Prove there's a god.

“A sentient umbrella speaks”

Since: Mar 11

Some stable somewhere

#550091 Oct 13, 2012
Brother Lee Love wrote:
I was invited by Gate Keeper 1. It's been quite some time since my last visit. Then again, it's been quite some time in any thread and/or forum since my last visit. Anyway...
Greetings, salutations, and shalowm.
Welcome to the thread.

So, how do you know Gate Keeper/Sir Doc/Viking/Martina and all the other names he uses?
Gun Smoke

South Africa

#550092 Oct 13, 2012
Then existence of man is proof there is a God. We did not just suddenly be. Every comes from something. There is a ARCHITECT behind everything. Even science shows there have to be an Architect. Charles Darwin put the theory. Note THEORY of evolution in mans head. Yet Most Great scientists know that it is flawed. In fact. some have try to prove the Bible wrong threw Science and ended up becoming Christian after all the overwhelming evidence they found. Like (Jacob Prach)

So if you want to believe there are monkeys hanging in your family tree. Well. thats your choice.

“Game Over”

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#550094 Oct 13, 2012
Gun Smoke wrote:
Then existence of man is proof there is a God.
The existence of man is really only proof of evolution. Females can pen you and milk you like cows. I wouldn't want that job but it's necessary for now. Just hope that we don't figure out how to inseminate you.

“Become Love!”

Since: Jan 09

Nowhere/Now here

#550095 Oct 13, 2012
Hidingfromyou wrote:
Welcome to the thread.
So, how do you know Gate Keeper/Sir Doc/Viking/Martina and all the other names he uses?
Great. So "they're" a "sock-puppet." I met "them" in another thread, of course. My visiting this thread was "their" challenge. I accepted, of course. In the meantime, thank you for the "welcome." I appreciate it.

Until next time...
Orangelion

Wrexham, UK

#550096 Oct 13, 2012
River Tam wrote:
<quoted text>
The existence of man is really only proof of evolution. Females can pen you and milk you like cows. I wouldn't want that job but it's necessary for now. Just hope that we don't figure out how to inseminate you.
No, it is proof of God, along with the rest of the world, the worlds natural desigh is far too perfect. What about how far the earth is from the sun? Too close and we would burn, too far and we would freeze.

“Become Love!”

Since: Jan 09

Nowhere/Now here

#550097 Oct 13, 2012
Gun Smoke wrote:
Then existence of man is proof there is a God. We did not just suddenly be. Every comes from something. There is a ARCHITECT behind everything. Even science shows there have to be an Architect. Charles Darwin put the theory. Note THEORY of evolution in mans head. Yet Most Great scientists know that it is flawed. In fact. some have try to prove the Bible wrong threw Science and ended up becoming Christian after all the overwhelming evidence they found. Like (Jacob Prach)
So if you want to believe there are monkeys hanging in your family tree. Well. thats your choice.
Science and mathematics go hand in hand in the majority of scientific scenarios. In saying that, the most simplest of mathematics proves that an intelligent designer exists. I say "the most simplest of mathematics" because, it's unnecessary to utilize the more complex mathematics to prove a simple "fact." First, I'll say this...

As of now, science has a couple of explanations to attempt to validate their theory that no "God" exists. One is that, at one point in time, nothing existed, at all. Then, all of a sudden, all things exist. The second explanation, I'll not mention here. It might contribute fuel to an already existing and uncontrollable fire that's unnecessary, especially if I'm aware of this new theory and those that oppose "God" aren't. Please and if you will, do not judge my integrity for my lack of sharing. As I believe, I've no reason to bring to any table anything new when we can't get passed what's already offered. Nevertheless...

In the case of the first scenario and according to science, all came from nothing. This is even while science admits that it's yet to create something from nothing, itself. As a matter of fact, science hasn't even come close. Anyway, this mathematical formula appears as such...

0+0=1

I'm sure we can already see the discrepancy in this. Nothing can originate from nothing. Something MUST come from something. Therefore, the only possible equation is this...

1+1=2

It's not necessary that a zero must represent anything. Considering the history of mathematics to begin with, the numeral "0" is fairly new to mathematics-world anyway. Despite what we might believe, only one equation can make sense to us. To recapitulate while more clear, I offer you this...

SCIENCE
0+0=0
0+0=1

RELIGION
1+0=1
1+1=2

The fact of the matter is this. Science can give us nothing but theories that unbelievers accept as answers, fact, evidence, and proof, because they've nothing else to go on. Religion gives us answers, fact, evidence, and proof. To the religious, the answers, facts, evidence, and proofs, are all around us and us, at the same time. Science keeps guessing.

And as to this theory of evolution? Again, this is science's attempt to validate theories. In their ever-persistent goal to disprove the existence of "God," they purposely and willingly reject any possibility and probability of adaptation before evolution. And considering all the species that have become extinct in just my lifetime alone, it's incomprehensible that science insists that we're descended from Neanderthals instead of even considering that these are other life-forms that not only were different from "Adam," but became extinct, too. When's the last time one of these "creatures" surfaced from some remote region of the Earth, wondering why it's living such a primitive lifestyle?

And by the way...just before his death, Darwin wholly denounced his "theory of evolution." Don't just believe me. Look it up. I'm sure it's on the internet, somewhere.

Until next time...

“Game Over”

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#550098 Oct 13, 2012
Orangelion wrote:
<quoted text>
No, it is proof of God, along with the rest of the world, the worlds natural desigh is far too perfect. What about how far the earth is from the sun? Too close and we would burn, too far and we would freeze.
How do you know that? Ever been to Venus?

Nobody here cares if you burn or freeze.

Xiao di di.

“"None shall pass"”

Since: Jul 11

There

#550099 Oct 13, 2012
Brother Lee Love wrote:
<quoted text>Great. So "they're" a "sock-puppet." I met "them" in another thread, of course. My visiting this thread was "their" challenge. I accepted, of course. In the meantime, thank you for the "welcome." I appreciate it.
Until next time...
Hi Brother!

You are now officially out of the frying pan and into the fire. LOL

Since: May 11

Cardiff, UK

#550100 Oct 13, 2012
Brother Lee Love wrote:
<quoted text>"[etc and so on] Nevertheless...
In the case of the first scenario and according to science, all came from nothing.[etc and so on]Religion gives us answers, fact, evidence, and proof.[etc and so on]Science keeps guessing.[etc and so on]In their ever-persistent goal to disprove the existence of "God," they purposely and willingly reject any possibility and probability of adaptation before evolution.[etc and so on]it's incomprehensible that science insists that we're descended from Neanderthals instead of even considering that these are other life-forms that not only were different from "Adam," but became extinct, too.[etc and so on][etc and so on]...just before his death, Darwin wholly denounced his "theory of evolution." Don't just believe me. Look it up. I'm sure it's on the internet, somewhere.
Failure in your opening gambit? Tragic

Seriously you should get some sleep.

Since: May 11

Cardiff, UK

#550101 Oct 13, 2012
Orangelion wrote:
<quoted text>
No, it is proof of God, along with the rest of the world, the worlds natural desigh is far too perfect. What about how far the earth is from the sun? Too close and we would burn, too far and we would freeze.
o luck with the Welsh proxy tonight?

“H-o-o-o-o-o-o-ld on thar!”

Since: Sep 08

The Borderland of Sol

#550102 Oct 13, 2012
Orangelion wrote:
<quoted text>
No, it is proof of God, along with the rest of the world, the worlds natural desigh is far too perfect. What about how far the earth is from the sun? Too close and we would burn, too far and we would freeze.
Silly sod.

Life adapted to the prevailing conditions, not the other way about.

“Game Over”

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#550103 Oct 13, 2012
MisterCharrington wrote:
<quoted text>
Failure in your opening gambit? Tragic
Seriously you should get some sleep.
Have we met?

“"None shall pass"”

Since: Jul 11

There

#550104 Oct 13, 2012
I will give you some info that, if you are willing and clever enough to use it, will add scientific fuel to your theistic point of view:

The concept of "nothingness" is being invalidated by science. The realization of this is embodied in "Quantum Vacuum" and "Quantum Fluctuations".
In short, there is no such thing as nothing, even nothing has properties. ONe of those properties is that this "nothing" can create th entire universe. You call that "The Big Bang" or "God", a rose by any name still blossoms when conditions are right to do so.

Have fun, BLL
Brother Lee Love wrote:
<quoted text>Science and mathematics go hand in hand in the majority of scientific scenarios. In saying that, the most simplest of mathematics proves that an intelligent designer exists. I say "the most simplest of mathematics" because, it's unnecessary to utilize the more complex mathematics to prove a simple "fact." First, I'll say this...
As of now, science has a couple of explanations to attempt to validate their theory that no "God" exists. One is that, at one point in time, nothing existed, at all. Then, all of a sudden, all things exist. The second explanation, I'll not mention here. It might contribute fuel to an already existing and uncontrollable fire that's unnecessary, especially if I'm aware of this new theory and those that oppose "God" aren't. Please and if you will, do not judge my integrity for my lack of sharing. As I believe, I've no reason to bring to any table anything new when we can't get passed what's already offered. Nevertheless...
In the case of the first scenario and according to science, all came from nothing. This is even while science admits that it's yet to create something from nothing, itself. As a matter of fact, science hasn't even come close. Anyway, this mathematical formula appears as such...
0+0=1
I'm sure we can already see the discrepancy in this. Nothing can originate from nothing. Something MUST come from something. Therefore, the only possible equation is this...
1+1=2
It's not necessary that a zero must represent anything. Considering the history of mathematics to begin with, the numeral "0" is fairly new to mathematics-world anyway. Despite what we might believe, only one equation can make sense to us. To recapitulate while more clear, I offer you this...
SCIENCE
0+0=0
0+0=1
RELIGION
1+0=1
1+1=2
The fact of the matter is this. Science can give us nothing but theories that unbelievers accept as answers, fact, evidence, and proof, because they've nothing else to go on. Religion gives us answers, fact, evidence, and proof. To the religious, the answers, facts, evidence, and proofs, are all around us and us, at the same time. Science keeps guessing.
And as to this theory of evolution? Again, this is science's attempt to validate theories. In their ever-persistent goal to disprove the existence of "God," they purposely and willingly reject any possibility and probability of adaptation before evolution. And considering all the species that have become extinct in just my lifetime alone, it's incomprehensible that science insists that we're descended from Neanderthals instead of even considering that these are other life-forms that not only were different from "Adam," but became extinct, too. When's the last time one of these "creatures" surfaced from some remote region of the Earth, wondering why it's living such a primitive lifestyle?
And by the way...just before his death, Darwin wholly denounced his "theory of evolution." Don't just believe me. Look it up. I'm sure it's on the internet, somewhere.
Until next time...

Since: May 11

Cardiff, UK

#550105 Oct 13, 2012
River Tam wrote:
<quoted text>
Have we met?
I don't think we've been formally introduced Madam; but I've seen you around the neighbourhood.
Orangelion

Wrexham, UK

#550106 Oct 13, 2012
macumazahn wrote:
<quoted text>Silly sod.
Life adapted to the prevailing conditions, not the other way about.
A planet can't adapt when it comes to distance, and if we are sensitive enough to burn if too close or freeze if too far, then the original species we evolved from would have been too sensitive to survive the temperature before we even got to evolve.
Orangelion

Wrexham, UK

#550107 Oct 13, 2012
G_O_D wrote:
I will give you some info that, if you are willing and clever enough to use it, will add scientific fuel to your theistic point of view:
The concept of "nothingness" is being invalidated by science. The realization of this is embodied in "Quantum Vacuum" and "Quantum Fluctuations".
In short, there is no such thing as nothing, even nothing has properties. ONe of those properties is that this "nothing" can create th entire universe. You call that "The Big Bang" or "God", a rose by any name still blossoms when conditions are right to do so.
Have fun, BLL
<quoted text>
What properties can nothingness have? Nothingness means no properties.
Orangelion

Wrexham, UK

#550108 Oct 13, 2012
River Tam wrote:
<quoted text>
How do you know that? Ever been to Venus?
Nobody here cares if you burn or freeze.
Xiao di di.
Hidingfromyou is your friend, she has been crushed and defeated, she is a pile of crap, thats your friend. How did you like it then? Are you humiliated and ashamed for your stupid friend then?

Since: May 11

Cardiff, UK

#550109 Oct 13, 2012
MisterCharrington wrote:
<quoted text>
o luck with the Welsh proxy tonight?
o = no

obviously but sometimes we expect too much....
Orangelion

Wrexham, UK

#550110 Oct 13, 2012
Hidingfromyou wrote:
<quoted text>
Welcome to the thread.
So, how do you know Gate Keeper/Sir Doc/Viking/Martina and all the other names he uses?
We aren't the same username, bitch. You have no proof what so ever. There are bound to be people who share similer views and would reacte similer to a kid like you. That doesn't mean were the same person.
Orangelion

Wrexham, UK

#550111 Oct 13, 2012
MisterCharrington wrote:
<quoted text>
o = no
obviously but sometimes we expect too much....
I'm native to england, not welsh LOL. I came with one excuse.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 2 min nanoanomaly 70,646
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 13 min New Age Spiritual... 658,564
Bush is a hero (Sep '07) 26 min bad bob 183,453
Snapchat fun 2 accounts 1 hr mar 3
Poll Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 1 hr onemale 282,942
Play "end of the word" part 2 (Dec '15) 2 hr ImFree2Choose 3,020
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 3 hr Peace_Warrior 618,845
Should Black People Forgive White People for Sl... (Jun '07) 5 hr Toby 4,966
Moms having sex with their sons (Aug '12) 12 hr Hilary 93
More from around the web