Naveen kumar

Ashburn, VA

#2303 Feb 25, 2014
CIVAN wrote:
<quoted text>
India native people are Dravidan people ( Dravida - dramila -Tamil ).
42% of telugu origins in tn remaining 58% are chola,pandya,and chera comunities,where are tamils here?
tamil

Chennai, India

#2304 Feb 25, 2014
Naveen kumar wrote:
<quoted text> tamil language and grammer created and written by north indians agasthya and jains
fool, jains is a religion not a ethnicity, you are in same mindset as some indians all muslims in india are pakistani. fool
tamil

Chennai, India

#2305 Feb 25, 2014
Naveen kumar wrote:
<quoted text> tamil language and grammer created and written by north indians agasthya and jains
fool, jains is a religion not a ethnicity, you are in same mindset as some indians think all muslims in india are pakistani. fool
wisdom tree

Gurgaon, India

#2306 Feb 25, 2014
Naveen kumar wrote:
<quoted text> aryan invasion theory and indo european language theory is fake created by britishers to rule india and indian culture
Reading your comments I understand Ur ashamed of being dark or associated with dark ppl. The Aryan invasion is true and this Dravidian tribe is true if you work for the bjp . Well and good . Everyone has their right to opinion u can live in the false world beleiving there was no Aryan invasion good for you . I've spent years studying this and I know what I am speaking . U speak Telugu and u must be proud of Ur Dravidian leanings . But I can understand Ur having an identity crisis because Ur from Andhra continuously invaded by north and the south Tamil rulers . Ur a true Indian a mixture of both hating any one of them doesn't help in finding your identity . Your a true ethnic Indian and u must be proud of it and Ur Aryan and Dravidian ancestors . Spread love not hate
Naveen kumar

Ashburn, VA

#2307 Feb 25, 2014
tamil wrote:
<quoted text>fool, jains is a religion not a ethnicity, you are in same mindset as some indians all muslims in india are pakistani. fool
jains came from northern india and contributed to tamil literature
Fools

Ashburn, VA

#2308 Feb 25, 2014
Mudaliyar,gauriyan,jacob tirunelveli,vinod,fools....... ...
wisdom tree

Gurgaon, India

#2309 Feb 25, 2014
Panner selvan wrote:
<quoted text> he might belongs to karnataka and claiming tulu and kannada dominating tamil and telugu
Sir I don't belong to Karnataka I'm from Delhi . You have a right to Ur opinion and I have mine . I speak all the four major Dravidian language partially but enough of India my study Is based on linguistics not etymology . It means it's based on language structure and vocabulary not the gramMer and literary proof . I study what the words mean . The Guinness book has also concurred that Kannada is older not based on archeological proof but on vocabulary based on how many words are borrowed from the language and many such parameters .but I still say the main language what we need to discover is the Lang . The mother language which gave birth to Kannada and Tamil. And one more reason y Kannada might be older .because 18 languages have been studied to be derived from Kannada which are spoken by the tribals In south India and the islands . So it's debated that the language s closer to Kannada. And also if they are going to discover the mother language they might name it Tamil because oly Tamils are actually proud of the fact that they are Dravidian and also the tn govt has more political muscle than Karnataka .

Since: Sep 13

Location hidden

#2310 Feb 25, 2014
Naveen kumar wrote:
<quoted text> jains came from northern india and contributed to tamil literature
I can't believe all this, Africa, is where it all started, proven fact. Spreading slowly over millennia, over land bridges, into Asia, then Europe, finally down through the America,s
Overtime only mans land greed , caused wars, now religion, does that.
We should remember we are all members of the human race. And live in peace and harmony
tamil

Chennai, India

#2311 Feb 25, 2014
Naveen kumar wrote:
<quoted text> jains came from northern india and contributed to tamil literature
you have right to your opinion, but you sounds like all chirstains in india are from west,for example silapathilaram is a greatest tamil-jain literature,author ilangoadigal is a prince of chera kingdom and brother of tamil king of Chera king Senguttuvan, he embracces jainism, doest mean he is from north, speak only if you know history dont blabber something, we live in free country but doesnt mean you can talk anything you want
tamil

Chennai, India

#2312 Feb 25, 2014
wisdom tree wrote:
<quoted text>
Sir I don't belong to Karnataka I'm from Delhi . You have a right to Ur opinion and I have mine . I speak all the four major Dravidian language partially but enough of India my study Is based on linguistics not etymology . It means it's based on language structure and vocabulary not the gramMer and literary proof . I study what the words mean . The Guinness book has also concurred that Kannada is older not based on archeological proof but on vocabulary based on how many words are borrowed from the language and many such parameters .but I still say the main language what we need to discover is the Lang . The mother language which gave birth to Kannada and Tamil. And one more reason y Kannada might be older .because 18 languages have been studied to be derived from Kannada which are spoken by the tribals In south India and the islands . So it's debated that the language s closer to Kannada. And also if they are going to discover the mother language they might name it Tamil because oly Tamils are actually proud of the fact that they are Dravidian and also the tn govt has more political muscle than Karnataka .
i agree with you, as far as etymology is concern tamil is close to proto-dravidian language than telegu and kannada, both telegu and kannada are greatly influenced by sanskrit or prakrit
wisdom tree

Gurgaon, India

#2313 Feb 25, 2014
jacob tirunelveli wrote:
<quoted text>
dear you are speaking about theories in 18th century. come to 21st century. kumari kandam proofs are coming from the ridges of indian ocean. and african as cradle of the world is false it is a old theory. wakeup. and you said sanskrit is older than tamil in writting is very poor statement. sanskrit script evolved only after 240bc. we have tamil inscriptions from 700bc. pre brahmi inscriptions. dont live in the past. come out.
Sir your speaking of the research being done from the 90s and it's not about KumarI kandam the archeologists have found various artifacts which look like Tamil Brahmi but it cannot be dated accurately and Ur Kumar kandam doesnt join Egypt . It's in the Indian ocean . And it's very obvious that u will find in Egypt because of the trade and communications between the Indus valley and egytian civilizations .proving the fact that Indus civilization s a Dravidian civilization. Talking about 21 century discoveries perhaps u would 've heard of pottery being found in Iran which dates back to ten thousand bc the oldest dated artifact again shifting the debate wether Mesopotamia or Indus s the cradle of civilization . It's scientifically proven there s no KumarI kandam if kumari kandam was true then there would be no Himalayas or western goats because the tectonic plates don shift how the Sanger literature wants it to . There s no proof at all of Kumar kandam it's blasphemy . I say Sanskrit is older simply because Mesopotamia s closer than Indus to Africa. And we all have one common genetic strain in all humans which proves that we have come from one human from one place . Mother Africa .
wisdom tree

Gurgaon, India

#2314 Feb 25, 2014
tamil wrote:
<quoted text>i agree with you, as far as etymology is concern tamil is close to proto-dravidian language than telegu and kannada, both telegu and kannada are greatly influenced by sanskrit or prakrit
Telugu and Kannada are not gently influenced by Sanskrit they are highly influenced by Sanskrit . But that s in terms of script the grammar but the basic vocabulary is still the same that is why the 4 languages are related its sad to see brothers fighting over who s eldest .

Since: Sep 13

Location hidden

#2315 Feb 25, 2014
wisdom tree wrote:
<quoted text>
Sir your speaking of the research being done from the 90s and it's not about KumarI kandam the archeologists have found various artifacts which look like Tamil Brahmi but it cannot be dated accurately and Ur Kumar kandam doesnt join Egypt . It's in the Indian ocean . And it's very obvious that u will find in Egypt because of the trade and communications between the Indus valley and egytian civilizations .proving the fact that Indus civilization s a Dravidian civilization. Talking about 21 century discoveries perhaps u would 've heard of pottery being found in Iran which dates back to ten thousand bc the oldest dated artifact again shifting the debate wether Mesopotamia or Indus s the cradle of civilization . It's scientifically proven there s no KumarI kandam if kumari kandam was true then there would be no Himalayas or western goats because the tectonic plates don shift how the Sanger literature wants it to . There s no proof at all of Kumar kandam it's blasphemy . I say Sanskrit is older simply because Mesopotamia s closer than Indus to Africa. And we all have one common genetic strain in all humans which proves that we have come from one human from one place . Mother Africa .
You put it better than me oh wise one ! But came to same answer, Africa is the mother country of the human race.
wisdom tree

Gurgaon, India

#2316 Feb 25, 2014
Mudaliar wrote:
<quoted text>
widom tree---S ?missing ,true no wisdom and a parrot like statements, need to give scientific proofs and not opinions based on old and rejected theory.
Sir r u the moderator? If u find it useless please remove it . I don 've to give proof for all this read 6th to 12std ncert textbook you'll get it if you haven't been to a cbse school they have textbooks on ncert . Nic . In u can read Der . These theories are the reason you ppl even know about your history don call them outdated because if these theories weren't proved Ur history would 've been an assumption . For every small thing found in the sea if u get excited good for u .they are finding it in Indian ocean from the nineteen ninteys but till now not a single piece confirmed to be in the bc era it's very nice of u to be proud of Ur language but please be sensible enough Wat to believe
I might not be wise but I'm not jumping to any conclusions UN like many of u here
wisdom tree

Gurgaon, India

#2317 Feb 25, 2014
Davie45 wrote:
<quoted text>
You put it better than me oh wise one ! But came to same answer, Africa is the mother country of the human race.
People are very passionate of their language and religion in India it's very hard to see the truth when your blinded by passion so it needs a little beating around the bush to convey the message . LOL
tamil

Chennai, India

#2318 Feb 25, 2014
wisdom tree wrote:
<quoted text>
Telugu and Kannada are not gently influenced by Sanskrit they are highly influenced by Sanskrit . But that s in terms of script the grammar but the basic vocabulary is still the same that is why the 4 languages are related its sad to see brothers fighting over who s eldest .
thats true,but its after all language is identity in india
tamil

Chennai, India

#2319 Feb 25, 2014
wisdom tree wrote:
<quoted text>
Sir your speaking of the research being done from the 90s and it's not about KumarI kandam the archeologists have found various artifacts which look like Tamil Brahmi but it cannot be dated accurately and Ur Kumar kandam doesnt join Egypt . It's in the Indian ocean . And it's very obvious that u will find in Egypt because of the trade and communications between the Indus valley and egytian civilizations .proving the fact that Indus civilization s a Dravidian civilization. Talking about 21 century discoveries perhaps u would 've heard of pottery being found in Iran which dates back to ten thousand bc the oldest dated artifact again shifting the debate wether Mesopotamia or Indus s the cradle of civilization . It's scientifically proven there s no KumarI kandam if kumari kandam was true then there would be no Himalayas or western goats because the tectonic plates don shift how the Sanger literature wants it to . There s no proof at all of Kumar kandam it's blasphemy . I say Sanskrit is older simply because Mesopotamia s closer than Indus to Africa. And we all have one common genetic strain in all humans which proves that we have come from one human from one place . Mother Africa .
there is theory of summerians are dravidians they followed indian tradition of marrying first cousins and living with family after marriage and their language is much close to proto-dravidian language,it was very well explianed in Dr.logonathan's thesis sumerio tamil, if that theory is proven, kumarikandam will be debunked and it also proved human migration from africa through red sea
wisdom tree

Gurgaon, India

#2320 Feb 25, 2014
tamil wrote:
<quoted text>there is theory of summerians are dravidians they followed indian tradition of marrying first cousins and living with family after marriage and their language is much close to proto-dravidian language,it was very well explianed in Dr.logonathan's thesis sumerio tamil, if that theory is proven, kumarikandam will be debunked and it also proved human migration from africa through red sea
Your very good Tamil . The act of marrying first cousins s practised in south India and is the oldest known form of marriage and even the property s given from uncle to nephew which was followed in south India but not anymore . The language of the Sumerian is unknown if we knew there would be no mystery we would know for sure which language led to which
But I feel even though we find this link we cannot establish KumarI kandam as humans migrated very close to the ice age before or after Is still speculatd so ice bridged the gap which the sea created this theory is oly used in Europe Japan and US because the tribes of the US unanimously said they came from the north . But not in case of us as we migrated along the coast line
wisdom tree

Gurgaon, India

#2321 Feb 25, 2014
tamil wrote:
<quoted text>thats true,but its after all language is identity in india
Very true language is definitely an identity but Dravidian speakers quarreling among their own s really demeaning for your tribe you people must be united
India is a diverse country and everyone must accommodate eachother .
We are Indians first
I noe your Dravidian languages are older than this country but u must live in the present and remain united ad Indians
mahavir

Bangalore, India

#2322 Feb 25, 2014
Tamil is old but not the oldest language Proto dravidian language is niether tamil, kannada or telugu .Harappan people are described Dahas(Dasyus) in Rig Veda .The word Dravidian was first employed by Robert Caldwell The word `dravida or dramila' does not occur anywhere in the Vedas or early literature .The fact is that no part of Tamil History has recorded Harappan in any Literary work until it was rediscovered so Harappans did not speak tamil. Harappans spoke an unknown language and they were followers of Sramana tradition.

Sanskrit is mixture of Avestan and Prakrit. The language of the Vedas was referred to as Chandasa even by Panini himself Chandasa is very similar to Avestan langauge Prakrit is older than Sanskrit,The first inscriptions in Indian history are in Prakrit and not in Sanskrit. Sanskrit had no script was never a spoken language it was used only for religious purposes Sanskrit became prominent during the Gupta period Bramhins succeeded to establish the theory that Sanskrit was pure/ divine language. Logically speaking, all the spoken and written languages in the world are made by human beings only .Language is always changing, evolving and adapting to the needs of its users.so this pure/divine just a myth created by. Bramhins to make the masses fools and take benefits of it.

Some fools here will never accept facts and can't argue based on facts let them be in denial but facts are facts

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 5 min trifecta1 609,750
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 21 min kent 578,717
Play "end of the word" (Jan '11) 53 min WasteWater 5,680
Rajkot gay Topix 1 hr manish 9
Is the problem of groping in India over exagger... (Jan '11) 1 hr rajiv 477
Poll Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 1 hr onemale 269,999
What do u think of Jesus Christ?(God) (Oct '06) 1 hr Seentheotherside 69,881
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 1 hr Hidingfromyou 817,290
Sims 4 Key Generator (Oct '13) 17 hr IWANNAPLAY 187
More from around the web