You should really call someone and at least get a clue about what you are saying prior to posting idiotic drivel like this one.<quoted text>A person can only be charged with murder for killing a z/e/f if the woman pregnant with said z/e/f had no wish or desire to terminate her pregnancy.
And the charge would not be that of murdering a BABY, but of terminating a zygote, an embryo or a fetus against the woman's wishes.
If you think there is such a thing as an "unborn" baby, that would mean that you are an "undead" corpse.
There is NO corpse until there is a DEATH; there is NO baby until there is a BIRTH.
At any rate, and despite your personal feelings and beliefs about the topic, do tell what would be right about any woman being legally forced to remain pregnant against her will in order to be legally forced to give birth against her will.
Not your body? Not your uterus? Not your pregnancy? Not your z/e/f?
Then not your choice, not your decision and NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS.
Hope that helps to clear things up for you.
Here I will help read this,
Here is just a little excerpt from that law.
"anyone who causes the death of, or injury to, an unborn child at any developmental stage is guilty of not only harming the mother but also, as a separate offense, of harming the child. In these cases, the court can convict perpetrators of two separate cases of bodily harm or murder."
Notice the word CHILD? Not any of those other terms you and your ilk like to use to dehumanize the child.
It is called a Child in utero.