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Unsuported assertion fallacy.
best hypothesis we currently have

NOT unsupported

Your lack of knowledge is not reflective of the science community.

at times

you are merely a troll
BadBreathBruce

Christchurch, New Zealand

#582321 Jan 3, 2013
karl44 wrote:
christianity is EVIL wrote:
universe is Infinite and self sustaining NO gods needed
<quoted text>
best hypothesis we currently have
NOT unsupported
Your lack of knowledge is not reflective of the science community.
at times
you are merely a troll
The universe is not infinite and/or self sustaining. I'm no scientist, but I believe the Second Law of Thermodynamics says that everything in the universe is deteriorating, running down, decomposing, rotting, getting worse. Entropy (the NON-availability of energy in a closed system) is INCREASING. Without an OUTSIDE FORCE, the universe would simply slow down and eventually come to a complete standstill.
BadBreathBruce

Christchurch, New Zealand

#582323 Jan 3, 2013
First Law of Thermodynamics states that matter can neither be created nor destroyed. Well, all matter HAD to have a beginning, right?? Invent yourself a time machine. Hop into the little time machine and travel back in time to as far back as your little heart desires. EVENTUALLY, you will arrive at the VERY BEGINNING of ALL THINGS and (no surprises) you will arrive at what it says in Genesis 1:1. THERE'S YOUR PROOF!! BUT........you'll have to make that little time capsule first. Good luck!!

Since: Feb 12

Germany

#582324 Jan 3, 2013
Huh wrote:
What a loser. Bwahahahaha. Want to meet 30 Marines who don't think I am abhorrent or a chicken shit? I bet you can't pull up 30 who will support you likewise. Go wallow in your mediocrity. You bore me.
Just because you were the company sl*t and all 30 guys did you for rec doesn't mean they either liked or respected you or that they would ever come to your aid only that they needed some physical release and you were handy.

A real Marine wouldn't need 30 of her supposed buddies anyway.

Besides were you not crying about threats o the internet a while back?

Since: Feb 12

Germany

#582325 Jan 3, 2013
It aint necessarily so wrote:
<quoted text>
I think you misjudged my need. I was merely looking for a way to confirm my suspicion that you are a stealth Christian calling himself an agnostic. For some reason, it's fairly common.
And no, you never the answered the question whether you accept any god claim,that is, believe in any god. All you said was that whatever you believed, that you didn't consider it certain. But the fact remains that you have refused to answer the question five times now. That's fine. Just as in a court of law when a defendant refuses to answer a question, the jury is free to decide why.
<quoted text>
Confidence and self-esteem have always been issues for me. I'm a very insecure guy.
Tiy still keep beatiung that same dead horse. I have answered what my beliefs are and you are not happy with the answer so you want to twist around and try an get a different one. Your motives are clear as you have stated them fairly plain for anyone that can reason.
You want to show somehow that I am actually a Christian because then you feel that is some kind of victory for you in your little world. Well sorry I am an agnostic I have been an agnostic and will remain an agnostic until one or the other side can come up with sufficient proof to sway me one way or the other.
The fact that you and kitty feel that you can be both agnostic and an atheist or a thiest does not play in what I consider an agnostic. As far as I am concerned an affirmation in either direction removes the agnostic and you then become either a theist or an atheist.
So if you want to keep beating this dead horse go ahead you have received my answer and that is all there is.

Catcher1

Since: Sep 10

Hermosa Beach, CA

#582326 Jan 3, 2013
BadBreathBruce wrote:
First Law of Thermodynamics states that matter can neither be created nor destroyed. Well, all matter HAD to have a beginning, right?? Invent yourself a time machine. Hop into the little time machine and travel back in time to as far back as your little heart desires. EVENTUALLY, you will arrive at the VERY BEGINNING of ALL THINGS and (no surprises) you will arrive at what it says in Genesis 1:1. THERE'S YOUR PROOF!! BUT........you'll have to make that little time capsule first. Good luck!!
Even if I wanted to, I wouldn't reply to your posts because your name is so horrible.

You should change your name.

Or if not, just go somewhere else.

No offense. It's not you; it's your name.

Catcher1

Since: Sep 10

Hermosa Beach, CA

#582327 Jan 3, 2013
UR BS wrote:
<quoted text>
Just because you were the company sl*t and all 30 guys did you for rec doesn't mean they either liked or respected you or that they would ever come to your aid only that they needed some physical release and you were handy.
A real Marine wouldn't need 30 of her supposed buddies anyway.
Besides were you not crying about threats o the internet a while back?
Oh, no, look who's back.

It's bad breath BS.

Must you?

“ad victoriam”

Since: Dec 10

arte et marte

#582328 Jan 3, 2013
karl44 wrote:
<quoted text>
guns in the wrong hands make the world a less safe place.
I would prefer to give up my guns than to see people like RR armed.
licensing, restrictions, and storage laws need upgrading.

Go ahead just don't include the US in your tyrannical plans.

Since: Feb 12

Germany

#582329 Jan 3, 2013
It aint necessarily so wrote:
<quoted text>
Why do you feel that you need protection? I don't, and never have.
<quoted text>
That's true of anything and everything.
It's the differences between guns and most other things that interest me.
The first statement you make here is a lie.

Everyone has needed protection if that were not true we would not have a Military, or Law Enforcement.

Since: Feb 12

Germany

#582330 Jan 3, 2013
It aint necessarily so wrote:
<quoted text>
I've never tried, but if you like, I will:
How can you justify charging somebody with grand theft auto for driving away in the car that you are allowed to drive at will? The answer is the same.
<quoted text>
I don't have a well-formed opinion there. You might be correct.
Not their car and that brings us to my second point. If it is because it is not their child then at best it should be a property crime and nothing more.

Since: Feb 12

Germany

#582331 Jan 3, 2013
It aint necessarily so wrote:
<quoted text>
I am pro-limited government. Some of the things that you do in your home are my business. Having a meth lab comes to mind first.
<quoted text>
I support a woman's right to choose. I do advocate for prenatal care for pregnant women that want their babies, and for government funding of such care where helpful.
Do we need more adoption agencies? If so, I'm all for their creation.
<quoted text>
Great. Some people will be interested in those options. They should be available to them. That's what choice means.
The problem with your answer here is that you start by saying you are for limited Government but then everything you mention expands Government.
My suggestion is for private funding or replacement of many of the services that are paid for with my taxes now.

“ad victoriam”

Since: Dec 10

arte et marte

#582332 Jan 3, 2013
It aint necessarily so wrote:
http://www.nhm.ac.uk/hosted-si tes/iczn/code/
<quoted text>
Crickets. I don't know what that means, especially "the fetus of a parasite."
The genus and species of a human fetus is Homo sapiens. It's on the primate branch of the mammalian branch of the vertebrate branch of the animal kingdom.
I really don't understand why this is such an emotional issue for so many. Why would anybody object strenuously or emotionally to anybody calling a fetus a parasite, even if that were incorrect? What if I called it a snowball? How much effort would you expend refuting that?
Really again it doesn't matter except if your hypothesis were true , then all placental mammals are a form of parasite. That would change all of biology in fact there would be no mammals no eutherian just more on this list.

http://www.cdc.gov/parasites/az/index.html

Since: Feb 12

Germany

#582333 Jan 3, 2013
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, no, look who's back.
It's bad breath BS.
Must you?
OH NO look who's responding it is the LONG BEACH LOON!

Catcher1

Since: Sep 10

Hermosa Beach, CA

#582334 Jan 3, 2013
UR BS wrote:
<quoted text>
The problem with your answer here is that you start by saying you are for limited Government but then everything you mention expands Government.
My suggestion is for private funding or replacement of many of the services that are paid for with my taxes now.
OK, thanks for your input.

We will consider your suggestion.

Since: Feb 12

Germany

#582335 Jan 3, 2013
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
OK, thanks for your input.
We will consider your suggestion.
Still responding I see.

There are gaps in my posts because my life does not revolve around topix. I have to work, as much as I know that is an alien concept to you I do have to work so I can have more of my money redistributed to broke a$$ states like California and deadbeats that stay on topix rather than work.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing 5 min Maxxx_Payne 18,218
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 11 min George Justapose 684,028
MESSAGE 4 Kyrie Irving of the Cleveland Cavaliers 21 min Doctor REALITY 6
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 33 min lil whispers 619,715
We Real Americans Love President Trump!! 2 hr Gismys 1
harthside COOKIES 4 hr C eh N eh D eh 2
Sexual Desires: My wife pooping in my mouth (Aug '13) 8 hr Mikeylikesit 29
More from around the web