Prove there's a god.

“A sentient umbrella speaks”

Since: Mar 11

Some stable somewhere

#567017 Nov 28, 2012
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Redneck's tried that. The left hand is only good for hair stroking, and the like..........
Sucks, but the right hand is amply prepared to tackle the situation.
Ok, but what do you do if you're holding a beer in your right hand?

“I never claimed to be Perfect”

Since: Nov 10

just better than yesterday

#567018 Nov 29, 2012
Hidingfromyou wrote:
<quoted text>
RR, you know that every man on here is over six feet tall, has a great body, usually owns his own company (which hires PhDs, they always tell us), drives a great car and is the envy of all? Lots of the men tell us their member is 9 inches long! It's like all these people are clones of themselves.
And all the creationists have IQ's over 180. I've lost track of how many times creationists have claimed to have a superhuman IQ.
I think my IQ is in the mid to low 40s. I'm pretty stupid. Maybe that's why I'm not a creationist.
Yup! That's true! All of us guys look like Da Vinci's David and are insanely rich.
As far as your IQ? That's how we like em. Pretty and Dumb as a box of rocks....!
(Snicker...) lol!

“A sentient umbrella speaks”

Since: Mar 11

Some stable somewhere

#567019 Nov 29, 2012
Al Garcia wrote:
<quoted text>
Yup! That's true! All of us guys look like Da Vinci's David and are insanely rich.
As far as your IQ? That's how we like em. Pretty and Dumb as a box of rocks....!
(Snicker...) lol!
Welcome home! I drew a hot bath for you and will bring a cold beer for your enjoyment.

“I never claimed to be Perfect”

Since: Nov 10

just better than yesterday

#567021 Nov 29, 2012
Errr.... Meant to say "Michelangelo's David" though I'm sure Da Vinci's wouldn't have been a bad one if he'd made one....
Damn these muscle relaxers, seems like they do nothing to eliminate the muscle pain but sure are good at making people feel loopy and increase drooling.....

“I never claimed to be Perfect”

Since: Nov 10

just better than yesterday

#567022 Nov 29, 2012
Hidingfromyou wrote:
<quoted text>
Welcome home! I drew a hot bath for you and will bring a cold beer for your enjoyment.
Now that's awesome! Hi Hiding!

“A sentient umbrella speaks”

Since: Mar 11

Some stable somewhere

#567023 Nov 29, 2012
Al Garcia wrote:
<quoted text>
Now that's awesome! Hi Hiding!
<giggle> It is my pleasure and duty to you, husband, who works so hard to maintain our home.

<passes cup, one hand on bottom, one hand lightly touching the side>

Please, allow me to fill your cold beer.

<pours slowly and carefully, places bottle on wooden rest>

Allow me to bring you some fresh clothes for after your bath.

<bows, one hand over the other in front of lap>

“There is no such thing”

Since: May 08

as a reasonable person

#567024 Nov 29, 2012
Hidingfromyou wrote:
<quoted text>
RR, you know that every man on here is over six feet tall, has a great body, usually owns his own company (which hires PhDs, they always tell us), drives a great car and is the envy of all? Lots of the men tell us their member is 9 inches long! It's like all these people are clones of themselves.
And all the creationists have IQ's over 180. I've lost track of how many times creationists have claimed to have a superhuman IQ.
I think my IQ is in the mid to low 40s. I'm pretty stupid. Maybe that's why I'm not a creationist.
That is so untrue. I for one am 5'6, 130lbs, a little on the thin side, no PhD more of a "street smarts" guy until the internets got me an associates. Member size is nobody's business but mine and those worthy of finding out. I.Q. is 140, not that I.Q.s matter much. Not that any of this matters much. A person is a person is a person. We all have our preferences. I personally prefer those that are not hypcrites, douchebags, or know-it-alls. Other than that pretty anything is fine more so if they are extremely attractive but that also is subjective. Intelligence can make up for a lack of "looks" sometimes unless it is Stephen Hawking because that guy is creepy looking.

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#567025 Nov 29, 2012
Lil Ticked wrote:
<quoted text>That is so untrue. I for one am 5'6, 130lbs, a little on the thin side, no PhD more of a "street smarts" guy until the internets got me an associates. Member size is nobody's business but mine and those worthy of finding out. I.Q. is 140, not that I.Q.s matter much. Not that any of this matters much. A person is a person is a person. We all have our preferences. I personally prefer those that are not hypcrites, douchebags, or know-it-alls. Other than that pretty anything is fine more so if they are extremely attractive but that also is subjective. Intelligence can make up for a lack of "looks" sometimes unless it is Stephen Hawking because that guy is creepy looking.
You're typing is worse than my typing ... when I'm wasted on beer.

“A sentient umbrella speaks”

Since: Mar 11

Some stable somewhere

#567026 Nov 29, 2012
Lil Ticked wrote:
<quoted text>That is so untrue. I for one am 5'6, 130lbs, a little on the thin side, no PhD more of a "street smarts" guy until the internets got me an associates. Member size is nobody's business but mine and those worthy of finding out. I.Q. is 140, not that I.Q.s matter much. Not that any of this matters much. A person is a person is a person. We all have our preferences. I personally prefer those that are not hypcrites, douchebags, or know-it-alls. Other than that pretty anything is fine more so if they are extremely attractive but that also is subjective. Intelligence can make up for a lack of "looks" sometimes unless it is Stephen Hawking because that guy is creepy looking.
hahaha, ok, ok.

“There is no such thing”

Since: May 08

as a reasonable person

#567027 Nov 29, 2012
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
You're typing is worse than my typing ... when I'm wasted on beer.
What is your point?

“First it steals your mind..”

Since: Jun 11

..and then it steals your soul

#567028 Nov 29, 2012
Hidingfromyou wrote:
<quoted text>
RR, you know that every man on here is over six feet tall, has a great body, usually owns his own company (which hires PhDs, they always tell us), drives a great car and is the envy of all? Lots of the men tell us their member is 9 inches long! It's like all these people are clones of themselves.
And all the creationists have IQ's over 180. I've lost track of how many times creationists have claimed to have a superhuman IQ.
I think my IQ is in the mid to low 40s. I'm pretty stupid. Maybe that's why I'm not a creationist.
Double Fine didn't claim any of those things!!

..Except the bit about the member.

But that's the holy truth
Christian Schirnhofer

Vienna, Austria

#567029 Nov 29, 2012
We don't need to proove it because we can now proof that the universe can have been created out of nothing without the need of God or any other creator. Yes, things do start existing out of nothing, it is a sientific fact.

All those so called believers are nothign more than confused people, too confused to focus on their own little lifes so they divert their attention to somewhere else. Read a book aout the Christian cruisades and tell me if those folks did the right thing, spread the word of God that is or if they created nothing else but war, misery and chaos.
Christian Schirnhofer

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#567030 Nov 29, 2012
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Skom apologizes for your mistake in misunderstanding what he really meant to say.
PEACE
You obsession with me has reached hysterical proportions

Hey, if you got nothing better to do be my guest. Just tuck your nuts in-between your legs first. If you are going to act like beotch you might as well look the part

~snicker

*And no that is not an insult towards women. In this scenario it is to "men" who act like little girls who got their feelings hurt and now can't let go.

“A sentient umbrella speaks”

Since: Mar 11

Some stable somewhere

#567031 Nov 29, 2012
Double Fine wrote:
<quoted text>
Double Fine didn't claim any of those things!!
..Except the bit about the member.
But that's the holy truth
Wow, yeah, it's the truth. Please, take that monster away from me!

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#567032 Nov 29, 2012
Hidingfromyou wrote:
<quoted text>
All I have are your words. If you claim to be willing to send a person to the ER for nakedness in front of your child, how am I to know you differently?
Perhaps you should engage in less hyperbole with respect to violence if you don't actually mean it?
So nobody should engage in hyperbole or exaggeration because some people will take it literally?

Other people got the point. They even noticed I ended my post with pretty much the golden rule that people can only exercise their rights if it doesn't infringe on someone else's.

I assumed since the conversation was about what was best for a child you would have known I wouldn't beat a man in front of a 4-year old. But in the future when I post to you I will make sure to preface or qualify everything I say.(by everything I don't actually mean everything but rather cases of exaggeration or hyperbole) Wow, this should be fun.(that comment was meant to be more sarcastic than literal)

Still, it was a pretty long post I made. I was surprised you had no response to all the points in it other than that one comment. What do you feel about a child thinking it is ok for an adult stranger to be naked in front of him as it relates to the higher potential for abuse?

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#567033 Nov 29, 2012
Hidingfromyou wrote:
<quoted text>
.
Look, all you are doing here is telling me that your version of cultural politeness is moral.
.
So what? Why should I assume that your version of your culture is correct above all others?
It doesn't take any critical thinking to arrive at your position.
.
And, just so we're sure here, I agree with you - well, I agree with the straw man position you set up. I'm not comfortable with (men) people grabbing their genitals in public. I don't want to see public pissing and shitting, and I most certainly don't want to see public self-stimulating. But you've offered no objective reasons for not liking that other than that you don't like that.
.
And the really strange thing is that to argue your point, you didn't bother addressing the question of public nudity, or the news piece to which I was referring, but required to grossly extend my position to a point which I would never agree. Do you believe you are making a cogent, rational argument rather than a ridiculous caricature of the simple position that I took, that nudity was not grotesque?
.
I mean, seriously - this is beneath you, to argue in this manner rather than simply admit you aren't comfortable with nudity.
I gave you plenty of reasons, especially as it relates to the potential of abuse. I simply got into more detail later as I never thought I would have to explain to someone why an adult stranger shouldn't be allowed to hang his nuts in a child's face. I admit, you caught me by surprise on that one and my initial response was more out of disbelief. The explanations which I didn't think were necessary as they are self-evident came later

“There is no such thing”

Since: May 08

as a reasonable person

#567034 Nov 29, 2012
Skombolis wrote:
<quoted text>
You obsession with me has reached hysterical proportions
Hey, if you got nothing better to do be my guest. Just tuck your nuts in-between your legs first. If you are going to act like beotch you might as well look the part
~snicker
*And no that is not an insult towards women. In this scenario it is to "men" who act like little girls who got their feelings hurt and now can't let go.
Are you saying that "little girls" are stereotypically more sensitive than men or that it is unmanly to have feelings? I am not sure which you meant, could you clarify?

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#567035 Nov 29, 2012
Hidingfromyou wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey Tide - you did a better job here, my friend. I don't take too well to being called a pedophile by a person who is frightened of the human body, so I responded with a fair bit of anger.
.
All I can say is, when I calm down, it will be good to think of how frightened, angered and paranoid some people are.
Nobody called you a pedophile. That is simply dishonest. In fact I even went out of my way to make it clear I was doing nothing of the sort. Please don't lie about things I have said and then characterize me based on your lies.

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#567036 Nov 29, 2012
Hidingfromyou wrote:
<someone else's nudity>
<quoted text>
.
You are now calling nudity "child molestation."
.
You have now accused me of agreeing that public nudity is the same as pulling a child aside and showing them your genitals.
.
You are making shitty, stupid arguments.
.
No, paranoid idiot, being naked in public is not the same as pulling a child aside and saying "want a lollipop?" What the fcuk is wrong with you that you would equate those things?
.
I don't even support public nudity and I can see the difference between your scare mongering and someone else's desire to walk in the wind.
.
What the hell is wrong with you that you would equate pedophilia with being naked???
You seem to have reading comprehension issues so I will re-post

". I am not saying by any means you are a child molester, I want that to be very clear. But your rationalizations sound the same. "Oh it is not abuse, it is love". "everybody has genitalia so what is wrong with me showing mine to a child?"

And yes someone walking around nude around children is showing them their genitals, whether that was their original intent or desired intent is irrelevant. That is the outcome. And YOU were the one who said who cares if I child sees genitals of a stranger because they have genitals of their own. That is the stupidest argument i have heard for anything.

If someone walks around naked and a child can see them, are they or are they not showing their genitals to a child, along with anybody else who can see them? Yes or No

Please try to answer the question as i have a feeling you will avoid it

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#567037 Nov 29, 2012
Lil Ticked wrote:
<quoted text>Are you saying that "little girls" are stereotypically more sensitive than men or that it is unmanly to have feelings? I am not sure which you meant, could you clarify?
No, I am saying calling a man a beotch is not comparing him to a woman but rather is a commentary on the type of "man" he is. Or in this case, the inability to act like one. To me a man should be secure enough with himself that he isn't always sucking up to people for validation. He shouldn't be so desperate for validation in his own mind that he tells people they should consider how they post because "we are watching you" meaning that others will form an opinion based on that which implies that should mean enough to me where it would change what I say. And a man isn't so bent out of shape over an internet chat-room that he goes into a week-long obsession spanning multiple threads replying to all my posts.

To me, that is the definition of a male beotch

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Homeowners lose Katrina insurance flood case (Aug '06) 4 min DBullock 12
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 7 min truth 665,632
Poll Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 30 min crucifiedguy 284,739
Christians cannot debate with ATHEISTS 33 min It aint necessari... 723
Bush is a hero (Sep '07) 2 hr WildWeirdWillie 184,820
donald trump will not fulfill all campaign prom... 2 hr crucifiedguy 62
women watching men naked on webcam (Mar '12) 3 hr str8hairymarried 85
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 3 hr truth 88,545
The Future of Politics in America 6 hr River Tam 313
More from around the web