prove that homosexuality is wrong.

“ reality, what a concept”

Since: Nov 07

this one

#25693 Feb 3, 2013
KiMare wrote:
1. Links;
The New Family Structures Study
http://www.prc.utexas.edu/nfss/
Ah yes, the Regnerus "study" of the effect of "growing up with" "lesbian" or "gay" parents, with definitions of "lesbian", "gay" and "growing up with", which are so vaguely defined that Regenrus himself readily admits that even though he calls their parents "lesbian" and "gay", he really can't fake having a clue as to whether they actually were and since "growing up with" was simplified down to maybe a week of these children's lives, the ONLY thing the participants had in common was that they had all come from biologically broken homes. But you already knew that Regnerus is nothing more than a shill for the anti-gay marriage set, his pricey "study" and guaranteed results bought and paid for by bigots with deep pockets, a "study" so methodologically flawed that the journal which published it had to eat crow and admit that its peer review process was shit and at least two on the panel which approved it for publication had been paid to help with it, otherwise it would have never been approved.
KiMare wrote:
A problem clearly evident in heterosexual relationships with pre-existing non-biologically related children brought into them should concern this discussion how?
KiMare wrote:
2. Many sociologists argue against single parents adopting. Many states do not allow it.
Actually dear, single parent adoption is not illegal in ANY state currently and in most states, never was. Although it was not illegal, it was incredibly, incredibly rare until the last two or three decades. Not just sociologists, but society, frowned upon it except in instances of widows of good repute or some kid's Little Orphan Annie dream come true. For same sex couples, in most states, single parent adoption is the only available option, unable to legally marry and what most states prohibit are second parent adoptions, which deny adoptions to opposite sex couples just shacking up, no matter what other legal agreements they might have absent a license.
KiMare wrote:
3. Gay couples with children always involve unrelated children for at least one partner. That often will involve the Cinderella effect.
What percentage of same sex couples with children will that be? More or less the percentage of the much more massive heterosexual population? Do you actually have a point here?

Are all lesbian and gay folk cut out to be good parents? No, some of us aren't cut out to be parents, period. Will all lesbian and gay couples who do become parents be good at it? Sadly, we already know the answer to that is no, with a scattering of headline grabbing legal cases to prove that for a very small percentage of same sex couples parenting will be a failure. But what about the overwhelming percentage of same sex couples who are good at it? Do they get punished for the bad acts of the few? If that's the standard, what would be more imperative would be to put the legal breaks on HETEROSEXUAL misbehavior as their abuses are far more common. You know, the Cinderella Effect, it's even named for a heterosexual fairy tale gone bad.

Smirk that.
Adam

Frankfurt Am Main, Germany

#25694 Feb 3, 2013
Rick in Kansas wrote:
<quoted text>Ah yes, the Regnerus "study" of the effect of "growing up with" "lesbian" or "gay" parents, with definitions of "lesbian", "gay" and "growing up with", which are so vaguely defined that Regenrus himself readily admits that even though he calls their parents "lesbian" and "gay", he really can't fake having a clue as to whether they actually were and since "growing up with" was simplified down to maybe a week of these children's lives, the ONLY thing the participants had in common was that they had all come from biologically broken homes. But you already knew that Regnerus is nothing more than a shill for the anti-gay marriage set, his pricey "study" and guaranteed results bought and paid for by bigots with deep pockets, a "study" so methodologically flawed that the journal which published it had to eat crow and admit that its peer review process was shit and at least two on the panel which approved it for publication had been paid to help with it, otherwise it would have never been approved.
<quoted text>A problem clearly evident in heterosexual relationships with pre-existing non-biologically related children brought into them should concern this discussion how?
<quoted text>Actually dear, single parent adoption is not illegal in ANY state currently and in most states, never was. Although it was not illegal, it was incredibly, incredibly rare until the last two or three decades. Not just sociologists, but society, frowned upon it except in instances of widows of good repute or some kid's Little Orphan Annie dream come true. For same sex couples, in most states, single parent adoption is the only available option, unable to legally marry and what most states prohibit are second parent adoptions, which deny adoptions to opposite sex couples just shacking up, no matter what other legal agreements they might have absent a license.
<quoted text>What percentage of same sex couples with children will that be? More or less the percentage of the much more massive heterosexual population? Do you actually have a point here?
Are all lesbian and gay folk cut out to be good parents? No, some of us aren't cut out to be parents, period. Will all lesbian and gay couples who do become parents be good at it? Sadly, we already know the answer to that is no, with a scattering of headline grabbing legal cases to prove that for a very small percentage of same sex couples parenting will be a failure. But what about the overwhelming percentage of same sex couples who are good at it? Do they get punished for the bad acts of the few? If that's the standard, what would be more imperative would be to put the legal breaks on HETEROSEXUAL misbehavior as their abuses are far more common. You know, the Cinderella Effect, it's even named for a heterosexual fairy tale gone bad.
Smirk that.
You can run from the reality you sodomite but you cannot hide.
Adam

Frankfurt Am Main, Germany

#25695 Feb 3, 2013
Rick in Kansas wrote:
Legal marriage must be kept a heterosexual only status, because growing up heterosexual apparently makes one easily confused and misled about their own sexuality. They need the state to teach them that their heterosexuality is the only legally accepted option for marriage, because otherwise, they will all easily forget that they are heterosexual and/or forget to take responsibility for their own irresponsible breeding habits as heterosexuals, even more so than they've been doing on their own for decades now.
We're here, We're Straight. We're easy to confuse and have a habit of breeding like bears. Protect us from the new gay role model.
God never intended for men to be romantically involved with one another. Homosexuality is just one of man's most abominable forms of rebellion against the Lord....and homosexuals are paying a very high price for their sexual filth. TODAY is the day of salvation! TODAY is the day for homosexuals and lesbians and pedophiles and rapists and turn from the wicked vileness of SEXUAL IMMORALITY and turn your hearts and minds and souls to the Almighty Lord,who created you from a mold of clay and gave you a brain to think about it.
Elohimsokie

Ringold, OK

#25696 Feb 3, 2013
Adam wrote:
<quoted text>
God never intended for men to be romantically involved with one another. Homosexuality is just one of man's most abominable forms of rebellion against the Lord....and homosexuals are paying a very high price for their sexual filth. TODAY is the day of salvation! TODAY is the day for homosexuals and lesbians and pedophiles and rapists and turn from the wicked vileness of SEXUAL IMMORALITY and turn your hearts and minds and souls to the Almighty Lord,who created you from a mold of clay and gave you a brain to think about it.
Most of 'em are reprobates and Yahweh will not hear them.
Justanotherguy

Portland, OR

#25697 Feb 3, 2013
HumanSpirit wrote:
Whole sale selling of homosexuality is the product of altered brain chemistry from pharmaceutical mind drugs that began under the Bush Sr presidency. The Support of the Mental Health Industry which was contained in the USA and other European countries since WWII because of crimes and atrocities and violations of human rights by Nazi Germany was well known and became a Republican movement for a coup detat.
Is there a word for how insane that is?
Justanotherguy

Portland, OR

#25698 Feb 3, 2013
Elohimsokie wrote:
SS marriage is part of population controll.
THANK YOU! Did it really take this long for someone to point that out?

“ reality, what a concept”

Since: Nov 07

this one

#25699 Feb 3, 2013
Adam wrote:
You can run from the reality you sodomite but you cannot hide.
Adolf, cupcake, I guess you fail to realize that you yourself are likely a "sodomite" as well, you just did it all by yourself, fortunately for every other member of the human race.

“ reality, what a concept”

Since: Nov 07

this one

#25700 Feb 3, 2013
Adam wrote:
God never intended ...
Adolf, my little potato dumpling, is there any particular reason why you imagine the strange psychological problems you choose to attribute to God are somehow my problem with Him?
Adam

Frankfurt Am Main, Germany

#25701 Feb 3, 2013
Rick in Kansas wrote:
<quoted text>Adolf, my little potato dumpling, is there any particular reason why you imagine the strange psychological problems you choose to attribute to God are somehow my problem with Him?
Stfu you pervert child seducer. You probably own child porno on your computer. I think we should inform the CIA,sweetie!!!!!!.
Adam

Frankfurt Am Main, Germany

#25702 Feb 3, 2013
Rick in Kansas wrote:
<quoted text>Adolf, cupcake, I guess you fail to realize that you yourself are likely a "sodomite" as well, you just did it all by yourself, fortunately for every other member of the human race.
Oh really Ricky boy?
You wicked liar and child abuser.
Listen fuckhead, take your gay shit and SHOVE it up your ass.
Maybe you should take some responsibility for your own miserable pathetic life instead of blaming other poeple or whatever for your problems or any kind of problems.
Ever thought about that dummy?
p.s
maybe you should change your name to “BACK OFF BITCH”– get my point?

“ reality, what a concept”

Since: Nov 07

this one

#25703 Feb 3, 2013
Adam wrote:
Stfu you pervert child seducer. You probably own child porno on your computer. I think we should inform the CIA,sweetie!!!!!!.
All that time off from here and you still haven't gotten the help you so obviously need. One post and I send you right to bat shit crazy. Not good, not good at all, Adolf.

“ reality, what a concept”

Since: Nov 07

this one

#25704 Feb 3, 2013
Adam wrote:
Oh really Ricky boy?
You wicked liar and child abuser.
Listen fuckhead, take your gay shit and SHOVE it up your ass.
Maybe you should take some responsibility for your own miserable pathetic life instead of blaming other poeple or whatever for your problems or any kind of problems.
Ever thought about that dummy?
p.s
maybe you should change your name to “BACK OFF BITCH”– get my point?
Adolf, Adolf, Adolf, if you don't want your Post Toasties pissed on, you should know when not to put the number in the little box and hit enter. Replying to me is ALWAYS going to be one of those times. You should have figured out by now that my aim with you is to help you make yourself look as much a ranting and raving childish fool as you really are. Like this for example.
Adam

Frankfurt Am Main, Germany

#25706 Feb 3, 2013
Rick in Kansas wrote:
<quoted text>Adolf, Adolf, Adolf, if you don't want your Post Toasties pissed on, you should know when not to put the number in the little box and hit enter. Replying to me is ALWAYS going to be one of those times. You should have figured out by now that my aim with you is to help you make yourself look as much a ranting and raving childish fool as you really are. Like this for example.
You're as bold of a LIAR as your daddy,Satan the Wicked One.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#25707 Feb 3, 2013
Rick in Kansas wrote:
<quoted text>Ah yes, the Regnerus "study" of the effect of "growing up with" "lesbian" or "gay" parents, with definitions of "lesbian", "gay" and "growing up with", which are so vaguely defined that Regenrus himself readily admits that even though he calls their parents "lesbian" and "gay", he really can't fake having a clue as to whether they actually were and since "growing up with" was simplified down to maybe a week of these children's lives, the ONLY thing the participants had in common was that they had all come from biologically broken homes. But you already knew that Regnerus is nothing more than a shill for the anti-gay marriage set, his pricey "study" and guaranteed results bought and paid for by bigots with deep pockets, a "study" so methodologically flawed that the journal which published it had to eat crow and admit that its peer review process was shit and at least two on the panel which approved it for publication had been paid to help with it, otherwise it would have never been approved.
<quoted text>A problem clearly evident in heterosexual relationships with pre-existing non-biologically related children brought into them should concern this discussion how?
<quoted text>Actually dear, single parent adoption is not illegal in ANY state currently and in most states, never was. Although it was not illegal, it was incredibly, incredibly rare until the last two or three decades. Not just sociologists, but society, frowned upon it except in instances of widows of good repute or some kid's Little Orphan Annie dream come true. For same sex couples, in most states, single parent adoption is the only available option, unable to legally marry and what most states prohibit are second parent adoptions, which deny adoptions to opposite sex couples just shacking up, no matter what other legal agreements they might have absent a license.
<quoted text>What percentage of same sex couples with children will that be? More or less the percentage of the much more massive heterosexual population? Do you actually have a point here?
Are all lesbian and gay folk cut out to be good parents? No, some of us aren't cut out to be parents, period. Will all lesbian and gay couples who do become parents be good at it? Sadly, we already know the answer to that is no, with a scattering of headline grabbing legal cases to prove that for a very small percentage of same sex couples parenting will be a failure. But what about the overwhelming percentage of same sex couples who are good at it? Do they get punished for the bad acts of the few? If that's the standard, what would be more imperative would be to put the legal breaks on HETEROSEXUAL misbehavior as their abuses are far more common. You know, the Cinderella Effect, it's even named for a heterosexual fairy tale gone bad.
Smirk that.
1. The Regnerus study was challenged by a gay blogger, not peers. It was fully vindicated. It was simply the same slander you expressed.

2. The Cinderella affect affects 100% of gay couples with children. At least one partner is NEVER a biological parent.

3. Single parenting is so frowned upon, it is usually rejected. Only because of the rise in divorce and illegitimacy has the practice increase. At the expense of the child's welfare. Your point?

4. See point 2. The majority of heterosexual parents are both biological. No gay couples with children are both biological. See the point now?

5. Nice gay twirl on the focus on number of heterosexual parents vs gay. Miss the affect on children, but you clearly aren't concerned about that. Here is the bottom line math; The best parents for children are biological. Out of default parenting options, heterosexual couples are the best options.

According to the latest, largest and most scientific study, lesbian couples rate last. AFTER single parents.

Sorry, that's the facts jack.

Smile.
Rosa Winkel

Australia

#25708 Feb 3, 2013
Adam wrote:
<quoted text>
God never intended for men to be romantically involved with one another. Homosexuality is just one of man's most abominable forms of rebellion against the Lord....and homosexuals are paying a very high price for their sexual filth. TODAY is the day of salvation! TODAY is the day for homosexuals and lesbians and pedophiles and rapists and turn from the wicked vileness of SEXUAL IMMORALITY and turn your hearts and minds and souls to the Almighty Lord,who created you from a mold of clay and gave you a brain to think about it.
Achtung! But there are no concentration camps this century.
Rosa Winkel

Australia

#25709 Feb 3, 2013
Justanotherguy wrote:
<quoted text>
THANK YOU! Did it really take this long for someone to point that out?
Is that so terrible? The world is overpopulated, after all.
7 billion and counting...
Elohimsokie

Ringold, OK

#25710 Feb 3, 2013
Rosa Winkel wrote:
<quoted text>
Achtung! But there are no concentration camps this century.
Thats what you think. Theres alot of FEMA camps that double for concentration camps. hehehehe

“ reality, what a concept”

Since: Nov 07

this one

#25711 Feb 3, 2013
KiMare wrote:
1. The Regnerus study was challenged by a gay blogger, not peers. It was fully vindicated. It was simply the same slander you expressed.
The Regnerus study was denounced by the Journal that published it, moron as well as by any number of his peers.
KiMare wrote:
2. The Cinderella affect affects 100% of gay couples with children. At least one partner is NEVER a biological parent.
I'm sorry that you are so f*cking clueless, but it's to be expected at this point. While one partner will not be a biological parent they will unlikely be viewed as a step parent, the whole point behind the Cinderella effect, moron.
KiMare wrote:
3. Single parenting is so frowned upon, it is usually rejected. Only because of the rise in divorce and illegitimacy has the practice increase. At the expense of the child's welfare. Your point?
My point is that you said something that proved, unsurprisingly, to be completely devoid of fact.
KiMare wrote:
4. See point 2. The majority of heterosexual parents are both biological. No gay couples with children are both biological. See the point now?
Unless your point is to prove how clueless you really are, then no, I don't see your point. The Cinderella effect applies to step-parents dear, not second parents as would be the case with same sex couples utilizing surrogates, you know, just like opposite sex couples using them.
KiMare wrote:
5. Nice gay twirl on the focus on number of heterosexual parents vs gay. Miss the affect on children, but you clearly aren't concerned about that. Here is the bottom line math; The best parents for children are biological. Out of default parenting options, heterosexual couples are the best options.
According to the latest, largest and most scientific study, lesbian couples rate last. AFTER single parents.
Sorry, that's the facts jack.
Smile.
Hey dumbf*ck, even Regnerus admits that he can't say how many actual lesbians mothers and gay fathers might have actually been among his lesbian mothers and gay fathers in his so called study. For you to continue to pimp that garbage only shows what a complete f*ck of a waste of time it is to tell you just how much of a f*cking moron you really are.
Justanotherguy

United States

#25712 Feb 3, 2013
Adam wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh really Ricky boy?
You wicked liar and child abuser.
Listen fuckhead, take your gay shit and SHOVE it up your ass.
Maybe you should take some responsibility for your own miserable pathetic life instead of blaming other poeple or whatever for your problems or any kind of problems.
Ever thought about that dummy?
p.s
maybe you should change your name to “BACK OFF BITCH”– get my point?
Hey heres an idea! Stop being a prick!:)
Justanotherguy

United States

#25713 Feb 3, 2013
Rosa Winkel wrote:
<quoted text>
Is that so terrible? The world is overpopulated, after all.
7 billion and counting...
Uh, no. Its not that terrible, thats kinda the point of my post. Cause thats a good argument for homosexuality.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Got my ex pregnant before break up. What do I do? 13 min glenford2 5
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing (Mar '17) 49 min GhtClk 53,382
Is God a "Bully" sometimes? 1 hr Doctor REALITY 62
3 Word Game (Feb '12) 2 hr quilterqueen 4,680
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 2 hr nanoanomaly 992,496
4 word game (use same Letter) (Mar '13) 2 hr quilterqueen 1,506
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 2 hr Unsolved Mistery 693,594
More from around the web