Is that an egomanic's version of submission?<quoted text>
Not touching on the other arguements? However if you word the arguements of those as you are doing here you will not be doing yourself a favor.
Personally I think you are only arguing for the sake of arguement, you have an ego that you do not want to see crumble, that along with your clinging to the belief that your "god" is real in the sense that something is real, tangible, provable etc. of which it is not, your descriptions here tell that in itself.
Have your "god" by all means, relish in it, enjoy it, love it. But please don't think for a second that your attempt at proving your "god" comes off in any sense as being plausible or believable.
Now, how about those other inconsistencies and myths?
OK, I'll accept it.