Rollin, if you read what I said correctly, I didn't say Obama should be impeached for the attack in Benghazi. Even though he should have and could have done something about it, I SAID HE SHOULD BE IMPEACHED FOR LYING TO THE AMERICAN PUBLIC THAT THE ATTACK WAS A REACTION TO A FILM. TO LIE TO THE AMERICAN PUBLIC AND MINIMIZE THE ROLE OF TERRORISM TO THE POINT THAT IT LOOKED LIKE SOMETHING AN AMERICAN HAD DONE TO CAUSE THE ATTACK RATHER THAN THE WORK OF AL-QUEDA ALL IN AN ATTEMPT TO MAKE HIM LOOK GOOD DURING HIS CAMPAIGN IS IMPEACHABLE.<quoted text>
SO then you are saying any attack that the President "lets" happen is an impeachable offense.
Bush - 9/11 should have been impeached.
Bush also sat by while 11 US embassies were attacked and a total of 54 Americans were murdered. Guess he should have been impeached 12 times just from that.
I have no doubt that Rollin is getting Obama's free stuff. Likely getting some sort of government aid while the rest of the working class pays for it.