Prove there's a god.

“MEET KIKI -She Seeks Home”

Since: Oct 10

With Established Harem

#550709 Oct 14, 2012
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Yup. And where is HL to put down this group?
They're just as "non-profit" as a church.
It is because it's not a church?
naaaw.....
It's because it fits her agenda.
.. you do not understand non-profit tax laws ..

.. church organizations are NOT required to file for tax-exempt status nor do they have to file income tax returns ..

.. other tax-exempt ARE required to file for tax-exempt status and MUST file an annual audited financial statements ..

http://www.irs.gov/instructions/i990/ch01.htm...

http://people.emich.edu/skattelus/gen004.htm

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#550710 Oct 14, 2012
Martina Navratilover wrote:
<quoted text>How funny, that you said "unless you are one of the named characters yourself". Which makes you either stupid or one of the characters. Boooots you are irrelevant, so don't post to me. I am one of the posters you said that you would not post to, so this is your reminder.
RR is way smarter than all 4 of you, especially you. You are a nutball poster, who posts 95% about personal CRAP.
HL is mentally screwed side-ways. She has a compulsive disorder, and the only way she has a modicum of intellect is if she is also Hiding. Not that Hiding has ANY intellect, but the simple fact that HL defers to Hiding and refers to herself as being inferior in intellect to Hiding.
It is my job and my skill set to access intellect. Whether I give you the accurate assessment or not, I know exactly what level of intellect each poster comes from. I am very good at what I do and you sir are just feed for the chickens. In other words, just as HL has used you and manipulated you, I have used that manipulation and done so many things that are just revealing of your desperate inner need.
Here is an example: You are lazy and dishonest, but you expect others to be the same. This causes you to post things, without doing a fact check. Second, your posts are all wrapped in you, as if you were talking to yourself in front of a mirror and waiting for a response.
Well, knowing this, all one has to do is look for similar elements in others. When you find it, you don't just assume the two are the same, there are certain tests you perform and document the reactions. Not the words, but the reactions.
Oh, I am bored, so when boredom sets in it is necessary to elevate the level of information that the weak opponent has. Don't get all giddy, because you are not an opponent. I don't play chess, with those who think the game is checkers.
Whatever you said, you appear to have an elevated opinion of whatever abilities you think you have. I am glad that you are one of those that I previously stated I would no longer post to, since there seems to be no substance to your posts now, and therefore I already had decided that was the case.
manasa

Middlesboro, KY

#550711 Oct 14, 2012
Martina Navratilover wrote:
<quoted text>I suppose that not many got much from your post, since it was sooooooo long ago and HL chose ot bring it up for her purpose. But indeed, I have excellent comprehension skills and I got your negativity. I was you who tried to attack the large church as a commercial corporate enterprise and to judge their intent and motivation.
It was you who said that churches that don't attract members and do not cause people to flock to, so to hear the word of God, have some massive value. I can only imagine a pastor in Starbucks, that means the YOU alone could not even get your immediate family to join you.
Al, ms/mr, whatever, I have great focus and perception and great love. You have none of the stated qualities, so God can not use you.
they are nothing more than laundering schemes in which people like joyce meyers, joel osteen, benny hinn et al., become worldly rich while preaching salvation and saving few from poverty.

absolution through another is not taught in the latin rites bible but each is held accountable for his/her own works/deeds.

“Ask me who I am and I”

Since: Sep 12

will tell you the same

#550712 Oct 14, 2012
boooots wrote:
<quoted text>
A young earth theory cannot hold up, based on actual existing evidence at this time. We have actual bodies which are stored in freezers of mammoths that date back to several times the length of time that the young earth theorists say the earth has been here.
Some people might try to argue that our dating systems are not correct, but there is one awful amount of time difference between 4.5 billion years and 6000 years. Scientists can't be out that much, even if they are off by even a few million years.
You are like the kid who says "mommy it is true, I know it is true, I read it on the Internet." My dad is alive, but that alone is not evidence of his age. Actual bodies of mammoths stored in freezers are only evidence of actual bodies of mammoths being in the freezer.

Our dating systems have been proven time after time to be erroneous. The fact that our dating system says 4.5 billion and sometimes 7,000 is exactly the error. Young and old earth are noted as such due to the error, and yes it would be as such. It all has to do with how we attempt to measure time and space and do not account for black holes, singularities and quantum gravity. If we know that in a black hole we reach 1/0=% infinity, which is when time stops or absence of time, then trying to measure time over major spatial quantum is useless. We are not equipped.

Science is absolute in it's lack of being absolute, God is absolute in entirety, and our absolute understanding of either is fundamentally flawed because of the nature of the instrument we call our mind.

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#550713 Oct 14, 2012
Just Results wrote:
<quoted text>
Lesbian, gay, or atheist , or all of the above. They are all miserable, depressed, dysfunctional, irritable, agitated, counterproductive, etc, etc.
Good point!
How many kids does the average person know that were raised in a gay household? I personally don't know any gays now, so I don't know any kids that were raised in a gay household. Likely the only people who are particularly familiar with children raised in gay households would be gays themselves or possibly teachers in schools that are in or near a particularly large gay community.

Of the people who I have known, or known about, in my life who were or are gay, none of them had children in their household, that I was aware of. I met one gay woman who my 1st wife worked in an office with, who was living with a previously married woman who had children from her previous marriage. However, I never saw or met those children, I just heard from my wife that person was a mother of children from a previous marriage.

“Ask me who I am and I”

Since: Sep 12

will tell you the same

#550714 Oct 14, 2012
Happy Lesbo wrote:
<quoted text>
.. you do not understand non-profit tax laws ..
.. church organizations are NOT required to file for tax-exempt status nor do they have to file income tax returns ..
.. other tax-exempt ARE required to file for tax-exempt status and MUST file an annual audited financial statements ..
http://www.irs.gov/instructions/i990/ch01.htm...
http://people.emich.edu/skattelus/gen004.htm
Okay,child, I own 7 nonprofit organizations and I had to consider how I wished to set them up. Nothing you posted supports your statement, which means that you did not read it or are lying. My brother and I are accountants, and his wife is a CPA.

Whether the IRS determines that a nonprofit has to file a i990, does not effect its nonprofit status and whether it has to pay taxes.

From your link:

B. Organizations Not Required To File Form 990 or 990-EZ

An organization does not have to file Form 990 or 990-EZ even if it has at least $200,000 of gross receipts for the tax year or $500,000 of total assets at the end of the tax year if it is described below (except for section 509(a)(3) supporting organizations, which are described earlier). See Part A. to determine if the organization can file Form 990-EZ instead of Form 990. An organization described in item 10, 11, or 13 of this section B is required to submit Form 990-N unless it voluntarily files Form 990, 990-EZ, or 990-BL, as applicable.

Certain religious organizations.

A church, an interchurch organization of local units of a church, a convention or association of churches, or an integrated auxiliary of a church as described in Regulations section 1.6033-2(h)(such as a men's or women's organization, religious school, mission society, or youth group).

A church-affiliated organization that is exclusively engaged in managing funds or maintaining retirement programs and is described in Rev. Proc. 96-10, 1996-1 C.B. 577. But see the filing requirements for Section 509(a)(3) supporting organizations in A, Who Must File.

A school below college level affiliated with a church or operated by a religious order described in Regulations section 1.6033-2(g)(1)(vii).

A mission society sponsored by, or affiliated with, one or more churches or church denominations, if more than half of the society's activities are conducted in, or directed at, persons in foreign countries.

An exclusively religious activity of any religious order described in Rev. Proc. 91-20, 1991-1 C.B. 524.

Certain governmental organizations.

A state institution whose income is excluded from gross income under section 115.

A governmental unit or affiliate of a governmental unit described in Rev. Proc. 95-48, 1995-2 C.B. 418. But see the filing requirements for Section 509(a)(3) supporting organizations in A, Who Must File.

An organization described in section 501(c)(1). A section 501(c)(1) organization is a corporation organized under an Act of Congress that is an instrumentality of the United States, and exempt from federal income taxes.

Certain political organizations.

A political organization that is:

A state or local committee of a political party;

A political committee of a state or local candidate;

A caucus or association of state or local officials; or

Required to report under the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 as a political committee (as defined in section 301(4) of such Act).

Certain organizations with limited gross receipts.

An organization whose gross receipts are normally $50,000 or less. To determine what an organization's gross receipts “normally” are, see Appendix B, How to Determine Whether an Organization's Gross Receipts Are Normally $50,000 (or $5,000) or Less.

“MEET KIKI -She Seeks Home”

Since: Oct 10

With Established Harem

#550715 Oct 14, 2012
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
he he he, boooots...
Where do you get your "information" from, your ass? America is roughly 75% Christian. 75%! THAT is a majority, son.
In Canada, it's 77%!! That is also a majority....
America & Canada are "higher educated countries".
America is the most powerful nation in the world. And the most influential.
Try again...
.. along with once again being intellectual dishonest, you have resumed your name-calling without cause. You so enjoy playing push, pull, don't you ??..

.. the majority of Americans (73%) IDENTIFY themselves as Christians but only 18.7% all Americans regularly attend church (1)..

(1) http://endoftheamericandream.com/archives/how...

.. you either want reasonable debate or prefer indulging in name-calling. Which is it ??..

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#550716 Oct 14, 2012
Just Results wrote:
<quoted text>
Scientists have not disproven Noah's Ark. You are lying again.
You obviously have very little education.

“Ask me who I am and I”

Since: Sep 12

will tell you the same

#550717 Oct 14, 2012
manasa wrote:
<quoted text>they are nothing more than laundering schemes in which people like joyce meyers, joel osteen, benny hinn et al., become worldly rich while preaching salvation and saving few from poverty.
absolution through another is not taught in the latin rites bible but each is held accountable for his/her own works/deeds.
The LGBT can be a laundering scheme. The one billion dollars that Obama is slated to collect this election period is nothing more than a laundering scheme. Las Vegas and Atlantic City are laundering schemes. If poverty is your issue, then at 12:01 tonight get to working and work until next Sunday morning and do it until you get out of your poverty. I can attend each one of their churches, go to their televised events, and there is no admission or exist charge. They do not force anyone to do anything that they do not choose to do.

A person has every right to give all of their money to them if they choose, just like gays have the right to have unprotected anal sex and get AIDS. Which group should we as a society try to stop?

“Ask me who I am and I”

Since: Sep 12

will tell you the same

#550718 Oct 14, 2012
boooots wrote:
<quoted text>
You obviously have very little education.
Obviously, he/she has way more education than you, especially since all of your spewings get busted. What gives you the right to attack his/her education, since it is a fact that you will whine like a pig when it is reciprocated against you or gays.(possibly the same issue)

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

#550720 Oct 14, 2012
Martina Navratilover wrote:
<quoted text>You are like the kid who says "mommy it is true, I know it is true, I read it on the Internet." My dad is alive, but that alone is not evidence of his age. Actual bodies of mammoths stored in freezers are only evidence of actual bodies of mammoths being in the freezer.
Our dating systems have been proven time after time to be erroneous. The fact that our dating system says 4.5 billion and sometimes 7,000 is exactly the error. Young and old earth are noted as such due to the error, and yes it would be as such. It all has to do with how we attempt to measure time and space and do not account for black holes, singularities and quantum gravity. If we know that in a black hole we reach 1/0=% infinity, which is when time stops or absence of time, then trying to measure time over major spatial quantum is useless. We are not equipped.
Science is absolute in it's lack of being absolute, God is absolute in entirety, and our absolute understanding of either is fundamentally flawed because of the nature of the instrument we call our mind.
Radiometric dating has not been shown to be erroneous. If used incorrectly you can get bogus answers, but that is no surprise. If someone gave you an electronic calender and told you to time a 100 meter dash with it what answer could you give? Since creationists always run away from this I will tell you. You could either say it took no time at all or one whole day. Either answer is obviously wrong.

When creationists try to debunk radiometric dating they use similar worthless tests.

You have all sorts of skepticism towards evolution and geology and yet you do not apply the same skepticism towards your own beliefs. That is the action of a hypocrite.

Since: Sep 08

La Veta, CO

#550721 Oct 14, 2012
Skitz wrote:
<quoted text>
Hi Dave. All is well here thanks.
Your summery is correct. I just don't know where people find the time.
I trust you are well?
I'm well, thank you. Just older.

It is mysterious about the time. Plus the amount of threads some hang out on.

“Ask me who I am and I”

Since: Sep 12

will tell you the same

#550722 Oct 14, 2012
Happy Lesbo wrote:
<quoted text>
.. along with once again being intellectual dishonest, you have resumed your name-calling without cause. You so enjoy playing push, pull, don't you ??..
.. the majority of Americans (73%) IDENTIFY themselves as Christians but only 18.7% all Americans regularly attend church (1)..
(1) http://endoftheamericandream.com/archives/how...
.. you either want reasonable debate or prefer indulging in name-calling. Which is it ??..
First, all anyone has to do is scroll back to your name calling and hate speech against Jesus, last night, and there is plenty of cause. Besides, you are accountable for your socks name calling.

18.7% regularly attend church? Which has what to do with being a Christian? The warm building. Well, unlike you atheists we Christians have heat and a Bible, both at home.
sirrush

Middlesboro, KY

#550723 Oct 14, 2012
Martina Navratilover wrote:
<quoted text>You are like the kid who says "mommy it is true, I know it is true, I read it on the Internet." My dad is alive, but that alone is not evidence of his age. Actual bodies of mammoths stored in freezers are only evidence of actual bodies of mammoths being in the freezer.
Our dating systems have been proven time after time to be erroneous. The fact that our dating system says 4.5 billion and sometimes 7,000 is exactly the error. Young and old earth are noted as such due to the error, and yes it would be as such. It all has to do with how we attempt to measure time and space and do not account for black holes, singularities and quantum gravity. If we know that in a black hole we reach 1/0=% infinity, which is when time stops or absence of time, then trying to measure time over major spatial quantum is useless. We are not equipped.
Science is absolute in it's lack of being absolute, God is absolute in entirety, and our absolute understanding of either is fundamentally flawed because of the nature of the instrument we call our mind.
MIND is everything figuratively/literally. MIND is INFINITE, BOUNDLESS MIND

“Ask me who I am and I”

Since: Sep 12

will tell you the same

#550724 Oct 14, 2012
Happy Lesbo wrote:
<quoted text>

.. you either want reasonable debate or prefer indulging in name-calling. Which is it ??..
No, we want to indulge your name-calling, and finish where you were left whining and crying last night when you bit off more than you could handle.

Also, giving RR 50 negative judgits, obsessively, is not an attempt to foster reasonable debate.....and begging for hearts is not either, it is your sole intent to divide and cause confusion.

Since: May 09

Location hidden

#550725 Oct 14, 2012
scaritual wrote: Deity explanations are a dead end.
RiversideRedneck wrote:
I think it shows the sign of a weak mind.
I do, too. Using a "deity" as an explanation isn't an explanation. It's a surrender to ignorance.
RiversideRedneck wrote:
One that can't see that there really is no difference in undertanding science & knowledge and understanding God.
There is a huge difference. The two are not similar in any way.
RiversideRedneck wrote:
They're not enemies, you know.
Agreed. The imaginary does not threaten the tangible, reality does not care about fantasy.
RiversideRedneck wrote:
And when you say "Deity explanations are a dead end" that leaves a lot to be explained....
Yes, it does. As I said earlier. To use "deities" as an explanation does not leave anything to be explained, nor does it explain anything.
RiversideRedneck wrote:
Assuming the "deity" is real.
Whether you meant it as such, that's an astute observation.
That's all that can be done with deities, you can only assume they are real.

They cannot be tested. There is nothing that proves them.

They rely solely upon belief and as the numerous deity beliefs show, there is no uniform description of a deity.
RiversideRedneck wrote:
Which deity? Some of them are very limited in their "power"..
What "power" do any of them have?

Right, none - either as an explanation for anything or even when you assume they are real - they have no power.

“Ask me who I am and I”

Since: Sep 12

will tell you the same

#550726 Oct 14, 2012
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm well, thank you. Just older.
It is mysterious about the time. Plus the amount of threads some hang out on.
Time is easy. One can watch a movie, keep his browser open; be at work, keep his browser open. I only take 15 seconds to respond and then you are back to work. You can also work on your computer, different browsers and other computer, takes no time at all.
ophan

Middlesboro, KY

#550727 Oct 14, 2012
Martina Navratilover wrote:
<quoted text>Obviously, he/she has way more education than you, especially since all of your spewings get busted. What gives you the right to attack his/her education, since it is a fact that you will whine like a pig when it is reciprocated against you or gays.(possibly the same issue)
i think therefore I AM

tat tvam asi

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#550728 Oct 14, 2012
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
Yet, we contribute less to scientific advance than India does. Go figure.
We do? Show me what's up.

Besides, in India, Hinduism represents 80.5% of their population...

LMAO

Since: Sep 08

La Veta, CO

#550729 Oct 14, 2012
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_SUP...

That man has some balls.

Thumbs up and out the door 124,000 feet up.

Estimated he did about 833 MPH on the way down.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 1 min Gods r Delusions ... 668,029
Bush is a hero (Sep '07) 14 min bad bob 183,664
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 17 min Lonestar 92,828
Poll Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 30 min Pegasus 286,108
FINDIKZADE Haseki Miele Servisi 2I2) 2O2 62 34 ... 1 hr birimariza 1
FATIH MIELE Servisi 2I2) 2O2 62 34 MIELE BEYAZ... 1 hr birimariza 1
Jehovah's Witnesses are true disciple of Jesus ... (Mar '07) 1 hr RiccardoFire 46,045
More from around the web