Jehovah's Witnesses are true disciple...
Ella

Rockford, MI

#33999 Apr 22, 2013
Student wrote:
<quoted text>
No I do not speak in tongues. And I haven’t done any of the above!
Have you?
Performing apparently miraculous works would not in itself prove divine authorization, nor would the inability of God’s servants to perform miracles with the help of God’s spirit cast doubt on the fact that they were being used by him.(Mt 7:21-23)
Not every first-century Christian could perform powerful works, heal, speak in tongues, and translate. Paul, and doubtless some others, had by God’s undeserved kindness been granted a number of these gifts of the spirit.
These miraculous gifts marked the infancy of the Christian congregation and were foretold to cease.
In fact, even Jesus indicated that his followers would be identified, not by their performance of powerful works, but by their love for one another.(1Co 12:29, 30; 13:2, 8-13; Joh 13:35)
PLEASE meditate and comment on the following scriptures: James 2:18-19, 5:14-16, Mark 16:14-18, Matt. 21:21-22, Matt. 13:14-15
Ella

Rockford, MI

#34000 Apr 22, 2013
Student wrote:
<quoted text>
No I do not speak in tongues. And I haven’t done any of the above!
Have you?
Yes, so there is no doubt within me that Jesus is the Lord and Savior of my life and that I am a child of God Almighty
Ella

Rockford, MI

#34001 Apr 22, 2013
Student wrote:
<quoted text>
No I do not speak in tongues. And I haven’t done any of the above!
Have you?
Performing apparently miraculous works would not in itself prove divine authorization, nor would the inability of God’s servants to perform miracles with the help of God’s spirit cast doubt on the fact that they were being used by him.(Mt 7:21-23)
Not every first-century Christian could perform powerful works, heal, speak in tongues, and translate. Paul, and doubtless some others, had by God’s undeserved kindness been granted a number of these gifts of the spirit.
These miraculous gifts marked the infancy of the Christian congregation and were foretold to cease.
In fact, even Jesus indicated that his followers would be identified, not by their performance of powerful works, but by their love for one another.(1Co 12:29, 30; 13:2, 8-13; Joh 13:35)
There is a vast difference between performance and glorifying God by believing, trusting and walking out His Word in our everyday life
Ella

Rockford, MI

#34002 Apr 22, 2013
Student wrote:
<quoted text>
They are both equal in power.
In Daniel’s prophecy,‘standing up’ frequently refers to the action of a king, either taking up his royal power or acting effectively in his capacity as king.(Da 11:2-4, 7, 16b, 20, 21)
This supports the conclusion that Michael is Jesus Christ, since Jesus is Jehovah’s appointed King, commissioned to destroy all the nations at Har–Magedon.(Re 11:15; 16:14-16)
I guess, this is where we differ in belief and interpretation of God's sacred Word.
Ella

Rockford, MI

#34003 Apr 22, 2013
Student wrote:
<quoted text>
The Messianic King displays such superior wisdom from God.(Isa 11:1-5; compare Re 5:12.)
We too can have the Spirit of wisdom on us through the power of the Holy Spirit.

“I am Sisyphus”

Since: Nov 07

Location hidden

#34004 Apr 22, 2013
Student wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes there are other angels. As with the visible creation, so also in the invisible realm there is order and rank among the angels. The foremost angel, both in power and authority, is Michael, the archangel.(Da 10:13, 21; 12:1; Jude 9; Re 12:7)
Ranking very high among the angels in privileges and honor are the seraphs.(Isa 6:2, 6)
More frequently (some 90 times), the Scriptures mention the cherubs, and from the description of their duties and responsibilities it is apparent that they, too, hold a special position among the angels.(Ge 3:24; Eze 10:1-22)
Then there is the great body of angelic messengers who serve as a means of communication between God and man. However, they do more than simply relay messages. As agents and deputies of the Most High God, they serve as responsible executioners of the divine purpose, be it protection and deliverance of God’s people or destruction of the wicked.(Ge 19:1-26)
Michael is the only one said to be “the archangel,” meaning “chief angel,” or “principal angel.” The term occurs in the Bible only in the singular. This seems to imply that there is but one whom God has designated chief, or head, of the angelic host.

There are actually 7 Archangels of which Michael is occasionally referred to as the chief.

They are Gabriel, Michael, Raphael, Uriel, Raguel, Remiel and Saraqael (Book of Enoch)

Saint Gregory I lists them as Gabriel, Michael, Raphael, Uriel (or Anael), Simiel, Oriphiel and Raguel.

The Eastern Orthodox tradition venerates Gabriel, Michael, Raphael, Uriel, Selaphiel, Jegudiel, and Raguel.

Pseudo-Dionysius gives them as Michael, Gabriel, Raphael, Uriel, Chamuel, Jophiel, and Raguel

In the Coptic Orthodox tradition the seven archangels are named as Gabriel, Michael, Raphael, Suriel, Zadakiel, Raguel and Aniel.

There may be an etymological relationship between the three "disputed" Archangel names, and they may in fact be equivalent.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_Archangels

“I am Sisyphus”

Since: Nov 07

Location hidden

#34005 Apr 22, 2013
Student wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes there are other angels. As with the visible creation, so also in the invisible realm there is order and rank among the angels. The foremost angel, both in power and authority, is Michael, the archangel.(Da 10:13, 21; 12:1; Jude 9; Re 12:7)
Ranking very high among the angels in privileges and honor are the seraphs.(Isa 6:2, 6)

Seraphs are not angels.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seraphs
Student wrote:
<quoted text> More frequently (some 90 times), the Scriptures mention the cherubs, and from the description of their duties and responsibilities it is apparent that they, too, hold a special position among the angels.(Ge 3:24; Eze 10:1-22)

Nor are Cherubs angels.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cherubs
Student wrote:
<quoted text> Michael is the only one said to be “the archangel,” meaning “chief angel,” or “principal angel.” The term occurs in the Bible only in the singular. This seems to imply that there is but one whom God has designated chief, or head, of the angelic host.

As noted above, this is incorrect.

“I am Sisyphus”

Since: Nov 07

Location hidden

#34006 Apr 22, 2013
Student wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, there are 144,000 Kings that Jesus is King of.
Revelation 14:1-3
And I saw, and, look! the Lamb standing upon the Mount Zion, and with him a hundred and forty-four thousand having his name and the name of his Father written on their foreheads. 2 And I heard a sound out of heaven as the sound of many waters and as the sound of loud thunder; and the sound that I heard was as of singers who accompany themselves on the harp playing on their harps. 3 And they are singing as if a new song before the throne and before the four living creatures and the elders; and no one was able to master that song but the hundred and forty-four thousand, who have been bought from the earth.
Revelations 5:8-10
8 And when he took the scroll, the four living creatures and the twenty-four elders fell down before the Lamb, having each one a harp and golden bowls that were full of incense, and the [incense] means the prayers of the holy ones. 9 And they sing a new song, saying:“You are worthy to take the scroll and open its seals, because you were slaughtered and with your blood you bought persons for God out of every tribe and tongue and people and nation, and you made them to be a kingdom and priests to our God, and they are to rule as kings over the earth.”

The 144,000 are members of the Unification Church, which is the true church of Jesus and they can prove it by the bible.

At lease so say the moonies.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/144000_%28number...

This happens to also be the number of Muslim Saints,

See also:
http://catholic-resources.org/Bible/Revelatio...

See, none of your cults ideas are based on reality. They work fine in a vacuum (i.e. the skull cases of JW cult members), but they fail when viewed in proper context.

“I am Sisyphus”

Since: Nov 07

Location hidden

#34007 Apr 22, 2013
Ella wrote:
<quoted text>
In the heavenly realm which is greater a King of Kings or an archangel?

Jesus.

The Watchtower cults "logic" in demoting Jesus to an archangel is found here:

http://www.letusreason.org/jw22.htm

JWism is nonsense. Anyone rationally examining the facts can see that. That is why the Watchtower cult tries to keep its followers away from objective information (temptation by Satan).

“I am Sisyphus”

Since: Nov 07

Location hidden

#34008 Apr 22, 2013
Student wrote:
<quoted text>
Daniel 10:13- But the prince of the royal realm of Persia was standing in opposition to me for twenty-one days, and, look! Michael, one of the FORMOST (or FRIST) princes, came to help me; and I, for my part, remained there beside the kings of Persia.
The name “Michael” means “Who Is Like God?” thus indicating that this foremost prince upholds Jehovah’s sovereignty. He had full authority from God to act in His name, just as kings in ancient times entrusted their seal rings to reliable subjects, empowering them to act in their name.(Exodus 3:2, 3; 4:10)
Is there anything here to make us believe that Michael and Jesus Christ are the same person? Well, Jesus is called “the Word.”(John 1:1) He is God’s spokesman. This special angelic messenger, too, was clearly God’s chief spokesman to the Israelites.

The name Michael does NOT mean "Who is like God?".

It means "Who is like God."

A period at the end, not a question mark.

This is the sort of diabolical little lies that Watchtowerism is built on.

“I am Sisyphus”

Since: Nov 07

Location hidden

#34009 Apr 22, 2013
Student wrote:
<quoted text>
Ezekiel, Daniel’s contemporary, foretold the coming of one “who has the legal right” to rule again as king of God’s people.(Ezekiel 21:25-27)
This one is not to be identified with the Levite Maccabees who exercised some authority during a brief period of independence. Not being descendants of King David, they had no “legal right” to be kings. Rather, it was Jesus Christ who was anointed by God to rule as king in a heavenly kingdom.(Luke 1:31-33; 22:29, 30; Psalm 110:1)
He was the only one thus anointed. It is therefore only logical to say that Jesus and Michael are the same person.
In Daniel chapter 7, there is another prophecy about the march of world powers that has parallels with Daniel chapter 11. At the climax of that prophecy, however, we read that “someone like a son of man” was “given rulership and dignity and kingdom.”(Daniel 7:13, 14)
The one “like a son of man” is widely recognized as Jesus.(Matthew 10:23; 26:64; Revelation 14:14) Hence, in the climax of one prophecy, Jesus becomes a king. In the other prophecy in Daniel, Michael becomes a king.
Since both prophecies deal with the same time and the same event, surely it is reasonable to conclude that they are also dealing with the same person.

Sorry, but you are wrong every single time.

Daniel 7:13 The Aramaic phrase 'bar enash' means human being.

Thus your "logic" fails again.




There is nothing in your cult I cannot bust. It is a deception, but not a very good one. The flaws are just so obvious.

“I am Sisyphus”

Since: Nov 07

Location hidden

#34010 Apr 22, 2013
Ella wrote:
<quoted text>
Jesus was more than God's spokesman. Are you sure you know who Jesus really is?

JW literature is all over the place on who Jesus was.

You want the inside scoop on the cult you can find publications that are intended only for members and even ones intended only for elders and higher on the internet if you know how to search for them.

Here is a book that rank and file members are not supposed to have access to:

http://www.bible.cfmin.com/PAYATTENTION.pdf

This is one of at least 2 "secret" watchtower books. This one is actually not a secret, but the elders did not like it getting out and made threats against the guy who released it.

http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtrut...

http://www.watchman.org/jw/steinhaug.htm



More great sites that expose the Watchtower cult:

http://www.oodegr.com/english/watchtower/watc...

http://kent.steinhaug.no/forum/index.php

http://www.religioustolerance.org/witness1.ht...

To name only a few.
Ella

Rockford, MI

#34011 Apr 22, 2013
Dogen wrote:
<quoted text>
Jesus.
The Watchtower cults "logic" in demoting Jesus to an archangel is found here:
http://www.letusreason.org/jw22.htm
JWism is nonsense. Anyone rationally examining the facts can see that. That is why the Watchtower cult tries to keep its followers away from objective information (temptation by Satan).
I know it's Jesus. I was asking Student to see if he understands differences in position and their levels of authority.

“I am Sisyphus”

Since: Nov 07

Location hidden

#34012 Apr 22, 2013
Student wrote:
<quoted text>
Proverbs 8: 1, 3-Does not wisdom keep calling out, and discernment keep giving forth its voice? 3 At the side of the gates, at the mouth of the town, at the going in of the entrances it keeps crying loudly:
It is true that in Hebrew, which assigns gender to its nouns (as do many other languages), the word for “wisdom” is always in the feminine gender.
This would continue to be the case even though wisdom is personified and so would not rule out wisdom’s being used figuratively to represent God’s firstborn Son.
The Greek word for “love” in the expression “God is love”(1Jo 4:8) is also in the feminine gender but that does not make God feminine.
Solomon, the principal writer of Proverbs (Pr 1:1), applied the title qoheleth (congregator) to himself (Ec 1:1) and this word is also in the feminine gender.
Here again most translators have made wisdom a woman, but like you have point out in Isaiah 11:2 this sprout will has the spirit of wisdom.

Same sort of logical and factual errors we have come to expect from you.


“I am Sisyphus”

Since: Nov 07

Location hidden

#34013 Apr 22, 2013
Student wrote:
<quoted text>
No I do not speak in tongues. And I haven’t done any of the above!
Have you?
Performing apparently miraculous works would not in itself prove divine authorization, nor would the inability of God’s servants to perform miracles with the help of God’s spirit cast doubt on the fact that they were being used by him.(Mt 7:21-23)
Not every first-century Christian could perform powerful works, heal, speak in tongues, and translate. Paul, and doubtless some others, had by God’s undeserved kindness been granted a number of these gifts of the spirit.
These miraculous gifts marked the infancy of the Christian congregation and were foretold to cease.
In fact, even Jesus indicated that his followers would be identified, not by their performance of powerful works, but by their love for one another.(1Co 12:29, 30; 13:2, 8-13; Joh 13:35)

First of all, what is it called when you quote something verbatim and do not cite the source document. Oh yea! PLAGIARISM!

http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Where_in_the_Bible_...

BUSTED!!!!

Typical JW deceit.

Do you guys have to go through a liar training class?

“I am Sisyphus”

Since: Nov 07

Location hidden

#34014 Apr 22, 2013
Student wrote:
<quoted text>
They are both equal in power.
In Daniel’s prophecy,‘standing up’ frequently refers to the action of a king, either taking up his royal power or acting effectively in his capacity as king.(Da 11:2-4, 7, 16b, 20, 21)
This supports the conclusion that Michael is Jesus Christ, since Jesus is Jehovah’s appointed King, commissioned to destroy all the nations at Har–Magedon.(Re 11:15; 16:14-16)

More Plagiarism.

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index...
Ella

Rockford, MI

#34015 Apr 22, 2013
Dogen wrote:
<quoted text>
JW literature is all over the place on who Jesus was.
You want the inside scoop on the cult you can find publications that are intended only for members and even ones intended only for elders and higher on the internet if you know how to search for them.
Here is a book that rank and file members are not supposed to have access to:
http://www.bible.cfmin.com/PAYATTENTION.pdf
This is one of at least 2 "secret" watchtower books. This one is actually not a secret, but the elders did not like it getting out and made threats against the guy who released it.
http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtrut...
http://www.watchman.org/jw/steinhaug.htm
More great sites that expose the Watchtower cult:
http://www.oodegr.com/english/watchtower/watc...
http://kent.steinhaug.no/forum/index.php
http://www.religioustolerance.org/witness1.ht...
To name only a few.
Thank you. This is very helpful. STUDENT should read it, especially since it is written by his enlightened elders.
Student

Caborca, Mexico

#34016 Apr 22, 2013
Dogen wrote:
<quoted text>
First of all, what is it called when you quote something verbatim and do not cite the source document. Oh yea! PLAGIARISM!
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Where_in_the_Bible_...
BUSTED!!!!
Typical JW deceit.
Do you guys have to go through a liar training class?
If you think I use the Internet in finding answer to question, you are really working for Satan. But thanks for the website, I will check it out!
Student

Caborca, Mexico

#34017 Apr 22, 2013
Ella wrote:
<quoted text>
Thank you. This is very helpful. STUDENT should read it, especially since it is written by his enlightened elders.
I have save this, and will read it, and print it and I'll also question one of the elders about it. There are so many lies about us on the internet, that I really do not have time to check them all out.

The experiences of Jehovah’s people in these “last days” have certainly proved Jesus’ words to be true:“Happy are you whenever men hate you, and whenever they exclude you and reproach you and cast out your name as wicked for the sake of the Son of man. Rejoice in that day and leap, for, look! your reward is great in heaven, for those are the same things their forefathers used to do to the prophets.”(Luke 6:22, 23; 2 Timothy 3:1)

Yes, God’s servants can faithfully endure all manner of persecution, and do so joyfully.

“I am Sisyphus”

Since: Nov 07

Location hidden

#34018 Apr 22, 2013
Student wrote:
<quoted text>
If you think I use the Internet in finding answer to question, you are really working for Satan. But thanks for the website, I will check it out!

Text matches yours. One of you is plagiarizing and I will go with the guy who wrote it last (you).

To bad you did not read his conclusion.

Of course you are not allowed to look on the internet for answers, unless it is on an approved JW web site.

You might want to read the book that your elders use to keep the sales force in line.


Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Poll If you're Christain what kind are you? (Oct '07) 4 min Passing thru 6,524
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 10 min June VanDerMark 599,917
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 19 min Buck Crick 865,346
Play "end of the word" (Jan '11) 35 min WasteWater 6,314
*** All Time Favorite Songs *** (Dec '10) 48 min middleman1 2,787
New Local state and federal prisons ARE A MUST 51 min Doctor REALITY 3
One of Whitney Houston's WORST MISTAKES: marryi... 57 min Doctor REALITY 3
gay bottom in gurgaon (May '14) 2 hr Oop 463
The Christian Atheist debate 11 hr Kaitlin the Wolf ... 2,016
Sleeping with mother (Oct '13) Sat Frannie 44
More from around the web