Fort Hood Attack Leaves America's Muslims in Fear of BacklashRa...

As word spread that a gunman had opened fire at Fort Hood leaving a trail of carnage, a chilling realization swept across the U.S. Muslim community: He has an Islamic name.

[carey529]

the "muslim community" has had 8 years to stand united and decry muslim extremism and distance themselves from events like these...
they haven't.

i wonder why.

[NM Desert Rat]

Until the Muslim community starts to openly condem terrorist attacks there will be very trust for any of them in this country.

[Escape Islam]

Find out why many Muslims ultimately leave Islam.

Watch all their stories.

http://escapeislam.blogspot.com/

[The Ghost Rider of NM]

Deport all the Muslims in the US. WE don't need them here in our country. Muslims Go Home, We Don't Want YOU Here!

[PooPoo Platter]

carey529 wrote:

the "muslim community" has had 8 years to stand united and decry muslim extremism and distance themselves from events like these...
they haven't.
i wonder why.

[QUOTE who="From The Article, CAREY!!!"]While a motive remains unclear, the confirmation of Hasan's faith alone prompted major Muslim groups and mosques to issue statements condemning the killings as contrary to Islam and praising the service of the many Muslim Americans in the U.S. military.[/QUOTE]

LOL!!! What a meathead!

You MUST start asking somebody to read the articles to you before you open your mouth and make a fool of yourself.

[PooPoo Platter]

The Ghost Rider of NM wrote:

Deport all the Muslims in the US. WE don't need them here in our country. Muslims Go Home, We Don't Want YOU Here!

It's their country too. Every bit as much as it's yours and mine.

You better be nicer, otherwise citizens might decide it's YOU they don't want here.

[PooPoo Platter]

NM Desert Rat wrote:

Until the Muslim community starts to openly condem terrorist attacks there will be very trust for any of them in this country.

Check the article, you'll find condemnation.

Maybe there needs to be a Muslim Al Sharpton to blanket the news and make headlines...

[NM Desert Rat]

PooPoo Platter wrote:

<quoted text>
Check the article, you'll find condemnation.
Maybe there needs to be a Muslim Al Sharpton to blanket the news and make headlines...

The Muslim leadership needs to step and start doing something.

[PooPoo Platter]

NM Desert Rat wrote:

<quoted text>
The Muslim leadership needs to step and start doing something.

???

You said the Muslim community needed to condemn terrorism. I pointed out the article mentions Muslim leaders hve condemned terrorism. Now you've "moved the goalpost" and say Muslim leaders "...needs to...start doing something."

I'll let that slide, but I'm curious: Just 'who' needs to do 'what'? Leaders condemn terrorism already. Is there something more?

[carey529]

PooPoo Platter wrote:

<quoted text>
<quoted text>
LOL!!! What a meathead!
You MUST start asking somebody to read the articles to you before you open your mouth and make a fool of yourself.

nice to know you're still a friggin moron! after all of the heinous acts of muslim extremists over the past 8 years you equate a couple muslim clerics being "troubled" by the ft. hood atrocity as the muslim community standing up and condemning extremists??????

you're nothing if you're not a total idiot!

[USMC]

http://www.wnd.com/index.php...

A website run by radical Muslims today honored Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, the man accused of killing 13 people at Fort Hood in Texas, as an "Officer and a Gentleman," saying his actions should not be denounced.

We must hold radical islam accountable for their deeds?

[laojim]

USMC wrote:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?f a=PAGE.view&pageId=115325
A website run by radical Muslims today honored Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, the man accused of killing 13 people at Fort Hood in Texas, as an "Officer and a Gentleman," saying his actions should not be denounced.

Heck, I can find web sites in praise of Hitler, in praise of abortion clinic bombers, in praise of Captain Calley, in praise of (I know you won't believe this but it's true) George Bush. What's the harm of a little praise. You don't have to agree with it just because it's on the web, do you?

[PooPoo Platter]

carey529 wrote:

<quoted text>
nice to know you're still a friggin moron! after all of the heinous acts of muslim extremists over the past 8 years you equate a couple muslim clerics being "troubled" by the ft. hood atrocity as the muslim community standing up and condemning extremists??????
you're nothing if you're not a total idiot!

They condemned it. All your denial proves is your bigotry and prejudice transcends any one group. That's a pity.

[Pierre France]

carey529 wrote:

the "muslim community" has had 8 years to stand united and decry muslim extremism and distance themselves from events like these...
they haven't.
i wonder why.

In your narrow, dim box, with high walls and muffled sound, you're not able to see or hear the vast denunciation of the tiny minority of deluded, fanatic idiots who give Islam a bad name from EVERY Islamic body worthy of respect on the planet.
Possibly the blare and glare from FOX Noise is too high for you to hear Reality, as well.

Try taking the ear-plugs out of your nose, the eye-blinkers out of your ears, and the stalks of celery (?????) out of your eyes, and maybe you'll be less ignorant.

Then again, maybe not.......

http://www.muhajabah.com/otherscondemn.php

http://www.whyislam.org/SocialOrder/Condemnat...

http://www.al-islam.org/dilp_statement.html

[NM Desert Rat]

PooPoo Platter wrote:

<quoted text>
???
You said the Muslim community needed to condemn terrorism. I pointed out the article mentions Muslim leaders hve condemned terrorism. Now you've "moved the goalpost" and say Muslim leaders "...needs to...start doing something."
I'll let that slide, but I'm curious: Just 'who' needs to do 'what'? Leaders condemn terrorism already. Is there something more?

I read the article. It didn't say much other than a few muslims are upset and condemn the acts. By in large the muslim community and leadership have remained quiet. This needs to change.

[reprobate]

I'm a westerner living in a moderate Muslim country and I agree with USMC that radical Muslims need to atone. There is a radical element in this country, but the government (the police and army)literally quell any rally and jails tend to be full afterward. There are politicians that favor a more fundamental form Muslim law, but it is balanced by the influence of the Chinese and Indian communities. America has no such mechanisms to balance the effects of a growing Muslim community; especially those who wish to follow a more fundamental form of Islam.

[laojim]

reprobate wrote:

I'm a westerner living in a moderate Muslim country and I agree with USMC that radical Muslims need to atone. There is a radical element in this country, but the government (the police and army)literally quell any rally and jails tend to be full afterward. There are politicians that favor a more fundamental form Muslim law, but it is balanced by the influence of the Chinese and Indian communities. America has no such mechanisms to balance the effects of a growing Muslim community; especially those who wish to follow a more fundamental form of Islam.

If I may inquire:

1. Who are you to be deciding on which form of Islam is to be allowed or suppressed and, if you are a Yank, what has become of freedom of religion? No doubt the followers of the forms of Islam that you call radical are as sincere in their beliefs as any American Protestant.

2. Is it that you propose that in the United States when there is a rally or demonstration by people whom you regard as radicals that the police should fill the jails? If you are a Yank what has become of your notions of freedom of speech?

3. You are in favor of repressing what you regard as fundamentalist Islam. Do you favor suppressing fundamentalist Christianity too?

Perhaps you should spell out what restrictions you would favor for regulating religious practices and the free expression of ideas and or the freedom of assembly. Then you might, just to make it clear, where exactly you suppose you got this authority or who is supposed to exercise the authority required to carry out your recommendations.

[Jim Hayden]

Fort Hood Attack Leaves America's Muslims in Fear of Backlash and Reprisals.

They should have started leaving right after 9-11

[reprobate]

laojim wrote:

<quoted text>
If I may inquire:
1. Who are you to be deciding on which form of Islam is to be allowed or suppressed and, if you are a Yank, what has become of freedom of religion? No doubt the followers of the forms of Islam that you call radical are as sincere in their beliefs as any American Protestant.
2. Is it that you propose that in the United States when there is a rally or demonstration by people whom you regard as radicals that the police should fill the jails? If you are a Yank what has become of your notions of freedom of speech?
3. You are in favor of repressing what you regard as fundamentalist Islam. Do you favor suppressing fundamentalist Christianity too?
Perhaps you should spell out what restrictions you would favor for regulating religious practices and the free expression of ideas and or the freedom of assembly. Then you might, just to make it clear, where exactly you suppose you got this authority or who is supposed to exercise the authority required to carry out your recommendations.

I crafted up a reply for you but somehow it got lost or censored, so I'll do another for you but a little more mellow this time so it will get by. It wasn't for the language I used - it must have been something else.

[WORLD IDIOTS RACE WAKEUP]

Jim Hayden wrote:

Fort Hood Attack Leaves America's Muslims in Fear of Backlash and Reprisals.
They should have started leaving right after 9-11

If that case those in army should all leave those Asians, Latins, Africans, S.E. Asians, etc., should leave the Military. And, those left in US military are Skin heads, Christian Fundamentalist, Neo-Nazis....