"Anatomically aberrant" is not the same as "morally wrong" and that is what this whole thread is about.One does not need a Ph.D. to realize that homosexuality is anatomically aberrant;
Morals are decided and imposed by society on all its members and vary from place to place as in ancient Egypt where royals married their siblings or in the middle east where women have no rights, young children are often forcibly married off and rape victims are stoned to death.
Sibling marriage and abuse of females are perfectly acceptable in those societies but, by western standards, are considered wrong. Biology has nothing to do with the ideas except as a later consequence.
Western society with its ideas of right and wrong has been shaped largely by Christianity and while many of its rules are good, there are some that are outright barbaric. Those people who try to impose their own warped ideas on the entire world are no better than the barbarians who would force marriage on a pre-teen girl.
The expression "anatomically aberrant" is very wide ranging and can be applied to a host of other abnormalities/disabilities such as albinism, epilepsy, haemophilia etc which are accidents of genetics or birth and beyond the control of those who are affected by them.
The attitudes to homosexuality are shaped mostly by Leviticus which is filled with poisonous ideas and went out of date about 3000 years ago.