Prove there's a god.

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#565580 Nov 25, 2012
nanoanomaly wrote:
<quoted text>Quit posting porn.
No, the correct category for the bible is smut.

Since: Sep 10

Hermosa Beach, CA

#565581 Nov 25, 2012
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
No, the correct category for the bible is smut.
That's right.

Porn can be fun. The bible, hardly.

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#565585 Nov 25, 2012
feces for jesus wrote:
<quoted text>
You are a vile example of a christard, much less a human being.
<quoted text>
Hell isn't in the bible, nancyboy. You're no better than those you condemn.
Your name doesn't rhyme if that is what you were going for genius!

And as for your claim, you really shouldn't just go around regurgitating anti-Christian indoctrination as itmakes you look silly. Especially when you couldn't be more wrong

Matthew 18:20
"Do not fear those who kill the body but are unable to kill the soul; but rather fear Him who is able to destroy both soul and body in hell

“YOU CAN NOT FOOL US WHEN”

Since: Nov 12

WE ARE LOOKING DEAD AT YOU

#565590 Nov 25, 2012
boooots wrote:
<quoted text>
That person is one pathetically sick human being (using the term human with reservations in his case)
You're kidding,right?

“YOU CAN NOT FOOL US WHEN”

Since: Nov 12

WE ARE LOOKING DEAD AT YOU

#565592 Nov 25, 2012
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
That's right.
Porn can be fun. The bible, hardly.
Yeah, you gays enjoy all that comes with your practices, disease, AIDS and death. Fun, not hardly

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#565593 Nov 25, 2012
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
No, the correct category for the bible is smut.
Oh you said smut, not porn. Was going off the reply.

What in the New Testament do you feel is smut?

Remember with the Old testament it was said:

Hebrews 8:7
"For if that first covenant had been faultless, then should no place have been sought for the second."

Hebrews 8:13
In that he saith, A new covenant, he hath made the first old. Now that which decayeth and waxeth old is ready to vanish away.

So if you are going to criticize the Bible, it is only fair you address the part we follow as Christians and that is the New Testament

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#565594 Nov 25, 2012
Skombolis wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh you said smut, not porn. Was going off the reply.
What in the New Testament do you feel is smut?
Remember with the Old testament it was said:
Hebrews 8:7
"For if that first covenant had been faultless, then should no place have been sought for the second."
Hebrews 8:13
In that he saith, A new covenant, he hath made the first old. Now that which decayeth and waxeth old is ready to vanish away.
So if you are going to criticize the Bible, it is only fair you address the part we follow as Christians and that is the New Testament
Oh wow, so you are picking and choosing. I don't need to address the rest of your post because that is just too sad. You don't like something, so you ignore it, but expect everyone else to believe the parts you like without question. Delusions know no bounds.

“YOU CAN NOT FOOL US WHEN”

Since: Nov 12

WE ARE LOOKING DEAD AT YOU

#565595 Nov 25, 2012
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh wow, so you are picking and choosing. I don't need to address the rest of your post because that is just too sad. You don't like something, so you ignore it, but expect everyone else to believe the parts you like without question. Delusions know no bounds.
Nope, we have entire Bible word for word. We will tell you what you need to know. Perhaps?

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#565596 Nov 25, 2012
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
You never did answer my question, how many socks do you have?
Sorry Kitten, if you asked me that I didn't see your post. I have no socks. I am not really all that familiar with that term, though I am starting to catch on to what it means. I post here as myself, that terrible sinful ex-Christian church elder, who has had two heterosexual legal wives and one heterosexual common-law wife, helped create two children, who have gone on to create 6 kids of their own, making me a soon to be 66 year old Canadian grandfather.

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#565597 Nov 25, 2012
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh wow, so you are picking and choosing. I don't need to address the rest of your post because that is just too sad. You don't like something, so you ignore it, but expect everyone else to believe the parts you like without question. Delusions know no bounds.
It is not picking and choosing at all. The Bible itself shows that once Jesus died on the Cross that we were no longer under Mosaic Law, which is the Old Testamnet.

Galatians 2:16
Knowing this that a man is not justified by the works of the law, but by the faith of Jesus Christ, even we have believed in Jesus Christ, that we might be justified by the faith of Christ, and not by the works of the law, for by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified."

Galatians 3:13
"Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us: for it is written, Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree"

It looks pretty silly for you to try to be condescending when it is you that has no idea what he is talking about.

“YOU CAN NOT FOOL US WHEN”

Since: Nov 12

WE ARE LOOKING DEAD AT YOU

#565598 Nov 25, 2012
boooots wrote:
<quoted text>
That person is one pathetically sick human being (using the term human with reservations in his case)
You hate your own mom because she was smart enough to be a Christian, so pathetic and sick describes you. You are right, I will not include human.

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#565599 Nov 25, 2012
Jedi Mind Tricka wrote:
<quoted text>Nope, we have entire Bible word for word. We will tell you what you need to know. Perhaps?
I have seen a lot of people on Topix that are anti-Christina or ex-Christian that claim they know the Bible better than believers. I can think of 3 people on all of Topix that know as much or more and that is HipG, X, and Chess Jurist. I may be forgetting someone but the point is it is a very small minority. The rest simply regurgitate what they have heard and copy internet sites. Some believers don't know the Bible extremely well but generally they are pretty honest about that. I have never seen someone arguing against it that didn't try to present himself as an expert. And they just end up looking foolish when it isn't the case. At best they may know more than someone who knows nothing. That won't fly with anyone who actually knows their Bible pretty well

(T) Peace

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#565600 Nov 25, 2012
Skombolis wrote:
<quoted text>
It is not picking and choosing at all. The Bible itself shows that once Jesus died on the Cross that we were no longer under Mosaic Law, which is the Old Testamnet.
Galatians 2:16
Knowing this that a man is not justified by the works of the law, but by the faith of Jesus Christ, even we have believed in Jesus Christ, that we might be justified by the faith of Christ, and not by the works of the law, for by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified."
Galatians 3:13
"Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us: for it is written, Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree"
It looks pretty silly for you to try to be condescending when it is you that has no idea what he is talking about.
Cop-out answer, I made no mention of your fallacious "laws." I stated the book is smut, that was all. It contains incest, murder, rape, and lots of it, most in "the name of" your god. If the book is not literal, then it is not factual, but if it is factual, then those things happened, and they're in the book, therefore it is smut. The beating of that Jesus is pure smut, akin to the Human Centipede movie, same quality of production as well.

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#565601 Nov 25, 2012
boooots wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry Kitten, if you asked me that I didn't see your post. I have no socks. I am not really all that familiar with that term, though I am starting to catch on to what it means. I post here as myself, that terrible sinful ex-Christian church elder, who has had two heterosexual legal wives and one heterosexual common-law wife, helped create two children, who have gone on to create 6 kids of their own, making me a soon to be 66 year old Canadian grandfather.
2 kids, 6 grandchildren. Okay, now you're up to 4 socks on here.

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#565602 Nov 25, 2012
Skombolis wrote:
<quoted text>
I have seen a lot of people on Topix that are anti-Christina or ex-Christian that claim they know the Bible better than believers. I can think of 3 people on all of Topix that know as much or more and that is HipG, X, and Chess Jurist. I may be forgetting someone but the point is it is a very small minority. The rest simply regurgitate what they have heard and copy internet sites. Some believers don't know the Bible extremely well but generally they are pretty honest about that. I have never seen someone arguing against it that didn't try to present himself as an expert. And they just end up looking foolish when it isn't the case. At best they may know more than someone who knows nothing. That won't fly with anyone who actually knows their Bible pretty well
(T) Peace
Yet, you don't know the old testament. That makes almost all atheists more knowledgeable in the book than you. When you read it, I mean actually read it instead of pretending to or ignoring the parts you don't like, you'll realize everything we have stated about the book is fact. You deny it, yet even Google shows you are lying.

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#565603 Nov 25, 2012
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
Cop-out answer, I made no mention of your fallacious "laws." I stated the book is smut, that was all. It contains incest, murder, rape, and lots of it, most in "the name of" your god. If the book is not literal, then it is not factual, but if it is factual, then those things happened, and they're in the book, therefore it is smut. The beating of that Jesus is pure smut, akin to the Human Centipede movie, same quality of production as well.
You don't understand what Mosaic Law is do you?

When you figure out that and the correlation to the Old Testament get back to me because then you may have a better idea of what's going on.

And yes I am well aware without being able to go back to the Old Testament, a time and rules we no longer are bound to, that you have pretty much nothing to say. Yes Jesus suffered an agonizing death at the hands of unbelievers so that all people might be saved. Brutal, but hardly smut. You are grasping.

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#565604 Nov 25, 2012
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
2 kids, 6 grandchildren. Okay, now you're up to 4 socks on here.
??

Socks ON Topix are "sock-puppets" meaning someone uses different identities. How does boots having kids or grandkids equate to him using multiple identities on Topix?

I am starting to understand why we had issues in our last exchange.

Since: Jul 09

Location hidden

#565605 Nov 25, 2012
Skombolis wrote:
<quoted text>
Your name doesn't rhyme if that is what you were going for genius!
And as for your claim, you really shouldn't just go around regurgitating anti-Christian indoctrination as itmakes you look silly. Especially when you couldn't be more wrong
Matthew 18:20
"Do not fear those who kill the body but are unable to kill the soul; but rather fear Him who is able to destroy both soul and body in hell
ah yes fear:

the Bible Bully Bastard

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#565606 Nov 25, 2012
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
Yet, you don't know the old testament. That makes almost all atheists more knowledgeable in the book than you. When you read it, I mean actually read it instead of pretending to or ignoring the parts you don't like, you'll realize everything we have stated about the book is fact. You deny it, yet even Google shows you are lying.
You didn't say anything. You just made a general claim with nothing to back it up and threw in a lie to end it

I guarantee I know the OT better than you. I guarantee I know the entire Bible better than you.

I would waste my time proving if that seemed liked something i would enjoy. I can't imagine why it would be. You have already shown your ignorance. I have no doubt you would offer nothing of interest. If you, someone who doesn't understand Mosaic Law or why I would bring it up in response to your comment, wants to believe I don't know the bible it really makes no difference to me, I will sleep just fine tonight either way:)

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#565607 Nov 25, 2012
Skombolis wrote:
<quoted text>
You don't understand what Mosaic Law is do you?
When you figure out that and the correlation to the Old Testament get back to me because then you may have a better idea of what's going on.
And yes I am well aware without being able to go back to the Old Testament, a time and rules we no longer are bound to, that you have pretty much nothing to say. Yes Jesus suffered an agonizing death at the hands of unbelievers so that all people might be saved. Brutal, but hardly smut. You are grasping.
Translation of the above post: You just got caught lying and are now backpedaling and avoiding the entire point. The fallacy is often called a red herring fallacy.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 2 min guest 670,155
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 3 min bagittagit 99,683
Bush is a hero (Sep '07) 6 min WildWeirdWillie 184,257
No Walls! Don't fence Me In! 17 min Tony 18
jones-tardy family reunion 2017 34 min JonesTardy2017 1
____*antichrist & israel march 2017____ 50 min YTube2017News 1
secret weapon contributing to global chaos 59 min Haylie2017 7
Poll Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 2 hr chazmo 286,432
the new gay skype Sat codyh 2
More from around the web