#1237 Jan 26, 2013
Black men have HIV
#1238 Jan 29, 2013
I have plenty of pride, you could probly use some. to hate some one else for no reason, shows alot about you. Get a life
#1240 Feb 1, 2013
well there are certainly much more TRASHY white women nowadays, that is for sure.
#1241 Feb 4, 2013
#1242 Feb 5, 2013
Rhonda, thanks for the very kind compliment. Likewise.
With Topixs forums, many times regarding a troll thread.--- Primarily a troll thread which deals with relationships, etc..
A troll thread which is long, other posters will blog on the thread. Type up other topics. Blog with a discussion & debate about other subject matter. Different from the topic of the initial post starting off the thread.
Even if posters are blogging with a discussion & debate about subject matter which is different from the topic of the initial post which started off the thread.--- Topix moderators don't mind when there is an in-depth blog discussion & debate on their forums.
#1243 Feb 5, 2013
Yeah, I thought so.
Very good to hear. I'm doing fine. Thanks for asking.
On a different thread, from February, 2011 till mid May, 2011, we had a very nice blog discussion & debate.
I first started posting on Topix back in late January, 2008. On the Dominican Republic & Haiti forums. I was a regular on the Dominican Republic & Haiti forums from late January, 2008 till mid September, 2008.
Fellow New Yorker here. Contrary to what Topix is showing my location as, no Wisconsin & no California. I mention California, because awhile back, on the thread "Stupid White Liberals" & on several other threads, it was showing my location as being in Los Angeles.
I'm using a quad connector with a proxy server.
My location is still the same from the Dominican Republic forum. Primarily on the thread "Anti-Haitian Bias Rooted in Dominican History". It is still New York, NY, 10001.
#1244 Feb 5, 2013
Rhonda --- In regards to your previous post to me,#1226.--- You said "Integration for Black Americans, descendants of slaves, was the beginning of the end".--- You are 150% right on the mark about this.
Rhonda, the 1960s "Civil Rights Movement" succeeded with getting laws enacted which dealt with the prevention of discrimination in housing & in job hiring. Getting laws enacted which dealt with the prevention of minority voting & in minority vote registration. Getting laws enacted which dealt with the discriminatory practices in not being able to eat at segregated lunch counters, restaurants & in hotels.
But, the Civil Rights Movement totally FAILED in regards to African Americans economic independence & solvency.
#1245 Feb 5, 2013
Rhonda --- An observation.--- About the 1960s Civil Rights Movement.---
Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. sought out integration with Whites. Dr. King Jr. sought out more job opportunities for African Americans.
Dr. King Jr. also sought out acceptance & validation from Whites.
Dr. King Jr. did succeed with getting African Americans more job opportunities. Primarily in the public sector.
But, via this, African American banks & businesses which thrived & prospered during segregation succumbed once integration came.
Back in the 1960s (Probably even today), most Whites did want segregation. But, the Whites in the federal government, the Whites in businesses & the Whites in the business lobby had other plans.
Though the rank & file Whites wanted segregation, the Whites in the federal government, Whites in businesses & Whites in the business lobby realized that by "integrating" with African Americans.--- This would lead to African Americans totally spending their money in & with White owned & managed banks & businesses.
This process would totally destroy the financial strength & unity of the African American community.
This made the African American community totally dependent upon the federal government. For jobs & for aid.
Had African Americans chosen the path of Malcolm X, which was separatism.--- The wealth of the African American community would have remained within the African American community.
But, clearly, this didn't happen.
It didn't happen because of these 2 reasons.---
1. Once integration came, the much smaller African American owned banks & businesses couldn't compete with the much larger White owned banks & businesses.
2. Once integration came, African Americans prefered shopping at & spending their money at White owned banks & businesses.
#1246 Feb 5, 2013
Rhonda --- You said "Right now it is most obviously as the sports field is becoming a wash out. The number of dark skin brothers in sports are those coming in from the urban centers of the country. As those guys are encouraged to marry non-black, Black Americans are really becoming a niche culture. There will be a number of us, along with segments from all cultures that will follow suit. Those that are the exception and without access to other cultures will remain true to their ethnicities".--- You are absolutely correct about your 5 points here.
#1247 Feb 5, 2013
Rhonda --- You said "The other latinos, Blacks, asians will be absorbed into the caucasian culture".--- Yep.
Asian-Americans have been known as being Americas "model minority".
Clearly, Asian-Americans have "Honorary White Status" in the United States (US).
Hispanics (Afro-Latinos included) are also being given Honorary White Status in this nation.
From 2000 till now, blacks in the US, who have ancestral roots from the Anglophone, French / Creole speaking Caribbean black nations & from Africa have been encouraged to seek SEPARATE classification. DIFFERENT from African Americans.
Blacks in the US, who have ancestral roots from the Anglophone, French / Creole speaking Caribbean black nations & from Africa haven't received the separate classification yet. But, in due time, they will.
Social engineering is in full force.
#1248 Feb 5, 2013
Rhonda --- Awhile back, you typed up a post which really POINTED out the dynamic of social engineering by the United States (US) federal government. You summed it up PERFECTLY. It's worthy of a cut, paste & post. Here it is.---
Where you said "Not all that are considered white today were always white.
Not the Jews
Not the Irish
Just those that were classified as Anglo-Saxon Protestants. As usual, the move to name them white had its basis in politics. When the Irish voting bloc grew threatening to the anglos then low and behold.. "We are all white here, why the angst?"
Like now the dumbass "one drop-rule" that help to oppress people of color or with obvious "negro" blood is considered a threat because Blacks are beginning to grow in strength and power. It consolidated us, isolated us, and helped to empower us. So, what does white america, republicans, do? Divide and conquer. So, set the biracials against the multiculturals and all of them against the Black Americans and slow down their advance. We are moving forward and picking up momentum, so a spanner had to be thrown into the works to slow it down. It's working. We all know the dillution of our race serves to strengthen the white power structure. It does not help us.
Don't apologize, because at one time Jews Irish and others were not considered white
That "honor" belonged only to Anglo Saxon Protestants.
#1249 Feb 5, 2013
Rhonda ---- Those examples with you gave.---
1. Writer Karen Brodkin. Karens book, "How Jews Became White Folks: And What That Says About Race in America".
2. Writer Noel Ignatiev. Noels book, "How The Irish Became White".
3. The Assata Shakur (Aka -- JoAnne Chesimard) site.
Clearly, Karen, Noel & Assata are very controversial people. Primarily Noel & Assata.
Karen & Noel are White leftists. White, Jewish-American cultural marxists.
Assata is a left wing, pro African American Nationalist.
Karen, Noel & other White leftists like these people.--- Howard Zinn, Susan Sontag, Saul Alinsky, Betty Friedan, Abbie Hoffman, Murray Bookchin, Herbert Marcuse, Georg Lukacs, Ernst Bloc, T.W. Adorno, Max Horkheimer, Wilhelm Reich, Erich Fromm, Rose Schneiderman, Muriel Rukeyser, Harold Laski & Tristan Tzara.---
White leftists reach out to African Americans. As a support base.
White leftists are looking at the United States (US) group dynamics, racial dynamics & racial politics through a different lens. Compared to what Assata is.
Despite Karen & Noel coming from a different history than Assata. Despite Karens family & Noels family "American experience" being different than Assata.---
Karen, Noel & Assata are 150% right on the mark about the social engineering policies of the US federal government.
#1250 Feb 5, 2013
Rhonda --- An observation.--- About the 1965 "Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965".
To show how this piece of federal immigration legislation had racial overtones.---
Back in 1965, Republicans & Democrats passed the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965.
The Democrats were in support of this law, since most of the newly arrived immigrants of color voted for candidates of the Democratic Party.
The Republicans were in support of this law, since these immigrants of color provided labor for American businesses.
American businesses & the American business lobby profited off of the labor of these immigrants of color.
HOWEVER though, there was also a RACIAL component with the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965.
Which isn't talked about openly in public forums or on television. Since it is not politically correct.
This was the deal.--- The Immigration and Nationality Act was passed in 1965. 1965 was a year at the HEIGHT of the 1960s African American Civil Rights Movement.
The Immigration and Nationality Act was passed in 1965, to bring immigrants of color into this nation.
To fill Americas job market. IN PLACE OF African Americans (Descendants of black American slaves).
This also put strains upon the African American family unit & community.
This also took A LOT of momentum out of the 1960s African American Civil Rights Movement.
#1251 Feb 5, 2013
Rhonda & Klink ---- I have to step out now. I still have to respond back to a few of your previous posts which you addressed to me. Hopefully, I should have some time by Saturday. Either way, I'll definitely get back to you.
In the meantime, later.
#1252 Feb 5, 2013
Its a rule I know I have mine where did it come from I know every snow bunny I ever done couldnt take da snake
#1253 Feb 9, 2013
Klink --- In regards to your previous post to me,#1222.--- You said "Really wasnt about ethnicity rather religion".--- Religion did play a part. But, ethnicity played a larger role.
Ideology played an even larger role than ethnicity & religion.
In my next post, I'll list examples of this.
You said "The country as founded by Protestants with a minority Catholic. While the Catholics were disliked and discriminated it was actually the Catholics who founded and ran Washington DC in MARYland the previous only Catholic colony while the Protestants continued to run the states until the feds took the states at the 1860 Civil War. Then the Catholic papal knights created the KKK (Albert Pike). The Klan would often burn crosses to instill FEAR of anything Christian while the Catholic ran newspapers would blame it all on the Christian southerners".----
You are 150% right on the mark about your seven respective points here.
Regarding your points about --- 1. The Catholics were disliked and discriminated.
2. The Protestants continued to run the states until the feds took the states.
Regarding #1.--- Granted, way back, most American Catholics collectively were discriminated against by Americas numerically dominant Protestants.
But, there were exceptions. There were many American Catholics who were aligned with Protestants. Aligned according to ideology.
So, ideology trumped religion.
Regarding #2.--- Yes, way back, American Protestants were more dominant in the United States (US) state run governments.
But, there were exceptions. There were many American Catholics who were aligned with the Protestants. Aligned according to ideology.
So, ideology transcended religion.
#1254 Feb 9, 2013
Klink --- To show, that ethnicity mattered more than religion. To show, that ideology factored in more than religion & ethnicity.
In my previous post to Rhonda,#1207, I pointed out how way back in the United States (US), German-Americans, Swedish-Americans, French-Americans, Jewish-Americans, Irish-Americans, Sicilian-Americans, Italian-Americans, Greek-Americans & Spanish-Americans were not considered "White".
But, over generations, this changed. These respective groups were then accepted as being White by English-Americans who controlled the means of production & who made the policies.
So, ethnicity & ideology mattered MORE than religion.
In my next post, I'll list examples of the World War 1 years in the US.
How ethnicity & ideology factored in more than religion.
Since: Nov 12
#1255 Feb 9, 2013
she told me the same thing !
#1256 Feb 9, 2013
Klink --- Examples. Which show that ethnicity & ideology factored in more than religion.--- 1. The World War 1 years. 2. The World War 2 years.---
In regards to #1, the World War 1 years.--- From 1914 up until the United States (US) entering into World War 1 in April, 1917.---
This nation was very much divided over the US entering World War 1 on the side of the Allies.
It WASN'T divided over religion. It was divided over ethnicity & ideology. Especially over ideology.
To show the ethnic division.--- It was mainly German-Americans & Irish-Americans who were very much against the US entering World War 1 on the side of the Allies.
From 1914 up until April, 1917, Americas English-American owned newspapers wrote articles which were very anti-Irish & anti-German.
In regards to #2, the World War 2 years.--- The start of World War 2 in Europe, September 1, 1939, up until right after the Axis power bloc invaded the former Soviet Union (USSR) on June 22, 1941.--
Jewish-Americans, English-Americans, Polish-Americans, French-Americans, Dutch-Americans, Flemish-Americans, Greek-Americans, Czech-Americans, Serbian-Americans, Norwegian-Americans & Chinese-Americans.--- Were pushing for the US to enter World War 2 on the side of the United Kingdom (UK) & the USSR.
Jewish-Americans & English-Americans were the most vehement for the US to enter World War 2 on the side of the UK & the USSR.
But, German-Americans, Irish-Americans, Italian-Americans, Japanese-Americans & African Americans were very much AGAINST the US entering the war on the side of the UK & the USSR.
Many African American women were very vociferously against the US entering the war on the side of the UK & the USSR. These African American women were in support of Italy. Because back in October, 1935, Italy invaded & took over Ethiopia, a black east African nation. All the Italian soldiers took Ethiopias urban women as wives. They had children.
So, African American women were against the US entering the war on the side of the UK & the USSR.
So, religion wasn't a factor. Ethnicity & ideology were the factors.
#1257 Feb 9, 2013
RhondaYes --- In regards to your previous post to me,#1225.--- You said "This is another form of Willie Lynchism".--- You are 150% correct about this.
You said "Blacks vote almost as a block".--- For the candidates of the Democratic Party, from the 1960 presidential election till now, so true. Especially from the 1964 election till now.
You said "to create division and class structure like what is invisibly built into the white culture. This helps the caucasians to mount a plan to manipulate the weakened and divided blacks".--- Yep. BIG TIME.
Back in 1988, was the first time in generations that the United States (US) federal government proposed getting rid of the "one drop rule" in regards to "race". Implementing the "2 or more races" (Multiracial / mixed) category.
African Americans main organizations like the National Association Advancement Colored People (NAACP), National Urban League (NUL), Operation Rainbow/PUSH, National Bar Association (NBA), Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC), National Action Network (NAN), Nation of Islam (NOI) & the New Black Panther Party (NBPP) were very vehemently against this.
But, it didn't matter one bit.
Back in 1990, the federal government first gave the option with an open box on the census.
From 1990 till 2000, Americans who came from an African American parent & a White parent were very much encouraged to seek SEPARATE classification. DISTINCT from African Americans.
Back in 2000, the "2 or more races" (Multiracial / mixed) category was put on the census.
From 2000 till now, Americans who come from an African American parent & a White parent have very much been encouraged to classify as 2 or more races (Multiracial / mixed).
From 2000 till now, black Americans who have ancestral roots from the Anglophone, French / Creole speaking Caribbean black nations & from Africa have been encouraged to seek SEPARATE classification. DISTINCT from African Americans.
Black Americans who have ancestral roots from the Anglophone, French / Creole speaking Caribbean black nations & from Africa haven't received the separate classification yet.
But, in due time, they will.
Add your comments below
|Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing (Mar '17)||8 min||Rednek||80,247|
|Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07)||12 min||SANE CATHOLIC||701,604|
|Why Im no longer a Christian (Jul '08)||2 hr||Dang Jersey Piney||448,403|
|Prove there's a god. (Mar '08)||2 hr||Sammy||995,788|
|I'm ON BOARD: James Harden for NBA MVP||4 hr||Doctor REALITY||2|
|Why does Draymond Green act like such a BLEEP! ...||4 hr||Doctor REALITY||10|
|Judas Iscariot and Mark Fuhrman||4 hr||Doctor REALITY||44|
Find what you want!
Search Top Stories Forum Now
Copyright © 2018 Topix LLC