Was 9/11 was an inside job?

Was 9/11 was an inside job?

Created by gueeee on Sep 11, 2010

129 votes

Click on an option to vote

Yes, absolutely

may be, with some fact

not sure

First Prev
of 10
Next Last

Since: Sep 10

Doha, Qatar

#1 Sep 11, 2010
To remember the victims/innocent of 9/11
Helton

Brentwood, TN

#2 Sep 11, 2010
4) no

“OUR SOLDIER's ROCK!”

Since: Jul 08

Location hidden

#3 Sep 11, 2010
Helton wrote:
4) no
4) NO

“Will you hold my pistol?”

Since: Sep 10

Oklahoma City

#4 Sep 12, 2010
no and there wernt any place to check no. mulitple choice is all i know and if its not there i cant check it moron
Idea

Hanover, PA

#5 Sep 14, 2010
The Oklahomo Kid wrote:
no and there wernt any place to check no. mulitple choice is all i know and if its not there i cant check it moron
Maybe you should check Youtube for facts before you decide.
hum

Chillicothe, OH

#6 Sep 19, 2010
heres something i'm sick and tired of hearing about 9/11 people leave it rest the building is being rebuilt.
Curtis Lowe

Montgomery, AL

#7 Sep 19, 2010
If I remember correctly, the planes started on the Outside, but ended up Inside. So I guess it was both an Inside and Outside job.

Since: Sep 10

Reseda, CA

#8 Sep 19, 2010
Re 9/11 - How do falling buildings create and then blow 40,000 small body fragments (skin and bone - all no bigger than a small finger nail) up to a third of a mile outward. How does 95% of all the concrete get turned into talcum powder like dust in 9 seconds. The energy required to do this can only be provided by high explosives. Science has already proved the building came down as a result of high explosives. Even the explosives have been found. Check Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth. Its a no brainer. The only way one couldn't see it is if they have no brain. Check the facts.

Since: Sep 10

Concord, CA

#9 Sep 19, 2010
SunnyJim wrote:
Re 9/11 - How do falling buildings create and then blow 40,000 small body fragments (skin and bone - all no bigger than a small finger nail) up to a third of a mile outward. How does 95% of all the concrete get turned into talcum powder like dust in 9 seconds. The energy required to do this can only be provided by high explosives. Science has already proved the building came down as a result of high explosives. Even the explosives have been found. Check Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth. Its a no brainer. The only way one couldn't see it is if they have no brain. Check the facts.
Or you know an airplane, a large airliner full a jet fuel causes a rather large explosion when it hits things. As for facts, the buildings definetly started falling at the site of the crash and if there were expolosives than how the heck did someone manage to set them up (without anyone noticing by the way) at the EXACT spot where the planes hit the buildings? Furthermore how come the plane crash didn't immediatly set the explosives off? Why hit them with planes at all when the could have just bombed them? Finally why the government go through the trouble of rigging both towers when one falling would have had the same effect with far less risk?

Also I vote no.
Curtis Lowe

Montgomery, AL

#10 Sep 20, 2010
The saddest part was when OJ handed the cat to Fred Astaire. I cried like a baby.

Since: Sep 10

South El Monte, CA

#11 Sep 20, 2010
PCIndependent wrote:
<quoted text>
Or you know an airplane, a large airliner full a jet fuel causes a rather large explosion when it hits things. As for facts, the buildings definetly started falling at the site of the crash and if there were expolosives than how the heck did someone manage to set them up (without anyone noticing by the way) at the EXACT spot where the planes hit the buildings? Furthermore how come the plane crash didn't immediatly set the explosives off? Why hit them with planes at all when the could have just bombed them? Finally why the government go through the trouble of rigging both towers when one falling would have had the same effect with far less risk?
Also I vote no.
Well you are correct an airliner full of jet fuel does cause a large explosion. That was the one we observed when they hit the
building and then most of the jet fuel burned off.To turn 95% of all the concrete into talcum powder like dust requires much more energy. Try pounding a one foot square block of concrete into fine dust and see how much energy you expend. Its just science. The explosives were easy to set up because both towers had lift shafts closed for extensive modifications. This gave full access to all floors of the buildings and workmen were coming and going for many months. All construction jobs are sub contracted out with multiple contractors doing work without seeing the big picture. Just a few key people would be needed to rig the explosives - in this case thermate. Extremely high-temperature igniters are needed to start the reaction by heating spots to the 2,200ºC ignition temperature.
The airplane exploding and resultant fires could not have produced such high temperature. It wouldn't matter where the airplanes hit - the whole buildings were rigged, probably with radio controlled detonators to ingnite the thermate. But why doesn't Marvin P. Bush, the younger brother of George W. Bush, who was a principal in the company responsible for the twin towers security company, Securacom, comment on the elevator renovations - then he could explain the work going on and put our minds at ease. He also explain why people had noticed a fine white dust collecting on their work desks in the weeks before 9/11. Unfortunately, Marvin has been silent on all these issues, even though he was in New York on that day.(Mother Bush says so in her book).

Both of the twin towers had received asbestos abatement orders and the estimates for correcting the problem was estimated at $7 Billion. They had received their 6 and apparently last warning to correct the asbestos problem.

You mention the Government rigging the towers. I would hardly think it was the Government - but sometimes Governments choose to close their eyes to things. Skilled demolition experts brought down the twin towers. However, then there is the question of building 7 which fell hours after the twin towers came down. Building 7 was not hit by an airliner and only small fires were observed. It came down in perfect symmetry and at free fall speed. Never before in history has a steel high rise building collapsed. On 9/11, and for the very first time, 3 steel high rise buildings fell in New York city with minutes or hours of each other. A first. However that is not the only coincidence that occurred that day. The 3 buildings were all owned by the same man, "Lucky" Larry Sylverstein. You’ve got to be lucky to make a $4 Billion profit on a 6-month investment of $124 Million. That was the amount Lucky Larry paid to insure the building against terrorist attack just six months previous. Bingo!

Oh yea, and those airplanes. Well they did give off a dramatic visual and there is nothing like a few good patsies when you are about to bring off the crime of the century. Hitler did the same thing in 1933 when he torched the Reichstag building and then blamed it on the communists. Its all a no brainer.

Lets all WAKE UP - visit Architects and Engineers for 9/11 - soon.

Since: Sep 10

Concord, CA

#12 Sep 20, 2010
SunnyJim wrote:
<quoted text>
Well you are correct an airliner full of jet fuel does cause a large explosion. That was the one we observed when they hit the
building and then most of the jet fuel burned off.To turn 95% of all the concrete into talcum powder like dust requires much more energy. Try pounding a one foot square block of concrete into fine dust and see how much energy you expend. Its just science. The explosives were easy to set up because both towers had lift shafts closed for extensive modifications. This gave full access to all floors of the buildings and workmen were coming and going for many months. All construction jobs are sub contracted out with multiple contractors doing work without seeing the big picture. Just a few key people would be needed to rig the explosives - in this case thermate. Extremely high-temperature igniters are needed to start the reaction by heating spots to the 2,200ºC ignition temperature.
The airplane exploding and resultant fires could not have produced such high temperature. It wouldn't matter where the airplanes hit - the whole buildings were rigged, probably with radio controlled detonators to ingnite the thermate. But why doesn't Marvin P. Bush, the younger brother of George W. Bush, who was a principal in the company responsible for the twin towers security company, Securacom, comment on the elevator renovations - then he could explain the work going on and put our minds at ease. He also explain why people had noticed a fine white dust collecting on their work desks in the weeks before 9/11. Unfortunately, Marvin has been silent on all these issues, even though he was in New York on that day.(Mother Bush says so in her book).
Both of the twin towers had received asbestos abatement orders and the estimates for correcting the problem was estimated at $7 Billion. They had received their 6 and apparently last warning to correct the asbestos problem.
You mention the Government rigging the towers. I would hardly think it was the Government - but sometimes Governments choose to close their eyes to things. Skilled demolition experts brought down the twin towers. However, then there is the question of building 7 which fell hours after the twin towers came down. Building 7 was not hit by an airliner and only small fires were observed. It came down in perfect symmetry and at free fall speed. Never before in history has a steel high rise building collapsed. On 9/11, and for the very first time, 3 steel high rise buildings fell in New York city with minutes or hours of each other. A first. However that is not the only coincidence that occurred that day. The 3 buildings were all owned by the same man, "Lucky" Larry Sylverstein. You’ve got to be lucky to make a $4 Billion profit on a 6-month investment of $124 Million....
.
But the explosive would have to be at the crash site, they would have to be exactly at the crash sit (or pretty darn close) because, and I watched the video again just to be sure, the building starts to fall at the burning gaping hole that was the crash site,if someone managed to trigger explosives below the crash site don't you think there would have been a demolition charge below the impact zone? Actually I looked up some building demolitions for fun and while it may be different with something as large as the Twin Towers...none of the demolitions that I saw looked vaguely like how the WTC fell.
A controlled demolition:
&fe ature=related
And as for WTC 7, well..:http://www.youtube.com/ watch?v=AsJQKpnkZ10&featur e=related

In the controlled demolition the building fails from the bottom as well as each side and sort of...I don't really have a better word than it implodes.
Now WTC 7, right as it falls look at the windows, you can tell something gives way. Clearly in the video there are no explosive charges that high up, if they were at the bottom why didn't the tower implode in the same way expected of a demolition?

Since: Sep 10

Concord, CA

#13 Sep 20, 2010
&fe ature=related

Accursed computer, I hope this link is better

Since: Sep 10

Doha, Qatar

#14 Sep 21, 2010
but the most important fact is the WTC 7, 47 stories building also collaps 5 hours after 2 WTC collaps. WTC 7 never hit by any plane. another one is the BBC reported a news about half hours prior to the WTC 7 collaps. see this video
://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6mx FRigYD3s

Since: Sep 10

Reseda, CA

#15 Sep 22, 2010
PCIndependent wrote:
<quoted text>
But the explosive would have to be at the crash site, they would have to be exactly at the crash sit (or pretty darn close) because, and I watched the video again just to be sure, the building starts to fall at the burning gaping hole that was the crash site,if someone managed to trigger explosives below the crash site don't you think there would have been a demolition charge below the impact zone? Actually I looked up some building demolitions for fun and while it may be different with something as large as the Twin Towers...none of the demolitions that I saw looked vaguely like how the WTC fell.
A controlled demolition: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =7XG-l3N1YfQXX&feature=rel ated
And as for WTC 7, well..:http://www.youtube.com/ watch?v=AsJQKpnkZ10&featur e=related
In the controlled demolition the building fails from the bottom as well as each side and sort of...I don't really have a better word than it implodes.
Now WTC 7, right as it falls look at the windows, you can tell something gives way. Clearly in the video there are no explosive charges that high up, if they were at the bottom why didn't the tower implode in the same way expected of a demolition?
The whole buildings were rigged with thermate steel cutting charges
and high explosives. When did we last see 40,000 fragments of human bodies, no bigger than a small finger nail, blown out to a third of a mile from a collapsed building? 95% of all concrete was turned into a fine talcum powder like dust. The fires of molten steel that went on months were a direct result of the thermate cutting charges. The lift shafts were under renovation for many months. Just like house builders, all work is sub contracted out. Contractors told to lay cable here, there and everywhere don't ask questions. They just do it to get paid. They don't think of sinister reasons as to why they drill holes in concrete columns that no doubt produced the fine dust that was coating everyone's desks in the weeks preceding 9/11. After the grunt work was done just a few experts would be needed to finish the job. The buildings were rigged top to bottom so it didn't matter where the planes hit, give or take a few dozen floors this way or that way.

You couldn't find a video that replicates 9/11 demolition because demolition experts don't use so many high explosives that result in the pulverization of 95% of the concrete.

Hitler sums the way it was done in his infamous quote -

"The size of the lie is a definite factor in causing it to be believed, for the vast masses of a nation are in the depths of their hearts more easily deceived than they are consciously and intentionally bad. The primitive simplicity of their minds renders them a more easy prey to a big lie than a small one, for they themselves often tell little lies, but would be ashamed to tell big lies."

Don't think things like this don't work. After Hitler torched the Reichtagg and blamed it on the communists, World War 2 soon followed and 7 million Jews and countless other millions had their life ended prematurely. After 9/11, we were told that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction that turned out to be fertilizer field spreaders - and thousands of our boys are dead along with countless other hundreds and thousands of people.

The con relies on the primitive simplicity of the human mind. Don't fall for it - Its a no brainer. The buildings were blown up.
Visit Architects and Engineers 9/11
simpleton

Grove City, OH

#16 Sep 23, 2010
purdue university's engineering department did a formal study on the possibility of a conspiracy... they concluded that it's total BS!

sunnyjim is right in that it takes a great amount of energy to reduce concrete into talcum powder.... but that's where E=MC^2 comes into play. thousands of tons falling hundreds of feet creates such amount of energy. anyone who has taken civil engineering courses will tell you that.

purdue university had no reason to lie about it. they would have benefitted much more had the evidence pointed to the contrary.

Since: Sep 10

Reseda, CA

#17 Sep 26, 2010
simpleton wrote:
purdue university's engineering department did a formal study on the possibility of a conspiracy... they concluded that it's total BS!
sunnyjim is right in that it takes a great amount of energy to reduce concrete into talcum powder.... but that's where E=MC^2 comes into play. thousands of tons falling hundreds of feet creates such amount of energy. anyone who has taken civil engineering courses will tell you that.
purdue university had no reason to lie about it. they would have benefitted much more had the evidence pointed to the contrary.
The Purdue University cartoon of 9/11 has been totally discredited by Kevin Ryan and many others - quote by Ryan "these Purdue professors show that they do not understand even the simplest aspects of the WTC events".
For those who don't know who Kevin Ryan is - Kevin Ryan was fired from his position at Underwriters Laboratories (UL) after writing a letter to Dr. Frank Gayle at the National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST) disputing NIST'S conclusions regarding the collapses of the World Trade Center twin towers.

He was the expert responsible for determining if the steel could have failed at temperatures generated by the crashing airplanes. He reminded NIST that the steel components were certified to ASTM E119 - well able to tolerate such fires. They didn't like the message so they fired the inspector! And so the fabricated story grew stronger.

Ryan also states in his rebuttal letter to Purdue President Córdova - quote:

"I could go on describing the stupefying failure of this new Purdue animation, and how it contradicts the reports it pretends to support. But I ask you to review this project yourself, and consider asking for clarification from the authors.

You might start with Purdue's Mete Sozen, a long time leader of official investigations for terrorist acts, and a mainstay of "expert" testimony for those supporting Bush's war of terror. Professor Sozen also happens to be the chairman of a US Department of Defense program, which puts him among the least likely people to objectively judge the scientific basis for the origins of this war. But my guess is that Mete Sozen is more than just a simple war profiteer, and may have more sinister personal reasons for promoting the Bush Administration's genocide for oil program"

http://stj911.org/ryan/PurdueLetter.html

“DON'T TREAD ON ME!”

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#18 Sep 27, 2010
you have to be kidding about this thread it is very disrespectful. Stupid conspiracy theory's.

Since: Sep 10

Reseda, CA

#19 Sep 27, 2010
CaptainBowline wrote:
you have to be kidding about this thread it is very disrespectful. Stupid conspiracy theory's.
Disrespectful - to who. The relatives of the victims of 9/11 are about to run a TV campaign in New York asking for a new investigation!

Take your head out of the sand - wise up, wake up and check out:

http://buildingwhat.org/
and
http://www.ae911truth.org/
similar

Queensbury, NY

#20 Sep 28, 2010
SunnyJim wrote:
<quoted text>
The whole buildings were rigged with thermate steel cutting charges
and high explosives. When did we last see 40,000 fragments of human bodies, no bigger than a small finger nail, blown out to a third of a mile from a collapsed building? 95% of all concrete was turned into a fine talcum powder like dust. The fires of molten steel that went on months were a direct result of the thermate cutting charges. The lift shafts were under renovation for many months. Just like house builders, all work is sub contracted out. Contractors told to lay cable here, there and everywhere don't ask questions. They just do it to get paid. They don't think of sinister reasons as to why they drill holes in concrete columns that no doubt produced the fine dust that was coating everyone's desks in the weeks preceding 9/11. After the grunt work was done just a few experts would be needed to finish the job. The buildings were rigged top to bottom so it didn't matter where the planes hit, give or take a few dozen floors this way or that way.
You couldn't find a video that replicates 9/11 demolition because demolition experts don't use so many high explosives that result in the pulverization of 95% of the concrete.
Hitler sums the way it was done in his infamous quote -
"The size of the lie is a definite factor in causing it to be believed, for the vast masses of a nation are in the depths of their hearts more easily deceived than they are consciously and intentionally bad. The primitive simplicity of their minds renders them a more easy prey to a big lie than a small one, for they themselves often tell little lies, but would be ashamed to tell big lies."
Don't think things like this don't work. After Hitler torched the Reichtagg and blamed it on the communists, World War 2 soon followed and 7 million Jews and countless other millions had their life ended prematurely. After 9/11, we were told that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction that turned out to be fertilizer field spreaders - and thousands of our boys are dead along with countless other hundreds and thousands of people.
The con relies on the primitive simplicity of the human mind. Don't fall for it - Its a no brainer. The buildings were blown up.
Visit Architects and Engineers 9/11
Y/w
"You couldn't find a video that replicates 9/11 demolition because demolition experts don't use so many high explosives that result in the pulverization of 95% of the concrete."

http://www.topix.com/forum/city/pittsfield-ma...
.

Also look at 00:16 to 00:23 and 00:32 to 00:48 on this one.


And compare....to these...
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/phot...
.
http://www.911truth.dk/first/img/northTowerEx...
.
http://www.youtube.com/watch...

Also...

Christopher A Brown has demonstrated that the core columns of the twin towers were infact made of concrete. As a safety measure the designers had hermetically sealed explosives strategically sealed into the concrete.

http://www.topix.com/forum/city/pittsfield-ma...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 10
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing (Mar '17) 8 min Nohweh 41,883
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 20 min waaasssuuup 690,412
Why are Europeans a race of savages, thieves, a... (Jun '15) 44 min Rabbis on the Run 124
Bring the jobs back to the USA! 1 hr Big Al 598
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 1 hr Rabbis on the Run 989,722
Charles Mansion Died Last Night 5 hr Paul McCartney is... 4
Sometimes I like Louis Farrakhan's "sermons"...... 7 hr Paul is dead 105
More from around the web