*** The Collapse Of The WTC Towers ***

*** The Collapse Of The WTC Towers ***

Posted in the Top Stories Forum

First Prev
of 39
Next Last

“Google Operation Northwoods”

Since: Aug 10

** 9-11 was an inside job **

#1 Dec 11, 2010
Let's look at the visual proof....
.
Does these look like a structural Collapse or and implosion/explosion?
http://i.telegraph.co.uk/telegraph/multimedia...
.
http://www.layscience.net/files/wtc/2.jpg
.
http://www.chw.net/foro/albums/marcel/album23...
.
http://www.plaguepuppy.net/public_html/video%...
.
If it were a structural collapse, the top part would have fallen off to the side, which in reality it did....
http://www.waarheid911.nl/wtc2collapse.jpg
.
http://weblog.sinteur.com/index.php/2009/09/1...
.
http://www.home-med-equip.com/images/09010614...
.
With the top portions weight falling off to the side as was shown, the core columns should have held their integrity, securely and not collapsed straight down, for there was no pile driver effect taking place on all 4 corners of the structure at this moment in time....
http://www.911truth.dk/first/img/wtcConstruct...
.
Fig. A7 - A building A with a top part C becomes rubble B due to progressive collapse and crush down of A by C according to false theories of Bazant and Seffen developed after 11 September 2001. Evidently a small top part cannot crush a bigger bottom part of same structure only due to gravity!
http://heiwaco.tripod.com/nist3.htm
.
You cannot crush an isotropic or composite 3-D structure A by a part C of itself (C = 1/10 A) by dropping part C on A using gravity. Part C either bounces on A or gets damaged in contact with A and is stopped by A that is also damaged a little.
It is quite basic and all due to forces and that part C has identical structure as part A.
Materials, size and particulars of the elements of the structure A doesn't matter the least. Part C of A cannot destroy A.
See fig...#22
http://heiwaco.tripod.com/nist3.htm

Judged:

35

35

35

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Dixie is YOUR NAME SUCKS

Fremont, CA

#2 Dec 11, 2010
What is your point? Do you have one?
Timesten wrote:
Let's look at the visual proof....
.
Does these look like a structural Collapse or and implosion/explosion?
http://i.telegraph.co.uk/telegraph/multimedia...
.
http://www.layscience.net/files/wtc/2.jpg
.
http://www.chw.net/foro/albums/marcel/album23...
.
http://www.plaguepuppy.net/public_html/video%...
.
If it were a structural collapse, the top part would have fallen off to the side, which in reality it did....
http://www.waarheid911.nl/wtc2collapse.jpg
.
http://weblog.sinteur.com/index.php/2009/09/1...
.
http://www.home-med-equip.com/images/09010614...
.
With the top portions weight falling off to the side as was shown, the core columns should have held their integrity, securely and not collapsed straight down, for there was no pile driver effect taking place on all 4 corners of the structure at this moment in time....
http://www.911truth.dk/first/img/wtcConstruct...
.
Fig. A7 - A building A with a top part C becomes rubble B due to progressive collapse and crush down of A by C according to false theories of Bazant and Seffen developed after 11 September 2001. Evidently a small top part cannot crush a bigger bottom part of same structure only due to gravity!
http://heiwaco.tripod.com/nist3.htm
.
You cannot crush an isotropic or composite 3-D structure A by a part C of itself (C = 1/10 A) by dropping part C on A using gravity. Part C either bounces on A or gets damaged in contact with A and is stopped by A that is also damaged a little.
It is quite basic and all due to forces and that part C has identical structure as part A.
Materials, size and particulars of the elements of the structure A doesn't matter the least. Part C of A cannot destroy A.
See fig...#22
http://heiwaco.tripod.com/nist3.htm

“Google Operation Northwoods”

Since: Aug 10

** 9-11 was an inside job **

#3 Dec 11, 2010
The following is summary of the differences of what was presented by FEMA, a core area full of 47 steel columns as shown by this diagram from FEMA's original WTC REPORT,
http://algoxy.com/conc/fema_deception.html
AAA

Gastonia, NC

#4 Dec 11, 2010
iT WAS ONLY POOR CONSTUCTION!thats it!
Dixie is YOUR NAME SUCKS

United States

#5 Dec 11, 2010
Timesten wrote:
The following is summary of the differences of what was presented by FEMA, a core area full of 47 steel columns as shown by this diagram from FEMA's original WTC REPORT,
http://algoxy.com/conc/fema_deception.html
Deep throater

“Google Operation Northwoods”

Since: Aug 10

** 9-11 was an inside job **

#6 Dec 11, 2010
Dixie is YOUR NAME SUCKS wrote:
<quoted text>Deep throater
Go away toilet mouth troll....
Read....
http://www.topix.com/topix/terms
Dixie is YOUR NAME SUCKS

United States

#7 Dec 11, 2010
Timesten wrote:
<quoted text>
Go away toilet mouth troll....
Read....
http://www.topix.com/topix/terms
I just shot all over your face again hahah
andet1987

Lyons, IL

#8 Dec 11, 2010
Timesten wrote:
<quoted text>
Go away toilet mouth troll....
Read....
http://www.topix.com/topix/terms
hi Timesten :) keep going, your posts are more important.

“Google Operation Northwoods”

Since: Aug 10

** 9-11 was an inside job **

#9 Dec 11, 2010
Dixie is YOUR NAME SUCKS wrote:
<quoted text>I just shot all over your face again hahah
Do you eat with that mouth.
Iopix Mods I hope your reading this. I'm making a collection of his quotes for you...
Dixie is YOUR NAME SUCKS

United States

#10 Dec 11, 2010
andet1987 wrote:
<quoted text>
hi Timesten :) keep going, your posts are more important.
Swallow this knob gobbbler:)

“Google Operation Northwoods”

Since: Aug 10

** 9-11 was an inside job **

#11 Dec 11, 2010
The Center Core....
There is no way an Aluminum plane tore into the core and destroyed it.
http://lh4.ggpht.com/_vlumW38WDzg/TQP0cooaT8I...
.
The plane that supposedly hit the Pentagon couldn't do it,It left the center support intact.
http://www.911review.org/Wget/investigate911....
.
Most of the fuel explosion was on the outside of the building, not the inside.
http://navfimusic.org/Images/World%20trade%20...
.
http://lh4.ggpht.com/_vlumW38WDzg/TQP5Wh2CvEI...
.

_Virginia_

Since: Apr 10

Location hidden

#13 Dec 11, 2010
Timesten wrote:
The Center Core....
There is no way an Aluminum plane tore into the core and destroyed it.
http://lh4.ggpht.com/_vlumW38WDzg/TQP0cooaT8I...
.
The plane that supposedly hit the Pentagon couldn't do it,It left the center support intact.
http://www.911review.org/Wget/investigate911....
.
Most of the fuel explosion was on the outside of the building, not the inside.
http://navfimusic.org/Images/World%20trade%20...
.
http://lh4.ggpht.com/_vlumW38WDzg/TQP5Wh2CvEI...
.
Interesting.

Did I tell you Timesten? I was an eye-witness to the second plane hitting Tower 2, I was living in Brooklyn at the time, and was in the Village that morning. It was so surreal, a group of people were gathered on the corner, watching Tower 1 burn, and suddenly Tower 2 exploded. People were screaming and crying, but the most bizarre part, was that most of the people actually went on to work. I headed straight for the train and caught the last train's running out of the city, the others had to walk home.

I knew at that moment that this was about Hate, and nothing else, and that one does not solve hate with more hate, but with reconcilliation.
Dave

United States

#14 Dec 11, 2010
Timesten wrote:
Let's look at the visual proof....
.
Does these look like a structural Collapse or and implosion/explosion?
http://i.telegraph.co.uk/telegraph/multimedia...
.
http://www.layscience.net/files/wtc/2.jpg
.
http://www.chw.net/foro/albums/marcel/album23...
.
http://www.plaguepuppy.net/public_html/video%...
.
If it were a structural collapse, the top part would have fallen off to the side, which in reality it did....
http://www.waarheid911.nl/wtc2collapse.jpg
.
http://weblog.sinteur.com/index.php/2009/09/1...
.
http://www.home-med-equip.com/images/09010614...
.
With the top portions weight falling off to the side as was shown, the core columns should have held their integrity, securely and not collapsed straight down, for there was no pile driver effect taking place on all 4 corners of the structure at this moment in time....
http://www.911truth.dk/first/img/wtcConstruct...
.
Fig. A7 - A building A with a top part C becomes rubble B due to progressive collapse and crush down of A by C according to false theories of Bazant and Seffen developed after 11 September 2001. Evidently a small top part cannot crush a bigger bottom part of same structure only due to gravity!
http://heiwaco.tripod.com/nist3.htm
.
You cannot crush an isotropic or composite 3-D structure A by a part C of itself (C = 1/10 A) by dropping part C on A using gravity. Part C either bounces on A or gets damaged in contact with A and is stopped by A that is also damaged a little.
It is quite basic and all due to forces and that part C has identical structure as part A.
Materials, size and particulars of the elements of the structure A doesn't matter the least. Part C of A cannot destroy A.
See fig...#22
http://heiwaco.tripod.com/nist3.htm
You know you're touching a raw nerve with official conspirators when their attack shills begin smearing you with silly names, deleting your posts and tampering with the judgments.

Yes those buildings were brought down with help from explosives.

“Google Operation Northwoods”

Since: Aug 10

** 9-11 was an inside job **

#15 Dec 12, 2010
Dave wrote:
<quoted text>
You know you're touching a raw nerve with official conspirators when their attack shills begin smearing you with silly names, deleting your posts and tampering with the judgments.
Yes those buildings were brought down with help from explosives.
I agree Dave. They are so obvious when they go into their attack and suppress mode. However, they can't stop the truth from coming out, no matter how they spin it...
Here's an interesting site.
http://www.archive.org/details/abc20010911193...
.
http://www.archive.org/details/sept_11_tv_arc...

“R3V01U7!0N”

Since: Apr 10

Denver, CO

#17 Dec 14, 2010
Timesten wrote:
The Center Core....
There is no way an Aluminum plane tore into the core and destroyed it.
http://lh4.ggpht.com/_vlumW38WDzg/TQP0cooaT8I...
.
The plane that supposedly hit the Pentagon couldn't do it,It left the center support intact.
http://www.911review.org/Wget/investigate911....
.
Most of the fuel explosion was on the outside of the building, not the inside.
http://navfimusic.org/Images/World%20trade%20...
.
http://lh4.ggpht.com/_vlumW38WDzg/TQP5Wh2CvEI...
.
Absolutely. Jet fuel doesn't get hot enough to melt steel either.

“9/11 Twoof = STUPID ”

Since: Jun 07

Manhattan, New York

#18 Dec 14, 2010
looks like somebody just watched Loose Change ..... LOL
-Politically- wrote:
<quoted text>
Absolutely. Jet fuel doesn't get hot enough to melt steel either.

“Google Operation Northwoods”

Since: Aug 10

** 9-11 was an inside job **

#19 Dec 14, 2010
The Center Core....
There is no way an Aluminum plane tore into the core and destroyed it.
http://lh4.ggpht.com/_vlumW38WDzg/TQP0cooaT8I...
.
The plane that supposedly hit the Pentagon couldn't do it,It left the center support intact.
http://www.911review.org/Wget/investigate911....
.
Most of the fuel explosion was on the outside of the building, not the inside.
http://navfimusic.org/Images/World%20trade%20...
.
http://lh4.ggpht.com/_vlumW38WDzg/TQP5Wh2CvEI...
.

“Google Operation Northwoods”

Since: Aug 10

** 9-11 was an inside job **

#20 Dec 14, 2010
-Politically- wrote:
<quoted text>
Absolutely. Jet fuel doesn't get hot enough to melt steel either.
Agreed Politically

“9/11 Twoof = STUPID ”

Since: Jun 07

Manhattan, New York

#21 Dec 14, 2010
EVERYBODY AGREES WITH THAT MORON ..... it's basic science!!!
Timesten wrote:
<quoted text>
Agreed Politically

“Google Operation Northwoods”

Since: Aug 10

** 9-11 was an inside job **

#22 Dec 14, 2010
RADEKT wrote:
looks like somebody just watched Loose Change ..... LOL<quoted text>
Looks like a phony [you] has 'screws loose', is more like it.
Extended days off again eh RADEKtroll lol
You are such a phony..
http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TM0ALSA...
Are they paying you good here?
http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TM0ALSA...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 39
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Things poping up while i was sitting on my dads... (Jun '11) 40 min Bluehair79 67
topix drops human sexuality forum.......this be... 41 min hornny15234 19
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 59 min River Tam 48,426
Jehovah's Witnesses are true disciple of Jesus ... (Mar '07) 1 hr RiccardoFire 44,656
What attracts white women to black men? (Mar '07) 1 hr Johnny 11,539
Play "end of the word" part 2 (Dec '15) 1 hr Yankster 2,035
Poll Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 1 hr MUQ2 281,243
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 2 hr Cory 646,503
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 2 hr The Hangman 971,627
Poll Is homosexuality a sin? (Oct '07) 3 hr Toby 105,572
More from around the web