endtime

AOL

#573515 Dec 15, 2012
.

PROOF Obama's ReElection = ANTICHRIST_______

&fe ature=plcp


.

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#573516 Dec 15, 2012
It aint necessarily so wrote:
<quoted text>
You don't like my opinions, so you feel the need to dehumanize me. You people have a tough time staying out of the gutter, don't you? You people almost always do this.
It's all good. Show us what Christians are made of. Show us what a Christian upbringing produces. Show us the benefits of a lifetime of going to church.
Well you select edit my post and then accuse me of dehumanizing you? I believe you are 100% human and lost.

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#573517 Dec 15, 2012
lightbeamrider wrote:
''One could argue as well that Jesus is the most important person in the history of the west,(Jesus means nothing to IANS) looked at from a historical, social, and cultural perspective, quite apart from his religious significance.''
Bart Ehrman.(Agnostic leaning towards atheism) Did Jesus Exist. p.95.
You had me going and then I realized that I'm not from the west.

“Life may be sweeter for this”

Since: Nov 08

Fennario

#573518 Dec 15, 2012
It aint necessarily so wrote:
I am an atheist, a target of your church's scapegoating
lightbeamrider wrote:
Are you crying?
Atta boy. Show us what the fruits of the spirit have done for you. Jesus is the potter, and you are the clay, right?
lightbeamrider wrote:
You are an aberation to atheists in that you demonstrate an unreasonable hate towards Christians.
I don't hate Christians. I don't think much of most of them, but I don't hate them. I see you as the principle victims of your church.

“Life may be sweeter for this”

Since: Nov 08

Fennario

#573519 Dec 15, 2012
lightbeamrider wrote:
Murder is murder. That is an objective moral standard your atheism does not allow.
Atheism doesn't have moral standards. It isn't an ethical system
lightbeamrider wrote:
If your atheism is true then all them children murdered and the killer only suffer the same fate. Non existence, nothingness. No justice, no purpose. Your atheism is bankrupt.
If that's how reality is, then that's how it is. If your philosophy teaches you to call reality bankrupt, I'd say that you need a new philosophy.

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#573520 Dec 15, 2012
River Tam wrote:
<quoted text>
Huh?
That is right. if the information is true or accurate then the source does not matter. Keep that in mind and use it. If you have teachers and they question your sources then you know what to say to them. They cannot refute the truth of your claim by discrediting the source. Truth claims cannot be refuted if they are true. Truth wins out every time!

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#573521 Dec 15, 2012
It aint necessarily so wrote:
<quoted text>
Atheism doesn't have moral standards. It isn't an ethical system
<quoted text>
If that's how reality is, then that's how it is. If your philosophy teaches you to call reality bankrupt, I'd say that you need a new philosophy.
Well if you fo to a funeral of a murder victim, i would suggest you keep your mouth shut.

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#573522 Dec 15, 2012
lightbeamrider wrote:
<quoted text> That is right. if the information is true or accurate then the source does not matter. Keep that in mind and use it. If you have teachers and they question your sources then you know what to say to them. They cannot refute the truth of your claim by discrediting the source. Truth claims cannot be refuted if they are true. Truth wins out every time!
Even you know that's not true.

The source must be vetted.

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#573523 Dec 15, 2012
lightbeamrider wrote:
<quoted text> Well if you fo to a funeral of a murder victim, i would suggest you keep your mouth shut.
I suggest you keep your mouth shut too.

It's not about you is it? If it's your funeral, speak up.

“Life may be sweeter for this”

Since: Nov 08

Fennario

#573524 Dec 15, 2012
River Tam wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =cfuJnUJa5JAXX
I think Piers was right.
River Tam wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =q8D7vribc5c
Leh-wan-yeh-ah. I hadn't realized what a sphincter Alex Jones was.
River Tam wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =MVvOi-JLidE
Very scary.

“Speaking with conscience”

Since: Dec 12

Free Speech in a Free World

#573525 Dec 15, 2012
it is tough to prove

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#573526 Dec 15, 2012
It aint necessarily so wrote:
<quoted text>
I think Piers was right.
<quoted text>
Leh-wan-yeh-ah. I hadn't realized what a sphincter Alex Jones was.
<quoted text>
Very scary.
I think Piers is wrong. I don't own any guns but if I decide to, I will. Legally would be better, I think.

“MEET ROSEMARY-She Seeks Home”

Since: Oct 10

With Established Harem

#573527 Dec 15, 2012
Just Results wrote:
It's Christmas time, and an atheist did the unthinkable today in killing 26 people. When are we going to take action and remove their rights to continue with this activity?????
.. you are using the death and pain of others to promote your belief system. That's despicable ..

“I never claimed to be Perfect”

Since: Nov 10

just better than yesterday

#573528 Dec 15, 2012
Just Results wrote:
<quoted text>
When are you going to realize that what happened today is the net result of atheism? How old are you? Have you not been paying attention to what has happened over the past 50 years? Are you a desensitized idiot like so many others ?
Wake up, you morron.
JR. The evil a hole that did this was mentally unstable or so were told. We don't know if he was atheist or not. I prefer to wait for the information rather than rely on a knee jerk response. His judgement for what he did to these beautiful babies is now in the hands of God and accusing the atheists for what this asswipe did is as undeserving as accusing Christians of being responsible for what some crazy people may have done in the past as well. Lets use common sense.

“Life may be sweeter for this”

Since: Nov 08

Fennario

#573529 Dec 15, 2012
STFU
lightbeamrider wrote:
If the information is accurate, then the source does not matter.
That is correct.

But how do we decide which information is accurate? Since we can seldom verify the information ourselves, to believe that it might be accurate requires that it come from a reliable source. The source's reputation is important.

As I said, Christian apologetics sites are notoriously dishonest, and any factual information on them was imported, not developed there. And in my experience, things found only on a Christian apologetics site have been dishonest.

So, if what you have is accurate, link me to the non-Christian source from whence it originated. If there is no such external source, I don't trust it. Past history matters. Reputation matters.

“Life may be sweeter for this”

Since: Nov 08

Fennario

#573530 Dec 15, 2012
[Sorry about the STFU above. It was litter from another project.]
lightbeamrider wrote:
Read Matthew Henry Bible Commentary on line regarding Ezek. 37. If you read it carefully then you will see it predicts the rebirth of Israel ...
Why are you referring me to a commentary? Aren't you discussing a biblical passage? I just mentioned that I prefer original sources when possible over apologetics. And FYI, very few readers will go hunt down something you want read unless they want to read it. Why would I be interested in Matt's opinion?
lightbeamrider wrote:
... it predicts the rebirth of Israel as a nation at the exact same spot and undivided.
So what? Do you consider that quality prophecy? I don't. No superhuman ability is necessary to fulfill a prediction.

Let me help you with that. The characteristics of prophecy that would convince a skeptic are these :

[1] High quality prophecy needs to be specific, detailed and unambiguous. Optimally, the time and place are specified.

[2] It also needs to prophecy something unexpected, unlikely or unique - something that was not self-fulfilling and could not have been contrived.

[3] The prophecies must be verified that they came before the event predicted, and that they were fulfilled completely.

[4] The prophecies must be unaccompanied by failed prophecies.
lightbeamrider wrote:
Completed early 1700s (?) when Israel did not exist. Now lets say 1000 years from now someone discovers a fragmented copy of that writing and knew Israel came back in 1948. They would have to conclude the Matthew Henry Commentary fragment was no earlier than 1948. While we know it was completed far earlier. I think that is called confirmation bias.
See above

“O'si yo!”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#573531 Dec 15, 2012
Aerobatty wrote:
<quoted text>
Wow!
You actually hit the shift key THREE whole times there!
excuse me?

“Why does my ignorance”

Since: Mar 11

justify your deity?

#573532 Dec 15, 2012
waaasssuuup wrote:
<quoted text>
mr - we won't be able to see eye-to-eye until you can remove the flaming-biased log out of your eye.
Huh? Mr? Are you addressing yourself?

Did you come out of the closet?'cause your words that follow "mr" suggest you did.

“Why does my ignorance”

Since: Mar 11

justify your deity?

#573533 Dec 15, 2012
Hidingfromyou wrote:
Your God is weak. He "put some restrictions on...slavery."
Hello?!? Helmut, do you hear me? That's like Great Britain telling Nazi Germany "Ok, you can have Poland and France, but that's it. No more. And be nice to those people! Or else!"
What an imaginative piss-ant wimp you worship.
waaasssuuup wrote:
<quoted text>
if you don't like nazism, why are you socialist? it's the same thing, but we just haven't seen it's full fruition yet.
Huh? I'm not a socialist.

Your brain doesn't quite work, hey.

“Why does my ignorance”

Since: Mar 11

justify your deity?

#573534 Dec 15, 2012
waaasssuuup wrote:
<quoted text>
actually, under Jewish law, on the year of julilee the jews were required to set slaves/indentured servants free whether they paid their debt off by then or not. many of them would refuse freedom and chose to continue to be members of jewish households because they saw how God was in their midst.
it was really a wonderful law, considering the barbarism of the surrounding nations at the time.
why are pagans always so barbaric and why do you refuse God's ways???
So you're saying that God was so all powerful He had to settle for "it's ok to have slavery as long as you have one day a year where you release some of them."

What morality! What ethics!

Your deity sucks.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
God is REAL - Miracles Happen! (Jun '11) 16 min Tony 5,758
There is Everything Wrong with Abortion (Nov '07) 1 hr Grunt56 221,551
Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 1 hr MUQ1 267,565
sexting (guys only) (Jul '12) 1 hr lee 234
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 1 hr mike 607,285
Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 2 hr pusherman_ 568,579
Israel's end is near, Ahmadinejad says (Jun '07) 2 hr MUQ1 38,067
Blaming Israel for carnage (Jul '06) 3 hr AN NFL FAN 120,765
Scientific proof for God's existence 6 hr eyeful 642
More from around the web