“Speaking with conscience”

Since: Dec 12

Free Speech in a Free World

#573525 Dec 15, 2012
it is tough to prove

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#573526 Dec 15, 2012
It aint necessarily so wrote:
<quoted text>
I think Piers was right.
<quoted text>
Leh-wan-yeh-ah. I hadn't realized what a sphincter Alex Jones was.
<quoted text>
Very scary.
I think Piers is wrong. I don't own any guns but if I decide to, I will. Legally would be better, I think.

“MEET ROSEMARY-She Seeks Home”

Since: Oct 10

With Established Harem

#573527 Dec 15, 2012
Just Results wrote:
It's Christmas time, and an atheist did the unthinkable today in killing 26 people. When are we going to take action and remove their rights to continue with this activity?????
.. you are using the death and pain of others to promote your belief system. That's despicable ..

“I never claimed to be Perfect”

Since: Nov 10

just better than yesterday

#573528 Dec 15, 2012
Just Results wrote:
<quoted text>
When are you going to realize that what happened today is the net result of atheism? How old are you? Have you not been paying attention to what has happened over the past 50 years? Are you a desensitized idiot like so many others ?
Wake up, you morron.
JR. The evil a hole that did this was mentally unstable or so were told. We don't know if he was atheist or not. I prefer to wait for the information rather than rely on a knee jerk response. His judgement for what he did to these beautiful babies is now in the hands of God and accusing the atheists for what this asswipe did is as undeserving as accusing Christians of being responsible for what some crazy people may have done in the past as well. Lets use common sense.

“Life may be sweeter for this”

Since: Nov 08

Fennario

#573529 Dec 15, 2012
STFU
lightbeamrider wrote:
If the information is accurate, then the source does not matter.
That is correct.

But how do we decide which information is accurate? Since we can seldom verify the information ourselves, to believe that it might be accurate requires that it come from a reliable source. The source's reputation is important.

As I said, Christian apologetics sites are notoriously dishonest, and any factual information on them was imported, not developed there. And in my experience, things found only on a Christian apologetics site have been dishonest.

So, if what you have is accurate, link me to the non-Christian source from whence it originated. If there is no such external source, I don't trust it. Past history matters. Reputation matters.

“Life may be sweeter for this”

Since: Nov 08

Fennario

#573530 Dec 15, 2012
[Sorry about the STFU above. It was litter from another project.]
lightbeamrider wrote:
Read Matthew Henry Bible Commentary on line regarding Ezek. 37. If you read it carefully then you will see it predicts the rebirth of Israel ...
Why are you referring me to a commentary? Aren't you discussing a biblical passage? I just mentioned that I prefer original sources when possible over apologetics. And FYI, very few readers will go hunt down something you want read unless they want to read it. Why would I be interested in Matt's opinion?
lightbeamrider wrote:
... it predicts the rebirth of Israel as a nation at the exact same spot and undivided.
So what? Do you consider that quality prophecy? I don't. No superhuman ability is necessary to fulfill a prediction.

Let me help you with that. The characteristics of prophecy that would convince a skeptic are these :

[1] High quality prophecy needs to be specific, detailed and unambiguous. Optimally, the time and place are specified.

[2] It also needs to prophecy something unexpected, unlikely or unique - something that was not self-fulfilling and could not have been contrived.

[3] The prophecies must be verified that they came before the event predicted, and that they were fulfilled completely.

[4] The prophecies must be unaccompanied by failed prophecies.
lightbeamrider wrote:
Completed early 1700s (?) when Israel did not exist. Now lets say 1000 years from now someone discovers a fragmented copy of that writing and knew Israel came back in 1948. They would have to conclude the Matthew Henry Commentary fragment was no earlier than 1948. While we know it was completed far earlier. I think that is called confirmation bias.
See above

“O'si yo!”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#573531 Dec 15, 2012
Aerobatty wrote:
<quoted text>
Wow!
You actually hit the shift key THREE whole times there!
excuse me?

“Why does my ignorance”

Since: Mar 11

justify your deity?

#573532 Dec 15, 2012
waaasssuuup wrote:
<quoted text>
mr - we won't be able to see eye-to-eye until you can remove the flaming-biased log out of your eye.
Huh? Mr? Are you addressing yourself?

Did you come out of the closet?'cause your words that follow "mr" suggest you did.

“Why does my ignorance”

Since: Mar 11

justify your deity?

#573533 Dec 15, 2012
Hidingfromyou wrote:
Your God is weak. He "put some restrictions on...slavery."
Hello?!? Helmut, do you hear me? That's like Great Britain telling Nazi Germany "Ok, you can have Poland and France, but that's it. No more. And be nice to those people! Or else!"
What an imaginative piss-ant wimp you worship.
waaasssuuup wrote:
<quoted text>
if you don't like nazism, why are you socialist? it's the same thing, but we just haven't seen it's full fruition yet.
Huh? I'm not a socialist.

Your brain doesn't quite work, hey.

“Why does my ignorance”

Since: Mar 11

justify your deity?

#573534 Dec 15, 2012
waaasssuuup wrote:
<quoted text>
actually, under Jewish law, on the year of julilee the jews were required to set slaves/indentured servants free whether they paid their debt off by then or not. many of them would refuse freedom and chose to continue to be members of jewish households because they saw how God was in their midst.
it was really a wonderful law, considering the barbarism of the surrounding nations at the time.
why are pagans always so barbaric and why do you refuse God's ways???
So you're saying that God was so all powerful He had to settle for "it's ok to have slavery as long as you have one day a year where you release some of them."

What morality! What ethics!

Your deity sucks.

“Why does my ignorance”

Since: Mar 11

justify your deity?

#573535 Dec 15, 2012
It aint necessarily so wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes. He was a famous pamphleteer, and a lot of people's favorite Founder.
Thanks. Funny how many of these theists lie about that.

“Life may be sweeter for this”

Since: Nov 08

Fennario

#573536 Dec 15, 2012
It aint necessarily so wrote:
I can stipulate for you that [Jesus] existed without knowing whether it is true or not. His historicity means nothing to me if he wasn't also a god.
I've read conflicting data. As I said, it doesn't matter either way.
lightbeamrider wrote:
Yeah it does not mean anything because you are on the losing side of that argument.
There was no argument there, just some claims. Which one were you contesting - that Jesus might not have existed, that there are dissenting opinions about his historicity, or that he wasn't a god?
lightbeamrider wrote:
"One could easily argue that the Bible is the most important book in the history of western civilization. What other books come close in terms of historical, social, and cultural significance?"
I can stipulate to that as well. I hope you know what that word means. I am not agreeing with you or disagreeing - just willing to concede the point for now because I see no value in challenging it. If that changes, I may have reason to disagree later.

“Life may be sweeter for this”

Since: Nov 08

Fennario

#573537 Dec 15, 2012
lightbeamrider wrote:
Who (Besides IANS) wouldn't want to know more about a book that has transformed millions of lives and affected entire civilizations?...It is important for all of us--at least for all of us interesred in human history, society and culture."
I agree that your bible is worth being familiar with. But how familiar? What more does an unbeliever need to know about your bible than what I know?
lightbeamrider wrote:
"One could argue as well that Jesus is the most important person in the history of the west,(Jesus means nothing to IANS) looked at from a historical, social, and cultural perspective, quite apart from his religious significance."
Only if he existed and was the author of the words attributed to him. Even then, Jesus may not even be the most important person in Christian history. Constantine probably did more for Christianity than Jesus.

Jesus might not even be the most influential character in the New Testament. Your religion mirrors the teachings of Paul more than those of Jesus.

But even if we stipulate to Jesus being the most important figure in history, so what? Are you offering that as evidence that he was a god?

“O'si yo!”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#573538 Dec 15, 2012
boooots wrote:
<quoted text>
Aha, a definite clue that you might not be Patty. You spelled 'desperate' correctly, which she has never done, and that is another word I forgot to mention in one of my earlier posts of clues that make UIF so obviously Patty are shown. Her spelling is despirate, which to my understanding is not a known word, at least not in English.
Or is it a case that she finally looked up the word and is going to spell it correctly?
LOL thats so funny. spelling is the bases on which you decide who's who on here........thats hallarious.

“Why does my ignorance”

Since: Mar 11

justify your deity?

#573539 Dec 15, 2012
It aint necessarily so wrote:
<quoted text>
Nope. I don't have much respect for its advice or values.
Faith, obedience, self-abnegation, chastity, worship and piety, are not virtues. And there is no such thing as sin.
The virtues include integrity, compassion, autonomy, authenticity, patience, responsibility, courage, and the like.
On a societal scale, the virtues would include such things as political freedom, democracy, egalitarianism, justice, and opportunity.
Well said!

waaasssuuup is too delusional to understand this, of course. He actually thinks that Satan is talking through you.

Which means that waaasssuuup comes here to talk to Satan. Topix is his place to commune with the devil. I think he wants to take Satan out on a date. Maybe share a cigar and a whisky.

“Why does my ignorance”

Since: Mar 11

justify your deity?

#573540 Dec 15, 2012
waaasssuuup wrote:
<quoted text>
"FAILED TO REVEAL HIMSELF"!!!
you've simply rejected God by rejecting His Son
Nah. Atheists reject your fiction, that's all. Just like you reject the fictions of other religions. We go one further and reject all you loons.

“Why does my ignorance”

Since: Mar 11

justify your deity?

#573541 Dec 15, 2012
waaasssuuup wrote:
<quoted text>
a person defending homosexuality takes all objectivity out of a moral/spiritual debate. shot - goal!
Why?

Because you say so? Your morality is sick.

Because you believe your deity says so?

Your deity is sick. It also condones rape and slavery.

Game, set and match. You lose. You're the not-winner :)

“Why does my ignorance”

Since: Mar 11

justify your deity?

#573542 Dec 15, 2012
waaasssuuup wrote:
<quoted text>
i read the bible as a believer, not a skeptic.
No truer words!

And that's why you fail to understand anything and everything not in your belief system.

“Why does my ignorance”

Since: Mar 11

justify your deity?

#573543 Dec 15, 2012
Happy Lesbo wrote:
<quoted text>
.. that's exactly why I don't do it. When we feel obligated to defend, justify or protect something, we need to examine our motives. Consider the recent posts regarding slavery and the Christian response. They know it's immoral yet are compelled to vehemently justify the practice ..
.. by the way, SCAR gave an excellent synopsis of Jewish tradition and law. If you missed it, here's a link:
http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TOCO8TE...
.. for homosexuality to be considered a normal sexual variant by the majority, a change in thinking must occur. We can start right here, right now on Topix ..
.. if anyone calls you or any other straight person gay, don't deny it. By posting a disclaimer, you're saying, "No, not me, I'm normal." Do you understand? Does anyone understand ??..
Absolutely.

Hey...wait a second...didn't...

You poohhead!

:p
:p
:-p

“Why does my ignorance”

Since: Mar 11

justify your deity?

#573544 Dec 15, 2012
Tide with Beach wrote:
<quoted text>
I haven't been reading anything from wasssssy, but has he brought up that the Bible does condemn kidnapping?
How else are you supposed to get a slave? You either kidnap someone yourself, or you get them pre-kidnapped.
That doesn't do anything to defend what the Bible does say about slavery. It's just another contradiction.
I don't know if he was doing that. He was arguing that God said slavery was ok because "everyone was doing it."

All I can say to waaasssuuup is "duuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuh! "

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 10 min Epiphany2 605,362
Which is the Oldest Indian Language? Sanskrit V... (Jul '08) 13 min Kannan 5,528
Moses never existed 34 min Khatru 839
Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 1 hr Tony17 560,588
Blaming Israel for carnage (Jul '06) 1 hr Mandela 119,693
Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 2 hr onemale 265,482
Teacher back in class after Bush-Hitler comparison (Mar '06) 2 hr Swedenforever 96
Wake up, Black America!! (Sep '13) 5 hr UIDIOTRACEUMAKEWO... 4,923
Straight guys: Would you ever have intercourse ... (Jul '12) 22 hr risque 137
More from around the web