prove that homosexuality is wrong.

“It's Time. . .”

Since: Jun 13

New Holland

#27146 Jul 2, 2013
KiMare wrote:
You are not in any way 'married' like diverse gendered couples.
Ss couples violate the design of physical union.
Ss couples are still only ever a duplicate half of marriage.
Ss couples are mutually fruitless, a defect of mating behavior.
Ss couples infringe on the most distinct, unique and critical relationship of society. Imposing an imposter relationship by every measure of history and universal culture.
Now who's in denial - AGAIN?

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#27147 Jul 2, 2013
KiMare wrote:
You are not in any way 'married' like diverse gendered couples. bla, bla, bla, bla, bla.
SCOTUS has confirmed otherwise.

I'll take the decision of SCOTUS over that of a geriatric troll with three nipples, a cooch, a wang, multiple "sanity certificates" and a psychotic alter ego "trapped" within his body.

“ reality, what a concept”

Since: Nov 07

this one

#27148 Jul 2, 2013
Joe Citizen wrote:
If we were meant to be with our same sex, there wouldn't be two sexes.
Hon, if we were all meant to be with our opposite sex, why were some of us born to grow up only attracted to our same sex? Nature has its reasons, it isn't our fault that you don't understand them. Reality, the human species doesn't require the active participation of everybody in the herd to keep the gene pool filled and even expanding, it never did.
Joe Citizen wrote:
One fits the other.
Not always and as far we know, never was. We have been around as long as you straight folk.
Joe Citizen wrote:
It's morally wrong - religion or not.
In whose judgment would that be? Nature disagrees with you, whether you want it to or not.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#27149 Jul 2, 2013
Dusty Mangina wrote:
<quoted text>
SCOTUS has confirmed otherwise.
I'll take the decision of SCOTUS over that of a geriatric troll with three nipples, a cooch, a wang, multiple "sanity certificates" and a psychotic alter ego "trapped" within his body.
I'm guessing by your blonde logic and fantasy about being a vagina that you are now the wife in your 'equal''marriage'?

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#27150 Jul 2, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm guessing by your blonde logic and fantasy about being a vagina that you are now the wife in your 'equal''marriage'?
What's this? Vagina man is making sexist remarks? LMAO

“=”

Since: Oct 07

Appleton WI

#27151 Jul 2, 2013
KiMare wrote:
Ss couples are not in any way 'married' like diverse gendered couples.
Ss couples violate the design of physical union.
Ss couples are still only ever a duplicate half of marriage.
Ss couples are mutually fruitless, a defect of mating behavior.
Ss couples infringe on the most distinct, unique and critical relationship of society. Imposing an imposter relationship by every measure of history and universal culture.
The assertion would be laughable if it was not so idiotic.
http://i1.cpcache.com/product_zoom/496976989/...

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#27152 Jul 2, 2013
KiMare wrote:
You are not in any way 'married' like diverse gendered couples.
Ss couples violate the design of physical union.
Ss couples are still only ever a duplicate half of marriage.
Ss couples are mutually fruitless, a defect of mating behavior.
Ss couples infringe on the most distinct, unique and critical relationship of society. Imposing an imposter relationship by every measure of history and universal culture.
Repeating this nonsense won't make it true or valid.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#27153 Jul 2, 2013
KiMare wrote:
Ss couples are not in any way 'married' like diverse gendered couples.
Ss couples violate the design of physical union.
Ss couples are still only ever a duplicate half of marriage.
Ss couples are mutually fruitless, a defect of mating behavior.
Ss couples infringe on the most distinct, unique and critical relationship of society. Imposing an imposter relationship by every measure of history and universal culture.
The assertion would be laughable if it was not so idiotic.
Tre H wrote:
Your post would have real impact if you specified what part of my post was false.

But you can't do that can you.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#27154 Jul 2, 2013
KiMare wrote:
Ss couples are not in any way 'married' like diverse gendered couples.
Ss couples violate the design of physical union.
Ss couples are still only ever a duplicate half of marriage.
Ss couples are mutually fruitless, a defect of mating behavior.
Ss couples infringe on the most distinct, unique and critical relationship of society. Imposing an imposter relationship by every measure of history and universal culture.
The assertion would be laughable if it was not so idiotic.
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
Repeating this nonsense won't make it true or valid.
Scoffing at it does not disprove it.

“=”

Since: Oct 07

Appleton WI

#27155 Jul 2, 2013
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
Ss couples are not in any way 'married' like diverse gendered couples.
Ss couples violate the design of physical union.
Ss couples are still only ever a duplicate half of marriage.
Ss couples are mutually fruitless, a defect of mating behavior.
Ss couples infringe on the most distinct, unique and critical relationship of society. Imposing an imposter relationship by every measure of history and universal culture.
The assertion would be laughable if it was not so idiotic.
<quoted text>
Your post would have real impact if you specified what part of my post was false.
But you can't do that can you.
No need to specify. There is nothing in it that is NOT false. It is 100% ignorant bigoted garbage, not worthy of more detailed disection.

I'm sorry that you think the most important thing about an intimate relationship with another person is that what's between their legs must be different from your own.

“ reality, what a concept”

Since: Nov 07

this one

#27156 Jul 2, 2013
KiMare wrote:
Scoffing at it does not disprove it.
Sweetie, what you are failing to realize is that you're lucky even to be scoffed at, you have said nothing that anyone believes in but yourself. You're the last one to get the plot here, there's no one left that needs to be convinced that you're a babbling fool, but you.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#27157 Jul 2, 2013
KiMare wrote:
Ss couples are not in any way 'married' like diverse gendered couples.
Ss couples violate the design of physical union.
Ss couples are still only ever a duplicate half of marriage.
Ss couples are mutually fruitless, a defect of mating behavior.
Ss couples infringe on the most distinct, unique and critical relationship of society. Imposing an imposter relationship by every measure of history and universal culture.
The assertion would be laughable if it was not so idiotic.
Tre H wrote:
<quoted text>
No need to specify. There is nothing in it that is NOT false. It is 100% ignorant bigoted garbage, not worthy of more detailed disection.
I'm sorry that you think the most important thing about an intimate relationship with another person is that what's between their legs must be different from your own.
Gender distinction is hardly false and not the only thing I mention.

Here, let me help you;

If you
believe denying marriage to a relationship
will prevent love

If you
demand any committed relationship
has to be called marriage

If you
claim rights and benefits can only be acquired
by an imposition on marriage

If you
equate the diversity of two genders
with the redundancy of same genders

If you
desecrate the sacred tradition of all major religions
and violate the historic practice of every single culture in history

If you
believe a fundamental change to the building block of society
will have absolutely no affect

If you
think a law can change
the reality of crucial distinctions in relationships

If you
pretend duplicating sexuality
is the same as blending masculinity and femininity

If you
condemn some children to parents of only one gender
and deliberately deny some children one natural parent

If you
ignore the design of sexual union
to manipulate a harmful act

If you
violate evolution's law of reproduction
to equate a genetic dead end

If you
risk the healthiest human relationship
to include one of the unhealthiest

If you
parallel the sole birthplace of every other relationship
with one that can reproduce none

If you
dilute all these things
down to just 'a committed relationship of two people'

Then, and only then, can you equate same-sex unions with marriage.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#27158 Jul 2, 2013
Rick in Kansas wrote:
<quoted text>Sweetie, what you are failing to realize is that you're lucky even to be scoffed at, you have said nothing that anyone believes in but yourself. You're the last one to get the plot here, there's no one left that needs to be convinced that you're a babbling fool, but you.
My sweetness can't begin to disguise the smell of the BS you spout tricky dicky ricky.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#27159 Jul 2, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm guessing by your blonde logic and fantasy about being a vagina that you are now the wife in your 'equal''marriage'?
Given that you're incapable of rational thought, guessing is all you have at this point.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#27160 Jul 2, 2013
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:

If you
believe denying marriage
That old copy and paste? That's as stale as your vag, dear.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#27161 Jul 2, 2013
Dusty Mangina wrote:
<quoted text>
That old copy and paste? That's as stale as your vag, dear.
Every point still true.

That's why it bugs you.

Smile.
fonzy

London, UK

#27162 Jul 2, 2013
the ass is for shitting.. a bloke was not not mean't to stick his dick in it....

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#27163 Jul 2, 2013
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
Ss couples are not in any way 'married' like diverse gendered couples.
Ss couples violate the design of physical union.
Ss couples are still only ever a duplicate half of marriage.
Ss couples are mutually fruitless, a defect of mating behavior.
Ss couples infringe on the most distinct, unique and critical relationship of society. Imposing an imposter relationship by every measure of history and universal culture.
The assertion would be laughable if it was not so idiotic.
<quoted text>
Scoffing at it does not disprove it.
There is nothing to prove. Your premise is false.

NEXT

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#27164 Jul 2, 2013
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
Ss couples are not in any way 'married' like diverse gendered couples.
Ss couples violate the design of physical union.
Ss couples are still only ever a duplicate half of marriage.
Ss couples are mutually fruitless, a defect of mating behavior.
Ss couples infringe on the most distinct, unique and critical relationship of society. Imposing an imposter relationship by every measure of history and universal culture.
The assertion would be laughable if it was not so idiotic.
<quoted text>
Gender distinction is hardly false and not the only thing I mention.
Here, let me help you;
If you
believe denying marriage to a relationship
will prevent love
If you
demand any committed relationship
has to be called marriage
If you
claim rights and benefits can only be acquired
by an imposition on marriage
If you
equate the diversity of two genders
with the redundancy of same genders
If you
desecrate the sacred tradition of all major religions
and violate the historic practice of every single culture in history
If you
believe a fundamental change to the building block of society
will have absolutely no affect
If you
think a law can change
the reality of crucial distinctions in relationships
If you
pretend duplicating sexuality
is the same as blending masculinity and femininity
If you
condemn some children to parents of only one gender
and deliberately deny some children one natural parent
If you
ignore the design of sexual union
to manipulate a harmful act
If you
violate evolution's law of reproduction
to equate a genetic dead end
If you
risk the healthiest human relationship
to include one of the unhealthiest
If you
parallel the sole birthplace of every other relationship
with one that can reproduce none
If you
dilute all these things
down to just 'a committed relationship of two people'
Then, and only then, can you equate same-sex unions with marriage.
A three nipple vagina man holds himself up as an authority on gender.

How ironic.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#27165 Jul 2, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Every point still true.
That's why it bugs you.
Smile.
It's merely opinion.
It doesn't bug me.
It makes you look silly, but you're pretty much used to that by now.

Muntzinga.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
What is the most forbidden sex you have had ? (Nov '16) 26 min StefH 10
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing 42 min Maria 26,450
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 1 hr PadMark 685,771
Truth About The Term: "White Nationalists" 3 hr Johnny 12
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 3 hr Test 985,711
Why it's time for Donald Trump to RESIGN...in d... 3 hr Johnny 31
God is REAL - Miracles Happen! (Jun '11) 3 hr Jake999 6,449
David Duke: "We're going to take our country ba... 3 hr Johnny 70
More from around the web