“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#562467 Nov 13, 2012
nanoanomaly wrote:
<quoted text>Try looking in the mirror and saying that again.
... and that was suppose to prove ....?

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#562468 Nov 13, 2012
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Gods sometimes moved between religions. For example, do we count Zeus and Jupiter as one or two gods?
Do you take into account gods that no human has ever believed in?
To simply write "3700" is ignorant.
But I expect no less from CrisM
Actually, 3700 was a decent low ball estimate. It's more about the lines of 37,000,000 though, very rough estimate.

The rest of what you said is just stupid, you should seriously consider reading something.

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#562469 Nov 13, 2012
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Round and round we go...
So it's not "fact" that you love your man because you can't prove it, you just "believe" it...
Cool.
Not, it's not a fact that she does, that's her opinion, if she does.

You creatards keep bringing emotion as being "unable to prove" as being proof of your god, it doesn't work that way. Of course that's also skipping the entire fact that emotions are actually opinions, no two people will describe emotions the same, just like your god except, we can measure emotions, we can't measure your god. What we cannot measure we cannot assert as being fact anymore than we can assert that emotions are fact.

To me, love is simply not wishing to kill someone.

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#562470 Nov 13, 2012
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Gods sometimes moved between religions. For example, do we count Zeus and Jupiter as one or two gods?
Do you take into account gods that no human has ever believed in?
To simply write "3700" is ignorant.
But I expect no less from CrisM
Wouldn't any god ever conceived of by man be a god that at least one person believed in?(not counting gods dreamed up for intentionally fictional stories, for fun, etc.)

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#562471 Nov 13, 2012
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
Not, it's not a fact that she does, that's her opinion, if she does.
You creatards keep bringing emotion as being "unable to prove" as being proof of your god, it doesn't work that way. Of course that's also skipping the entire fact that emotions are actually opinions, no two people will describe emotions the same, just like your god except, we can measure emotions, we can't measure your god. What we cannot measure we cannot assert as being fact anymore than we can assert that emotions are fact.
To me, love is simply not wishing to kill someone.
Woah.... WTF??

"To me, love is simply not wishing to kill someone"

Oh my. So then it's ok to beat your lovers ass? I mean, as long as you don't kill them, you're ok, right?

You're a strange puppy. I'll assume that you've never been in love, based off of your idiotic post.

OCB

“What a GLORIOUS day!!!”

Since: Apr 12

Orlando but NYC born & raised

#562472 Nov 13, 2012
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, I thought you were flirting....
Not so much, RR....

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#562473 Nov 13, 2012
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually, 3700 was a decent low ball estimate. It's more about the lines of 37,000,000 though, very rough estimate.
The rest of what you said is just stupid, you should seriously consider reading something.
3700...

3,700,000...

That's science for ya! Just add a few zeros here & there until you get it right!

Good job.

OCB

“What a GLORIOUS day!!!”

Since: Apr 12

Orlando but NYC born & raised

#562474 Nov 13, 2012
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
Not, it's not a fact that she does, that's her opinion, if she does.
You creatards keep bringing emotion as being "unable to prove" as being proof of your god, it doesn't work that way. Of course that's also skipping the entire fact that emotions are actually opinions, no two people will describe emotions the same, just like your god except, we can measure emotions, we can't measure your god. What we cannot measure we cannot assert as being fact anymore than we can assert that emotions are fact.
To me, love is simply not wishing to kill someone.
Wonderfully stated, Kitten!

OCB

“What a GLORIOUS day!!!”

Since: Apr 12

Orlando but NYC born & raised

#562475 Nov 13, 2012
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
3700...
3,700,000...
That's science for ya! Just add a few zeros here & there until you get it right!
Good job.
Science has nothing to do with the number of gods people believe in or have believed in.

And that you think science is that simplistic anyway tells us who is the simpleton here, RR and it further proves just how little you actually know about science.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#562476 Nov 13, 2012
timn17 wrote:
<quoted text>Wouldn't any god ever conceived of by man be a god that at least one person believed in?(not counting gods dreamed up for intentionally fictional stories, for fun, etc.)
Not in my view. To me, there is only one true God.

There's some pretty silly "gods" out there to add to the "3700" list.

Like Dionynus, the god of wine and parties....

Gimme a break.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#562477 Nov 13, 2012
KittenKoder wrote:

To me, love is simply not wishing to kill someone.
OCB wrote:
<quoted text>Wonderfully stated, Kitten!
wow..........

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#562478 Nov 13, 2012
OCB wrote:
<quoted text>Science has nothing to do with the number of gods people believe in or have believed in.
And that you think science is that simplistic anyway tells us who is the simpleton here, RR and it further proves just how little you actually know about science.
Yes it is that simplistic, in a dumbed-down, humorous way...

But your butt buddy kitten says its somewhere between 3700 & 37,000,000...

Sounds very scientific to me!

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#562480 Nov 13, 2012
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Not in my view. To me, there is only one true God.
There's some pretty silly "gods" out there to add to the "3700" list.
Like Dionynus, the god of wine and parties....
Gimme a break.
I know that you won't agree or be able to see it, but your god is just as silly as all the others to an impartial observer. There's nothing to set your god apart from the pack. Every god is an interesting reflection of the culture that created them, nothing more.

Tell me why I should give your god more attention than Dionysus. I rather like the idea of a god of parties. And didn't people get pretty excited about jesus turning water into wine?

OCB

“What a GLORIOUS day!!!”

Since: Apr 12

Orlando but NYC born & raised

#562481 Nov 13, 2012
RiversideRedneck wrote:
KittenKoder wrote:
To me, love is simply not wishing to kill someone.
<quoted text>
wow..........
Hey- if that's her perception of love, so be it.

But of course, I was referring to the majority of her post and not just the last sentence.

OCB

“What a GLORIOUS day!!!”

Since: Apr 12

Orlando but NYC born & raised

#562482 Nov 13, 2012
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes it is that simplistic, in a dumbed-down, humorous way...
But your butt buddy kitten says its somewhere between 3700 & 37,000,000...
Sounds very scientific to me!
Why are you trying to apply science to beliefs in various gods?

Nothing at all scientific about the belief in ANY god.

And uh....Kitten is NOT my butt buddy- just this morning, I disagreed with her regarding her opinion of AA.

OCB

“What a GLORIOUS day!!!”

Since: Apr 12

Orlando but NYC born & raised

#562483 Nov 13, 2012
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes it is that simplistic, in a dumbed-down, humorous way...
But your butt buddy kitten says its somewhere between 3700 & 37,000,000...
Sounds very scientific to me!
And no....it is NOT that simplistic no matter how much you need to dumb down science so that YOU can begin to grasp what science actually is.

Regardless, nothing scientific is applied to the belief in a god or gods.

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#562484 Nov 13, 2012
River Tam wrote:
<quoted text>
I was thinking it hit closer to your ankle. We'll need more testable jokes and I think Pokay is all out of them.
Here's some:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =loIoWquy4KMXX
All those jokes helped me to narrow it down to my left foot. We're almost there.

“let's do this thang!”

Since: Aug 10

Location hidden

#562485 Nov 13, 2012
Aura Mytha wrote:
<quoted text>
Tea baggers are the closest thing to Nazi's in the mainstream political parties. In fact there were parallels drawn up showing it.
The only thing Biden said that made me feel better, was that he though personally believes in pro life, that he did not think it was his right to force that belief on others. I favor republicans for one reason only , that's strong foreign policy that is known to wield a hammer. But I favored Romney because he seemed better capable to turn the economy around.
Other than that the republicans have ruined themselves being too far right wing Christians, wanting to impose a theocracy and ruin America with the ilk of people with minds like that.
I have no confidence in Obama because I fear our economy is going to take a dive now into recession again. I actually wish we could have Romney president and Biden Vice because Ryan is a religionut with an agenda toward theocracy.
But you are way off base accusing the dems of being like Nazis,
ther're policy's are actually more like Marxists. Thinking they can create an American share the load Utopia. It will fail because nobody is going to be able to pay for their ideas. They may sound good on paper , but reality bites a lemon. Healthcare is going to wreck the already sinking economy.
"you are way off base accusing the dems of being like Nazis"

hitler came to power through a socialist-unionist platform. our democrat party is closer to his model than the republican party is.

"republicans have ruined themselves being too far right wing Christians"

you must think that evil/darkness and plain anarchy has more rights in this country than does goodness and common sense! based on the outcome of this last election, more people seem to agree with you than not.....

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#562486 Nov 13, 2012
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Woah.... WTF??
"To me, love is simply not wishing to kill someone"
Oh my. So then it's ok to beat your lovers ass? I mean, as long as you don't kill them, you're ok, right?
You're a strange puppy. I'll assume that you've never been in love, based off of your idiotic post.
I don't have "lovers" ... nor do I wish for any. How many times do I have to remind you that I am asexual before you actually realize what that means?

Also no, I love my father, he was a good person and highly intelligent. I love my friends, enjoy their company and chatter. I love animals, except the ones I eat, those are just too tasty, and you gotta kill them to eat them.

As I pointed out, no, none, two people will ever describe any emotion the same. They are opinion, though they are produced by the same chemical reactions, the "feeling" of that emotion will always differ.

“I never claimed to be Perfect”

Since: Nov 10

just better than yesterday

#562487 Nov 13, 2012
Hidingfromyou wrote:
<quoted text>
You just did. Why can't science?
<quoted text>
For me, that's 1950's science.
How does the Bible explain love in a way that science cannot?
How does the Bible explore what it means to be human in a way that science cannot?
Science canít tell us the purpose of anything. It can't give us the meaning of life, it can tell us what life is, not what it ought to be.

Science can tell us more than we ever wanted to know about human anatomy, it can describe what makes up the heart and the brain and how these fascinating organs function, but it can not tell us the purpose of a person or how to love or even what love is. To describe the purpose of something implies a knowledge of the reason it was made the way it was. Science can tell us a lot about the way a human being works, but it cannot tell us the intent behind the design of a human being.(of course this is a Christian view point)

Science can describe and categorize life and our experience with the world, but it cannot explain what it all means. People try to use science to tell us that the world is an accident, that life has no meaning, but these types of determinations are outside of the jurisdiction of science. These are Theological questions, not scientific questions.

The Bible teaches us that love is patient, love is kind, love is not jealous or boastful or proud. It teaches what it is and ought to be. The Bible has many meanings and passages explaining, and defining love.

The Bible restores our humanness from the cold and unfeeling of the world. It explains why besides we simply being the result of assemblage of molecules and atoms that we posses why life is worth living.

The Bible teaches us the responsibilty and nature of returning love back as the response for life.

There is no 1950's about it Hiding.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Is homosexuality a sin? (Oct '07) 2 min Tienboy 97,843
Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 11 min marge 573,526
Do white women like black men? (Jun '11) 28 min iknowcelecki 295
'Ukraine is a hot potato': Why US stood back fr... 40 min ACTUALLY 8
Why Iím no longer a Christian (Jul '08) 1 hr Marlowe 442,088
Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 1 hr ACTUALLY 268,747
REAL Music REAL Smooth! Part II! 1 hr Doctor REALITY 22
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 3 hr truth 608,069
Dubai massage Body To Body full service 0559... (Mar '14) 17 hr same 199
More from around the web